Bounty and too many participants

[zingmela]

The space would become very big in a few years (at least few trillion dollars) due to increased adoption and cryptos playing mainstream  in our day-to-day lives and many more tokens would need to be created to solve numerous challenges especially as digitalization is revolutionizing the way we do things faster than we can breathe. About the bounty finds out more and more people this is more often recognized as a word of mouth and the more participants the less we get the percentage of generosity distribution. I just hope that dev further increase the token that will be distributed to the bounty hunter if one day the project experience swelling bounty participants

[1715659629]

1715659629

[jackjackfly]

Sure we see a significant growth in bounty participants, but aren't this same for ICO projects? There were days when there were more than 500 projects going at the same time? Don't you think this number is crazy?

[FoBoT]

Yes, I agree with you and I believe with this regulation, the rate of participating wilt multiple account will be reduced thereby reducing the rate of fraud and it will also help to reduce the crowd and there will be a limit to number of participant that will participate in the campaign.

[jpnl0008]

i don't want to believe there is anything called too many participants in a bounty the reason is that the more the bounty participants the more they reach out to a larger group of people and that keeps the project a step closer to achieving their set goal financially

[zikabra]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It is because for twitter and facebook bounties is not important how many projects you are promoting as long as you are promoting their project. All this is leading to all users with twitter and facebook accounts promoting half of bounties on forum.
I am not sure how that can be good for project, someone participating in fifty or more bounties.

[Bosda]

when a bounty has a lot of bounty participants it can be said that the bounty will be a success and the issue of gift sharing follows the rules of how to battle the bounty. when the bounty is launched it must have been set menefer well

[standards]

You should be happy to find a bounty with plenty of participants.
It usually means that it is a popular project, or popular bounty at least.
If there are few people participating a bounty, it is probably not a good one.

[mine_20]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Bounty participants is not limited to some participants that is why there are a lot of people in their community, and more participants more people advertising their project, so its help them to achieve their success.

[Artos893]

Bounty every day are becoming more popular and more people are participating in the bounty.  I advise you to participate in the bounty where there are few participants.

[Rhamon]

Actually there are various bounty programs have limits to their participants. High standards are given to applicants who wish to participate in different campaign. So it's not easy for new ones to get involved. But now more members prefer to join in different campaign to earn profit, rather than investing or trade different currency. I think this will not be a problem , because there are so many bounties out there. You just have to look those bounty that have a good ICOs to their members.

[Rhego]

That's true , everyday bounty campaigns attract more and more participants . Bounties becomes a whole industry nowadays , but I think campaigns must tougher their participants limits , because with growing number of participants , the salary of bounty hunters tends to zero.

[vitalskir]

I advise you to find a bounty where there is a limit on the number of participants.  I think this is the best option.

[ciang huang]

if now participate very much and new accounts always follow like newbie also participate in social media campaigns, the number of participants better in the limit because now the gift of income is getting smaller. and now we have to work hard for big prizes. if my suggestion mending limited number of bounty participants.

[zingmela]

Everyone was told about their earnings on each forum or youtube. You need to be silent if you have a good income. But most people do not understand this. Perhaps this course will positively affect the bounty of the campaign and significantly increase their effectiveness. Most of the participants who only use facebook and twitter may have to join the forum if they want to earn coins.

[blinkin]

If you want to get a good profit, then I advise you just to find a promising company with few participants.

[Niklomn]

Yes, now the bounty is very popular and many people participate in the bounty.  Now it's harder to earn coins.

[markint]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

You are right, there should be more control and greater restrictions to participate in the campaigns of Twitter and Facebook, because by distributing a bounty between a hundred and even thousands of participants can lead to a gradual loss of motivation to participate in those campaigns.

For example, a bag of $100,000 for 1500 participants on twitter would only leave a profit of about $13 for each individual, which is truly insignificant considering that usually those campaigns require many months of continuous work, and that in the long run tends to discourage participation.

[aryoharpana]

yes my friend strongly agree with you asking like this. karene now a lot of excessive ico in its participants then we hunters prizes for bounty programs Twitter or Facebook very few receive token rewards from their ico. is it better for bounty programs to limit participants to less participants in their bounty. I think it would be better in prizes of prize hunters.

[Hood68239470]

Especially those who are greedy enough to make bots and fake accounts just to get a lot of stakes.
My analysis saw me that manager fix all job correctly and cahnge rules to join and not all participants still alive in final of bounty camp. Just keep providing valuable comments in the marketplace, it will come back to you in a nice way.

[minlirto]

There are managers who limit the number of participants.  I advise you to participate in such bounty.