Bounty and too many participants

[Wicked17]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I dont think it will happen to be more strict, many bounty participants to promote the ICO will leads to more exposure of their ICOs to investors. As long as they are doing their work. You can still join bounty campaign as many as you want like social media campaign, telegram campaign and translation campaign.

[1714708792]

1714708792

[1714708792]

1714708792

[Oregano012]

there are bounty campaign which limits their participates. and it still depend on what type of ico and how much hype it has. some project can be sold out in a matter of minutes , you just gotta find the right Bounty program and be there first before anyone else keep searching brother ^_^

[Yourodiviy]

Develop an account on the forum and you will be happy. The income from signature campaigns is several times greater than in campaigns for social media. Even jr.member gets much more than twitter and facebook.

[tutchpa]

totally agree with you. with the increased popularity of cryptocurrency during last 6 months there are so many newbies joined to the crypro world. majority of them dont have enough capital to invest in projects.so they used to do bounty and earn some free stuff to build a capital. personally, i know a school child who is doing 50 bounty campaigns, so with an increased number of participants total rewards decreased for participants.becase most of the bounty campaigns based on stakes system. before 6 months you usually get 500-1000 usd for bounty campaign now its usually 100-200. as you told its really important to limit participants. a system like merit system in bitcointalk is essential.otherwise this will badly affect to crypto world with in next few months

[pedropendukot]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

The forum itself are more meaningless compare to the early days that i have been here,totally flooded by shitposters posting shit contents that is why the forum owner ,theymos did fucked up the ranking system so that less shitposters will be able to rank up limiting partcipants of the signature campaigns and i really like this because less participants will be able to join the campaigns.

[adriaymati58]

Everyone has the chance to improve their incomes so it's good for them that they found ways how to do it. The bounty managers should take this in consider and they can grow the rewards

[Lakai01]

Well, you have to deliver exceptional good work to learn a good amount of coins nowadays. But thats nothing to worry about in my opinion, I think its good for the market overall.

[Benarand]

This is certainly a big problem. Managers of bounty programs must set limits on the number of participating in social campaigns twitter and facebook. For a good project, the most important thing is more advertising. Therefore all and join a lucrative bounty campaign.

[veliq]

more and more people learn about bounty and therefore have to share with everyone ! less and less coins we get ! choose such bounty in which a limited number of participants and you will be lucky more

[supine]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

That is why the forum is making changes to lessen the potential of other people on making several accounts and joining campaigns with multiple accounts. Some managers are making strict rules to lessen participants and picking their participants carefully because some people are just up for the money and not on the quality of their jobs.

[Irkytsk38rus]

I think here very soon it will be very difficult to earn. Many people come and profits fall. The only thing that can help is the restriction on the number of participants already

[hiwainmoto]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Some of the campaigns has already getting more strict,before they accept some participants might have a good quality posts in their profiles,and those low quality posters wont get accepted,i love these campaigns because these shitsposters wont have any chance to get stakes because the managers are greading quality posts to be accepted.

[cryptomarijuana]

The merit system really heps this forum from shitposters,that is why i love what theymos did,less people will be able to participate these signature campaigns shitposters wont have any choice but to participate the social media campaigns there they can posts spam.I also love less participants in the bounty campaigns because the less partcipants the higher the rewards.

[hdclover]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I agree with more strict rules and regulations and limiting the number of participants to a certain campaign. If we think I'm ICO team point of view it is actually a good news for them because their campaign will get more exposure. More exposure is equal to more audience it will reach.

[rizkyx56]

This is certainly a big problem. Managers of bounty programs must set limits on the number of participating in social campaigns twitter and facebook. For a good project, the most important thing is more advertising. Therefore all and join a lucrative bounty campaign.

many participants mean many people who promote too
so, it will be many investors coming in.
IMO limiting participant isn't effective, better to tighten the rules

[cryptocue]

Good thing the merit system has lessen the shitposters in this forum,less account farmers will be able to get high ranks in this forum so that there will be less people to participate bounty campaigns especially the signature campaigns,less participants will give us more profits because there will be less competitors from this forum.

[JCLee]

For now, as I can see bounty campaign is going to control the number of participant, new bounty campaign often accept limited number of participant for all their bounty part. But there are only few campaigns is doing like that. Facebook and Twitter bounty are the easiest bounty that why there are a lot of people prefre joining these bounty to signature or translation bounty.

[cryptomngr]

No need to regulate im sure in the future there will be less people who will participate these ICO campaigns,because the merit system really did a good job to fight these shitposters,therae will be less high ranking accounts that will be able to join signature campaigns less high rank participants will give us good bounties in the future.

[arthurgrand]

I think it should be regulated because lately it's all enthusiasts wants to partake in and not the pre-sales or crowdsales.

[paxmao]

Yes it happens too many times and the results are awful because the people whow got involved early are facing a very low profit for their efforts. The participant number has been limited in the most successful ICOs.