Bounty and too many participants

[simmo77]

When choosing a bounty campaign, one of the criteria is the number of participants. in particular, if there are less than 500 people, it is better not to contact with such a campaign. nevertheless, if there are too many participants, then you will earn a penny, and this will not be a normal and worthy profit.

[1714813654]

1714813654

[sergienkoe]

dev thinking
requires many participants to make more people promote the project so that more people will know how the project is developing
thinking hunters
with a large number of participants will get a small payment in the work for 2-3 months may be only $20 - $ 50 (social media)
how will they create new rules to limit the number of participants? this is a very difficult choice

This is true. Many participants reduce the number of steaks. But on the other hand, the cost of mounts grows after listing on the exchange.

But it's not so scary, like the fact that lately there are more reports of abuse and fraud of bounty managers.
I know for sure that there are companies in which the reward is not $ 20-50 for social media, but $ 1.5-2.

That's frustrating.

[DoubleShow]

When choosing a bounty campaign, one of the criteria is the number of participants. in particular, if there are less than 500 people, it is better not to contact with such a campaign. nevertheless, if there are too many participants, then you will earn a penny, and this will not be a normal and worthy profit.

I also try to choose a company with a limit of participants. For example, take known to all company and ICO - XYO . So there is at the moment in the bounty of media articles and more than 1500 lines. Yes, of course, the project is very attractive, but I think the reward for participating in this bounty would not be very large because of the influx of participants.

[ahah]

The bounty participants will add a lot of ico this year, and the number of participants is increasing. I think a lot of research will read the future and roadmap of the white paper team before anyone joins the program, and all of these things need to be validated.

[Boi qaaf]

Well, the ICO project is more profitable to have a lot of participants with a small number of subscribers..They pay less, but a lot of them! Although I think that large ICO, with good potential, should promote their project by large participants. Thereby showing that they have a very good idea and product!

[jdkly]

Yes, the bounty is getting more and more popular, but now it's not easy to get fat profits, so new entrants must redouble their efforts to get a satisfactory profit. As far as I am concerned, this will not be a problem for us.

[buimangai1234]

It was inevitable. People participated in bounty campaigns throughout 2017. Then everyone was told about their earnings on each forum or youtube. You need to be silent if you have a good income. But most people do not understand this. Competition will grow more and more. I think by the end of the year to participate in bounty campaigns(twitter/facebook) will become unprofitable. As it became with the mining of bitcoins on the portable PC a few years ago.

[ardydyon]

bounty is one where we can get paid according to the project that we follow. bounty can be followed by anyone who is interested in following a bounty that exists. but if bounty in tight in following it will be a few people who follow bounty and bounty manager will lose in marketing his new token,
but if it is not strict anyone can follow the bounty and the fee will be accepted bounty followers will be a bit because of the many participants

[Bobocantik]

If you think there are too many participants in bounty campaign, most especially for those who are yet to come into it. They are missing a lot of opportunities. No matter how much the number of participants are, if you do your tasks so well, you will still get good rewards.

[malbano2099]

For me, there's nothing wrong with increasing participants of bounty campaigns, we need to accept that bitcoin and learnings is for everyone.

[gogrowglow]

Yes bounty campaign is very popular now,  many paticipate but many also are disappointed because of their strict rules sometimes you get O stakes.  So no problem if you saw many participants  in a bounty, they are not all rewarded anyway bointy hunting is open to all that meets their requirements.

[zxl912157]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think if the participant's twitter and Facebook campaign have been full, you sign up for bounty article, video or signature campaign. The reward is big than twitter or facebook campaign.

And you do not have to jostle for a reward.
You are required to be smarter and more observant to see opportunities.

[Kenway]

 Bounty and too many participants,This is true. I don't think there will be a way to reduce the number of participants especially social media bounty.

[alieknov]

We couldnt avoid that because bounties are getting popular everyday.
But some of the bounties limit their participants.

[hastag_80]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Actually the more thing's you must proposed a strict regulation here in the group of bounty campaign,the more  of us also chronic in this community will be affected,if there is a new implemented compliance in this bounty group and one example of this is this merit and kyc system,because of this implementation,we are now behind and steady to our main rank,without moving to the next level,and same also happen in kyc thats why making another implementation is not good,its makes you become greedy and you look into your own welfare.

[Quas09]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes, i think that the bounty managers will be strict for joining bounty campaigns especially in social media campaigns, i think that there is a limit in joining social media campaigns, like the maximum participants are 500 or 1000 only.

[pstraene]

the real reason bounty campaigns are launched is to promote their ICOs. the more the participants to join the better it is. their are some ICOs that limit their participants but most ICOs don't have a limit.  if ICOs limit their participants it will have some or more effect in their project. in order for their ICOs to have a higher chance of success they have to accept participants as many as possible to promote their ICOs. this will lessen the bounties the bounty hunter will receive but more participants is good for ICOs. Envion also had thousands of Bounty people. But no one gets the reward until today

[marginal]

The great idea for some bounties is to limit the amount of possible participants in. That way pool is much more profitable to them, but the project wants more hunters, not more payments.

[Mohammed6692]

 yup i agree day by day bounties are becoming popular and participants rushed to join it. this will lead to get less reward but....
there still some good project which needs bounty participants which are experienced and genuine . one of those project is "THUGCOIN".
they always ready to support . if u have any type of issue u can contact anytime.  rewards are good and most importantly worth participating .

[Snaic]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think that there is nothing to restrict or complicate in the generosity campaigns ICO. All these restrictions can lead to nothing good. While there is a fairly democratic way to join the ICO bonuses campaigns. The introduction of prohibitions and restrictions will give privileges to one and unfairly restrict others. If you do not agree with the size of generosity, you can not join them and look for other, better ways of making money. Moreover, ICO companies themselves are not interested in such a restriction. For them, the more participants in the generosity campaign will advertise the ICO, the better. Therefore, this conversation does not make sense.