Bounty and too many participants

[chichigirl]

I think the campaign manager should limit the participants to ensure the bounty rewards.  There are some projects that doesnt have a limitations and very open to all bounty hunters.

[1715248750]

1715248750

[1715248750]

1715248750

[1715248750]

1715248750

[1715248750]

1715248750

[1715248750]

1715248750

[christina30]

Joining Bounties with many participants is not bad they also looking for a good bounties where they can make sure they get reward even though its not big.We all see more people joining bitcoin and everyone is working hard so we should not be worry of having less reward just because to many participants as long as everyone is fair. Theres a lot of bounties to join so no worries lets help everyone to be rich!

[sparkling10]

Most people in crypto are engaging from bounties because they heard it gives profit without an actual investment, just your time and effort to be consider as your investment in these medium. Too much participants would not be a nice idea for people who used to do bounties, because the reward might be divided into multiple depending on how much participants they have in a campaign.

[cryptotenoy]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

As a  bounty participants and a late comers in this forum i am happy that there were ICOs that accepts low rank hunters ,in this case we may able to be inspired to work hard on it and to prove that not all late adoptors just made this community crowded with less knowledge hunter.We need to prove to everybody that we are dedicated on what we are doing and hoping everyone will never treat us as a trash in this forum.

[clonedone]

I think everything is fine with a bounty but there is a problem with facebook and twitter campaigns, there are too many participants in these campaigns now and most of them are fakes or bots, such accounts can't help the project, they're totally useless, and i think we need some changes to fix the problem with this type of bounty.

[energodar2019]

What's good about a signature campaign is that you can only do one campaign. There was certainly more willing, but ICO has become more, so you can earn here! But on Facebook and Twitter 3000 people make one campaign and of course each will get very little!

[stevenpn]

More and more prize hunters mean the world of crypto is widespread and the community participates. I also do not think it's a problem because too many campaigns are popping up every day.

[Genosx]

I still believe in ICO rating because this is a good basing in terms of knowing if they are one of the trusted company and business in this industry to be able of part of them because they are the best.

[sonofliberty]

 this sound like Utopia, because as many guys told here already it is not useful for managers to cap the limits

[Darknight31]

Actually, there are bounty campaigns which limits their participants. Though it is not that big of a deal really. Investors would tend to invest and, can, at the same time join bounty. They know too well that if they do believe the project then it is better to throw your money than catching some free small money being partitioned in different campaigns to a lot of participants. Also, participants would tend to find another campaign if they think there are too many participants already so in other words it tends to limit themselves rather than implementing something to limit them.

It is true, we could also join on the campaign with a limit on participant for you to have a better opportunity to earn more tokens yet those campaign could be more strict on posting or even on the thread you could post. Yet, limits in participant could increased the token count per participant that could be trade in a much more higher price.

[R9s]

Each bounty quest has a limited number of people. No matter how many people increase, there will be no reward for more than the number of qualified people. I do not think that the increase in the number of people will have any impact on the benefits. I think that the quality of the bounty quest is the key to the current rewards. Many tasks are deceptive!

[agatamannini]

Companies are interested when there are a lot of participants. They are not very interested in how much we earn. They need to do a lot of advertising for some budget. The more advertising (participants), the more information about the project

[padcoin]

Hi, i don't know a lot but when there is too many participants, the bounty are less profitable, look in OAX bounty it is a good project and there in not so much participants

[SALAVAT]

Each bounty quest has a limited number of people. No matter how many people increase, there will be no reward for more than the number of qualified people. I do not think that the increase in the number of people will have any impact on the benefits. I think that the quality of the bounty quest is the key to the current rewards. Many tasks are deceptive!

Right, a lot of people can register for a bounty, but they don't do anything, and they end up not getting steaks. But for projects, the more people spread information about the product, the better.

[Maks.fadeev1978]

Well I don't that this is good when bounty have too many participants. I liked bounty with limited participants and of course this is good to join signature, because you can join signature only one time. I saw a lot of social media companies have 3000 - 4000 participants! This is insane. You can earn 2-3$ top from these social companies

[mitchel_am]

Well we can not forbid people to not join a campaign but maybe the owners can reduce the number of the campaign joiners

[Beymax08]

Without the existence of bounty hunter, Of course,,, Any project as good.  Any ICO concepts they bring will not get to investors. More and more the bounty hunters mean the world of crypto is widespread and the public participates.

It is good to crypto will  be widespread and ICO will get many investors but not all ICO will be successful its outcome. Then bounty hunyer will only earn little because on many participants, rewards will be divided among all who joined.

[DragonCoinZ]

I think the most people saw the problem with to many bounty hunters per campaign. But you also see the bountymanager reacting. There many bounty campaign where you can just participate when you are at least member. I think the problem is with the multiply account with the jr members. The merits system stopped them a little bit.

[Kurtyp1010]

Joining Bounties with numerous members isn't bad they additionally searching for a decent bounties where they can ensure they get compensate despite the fact that its not big.We all observe more individuals joining bitcoin and everybody is buckling down so we ought not be stress of having less reward on the grounds that to numerous members as long as everybody is reasonable.

[ngano ba]

This is what we can see that if there is a bounty campaign it would be applied by so many participants in the different areas of campaign on which the ICO project  is offerring for that certain projects