-- The Riddle of the Twin Brothers - Who Were, Are and Will Rule the World!

[Vlad2Vlad]

The serpent beast is never asleep? 

Now let me try google translate.

Google translate:  The snake beast that never sleeps. 

Boy, Romanian comes in handy. 

And I don’t know what that means, but I just got the hibbie-jibbies again!   

Don't worry about it Vlad.These things only mean what people want them to mean.

Heres one I made earlier

4 9 2
3 5 7
8 1 6

Boy, Romanian comes in handy.

Yeah but I just cant get this to translate right at all

Code:

...De la unul din cojile gusturilor unui măr, cunoștințele de bun și rău, aveau doi gemeni unul într-altul, sări în lume.

So 15 is the sum on every line. XV(G?)

15 or 6. 

[1715135851]

1715135851

[1715135851]

1715135851

[1715135851]

1715135851

[1715135851]

1715135851

[1715135851]

1715135851

[Traxo]

Soon.  

[Vlad2Vlad]

Soon.  

I have time travelled [again] and the timeline has officially shifted to IMMINENT! 

[Vlad2Vlad]

Heres one I made earlier

4 9 2
3 5 7
8 1 6

4 9 2 = 6
3 5 7 = 6
8 1 6 = 6
 |  |  |
 6 6 6


Hibbie-Jibbies.  Again!

[Traxo]

Soon.  

I have time travelled [again] and the timeline has officially shifted to IMMINENT!  

[hornetsnest]

ABRACADABRA
ABRACADABR
ABRACADAB
ABRACADA
ABRACAD
ABRACA
ABRAC
ABRA
ABR
AB
A

Write it down

[hornetsnest]

 |  |  |
 6 6 6

Hibbie-Jibbies.  Again![/i][/center]

Gemini V Libra in the age of Aquarius

The fictitious story of Bitcoin was spawned through the roulette wheel and gambling associations and the sum of the numbers on a roulette wheel is 666.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKWDSDTLNo

[Vlad2Vlad]

Gemini V Libra in the age of Aquarius

The fictitious story of Bitcoin was spawned through the roulette wheel and gambling associations and the sum of the numbers on a roulette wheel is 666.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynKWDSDTLNo

Interesting theory. 

I know very little about stuff like “age of the Aquarius” but I’m looking for a V so I’ll try to research it. 

Needless to say, all this stuff is definitely:  Hibbie-Jibbies.

[Vlad2Vlad]

Who told us 5 years ago that religion coins were coming?  Who?   

[hornetsnest]

Who told us 5 years ago that religion coins were coming?  Who?  

I hear theres a storm coming too.

[hornetsnest]

Valley of death ok bud but chinatown bad. They eat birds of all kinds there

[sindjica]

I really do like AXE, the volume is huge. One of my big bags for 2020

[Vlad2Vlad]

When you got friends like this in crypto maybe it’s time to quit.  Some people don’t understand the benefits of a win - win situation.  When robbing me isn’t enough then start with death threats.  What noble class.

-

“All of a sudden it comes around faster. Things ain't what they used to be. I'm afraid worse for me, but good luck, U have family and children, just don't go drive off a cliff with them please.”

-

[Vlad2Vlad]

I really likes me Freiexchange and FRC ($.007). 

Anyway, I’m off the nets and I got stuff to do.  :/

[hornetsnest]

I really likes me Freiexchange and FRC ($.007). 

Anyway, I’m off the nets and I got stuff to do.  :/

Forget about freicoin.It's going nowhere.I had a sell wall there that hasn't been touched in months and with the liquidity on that exchange I could bounce it up and down like a yo-yo if I wanted with only a few btc.

Now back to bizness regards IXcoin.

How does it make any difference having 42m coins as opposed to 21m exactly?If you are talking about global adoption for any currency 42m is also just a drop in the ocean.It is akin to putting 2 sandbags up against a dam breach instead of only one.Two is as useless as only one so why waste time and effort on something that means nothing and will not be an effective solution?

42m coins I assume is a reference to some crypto babble from the "duality" paper?This was simply a reference to the number 42 as having some mystical significance nonsense or related to some babble from "Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy" and nothing more.


