The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings?

[JMD07]

My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?

Yeah that's true for the lower rank, i seen many ICO's with that scenario and the reward was not good as the longer the bounty campaign those higher ranks participants will get the bigger slice of the reward but we can't argue about that as that's the rules of the forum.

[firozat01]

If the campaign getting longer, its probably means that the sale not reached the target. The longer the bounty would mean fewer earnings because the participants would be growing But it's possible that the team project also raises the bounty rewards.

[P60]

No.  It all depends on the company.  If the company is good and promising, you can get a lot more in a month than with a bad bounty.

Yes it depends. Sometimes the longer the bounty, the bigger the earnings but sometimes it endend up to be a small amount. If the campaign did not get the support, the earning will be low.

[idioma1]

It depends on the number of participants. If the bounty campaign has few participants it would be profitable  but if the more participants the less you will get.
And last but not the least everything depends on the outcome of the campaign. It seemes to me that ICO that was delayed so many times cant be very successful. It is my opinion

[klub88]

It's because there's a chance that you will not get paid so your friend started to leave the bounty.
And there are many people who joined the bounty so the pool will be rewarded to many people.
More participants = lower share for stakes.

thats just when they join in bounty social media, bounty pool for social media is small and so many members join 1000-3000 but not for signature the coins they are get its bigger when join in signature and i think its just a doubt your friend, maybe bounty not reach terget or have problem

[icalical]

Not at all, your friend is completely wrong, it is instead the opposite, the longer the campaign, you will get more token. And most of the time, the longer the campaign increase the success chance of that ICO. But still you need to do research on that ICO, their team, their whitepaper, roadmap, etc. But my point is when ICO do a long run on campaign, they usually pay more token to the participant.

[thaovtt210]

It seems so but not always so, some bounty pays more when it last more than people initially anticipated, also it depend on so amny factor, the amount the team is looking to raise, the amount allocated to the bounty campaigns and the number of people that join the campaign. Most people always look at the current valuation and the future prospect of the token

[a_t_e_e_b]

the more the people in the bounty game the the lesser is the bounty for everyone and the longer you the ico takes time to release the more its tiring so it is completely your decision to either leave or stay

[kriticko29]

My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?

Well as a bounty hunter, you must consider first if a project is well known or well graded by top websites that gives their prediction on the future of an ICO. There are many sites where we can compare their thoughts if an ICO is worth the time we are giving or nonsense at all. Some ICO's took a long time before ending their sale but became successful in the long run. Patience is a virtue bro.

[Nowherman]

Indeed. I completely agree with the fact that the longer the bounty campaign, the less you earn. This statement can be shown in a simple example.
With the same bounty and reward conditions, you can wear a 1 month signature and earn $ 1,000. Or you can stretch a similar campaign for 6 months
and also earn 1 thousand dollars. In this case, your monthly income will be a little over $ 150.

[CLywaTeLb]

Of course, we need to consider the bounty in terms of efficiency by time. In addition, when the ICO is postponed, it is a signal to consider whether it is worth continuing to participate in this campaign. This does not apply to bad times, when the market falls heavily.

[shamanrer]

It is depended on company's position, if they have set the limits on quantity of the members. If yes then the profit is more, but if there is no limits , in the end of project there are too many members and the profit is very low.

[slava87]

I disagree with you, there are different situations . I met with various projects . It turned out the opposite, the longer you spend the project the more you pay

[Sithara007]

My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?

This has happened to me as well. Originally the bounty campaign was supposed to run for 1 month, but they extended it by another 3 months. The reward remains the same, so in the end it is the participants who lose out.

[cokirix]

I don't like long term bounty campaign, because The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings this is true ,i part in  many times .

[daudaihoc24]

No this is not true if the total pool of bounty is small, and the payment will be small, and everything will hang how many people participate in the bounty. I recently participated in a 2 month bounty and there paid well))

[RAMZA]

I choose campaigns that last no more than a month. You can get a lot more for them. Campaigns that last long have too many participants.

[ipanks]

I think it depends on the bounty campaign itself, usually, they determine how much participants will get in the first time they started the bounty. sometimes, the rewards are big if we can stay for a long time after the bounty is finished, sometimes the short-term bounty can also give a big bounty. and it's our choice to join in whatever bounty campaign and I think we should know how much we will get that rewards and if we think that the rewards are not good enough for us, then we don't have to join.

[Kettle255]

Yes it is especially in the signature campaigns it wont give you much when there too many high ranking participants,you have worked for 2months and and these high ranks will only post for 2weeks and they will have more than stakes that you will get? isnt that unfair for the lower ranks? that is why i dont usually join campaigns which has a lot of high rank participants.

[donadoni212]

I think there are too many participants in a bounty so that the number of allocations is small. you can see at this time one gift has thousands of participants, take the example of social media gift the number of participants can reach 5000 participants. total allocation in for the participants that you can predict how you can get it.