Bounty and too many participants

[fourpiece]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

The more the participants in a campaign the less reward they will get. Lets say twitter and facebook bounty has 1 million tokens , and the participants is almost 5000  sk they will only get little reward by doing the task for almost a month.

[1714132552]

1714132552

[1714132552]

1714132552

[1714132552]

1714132552

[1714132552]

1714132552

[aryoharpana]

I have a little suggestion might be better his gift of limiting participants so that not too much is accepted. therefore. we must be quick to get that gift if it is not fast then we are behind and can not join that gift. I think that's a pretty good suggestion. so as not to register too much and we get little rewards.

[OlgaAmraie]

Yes, i am also agree with you. There should be more precise rules and regulation for reward distribution and choosing the best bounty hunter. There should be limitation for participation. By doing this bounty hunter and ICO holder both will be benefited.

[ternyabin]

The most said and most obvious thing is that bounty campaigns would not capped that limits. Because it is not good for them to have less participants in the process of spreading out the news about bounty company.

This is a sound idea. If you limit the members of the bounty campaign, then this will negatively affect the progress of the project. In each project, the bounty campaign is allocated the least part of the collected funds (usually 0.5% - 1%), so it is beneficial for projects to have a large team of bounty hunters. For the same money, the project receives better work.

[Irvanremok]

if I may give a little advice about the many of his participants in the bouty prize. then the gift that held the gift must limit its participants so that the gift is not too many who register his account. then we the bounty hunter must be quick to register and do not miss to be able to join in the gift. with the restriction of participants I think the prize hunters will get their prizes according to what he wants.

[DPrillio]

The most said and most obvious thing is that bounty campaigns would not capped that limits. Because it is not good for them to have less participants in the process of spreading out the news about bounty company.

This is a sound idea. If you limit the members of the bounty campaign, then this will negatively affect the progress of the project. In each project, the bounty campaign is allocated the least part of the collected funds (usually 0.5% - 1%), so it is beneficial for projects to have a large team of bounty hunters. For the same money, the project receives better work.

Yes, having more participants can make the project popular but there are cases reported of having multiple accounts and that is the reason of why the forum have strict moderation because of this scenario and mostly I observed that there a lot of junior members are keep on coming by participating the bounty and way back for the implementation of merits system I think that is a very good idea to prevent bounty campaign being abuse by some bounty hunters.

[keramzit]

Yes, now the bounty is very popular and it is now difficult to find good bounties with few participants.

[Jimtorko]

I advise you to participate in the bounty where there is a limit on the number of participants.  I think this is the best option.

[lihongjing]

Every industry can't avoid competition. The current bounty hunters are the same. The most serious problem of the current bounty mission is not too many participants, but too many scams. We can't even guarantee every month. The profit earned by the mission!

[onepiece1995]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I strongly agree with your opinion. every day bounty more and more. and here I hope there will be many rules to tighten into bounty, so in the future bounty reduced. bounty a lot of it because many people who register more than 1 account and also many bounty who cheat and harming many parties. work to be bounty is very nice but sometimes there are also people who just want to be stay at home but want to earn money. and cheating, I hate people like that.

[Na1l]

Today it is really hard to earn decent amount of tokens, especially if we talk about Twitter and Facebook. There are so many projects that have 1-2k people in Facebook\Twitter campaigns, so the reward usually are not too big.

[Disclaimert]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

my opinion about it is you must follow the bounty that the number of participants is limited so that we do not fear the small division.
examples such as one bounty that has ended, I example ZUFLO project that the number of participants is limited. registration is closed when it reaches the maximum number of registrants on the bounty

[KOF97]

More and more people have chosen the bounty mission, which is unavoidable. Now the bitcointalk forum limits the way accounts are upgraded. I think there are countless bounty tasks every day. Even if there are a lot of bounty hunters now, they can't choose the same task at the same time!

[bitcoinveda]

People are increasing that's why ICO bounties are increasing. We don't have any restriction to participate in the ICO, as long as the manager is accepting. I hope this bounty should continue as long as ICO exists.

[hwenhuynh]

if new people will be achieved satisfact profit, they  must be hard working for this. it takes a lot of time.

[chibimanau]

That is great for the marketers of ico. They always want to have more people involved, to promote their products and brands. The Bounty project has many participants, meaning that most people find it a good idea. Will attract more investors, I encourage the same. If few people participate in the promotion of the ICO will probably not succeed. In my opinion, it is best to strictly control people who have multiple accounts.

[Jasell]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I just hope that bounty managers would come up with a solution and rewards only those with high quality works in advertising a particular project and to give stricter rules so we can avoid those bounty farmers!

[btcrich2020]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest in ICO - again fewer rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns are more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I just hope that bounty managers would come up with a solution and rewards only those with high quality works in advertising a particular project and to give stricter rules so we can avoid those bounty farmers!

I too agree with you because there are many participants who are promoting the ICO project and we should not restrict them because everyone has equal right to participate in bounty campaign and yes manager should come up with a solution to identify best one to promote quality content.

[lecongchi18091991]

very very too many participants. 2 year ago, only some people participate in a bounty project but now too many people participate

[zenifertran]

I think the more the bounty hunters participated the campaign the more the ICO projects promoted and the great chances for a project would success