Bounty and too many participants

[Misiak4]

I hope some people stop to participate in bounty and stay only the best one and the hard working. We have some periods of time, when opinion about crypto world changing, so who knows... if BTC gonna cost $3000 maybe some community go away and stay aware of this fucking crypto money

[pekingcoepo]

Is not the current spending rules more stringent? especially with the new rules regarding the feasibility of this forum, I think more and more participants who follow the bounty then the better the development of the project because my opinion of investors from the ICO project also from one bounty participant.

Somewhat confusing if the manager makes the rules of giving and requirements more difficult then very rarely will follow the bounty then the thread will also sink because there is no more discussion about the project.

[Creating N Action]

Let's say that when the participants of a campaign are bigger, we can not get all of our rewards. If the campaign is for longtime, then the reward we receive will be less, because while the campaign takes longer the participants are increasing.
Or maybe even so many participants are joining a campaign because they know the project is good.

[DemLom]

Now the only thing I notice in the constraints. This is just a limited number of participants. Who made that good man. That's not right

[Cauchy]

You need to work out the maths before jumping on the Bounty train. I mostly do signatures when I do partake in Bounty. I usually try to go for Projects that I find have good metrics but if it is to much participants in the signature I keep looking.

[PrincessChe]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes you are right. But my analise said that Managers check more and more about doing campaigns and delite a lot of participants in spreadsheet and regulate revards.
By the way, your account has no a lot of posts too 

[kingzues09]

In my opinion we have alot of investors and we should have many participants on bounty campaigns. Remember we are on early stage we could dominate the market and alot of countries will adopt the blockchain and will create a startup business with their ICO it will broadcast on social media.

[xxxRaidysxxx]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Last time managers more and more regulate rules and check with attention job of bounty participants. Another problem is created scam ICOs and in final all participants didn't get rewards

[alexeylom]

I think that not everything is as bad as you described. You see only one side of the medal, and there is another. More people, and therefore more large-scale advertising companies and popularization, and hence more investors will be involved and as a result, the company collects the maximum amount and rewards you with rewards, you will in any case get what you deserve.

[CrazyJoker]

Yes, too much people now are tended to be involved in any ICO. And sure, other participants have less opportunities to earn good rewards.
I think the best decision is limited number of participants. If some participants begin to ignore rules and do nothing, they should be banned and their positions will be free for new participants.

[aussiesloth]

While bounty hunters may want participant numbers capped for each campaign segment (and some are), many ICOs are happy to get the widest possible exposure, hence, allowing unlimited participants.  There have been campaigns where I've decided there isn't enough 'meat left on the bone' to continue the campaign, so I've simply walked away from it. 

Personal choice for everyone - how little are you prepared to receive for your efforts.  For bounty campaigners from poorer areas of the world, I think any return is better than nothing, so they will continue to participate, regardless of participant numbers.

[konco_kenthel]

Yes with the campaign participants who often soar automatically can reduce the results obtained later so we should be able to join as soon as possible if we want to continue to gain an advantage.

[MarkusIsaiah]

Bounty campaign is popular in this crytocurrency because i think it is the best way to earn with no capital. but right now it is hard to. join bounty campaign first because of the ranking system, then some of the campaign are picking the best participant to their campaign.

[fileo]

According to my observation if one campaign limit the number of bounty hunters that able to participate the loses is not for the bounty hunters but for them. Bounty hunters play some major roles to promote the project effectively. Through them the campaign can end success or it could not.

[Jonnitor]

Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of you are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated.

[mrdelacrua]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I'm afraid that the company's bounty will disappear with time. I noticed that the most successful projects go to the stage of private ICO and as a rule do not have a bounty, but only anouncement topic on the bitcointalk forum...

[AmazingDynamo]

Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of you are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated.

the good effect is on the side of the one who creates the project because the ads will be spread in broad way but the participants obviously they will earn lesser than with the lesser number of the participants so people choosing a less participants even has no good stakes .

[Blake_Last]

Actually, for me, I think it is better for an ICO to have many participants in their bounty campaigns because that is really the reason or purpose why they started it -- to get lots of support from people who would spread the word about their project. Think about it, if only a few people join their campaign, then it will also be unfair to them, especially if they are giving rewards based on stakes. What if only three people participated, for example, in their signature, and they allocated 20% or 5 million of their tokens to that campaign? Then that means only those three people will get all the total tokens allocated to it even if they didn't attract any investors to the project. That, I think, would not be fair to the ICO.

[sweetmakak]

I really hope that either the people themselves will leave, because there is not enough patience and will not earn enough, or there will be some restrictions ...

[kuah bakso]

I think it is the policy of each dev that regulates the rule of bounty, we can not do anything because it proves more bounty participants then the more likely the project will be successful so we can only surrender