ujka
|
|
February 17, 2014, 10:57:19 AM |
|
O3 is unstable, was off for an hour, now at 50%. Like one of its boards is not hashing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
EdoBcn
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:32:10 AM |
|
So, 1.4GH/s average per machine? And we only have 2. Can you imagine once we have the other (100?)
Doesn't look like we are going to get the mining we were expecting.
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:45:06 AM Last edit: February 17, 2014, 12:18:47 PM by ujka |
|
So, 1.4GH/s average per machine? And we only have 2. Can you imagine once we have the other (100?)
Thats not average hashrate of the machine - it's a fail board in one machine. Hope it can be fixed. What 100? It's 30 machines from Cointerra. And they underdelivered. I taught CryptX could negotiate from Cointerra hashrate as per contract (60THash), not by number of machines.
|
|
|
|
trek27
|
|
February 17, 2014, 01:55:57 PM |
|
It seems we have more new machines
|
|
|
|
EdoBcn
|
|
February 17, 2014, 02:00:32 PM |
|
So, 1.4GH/s average per machine? And we only have 2. Can you imagine once we have the other (100?)
Thats not average hashrate of the machine - it's a fail board in one machine. Hope it can be fixed. What 100? It's 30 machines from Cointerra. And they underdelivered. I taught CryptX could negotiate from Cointerra hashrate as per contract (60THash), not by number of machines. I was just assuming 220TH/s with each machine doing (in theory) 2TH/s = ~110
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
February 17, 2014, 02:12:02 PM |
|
It seems we have more new machines 7 machines so far. Things are moving...
|
|
|
|
EdoBcn
|
|
February 17, 2014, 02:23:11 PM |
|
It seems we have more new machines 7 machines so far. Things are moving... Peak to 8,279.83 Gh/s Impressive (and extremely nice!)
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
February 17, 2014, 04:05:45 PM |
|
Deployment earlier than expected. Definitely a welcome progression.
|
|
|
|
IamNotSure
|
|
February 17, 2014, 04:17:07 PM |
|
Some calculations, correct me if I'm wrong :
80675 outstanding shares 2.4 Gh/s + 20% / share = 2.88 Gh/s
Ultimately we should hash @ 232.34 Th/s
ATM we have 7.6 Th/s -> 3.3% of the promised farm
0.00015308335 BTC / share every 10 days
I know it's just the beginning but I hope it'll ramp up soon !
|
|
|
|
michaelGedi
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
"to be or not to be, that is the bitcoin"
|
|
February 17, 2014, 04:22:35 PM |
|
Some calculations, correct me if I'm wrong :
80675 outstanding shares 2.4 Gh/s + 20% / share = 2.88 Gh/s
Ultimately we should hash @ 232.34 Th/s
ATM we have 7.6 Th/s -> 3.3% of the promised farm
0.00015308335 BTC / share every 10 days
I know it's just the beginning but I hope it'll ramp up soon !
of course it will ramp up, this week, as stated last week. You could maybe do the calculation for another 20% on top if you are looking at "should", but you might as well save the calculations until we have an update that says "we are fully deployed with all the contracted equipment..." etc
|
|
|
|
mikemikemike
Copper Member
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
|
|
February 17, 2014, 04:27:46 PM |
|
Some calculations, correct me if I'm wrong :
80675 outstanding shares 2.4 Gh/s + 20% / share = 2.88 Gh/s
Ultimately we should hash @ 232.34 Th/s
ATM we have 7.6 Th/s -> 3.3% of the promised farm
0.00015308335 BTC / share every 10 days
I know it's just the beginning but I hope it'll ramp up soon !
of course it will ramp up, this week, as stated last week. You could maybe do the calculation for another 20% on top if you are looking at "should", but you might as well save the calculations until we have an update that says "we are fully deployed with all the contracted equipment..." etc i'm absolutely laughing my tits off at how low the price of these shares are. very much looking forward to next week. excellent work CryptX
|
|
|
|
EnJoyThis
|
|
February 17, 2014, 04:38:32 PM |
|
Some calculations, correct me if I'm wrong :
80675 outstanding shares 2.4 Gh/s + 20% / share = 2.88 Gh/s
Ultimately we should hash @ 232.34 Th/s
ATM we have 7.6 Th/s -> 3.3% of the promised farm
0.00015308335 BTC / share every 10 days
I know it's just the beginning but I hope it'll ramp up soon !
