Bounty and too many participants

[drogba773]

Last year i got good amounts. At the moment thereare thousands of participants with multiple fake accounta and i prefer to invest instead of bounties.

[1715636516]

1715636516

[1715636516]

1715636516

[1715636516]

1715636516

[1715636516]

1715636516

[1715636516]

1715636516

[baho11]

This is so timely. Bounty also begins to be glorified, because even investors join to earn more coins. It will be in favor of the project, than for the participants. For me it does not matter if I get paid for what I worked for. Maybe soon it will be regulated.

[drogba773]

Last year my wife got like 20k in total now she doing even more but got only 400 in 4 months!

[lengocanh2998]

That is how it should be imo. As many people as possible should be able to get hold of whatever they put in the work for. Investors will invest, hunters will hunt. There should be incentive for every act here. Distribution is good. Embrace it. Thats how things will look with time when the mass adoption comes.

[Z_Max]

A lot of participants in the campaign will not do anything. But, to participate in Bounty campaigns, you need to choose only the project that you would invest yourself in.

[niublity]

I think the most important thing is to review the ICO. The forum should set up a team to supervise the ICO. As long as the ICO is well managed, I don't think the others are problems. The main reason is that there are too many ICO scams.

[Maya56674]

About the bounty finds out more and more people this is more often recognized as a word of mouth and the more participants the less we get the percentage of generosity distribution.

[landysh007]

I think the most important thing is to review the ICO. The forum should set up a team to supervise the ICO. As long as the ICO is well managed, I don't think the others are problems. The main reason is that there are too many ICO scams.

If the forum had a separate team to track fraudulent ICO, then it would be very cool. Especially great if this team worked effectively. This would give a tremendous boost to the development of the forum.

[tungduong598]

I hope some people stop to participate in bounty and stay only the best one and the hard working. We have some periods of time, when opinion about crypto world changing, so who knows... if BTC gonna cost $3000 maybe some community go away and stay aware of this fucking crypto money

[KarinaMix]

of course, there are generous companies that limit participants, but for me it is not a problem because now every day there are many companies, and many are not very aware of cryptography and do not understand until the end of everything.

[404edson]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think there's should be a participants limit in bounty campaign so that bounty hunters will focus and avoid to be kick by the campaign in short they have to take serious works. And as of that bounty hunters will make a greater compensation when it's over. Because if the campaign are too crowded then the given allocation for the bounty campaign divided into small parts. Then in that matter whose bounty hunters that will last long in this case?

[Brimtorl]

Yes, now bounties are very popular.  And many people participate in the bounty.  It seems to me now is worth participating in a prospective bounty where few participants.

[richardeames]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

yes, too many participants contributing real value of work at the moment. Mostly now the bounty particpants are just slackers who doing copy paste/rephrase and other things that requires lowest efforts. I don't know whether bounty is worth it anymore

[lightning mcqueen]

Last year i got good amounts. At the moment thereare thousands of participants with multiple fake accounta and i prefer to invest instead of bounties.

There are many bounties that arise now and too many participants also, I don't know how to check the participants if its legit or not. But the thing is, too many participants will become too little tokens that we get after the end of the bounty.  

[Scambusterz]

Yes, now bounties are very popular.  And many people participate in the bounty.  It seems to me now is worth participating in a prospective bounty where few participants.

Now there are very few good campaigns in which there are few participants. In my opinion, if there are too few participants, then this is a bad sign. This means that people do not trust the campaign.

[Redbulle]

I think that this is not a problem. The number of new projects is increasing every year. The number of participants is also growing. Do not worry about it.

[Cryptomania12]

everything changes in life, the campaigns have changed, the conditions have changed .... Many people learned about the crypt and the bounty

[Jonesdoo]

As more people participate in the bounty activities, its requirements are more stringent and the benefits it can bring to us are diminishing. But if you can find good projects it will bring you a lot of wealth, so more research projects are very necessary.

[Mancung]

I've been talked about this long time a go with my friends, about how bounties need to set a limit of participants especially in their social media campaigns. When there are thousand of hunters signed for twitter & fb campaign, well dont you ever expect a huge rewards then. Im agree with the limitation in participants number in order to gain more rewards for bounty hunters.. Worked for 8-10 weeks and ended up with $8-$10 reward isn't something we would hope for

[gempil]

Bounty participants are increasingly increasing, this may indeed affect the reduction of bounty allocations that we should be able to get. However, with the growing number of participants, this makes bounty more and more support, so that more bounty will be created. With the many bounties created, it will be more options to be followed by the participants. I hope crypto can have an application to filter the scam ICO, so that who can be registered in the bounty is only a legitimate ICO. That way the crypto will not be colonized again by the scam ICO makers.