If you were to merge 2 coins with 21m supply then how does this make any difference if both coins are mined already?Where is the incentive to keep secure the network with such high diff unless tx volume is large enough for tx fees to be attractive?

How are peoples coins on both chains converted to this "new" coin without losing the coins integrity?

THe other basic argument is against deflationary V inflationary.PoW is essential for the former and PoS would satisfy the latter and it is nesscessary for inflation at a rate that matches an economy for a currency to work effeciently/effectively but nobody would buy into coins like say freicoin due to the way they have negative interest or demmurage as a way of enforcing spending and rewarding miners if they wish to see same currency as an investment.For any form of currency both satisfying RoI and inflation then it would have to be PoS or deflationary then PoW.

PoS can work if distribution is fair but if not then it simply caused another attack vector on security from someone eventually owning over 50% of the supply.Highly unlikely of course but plausable taking us back to the original PoW algo as the best option but this then reverts back to the original question.How do you think anything will be any different joining 2 coins together when both are already mined and have the same supply?

[Vlad2Vlad]

I really likes me Freiexchange and FRC ($.007). 

Anyway, I’m off the nets and I got stuff to do.  :/

Forget about freicoin.It's going nowhere.I had a sell wall there that hasn't been touched in months and with the liquidity on that exchange I could bounce it up and down like a yo-yo if I wanted with only a few btc.

Now back to bizness regards IXcoin.

How does it make any difference having 42m coins as opposed to 21m exactly?If you are talking about global adoption for any currency 42m is also just a drop in the ocean.It is akin to putting 2 sandbags up against a dam breach instead of only one.Two is as useless as only one so why waste time and effort on something that means nothing and will not be an effective solution?

42m coins I assume is a reference to some crypto babble from the "duality" paper?This was simply a reference to the number 42 as having some mystical significance nonsense or related to some babble from "Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy" and nothing more.


If you were to merge 2 coins with 21m supply then how does this make any difference if both coins are mined already?Where is the incentive to keep secure the network with such high diff unless tx volume is large enough for tx fees to be attractive?

How are peoples coins on both chains converted to this "new" coin without losing the coins integrity?

THe other basic argument is against deflationary V inflationary.PoW is essential for the former and PoS would satisfy the latter and it is nesscessary for inflation at a rate that matches an economy for a currency to work effeciently/effectively but nobody would buy into coins like say freicoin due to the way they have negative interest or demmurage as a way of enforcing spending and rewarding miners if they wish to see same currency as an investment.For any form of currency both satisfying RoI and inflation then it would have to be PoS or deflationary then PoW.

PoS can work if distribution is fair but if not then it simply caused another attack vector on security from someone eventually owning over 50% of the supply.Highly unlikely of course but plausable taking us back to the original PoW algo as the best option but this then reverts back to the original question.How do you think anything will be any different joining 2 coins together when both are already mined and have the same supply?

Duality:  Dual chains/coins in one dual wallet [IX/XI].  Instantly swap in the wallet anytime you wish to pay [it can be automated for optimal use].

With the proposed donation based miner incentive programme you get optional adjustable inflation without real inflation. 

It’s happening. 

[hornetsnest]

I really likes me Freiexchange and FRC ($.007). 

Anyway, I’m off the nets and I got stuff to do.  :/

Forget about freicoin.It's going nowhere.I had a sell wall there that hasn't been touched in months and with the liquidity on that exchange I could bounce it up and down like a yo-yo if I wanted with only a few btc.

Now back to bizness regards IXcoin.

How does it make any difference having 42m coins as opposed to 21m exactly?If you are talking about global adoption for any currency 42m is also just a drop in the ocean.It is akin to putting 2 sandbags up against a dam breach instead of only one.Two is as useless as only one so why waste time and effort on something that means nothing and will not be an effective solution?

42m coins I assume is a reference to some crypto babble from the "duality" paper?This was simply a reference to the number 42 as having some mystical significance nonsense or related to some babble from "Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy" and nothing more.


If you were to merge 2 coins with 21m supply then how does this make any difference if both coins are mined already?Where is the incentive to keep secure the network with such high diff unless tx volume is large enough for tx fees to be attractive?

