Bounty and too many participants

[horrifiedx1]

actually I'm worried about this, should bounty managers limit their participants to pay the fees they receive in accordance with what they do

I agree with you. They have lot of participants joining in a one bounty campaign. And the total token allocation in a one bounty campaign will be share in the whole participants. If they have so many participants in one campaign the tokens allocation will be less because they many people sharing this token allocation. So if the bounty manager will limit the participant. The token allocation for the  whole participant will become bigger because it is less in partipants.

from dev i think more and more participants will be better, because they are more widely promoted. i think it is reasonable if there is good project will be invaded by many bounty participants. but like bountyhive, they've limited participants, you can see that

[xGeraValerax]

rules should be one, each ICO should limit the number of participants, and another censorship is not needed

[GrannyC]

I am thinking that those campaigns that have huge numbers of participants are manage by popular manager in this forum. Basically people put their trust to the person that they know not scammer.

[zmeddy]

I believe that a good bounty company should limit the number of participants, for example no more than 1000 for Twitter or facebook, personally I do not participate in the bounty in which the number of participants is more than 1500 ..

[MWesterweele]

I believe that a good bounty company should limit the number of participants, for example no more than 1000 for Twitter or facebook, personally I do not participate in the bounty in which the number of participants is more than 1500 ..

I think bounty that have a lot of participants it means many people believe to it, but for me its better if the bounty manager limit the participant to a better payouts. Also too much participant make the bounty become more known because it means they believe and trust to it without any hesitation of being scam. But even if the bounty has a lot of participant there's a time the manager abandoned it like before i participated.

[kdiag]

my opinion is that you need to carefully study quality companies with a bona fide bounty manager, who limits the number of participants and excludes multiaccounts and unscrupulous participants.

[duoduoshigexiaozhu]

actually I'm worried about this, should bounty managers limit their participants to pay the fees they receive in accordance with what they do

I agree with you. They have lot of participants joining in a one bounty campaign. And the total token allocation in a one bounty campaign will be share in the whole participants. If they have so many participants in one campaign the tokens allocation will be less because they many people sharing this token allocation. So if the bounty manager will limit the participant. The token allocation for the  whole participant will become bigger because it is less in partipants.

from dev i think more and more participants will be better, because they are more widely promoted. i think it is reasonable if there is good project will be invaded by many bounty participants. but like bountyhive, they've limited participants, you can see that

Yes, as a dev party, they are definitely willing to see more people to participate in the promotion of their projects, but as a participant, more participation means less benefits.

[svobodnyi]

It's just a disaster ... the participants have become so many that there is very little money to earn ...
What do the participants themselves count on when they connect to some kind of bounty, where 3000+ participants already

[dvmd]

I think peoples has right and deserved a chance to participate in bounty even they are newbie. It is the time for them to learn more about alt coins, when they know then there are a probability that they will become an investors in ICO. And it is good for the alt coins existence . 

[3BCcash]

i think the only regulations that should be made is to regulate the ICOs that are coming up,it has become so easy for them to launch scam ICOs.

[jess04]

Yes, Bounty campaign are more and more popular, Many of the participant are very good at promoting their brand, That is very important in the success of the ico's campaign, And many people join the bounty and  I'm sure many of them Invest in that ico's. So we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties.

[shalaza]

i don't think that should pose any threat to existing bounty hunters, it just means the cryptocurrency is now gaining more ground in the real world and people are now knowing more about it, and i think that is a good thing

[hengha]

i think the only regulations that should be made is to regulate the ICOs that are coming up,it has become so easy for them to launch scam ICOs.

Fully agree, I think that the current bounty thread should include ICO rating information, or there should be a bounty guarantee platform, on which a bounty is required to be reviewed by the platform, or a certain guarantee provided by the development to the platform. A percentage of fees or tokens can be charged to bounty participants.

[cryptomeo]

I personally believe we in fact in need of more bounty hunters. There are so many bounty campaigns now. Obviously, many of us would be lost out some money especially from big-name ICOs bounty. But the growing numbers of bounties require more participants.

The crypto and ICO market has become so big nowadays, we need more adoption. Just look at the current state of Bitcointalk. It will keep on growing. I believe the bounty pool will increase in response to the bounty hunters volume. This year we could see more airdrops. They realized their tokens will be actually only worth something if they hit the exchanges. Thus, building community will be an important element now. Bounty campaign in a way is also one type of airdrops.

[hoanghoatham04]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Do not agree with your opinion. There are a lot of Bounty projects and there are a lot of Bounty players too. But everyone does not choose a certain Bounty so there are a lot of Bounty and everyone chooses a certain Bounty.

[pipashu]

Only a growing number of followers will invest in a project. For investors, this is a waste of valuable time to promote meetings.

[nawaki]

You really have a lot of partitions when it comes to payments.
thousands of participants will actually split.
Unless you join a signature campaign then the attention is calm
but when it comes to twitter then it will be another story.

[kliown]

I think bounty company attract more new members, and it's not weird. The ability to get tokens for free for any kind of action is very tempting. But I think that it is worth limiting the bounty of the company by the number of participants. This will help to avoid dissatisfaction among the participants.

[hilman89]

yes bounty is very famous. but what I see today, the requirement to follow this bounty is more tightened and exacerbated the difficulty.Maybe because many people who participate to seek profit.

[coinsontheroad]

yes bounty is very famous. but what I see today, the requirement to follow this bounty is more tightened and exacerbated the difficulty.Maybe because many people who participate to seek profit.

With so many new people coming to the board, the bounty pools would surely get diluted. I agree on a set number of participants. Also, the merit system will keep people from getting into more bounties so they won't be as diluted.