NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information

[eB101]

Do you guys know what soft/extension I can use for using aliases in browser?

I was using 22k so far, but doesn't seem to be updated with the link reassignments..

What alias? I'll dig into it.

Few examples:
Nexttalk & lastposts -> supposed to redirect the last page of this thread
Nxtstats -> supposed to redirect to blockchain explorer statistics

Thanks for checking

[1714599538]

1714599538

[1714599538]

1714599538

[landomata]

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

You mean small village or large household.

[Bitventurer]

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.Pos
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

Bitcoin can just change  ,from Pow to Pos. It's just become to big to fail
 That's what ive been said from a friend of mine...

[utopianfuture]

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.Pos
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

Bitcoin can just change ,from Pow to Pos.

How can they reach a consensus?
It is never that easy.

[User705]

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.Pos
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

Bitcoin can just change  ,from Pow to Pos. It's just become to big to fail
 That's what ive been said from a friend of mine...

Really?  Please describe the process of how it would work without a hard fork?

[BitAddict]

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.Pos
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

Bitcoin can just change ,from Pow to Pos.

Tell that to the miners and ASICs factories...

Too many big players invested a lot in mining/ASIC related business, they won't allow that to happen. Remember they're the bosses of bitcoin.
They would probably spread FUD about how bad is PoS, and that Satoshi didn't mention anything about that.
.

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.Pos
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

Bitcoin can just change  ,from Pow to Pos. It's just become to big to fail
 That's what ive been said from a friend of mine...

Really?  Please describe the process of how it would work without a hard fork?

You need hard fork. Also I'm not 100% sure that is posible to do.

[jl777]

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.Pos
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

Bitcoin can just change ,from Pow to Pos.

Tell that to the miners and ASICs factories... They won't allow that to happen. Remember they're the current bosses of bitcoin.

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.Pos
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

Bitcoin can just change  ,from Pow to Pos. It's just become to big to fail
 That's what ive been said from a friend of mine...

Really?  Please describe the process of how it would work without a hard fork?

You need hard fork. Also I'm not 100% sure that is posible to do.

I always wondered why Voting System was such an emphasized part of NXT. Now I know. BCNext knew that nobody, not even himself, could solve all the problems ahead of time.

If NXT ever runs into the systemic problems bitcoin is running into, we will be able to vote on the best solution.

James

[Bitventurer]

we will get so much media attention and mass adoption after we publish these texts about Nxt:

Bitcoin's carbon footprint is out of control.Pos
http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html

"Nxt's carbon footprint will never be bigger than one village"

Bitcoin can just change  ,from Pow to Pos. It's just become to big to fail
 That's what ive been said from a friend of mine...

Really?  Please describe the process of how it would work without a hard fork?

dunno , but my guess is that http://www.bitcarbon.org/introduction.html  , will be the main problem of Bitcoin and eventually btc will be banned by the gov.  otherwise goodbye earth ?

[BitAddict]

I always wondered why Voting System was such an emphasized part of NXT. Now I know. BCNext knew that nobody, not even himself, could solve all the problems ahead of time.

If NXT ever runs into the systemic problems bitcoin is running into, we will be able to vote on the best solution.

James

Currently you have voting system in bitcoin. Each miner can vote with his mining power, but it is completely centralized by ASIC factories... and that is really stupid.

Anyway 1NxT=1 vote is better than bitcoin voting system but it is still not the best solution. For example if in the future something is better for the whole comunity, but has few bad effects to the big players they probably won't accept that.

[opticalcarrier]

The NXT Foundation will at not cost to you manage your VPS; this offer comes with a custom SCREENNAME.vps.nxtcrypto.org domain name visible in peer lists!  All you hae to do is pay for the VPS and we will do the rest.

1) Sign up https://www.budgetvm.com/account/cart.php?gid=64  They accept PayPal.  Or use Digital Ocean.  Or use any other provider.  You need at least 1024MB of RAM on the VPS though.

2) The 1024MB VPS for $4.99/month should be sufficient unless you have a hallmark balance with more than 1,000,000 NXT, in that case please choose the 2048MB VPS for $9.99/month

3) When signing up for a VPS, when they ask for a hostname for your VPS, enter in: SCREENNAME.vps.nxtcrypto.org

4) When selecting an OS, please choose Debian6 x64

5) Send a Private Message in the NXT Foundation Forums to user forkedchain.  The Forums are at http://forums.nxtcrypto.org and in the PM please include the VPS's IP address, root password, and your generated hallmark for hostname SCREENNAME.vps.nxtcrypto.org.  You can generate your hallmark at https://localhost:7875/admin.html but please do this in private browsing mode so that your passphrase isnt cached to your disk

6) The NXT Foundation will 100% manage the VPS for you; you will still have shell access and I will give you a script on your server you can run ant any time to check your server at any time

All, thanks to abctc and xyzzyx for taking me up to manage their VPSs, please remember, its only $4.99/month and I do all the rest!

[Damelon]

Hi!

This site is dedicated to our NXT)

www.nxtgirl.ru

He created all these weeks, now there is a functional, but much remains to be done.
Enjoy!
Donate us please NXT 8939822453162021183

I like your marketing angle 

[pinarello]

Hi!

This site is dedicated to our NXT)

www.nxtgirl.ru

He created all these weeks, now there is a functional, but much remains to be done.
Enjoy!
Donate us please NXT 8939822453162021183

what is NXT? NXT parfume?

very nice site love it.

Pin

[jl777]

I always wondered why Voting System was such an emphasized part of NXT. Now I know. BCNext knew that nobody, not even himself, could solve all the problems ahead of time.

If NXT ever runs into the systemic problems bitcoin is running into, we will be able to vote on the best solution.

