Bounty and too many participants

[mattroibecon24]

Well, there is no surprise that the number of participant is increasing  due to the bounty campaigns do offer some good options for those who just started in the crypto world.

[1715627992]

1715627992

[1715627992]

1715627992

[1715627992]

1715627992

[1715627992]

1715627992

[1715627992]

1715627992

[selivers]

if I see it like that happening now, many newcomers who want to join bounty campaign. I'm sure most are looking for money and only a small part of the fun . If you have a problem with income, you should look for a larger campaign that has a limit of participants I'm sure this will pay you more leverage.

There are plenty large campaigns with no limit of participants, if you pick them your rewards will get divided by many and you might only end up with pennies, keep that in mind too. Besides, why would a bounty manager limit participants, it does not cost them any more but the get additional buzz

[Spoop]

I really don't think that the organizers of the bounties are complaining about too many people because the whole point of the bounty in the first place is for them to get as many people interested in the project as possible so more bounty participants means more people for them. Although more participants means less rewards for bounty hunters.

[RealMean55]

Bounty campaigns have attracted a considerably large number of participants in he recent past, with a number of them competing for the little available spots to be a part of  promising project. There really is nothing wrong with the competition, But with the influx of users, means a lower pay for the hunters, its therefore the responsibility of the hunter to chose the campaigns hes part of wisely so as to avoid being in a scam, make the competition worth it

[upyem2k]

Yes there are too many bounty hunters nowadays. That makes the bounty earnings so small. I think the bounty managers should try and put a cap on the number of participants for the bounty campaigns the manage to help hunters earn a reasonable sum.

[haipzh99999]

I am thinking that those campaigns that have huge numbers of participants are manage by popular manager in this forum. Basically people put their trust to the person that they know not scammer. We choose the person that we know real and not liar.

[Ekosistim]

i think back then bounty hunters was a several person or community, but nowadays, everyone interest become a bounty hunters besides he join invest on ico, so he can gain double for the token.

[andor.gellenhidi]

Now many people feel the problem of people using multi accounts, this is a big problem, because such people are clearly cheaters and many projects and bounty managers are blocking such actions, because this is really a very bad situation.

[mdenys]

Yes,this is a big problem for this forum,too many bounty participants and old accounts cannot already make the same money as they did before,too many junior members and members.

[Et Hereum]

Many people arw joining bounties because they don't have money to use in investing or trading. And some bounties give huge profit so many people are attracted to it.

[quesi_job]

Most projects organize private sales, which I think that where they get most of their contribution. WIth regards to investors participating in bounties to ICO, it's just small portion of the total supply they allocate to bounties. However, I agree with you for the facebook and twitter campaigns, there are lot of people who participate which has cause delay in stake calculation in most bounty programs.

[zubrr51]

This really is a problem when the project is packed with up to 400 participants. The distribution of money is very small.

[Cryptokarl]

This topic sounds interesting to me because many people in this forum are into bounty. I am not surprised about having huge participants in bounty because some do not want to risk their Fiat by investing in crypto, there are also others who do not have anything to invest with. This might sound bad to participant but let is not be greedy. Maybe their might be some rules to reduce participants

[timfish]

I think a large number of participants most time describes and decides how successful a projectvwill be, so I think the reason you are asking for regulations is because of the reward at the end of the whole project, from what have seen so far a huge number of participants decreases the reward each participants receive most times. I think if you want higher rewards, participate in signature campaigns

[Bybox]

I agree with you, the number of participants in the bounty has increased because the crypto space is getting bigger since bitcoin has reached 10k USD and many people are starting to talk about Bitcoin and crypto-currency in general. And the easiest way to earn money in crypto is to join a bounty campaign. I think the bonus campaign will be less rewarding because we have too many participants and the only way to avoid this problem is to join a non-hype bonus campaign.

[khanhhuyen0630]

According to my observation if one campaign limit the number of bounty hunters that able to participate the loses is not for the bounty hunters but for them. Bounty hunters play some major roles to promote the project effectively.

[dollurs]

Very simple and logical reply for this is, the reward amount for the participants will be very less. I've heard that in previous even doing twitter and facebook some people have earned more than $500-1000 from just one campaign. But now doing just only social media bounty is just a waste of time for me.

[priyanjana]

Yes, there are a lot participates in a bounty program in order that reward amount is low. I have 3 suggestion for this problem.
1. limit the participant count. (But a lots ICO holders don't like to limit the bounty participants.)
2. Chose the good project with the decent amount of bounty participants. I know this very hard thing to find but I found good ICO  called Guarium Project with a decent amount of participants. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3359820.0).
3. Chose bounty campaign with fewer participants count than other campaigns(Social media - facebook and twitter). Such as Signature, Reddit, Instagram, medium, article and content creation etc.

[selivers]

Yes, there are a lot participates in a bounty program in order that reward amount is low. I have 3 suggestion for this problem.
1. limit the participant count. (But a lots ICO holders don't like to limit the bounty participants.)
2. Chose the good project with the decent amount of bounty participants. I know this very hard thing to find but I found good ICO  called Guarium Project with a decent amount of participants. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3359820.0).
3. Chose bounty campaign with fewer participants count than other campaigns(Social media - facebook and twitter). Such as Signature, Reddit, Instagram, medium, article and content creation etc.

These are some good ideas, most people do twitter bounties but few register to do contend creation like writing articles or creating videos. So you need to think outside the box.

[Yucco]

A large number of participants in the bounty is not very good, but it's not so bad. Much worse is that recently organizers of projects are dishonest people, scammers. This is much more dangerous.