How are peoples coins on both chains converted to this "new" coin without losing the coins integrity?

THe other basic argument is against deflationary V inflationary.PoW is essential for the former and PoS would satisfy the latter and it is nesscessary for inflation at a rate that matches an economy for a currency to work effeciently/effectively but nobody would buy into coins like say freicoin due to the way they have negative interest or demmurage as a way of enforcing spending and rewarding miners if they wish to see same currency as an investment.For any form of currency both satisfying RoI and inflation then it would have to be PoS or deflationary then PoW.

PoS can work if distribution is fair but if not then it simply caused another attack vector on security from someone eventually owning over 50% of the supply.Highly unlikely of course but plausable taking us back to the original PoW algo as the best option but this then reverts back to the original question.How do you think anything will be any different joining 2 coins together when both are already mined and have the same supply?

Duality:  Dual chains/coins in one dual wallet [IX/XI].  Instantly swap in the wallet anytime you wish to pay [it can be automated for optimal use].

With the proposed donation based miner incentive programme you get optional adjustable inflation without real inflation. 

It’s happening. 

Where will moon partay be held?I want to park my new duckaduck on somebodys lawn 

[Vlad2Vlad]

I really likes me Freiexchange and FRC ($.007). 

Anyway, I’m off the nets and I got stuff to do.  :/

Forget about freicoin.It's going nowhere.I had a sell wall there that hasn't been touched in months and with the liquidity on that exchange I could bounce it up and down like a yo-yo if I wanted with only a few btc.

Now back to bizness regards IXcoin.

How does it make any difference having 42m coins as opposed to 21m exactly?If you are talking about global adoption for any currency 42m is also just a drop in the ocean.It is akin to putting 2 sandbags up against a dam breach instead of only one.Two is as useless as only one so why waste time and effort on something that means nothing and will not be an effective solution?

42m coins I assume is a reference to some crypto babble from the "duality" paper?This was simply a reference to the number 42 as having some mystical significance nonsense or related to some babble from "Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy" and nothing more.


If you were to merge 2 coins with 21m supply then how does this make any difference if both coins are mined already?Where is the incentive to keep secure the network with such high diff unless tx volume is large enough for tx fees to be attractive?

How are peoples coins on both chains converted to this "new" coin without losing the coins integrity?

THe other basic argument is against deflationary V inflationary.PoW is essential for the former and PoS would satisfy the latter and it is nesscessary for inflation at a rate that matches an economy for a currency to work effeciently/effectively but nobody would buy into coins like say freicoin due to the way they have negative interest or demmurage as a way of enforcing spending and rewarding miners if they wish to see same currency as an investment.For any form of currency both satisfying RoI and inflation then it would have to be PoS or deflationary then PoW.

PoS can work if distribution is fair but if not then it simply caused another attack vector on security from someone eventually owning over 50% of the supply.Highly unlikely of course but plausable taking us back to the original PoW algo as the best option but this then reverts back to the original question.How do you think anything will be any different joining 2 coins together when both are already mined and have the same supply?

Duality:  Dual chains/coins in one dual wallet [IX/XI].  Instantly swap in the wallet anytime you wish to pay [it can be automated for optimal use].

With the proposed donation based miner incentive programme you get optional adjustable inflation without real inflation. 

It’s happening. 

Where will moon partay be held?I want to park my new duckaduck on somebodys lawn 

Drobeta Turnu Severin.  Gotta put this place on the map since it’s apparently my destiny to be trapped here. 

[wiked1]

Drobeta Turnu Severin.  Gotta put this place on the map since it’s apparently my destiny to be trapped here. 

"The gates of Heaven are open wide; off I ride..." My shiny Apollo 17 LRV on EVA 3 across Trajan's Bridge 

[Vlad2Vlad]

Drobeta Turnu Severin.  Gotta put this place on the map since it’s apparently my destiny to be trapped here. 

"The gates of Heaven are open wide; off I ride..." My shiny Apollo 17 LRV on EVA 3 across Trajan's Bridge 

Hahaha.  I love it, good sir!