James

Currently you have voting system in bitcoin. Each miner can vote with his mining power, but it is completely centralized by ASIC factories... and that is really stupid.

Anyway 1NxT=1 vote is better than bitcoin voting system but it is still not the best solution. For example if in the future something is better for the whole comunity, but has few bad effects to the big players they probably won't accept that.

Ignoring the ghash.io concentration, would ALL the bitcoind's really incorporate a change based on majority vote? The way things are setup, it seems more likely that some will upgrade and others won't leading to ...
Is that what a hard fork is? Sounds pretty bad.

With NXT, my sense is that regardless of whether everyone fully agrees with how the Voting System is setup, everyone will agree to go along with the voting result. A democracy needs to have everybody implicitly agree to follow the results of voting.

James

[pinarello]

Hi!

This site is dedicated to our NXT)

www.nxtgirl.ru

He created all these weeks, now there is a functional, but much remains to be done.
Enjoy!
Donate us please NXT 8939822453162021183

I like your marketing angle 

Damelon your site is also awsome!

http://www.nxtcoins.nl/

Pin

[salsacz]

Hi!

This site is dedicated to our NXT)

www.nxtgirl.ru

He created all these weeks, now there is a functional, but much remains to be done.
Enjoy!
Donate us please NXT 8939822453162021183

wow, btw have you already heard of https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=358260.0 ?

[pandaisftw]

I always wondered why Voting System was such an emphasized part of NXT. Now I know. BCNext knew that nobody, not even himself, could solve all the problems ahead of time.

If NXT ever runs into the systemic problems bitcoin is running into, we will be able to vote on the best solution.

James

Currently you have voting system in bitcoin. Each miner can vote with his mining power, but it is completely centralized by ASIC factories... and that is really stupid.

Anyway 1NxT=1 vote is better than bitcoin voting system but it is still not the best solution. For example if in the future something is better for the whole comunity, but has few bad effects to the big players they probably won't accept that.

I see that as a balancing effect: 1 NXT = 1 vote prevents 100mil zombie bot accounts to outvote everyone. Also, if something is better for the whole community, it is unlikely big accounts would vote against it (as they have the most to lose, they wouldn't want to hurt their investment). If the action hurts their investment, they should have a right to defend it, so that also makes sense. I think if the issue is very controversial, over time the majority of the community will eventually agree to a compromise that satisfies the majority of the users without having to cause a hard fork.

I think that while it's not ideal, there is no better solution than this currently. All other methods are vulnerable to attack and abuse. 1 NXT = 1 vote is the only way to ensure fair voting because it's guaranteed by the PoS system.

[salsacz]

People controlling Nxt are very smart or very rich and smart
- original stakeholders who didn't sell
- developers who didn't sell
- early buyers
- rich newcomers

[msin]

I always wondered why Voting System was such an emphasized part of NXT. Now I know. BCNext knew that nobody, not even himself, could solve all the problems ahead of time.

If NXT ever runs into the systemic problems bitcoin is running into, we will be able to vote on the best solution.

James

Currently you have voting system in bitcoin. Each miner can vote with his mining power, but it is completely centralized by ASIC factories... and that is really stupid.

Anyway 1NxT=1 vote is better than bitcoin voting system but it is still not the best solution. For example if in the future something is better for the whole comunity, but has few bad effects to the big players they probably won't accept that.

I see that as a balancing effect: 1 NXT = 1 vote prevents 100mil zombie bot accounts to outvote everyone. Also, if something is better for the whole community, it is unlikely big accounts would vote against it (as they have the most to lose, they wouldn't want to hurt their investment). If the action hurts their investment, they should have a right to defend it, so that also makes sense. I think if the issue is very controversial, over time the majority of the community will eventually agree to a compromise that satisfies the majority of the users without having to cause a hard fork.

I think that while it's not ideal, there is no better solution than this currently. All other methods are vulnerable to attack and abuse. 1 NXT = 1 vote is the only way to ensure fair voting because it's guaranteed by the PoS system.

I really like the voting feature, but I do worry about exchanges that hold large sums of Nxt in escrow being able to have a heavy influence on voting subjects.

[utopianfuture]

People controlling Nxt are very smart or very rich and smart
- original stakeholders who didn't sell
- developers who didn't sell
- early buyers
- rich newcomers

I like the sound of it very much 

[Bitventurer]

I always wondered why Voting System was such an emphasized part of NXT. Now I know. BCNext knew that nobody, not even himself, could solve all the problems ahead of time.

If NXT ever runs into the systemic problems bitcoin is running into, we will be able to vote on the best solution.

James

Currently you have voting system in bitcoin. Each miner can vote with his mining power, but it is completely centralized by ASIC factories... and that is really stupid.

Anyway 1NxT=1 vote is better than bitcoin voting system but it is still not the best solution. For example if in the future something is better for the whole comunity, but has few bad effects to the big players they probably won't accept that.

I see that as a balancing effect: 1 NXT = 1 vote prevents 100mil zombie bot accounts to outvote everyone. Also, if something is better for the whole community, it is unlikely big accounts would vote against it (as they have the most to lose, they wouldn't want to hurt their investment). If the action hurts their investment, they should have a right to defend it, so that also makes sense. I think if the issue is very controversial, over time the majority of the community will eventually agree to a compromise that satisfies the majority of the users without having to cause a hard fork.

I think that while it's not ideal, there is no better solution than this currently. All other methods are vulnerable to attack and abuse. 1 NXT = 1 vote is the only way to ensure fair voting because it's guaranteed by the PoS system.

I really like the voting feature, but I do worry about exchanges that hold large sums of Nxt in escrow being able to have a heavy influence on voting subjects.

this will be irrelevant when des. exchange will work...