Bounty and too many participants

[drogba773]

Last year my wife got like 20k in total now she soing even more but got only 400 in 4 months!

[1715388784]

1715388784

[1715388784]

1715388784

[1715388784]

1715388784

[AllToMoon]

We need a limit of a contributor in the bounty. It's not honestly if someone spends few months in a signature campaign and it was not scammed ICO and after this, you get less than 1 eth for member rank. There should be at least 1 eth/ month for member and more for highest ranks

[petrolefr]

People want to earn money, so I think there is not much can be done to control the increase of bounty participants. The time will come, it will all go to the quality. Merit system already limited signature campaigns

[chenjkai]

Definitely, there is no need to make restrictions for it. In my opinion, the bounty campaigns are mainly not done for being benefited to other people, but to bounty's provider. This means that spreading the information out should be done perfectly to make the company better. I understand that we are getting less awards, but come on, be fair, there will be less profit to companies if they will just choose less participants.

[yourbird]

Most of people looking for free money or making cryptocurrency as their work by joining bounty. In every bounty campaign i think there is a limit on how many participants is allowed, also there is a certain rules if bounty participant is qualified or not. If you think that you will gain less with so much participants, then you should look for an ICO with no limit participants. Investors joining bounties are their freedom to do so, But i think most investors are people who earned from cryptocurrencies and bounties too.

[BritcoinFTW]

I think that it is necessary to introduce some rules that will limit the participation of dishonest bounty hunters, as well as low-quality work.

[Borisb52]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think that ICO teams also see this trend. Companies such a situation is beneficial. In the future there will be restrictions on participation (already now it meets more and more often). Good bounty managers already practice this.

[beccer]

actually I'm worried about this, should bounty managers limit their participants to pay the fees they receive in accordance with what they do

[valek.bruno]

Many participants, on the contrary, improve the situation with competition, I think that today there is a possibility that people can really make some money on crypto-currencies, because crypto-currencies are our future, so we need to deal with them now.

[franklinrichards]

You really have a lot of participant when it comes to payments.
Thousands of participants will actually split.
Unless you join a signature campaign then the attention is calm but when it comes to twitter then it will be another story.

[sherenikaw]

It's not fun to participate for 0-20 weeks and ultimately earn very little,
as there are 4000 participants.
And it would be nice to have some sort of adequate selection.
participants, and most importantly- have a limited number of participant.

[pstraene]

Well more and more who follow the bounty campaign, because no need to spend capital. but it is not easy also because we have to be diligent to find other profitable projects, we can not rely on one project, but no problem it just takes hard work.Bounty campaigns are more and more popular.But it is also fun 

[Omnopon)]

Yes, you are right here, I have noticed it as well. There are so many fake accounts appeared. And there are people who want free money as well, which does not right.

[Sirenny]

The problem is not that the bounty programs involved a large number of people and the fact that investments in ICO is now reduced and new projects extend the terms of fees and reduce bounty pool. If this continues and then wishing to participate in the bounty of the company will become less.

[asudja89]

I think there will be more and more participation in the bounty, because they are becoming more and more popular. From my point of view as a bounty hunter, I want to limit the number of participants, especially in those small pools. But I don't think it's fair. Don't forget, what we are doing is targeting the marketing and promotion activities of our company, and the company will be interested in more ads, the better. So I don't think they're very interested in limiting the number of participants.

[CryptoTrip]

I agree with the fact that now there are a lot of participants. Bounty is one way to get coins without having to invest. Bounty has been widely disseminated and publicized, therefore, too many people participate in these companies. Also, don't forget about unscrupulous participants who use multiaccounts. I  I have repeatedly faced with scammers and liars.

[nemesis_]

Anyone is eligible to join any bounty campaigns if they want to. But I do agree that as days/weeks passed by, the number of participants in bounty campaigns is increasing. Some may have multiple accounts and joining without a proper knowledge with the project they have joined. But well, since the implementation of the merit system, we should not fear that some of those who joined may post irrelevant replies/threads. Due to this, low quality post has lessen and fake accounts are reduced. Though I still hope that the number of participants in any campaign should have a limit.

[esjsr]

Actually for me, I think the ICO more participants to participate in the activities of the rewards they will be better, because it can increase their community, increase the coin to encrypt the influence of the world, I think this is not the problem, the new project is increasing every day, participation is also growing, this is normal.

[charlystriker]

actually I'm worried about this, should bounty managers limit their participants to pay the fees they receive in accordance with what they do

I agree with you. They have lot of participants joining in a one bounty campaign. And the total token allocation in a one bounty campaign will be share in the whole participants. If they have so many participants in one campaign the tokens allocation will be less because they many people sharing this token allocation. So if the bounty manager will limit the participant. The token allocation for the  whole participant will become bigger because it is less in partipants.

[Artem57]

I believe that sooner or later in each company's bounty there will be restrictions on the number of participants. Perhaps these restrictions should not be introduced for signature of the company, but for companies Facebook and Twitter they will be very relevant. Since the number of participants is increasing every day.