of course it will ramp up, this week, as stated last week. You could maybe do the calculation for another 20% on top if you are looking at "should", but you might as well save the calculations until we have an update that says "we are fully deployed with all the contracted equipment..." etc I'm laughing my tits off at how low the price of these shares are. excellent work CryptX Which calculations are you doing which make you laugh? 2.88Gh/s a share which costs 0.0735btc each. This averages about 25.5btc for 1 Th/s, if you ask me that's quite expensive. Or am I missing something in my calculations?
|
1Ew9k5guAGb44Uz6rYfSVscgFBUcgDZp5C
|
|
|
EnJoyThis
|
|
February 17, 2014, 05:18:06 PM |
|
return works out at less than 10 weeks dividend once the mine is fully operational. That doesn't include any extra's or reinvestment
Don't know which calculation you have made in order to get to the 10weeks div. http://www.vnbitcoin.org/bitcoincalculator.php If I calc and assume the diff increase will keep at the same pace (+/- 20% every diff change) that an investment of 25.5btc for 1000Ghs has a ROI time of over 360days. This assumes 100% is being paid out in dividend and there are no electricity costs. If indeed the return is 10 weeks of div than I'll go all-in.
|
1Ew9k5guAGb44Uz6rYfSVscgFBUcgDZp5C
|
|
|
EdoBcn
|
|
February 17, 2014, 06:47:48 PM |
|
return works out at less than 10 weeks dividend once the mine is fully operational. That doesn't include any extra's or reinvestment
Don't know which calculation you have made in order to get to the 10weeks div. http://www.vnbitcoin.org/bitcoincalculator.php If I calc and assume the diff increase will keep at the same pace (+/- 20% every diff change) that an investment of 25.5btc for 1000Ghs has a ROI time of over 360days. This assumes 100% is being paid out in dividend and there are no electricity costs. If indeed the return is 10 weeks of div than I'll go all-in. Shouldn't you take in consideration the weekly dividend pay and the (possible) difference in price of the shares? I was planning to reinvest the dividends by purchasing more shares. Anyone else? this way if the share price stays srable, I should have roi quite sooner
|
|
|
|
mikemikemike
Copper Member
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:03:57 PM |
|
return works out at less than 10 weeks dividend once the mine is fully operational. That doesn't include any extra's or reinvestment
Don't know which calculation you have made in order to get to the 10weeks div. http://www.vnbitcoin.org/bitcoincalculator.php If I calc and assume the diff increase will keep at the same pace (+/- 20% every diff change) that an investment of 25.5btc for 1000Ghs has a ROI time of over 360days. This assumes 100% is being paid out in dividend and there are no electricity costs. If indeed the return is 10 weeks of div than I'll go all-in. the 35% reinvestment will offset the difficulty increase, especially if they can make there own boards
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:33:30 PM Last edit: February 18, 2014, 01:30:54 AM by Anotheranonlol |
|
return works out at less than 10 weeks dividend once the mine is fully operational. That doesn't include any extra's or reinvestment
Don't know which calculation you have made in order to get to the 10weeks div. http://www.vnbitcoin.org/bitcoincalculator.php If I calc and assume the diff increase will keep at the same pace (+/- 20% every diff change) that an investment of 25.5btc for 1000Ghs has a ROI time of over 360days. This assumes 100% is being paid out in dividend and there are no electricity costs. 100% return via dividends is ~360 days assuming: Full rate is deployed fairly shortly Last shareprice is 0.071 ~20% mean diff increase, historically correct NO re-investments, no own production PCB, no squeezing any extra performance out of hardware, no compensation So operating on that assumption of completely no re-investments (which is really the key part to this venture, and not fair to exclude it really ) that's still 360 day return of what would take you around 11,230 days or 30+ years investing into Asicminer (based on last dividend and current last market price of asicminer). so let's imagine shareholders are happy with 30 year return here, shareprice will be 2.13 BTC well of course that's a stupid argument.. but it just give a little perspective. obviously AM is going through period where divs have been extremely low and many are happy to hold regardless because of past performance and future news, but in the past when they are performing well shareholders had settled on weekly yield of ~0.5% , you can work out what the shareprice would be here with similar expections of yield. even toned down a fair amount there is considerable potential here. During the stage BitFury hardware was in use all shareholders were pretty happy, operation was extremely smooth. if things can scale up from now in a similar way, things will be exciting.
|
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
February 18, 2014, 04:04:40 PM |
|
03 down p3 underperforming
03 was renamed to O3. P5 is underperforming. Like only one chip is hashing.
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
February 18, 2014, 04:52:13 PM |
|
03 down p3 underperforming
03 was renamed to O3. P5 is underperforming. Like only one chip is hashing. Seems I was half asleep. thanks- yes you are correct
|
|
|
|
|
|