Bounty and too many participants

[whatthesith]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

[epidose]

That's a tough one; it's definitely an early adoption model for profit, but what sort of regulations can be put in place? How would you define the "Best" participants? Likely any system would only make it suitable for long-term participants/members of some group and only serve to discourage anyone who is just entering the community.

[bhantom]

Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us

[staywoke081]

Never going to happen, but what will happen is those who are in areas that have higher costs of living will cease to do them. It is like any industry, if you can't make enough money people move on. And this is no different, the equilibrium will be found constantly, and will always be evolving to find a new equilibrium.

[CisColtz]

Too many participants ? I must disagree with you , we are no yet on the mainstream of bounties , ICO's and so on. After we gonna reach this stage , we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties.

[dillpicklechips]

Actually, there are bounty campaigns which limits their participants. Though it is not that big of a deal really. Investors would tend to invest and, can, at the same time join bounty. They know too well that if they do believe the project then it is better to throw your money than catching some free small money being partitioned in different campaigns to a lot of participants. Also, participants would tend to find another campaign if they think there are too many participants already so in other words it tends to limit themselves rather than implementing something to limit them.

[martina14]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

People are looking for free money, or making cryptocurrency as their work. If you think that you will gain less with so much participants, then you should look for an ICO with no participants, sharing our knowledge and source of income is not bad, you just need to do their job and do yours.
Investors joining bounties are their freedom to do so. But most investors are people who earned from cryptocurrencies and bounties too.

[Samk]

ya you are absolutely correct as because more and more people are joining the bounty there should be some regulations.

[AmazingDynamo]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

since bounty campaign has an allocation per campaign (twitter , facebook, signature ) i think it is hard to limit those participants because that allocation will be divided into the number of participants so there is nothing wrong with that especially the allocation is high.

[robynmario]

I'm sure it's not a problem for the marketers of ico. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting their brand, product. That is very important in the success of the ico campaign. In other words, many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in that ico. I was one of them.

[SalmanMJ9]

I don't think it's a problem as way too many campaigns popping up everyday, and still many people in the crypto world not fully aware about bounty campaigns. Probably it's better to look into translation and content campaigns as they require more work = less participant.

[bitcoin.beda]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes, i also notice that bounty hunters were increased dramatically, unlike in the last few months,
I guess it depends always in the bounty manager if he/she has a stricter rules,
As the bounty is based on stakes, more participants means more stakes and the own stakes versus the total stakes will be decrease hereby getting lesser tokens,
Some of the bounty managers, only wants older accounts in avoiding spam accounts, also some managers limits the participant in able to receive a decent reward upon distribution.
I guess we cannot control it, and the best thing to do is to pick a good bounty manager with good ICO,
It is better to use your time finding a good bounty manager and development of ICO rather than joining all the bounties
  

[dreamerXXI]

Don't worry, we are still in the early days. Even though it seems like we have gone mainstream, we are still in the very early stages of cryptocurrencies, ICOs and thereby bounty programs.

I don't see how investors will be discouraged, because they can join the bounty programs too and at the same time invest.

[aurorabitcoin.96]

I don't think it's a problem as way too many campaigns popping up everyday, and still many people in the crypto world not fully aware about bounty campaigns. Probably it's better to look into translation and content campaigns as they require more work = less participant.

But, i have different perspective.
Bounty that we get decreased day by day because many Alt-Account joining that make allocation small
I admit Translation and Content is hard to do, besides many user try to Claim our Work with False-acquisition.

[jondel]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

On the contrary, from project owner's point of view, the more participants in a bounty campaign will benefit for them.
More participant = more outreach = more potential investors

[sadmaster]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

My opinion is that you're just getting selfish with the rewards. Though people that are potential investors will still be invest because if you do believe in the block chain technology then investing would be the best way to earn profits.

[bundo]

Without the existence of bounty hunter, Of course,,, Any project as good.  Any ICO concepts they bring will not get to investors. More and more the bounty hunters mean the world of crypto is widespread and the public participates.

[Lock00Live]

Bounty and too many participants will have competition in ICO projects to get bonuses. Therefore, ICO project participants should have good knowledge and they need to promote the brand in a positive and effective way. At the same time, ICO project participants will need other ideas that are beneficial to the project and contribute to the development of the project.

[whatthesith]

Oh, nice discussion here!   Thank you all for your opinions. Maybe situation will be better if ICO be more successful - there will be more investors - more bounty hunters, but nowadays crypto is crashing and also interest in ICO is lower.

[parekoy]

This is so very timely now. Bounty is also starting to become famous because even investors are joining to earn free more coins. It would be in favor of the project than to participants. It does not matter to me as long as I get paid for what I have worked for. Maybe soon it will be regulated.