|
^[GS]^
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
January 05, 2014, 01:23:50 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
lophie
|
|
January 05, 2014, 01:33:35 AM |
|
|
Will take me a while to climb up again, But where is a will, there is a way...
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
January 05, 2014, 01:43:45 AM |
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Version 0.5.0 is now available at: http://info.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.ziphttp://www.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.ziphttp://forums.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.zip(it may take some time to get it uploaded to all the above, so try whichever works) sha256: c0676985f9ef08852250ba1d3fe980ee1392c3f70be6917f384f3636fa6f06e3 This is to be considered stable release. Change log: Fixed more concurrency issues, performance optimizations and code cleanup. I have fixed all the visible code issues that I consider to be bugs, the remaining TODO's on my list are a matter of code cleanup and refactoring. Added a checkpoint at block 30000 (the start of transparent forging block). Added wesleyh's update checker: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4294180#msg4294180Use https://localhost:7875/update.html to check for updates - this feature may still have bugs, but including it in the package is a good way to get people to test it on multiple browsers. I have not been able to find any possible cause yet for the most critical in my opinion bug reported so far, transactions being sent to a recipient different than the one selected. I have read through the relevant code again, but don't see any obvious way how this could happen. I am not ignoring those reports and believe it may be a real bug and not a user error, but without a way to reproduce the problem, it is very hard to track it down. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSyB4TAAoJEFOhyXc7+e2AJ2kP+waLjbK+mhaNHxWUqruv0jrD 74xzaZ4AqZ0jseM95CEqanolrRhWqYJYrxvX5X+JVyG1ERQBj159jp6OuEjdn4G4 NWwTI5uP3QghrIZ1KCh0bG3uUYB3pSrGvjP7n10YH4er2kWtUzT+EZltSlTblUMB SufMnr/9IbIm6d30hhTh9cUW7jzkQbP0Q1YqdOJsrmEuyWW+ZSGuOcU25naglQ2G RV/7sIKN0JCebe0Xe3qjwI12E5yq2DccTjgTwP74o1aVOHcdonIgocu963X49kql /j8uB6ue8rxQ+fhwXpHTwZYC4ysZP1kFP0NKxNh0S0PoPfdlH51aAO2pJhQyOQBB 06BH8NSXKvJx7SUmBP85X9Q1oYXHggTc6RPM3quvLd4B5zkZuztG03i6jIRBVAQ6 lnyq8SJTabfmHK0F1qyyLSZkGwirWZUSrOP04uA3XE6zRT1FSmv/eRx+Mio/0ryE XOAnIraWEMz7/12hYEdDWtsZWXMstdTrWPOveTODeko4gEppx3b/xgon/EVP4q4O 1pl/pBD0KOXv50XWF9488137RUy6EHRPy6ErF0IPIs3sZQTo+o8X2PJ+yK6dmkEN owAr7Yu9tJ0AcLhltkXBxxCcTXQj9MohCics0/CJs51wHv+rrvMFPexHqd1Z2E4V 1p/VUMYOjcG0zcCuWUnd =VNK0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- When I start the client I get a java.lang.NullPointerException right away in the pop-up. Tried to delete and re-copy the whole nxt folder, restarted my laptop, still the same.
|
|
|
|
xibeijan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 05, 2014, 01:44:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
idev
|
|
January 05, 2014, 01:46:45 AM |
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Version 0.5.0 is now available at: http://info.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.ziphttp://www.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.ziphttp://forums.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.zip(it may take some time to get it uploaded to all the above, so try whichever works) sha256: c0676985f9ef08852250ba1d3fe980ee1392c3f70be6917f384f3636fa6f06e3 This is to be considered stable release. Change log: Fixed more concurrency issues, performance optimizations and code cleanup. I have fixed all the visible code issues that I consider to be bugs, the remaining TODO's on my list are a matter of code cleanup and refactoring. Added a checkpoint at block 30000 (the start of transparent forging block). Added wesleyh's update checker: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4294180#msg4294180Use https://localhost:7875/update.html to check for updates - this feature may still have bugs, but including it in the package is a good way to get people to test it on multiple browsers. I have not been able to find any possible cause yet for the most critical in my opinion bug reported so far, transactions being sent to a recipient different than the one selected. I have read through the relevant code again, but don't see any obvious way how this could happen. I am not ignoring those reports and believe it may be a real bug and not a user error, but without a way to reproduce the problem, it is very hard to track it down. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSyB4TAAoJEFOhyXc7+e2AJ2kP+waLjbK+mhaNHxWUqruv0jrD 74xzaZ4AqZ0jseM95CEqanolrRhWqYJYrxvX5X+JVyG1ERQBj159jp6OuEjdn4G4 NWwTI5uP3QghrIZ1KCh0bG3uUYB3pSrGvjP7n10YH4er2kWtUzT+EZltSlTblUMB SufMnr/9IbIm6d30hhTh9cUW7jzkQbP0Q1YqdOJsrmEuyWW+ZSGuOcU25naglQ2G RV/7sIKN0JCebe0Xe3qjwI12E5yq2DccTjgTwP74o1aVOHcdonIgocu963X49kql /j8uB6ue8rxQ+fhwXpHTwZYC4ysZP1kFP0NKxNh0S0PoPfdlH51aAO2pJhQyOQBB 06BH8NSXKvJx7SUmBP85X9Q1oYXHggTc6RPM3quvLd4B5zkZuztG03i6jIRBVAQ6 lnyq8SJTabfmHK0F1qyyLSZkGwirWZUSrOP04uA3XE6zRT1FSmv/eRx+Mio/0ryE XOAnIraWEMz7/12hYEdDWtsZWXMstdTrWPOveTODeko4gEppx3b/xgon/EVP4q4O 1pl/pBD0KOXv50XWF9488137RUy6EHRPy6ErF0IPIs3sZQTo+o8X2PJ+yK6dmkEN owAr7Yu9tJ0AcLhltkXBxxCcTXQj9MohCics0/CJs51wHv+rrvMFPexHqd1Z2E4V 1p/VUMYOjcG0zcCuWUnd =VNK0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- When I start the client I get a java.lang.NullPointerException right away in the pop-up. Tried to delete and re-copy the whole nxt folder, restarted my laptop, still the same. Use transactions.nxt and blocks.nxt files from your last version.
|
|
|
|
|
yan83
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2014, 01:57:07 AM |
|
致NXT团队和DGEX:
对于NXT,现在最重要的是要把原始股东的NXT分散开来,这样NXT才能有长远发展。如果原始股东手中一直持有那么多NXT,将是NXT发展的最大障碍。 以前,DGEX提现NXT费用为0,这样是鼓历NXT参与者持有NXT,从而有利于分散持有NXT,有利于NXT的长远发展,这是非常正确的。 但是,现在DGEX大幅提升NXT的交易费和NXT的提现费用,是把NXT参与者拒之于门外,这是分散持有NXT的一大障碍!不利于NXT的长远发展! 一个最明显的事实是,现在DGEX的交易量由之前的1000BTC/天,降到了现在的不到300BTC/天. 我们强烈要求NXT团队和DGEX协调以下事项: 1、把NXT提现费用降为0 ; 2、把NXT交易费用降为0或0.05%以下; 3、BTC提现费用可以不变或稍为降低。
谢谢!
|
|
|
|
rnr
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:11:35 AM |
|
Really basic questions: Does anyone explained the Decentralized Exchange yet? I mean, how it works to get Fiat money traded against the coins with this function? How can be a transaction from Fiat to coins 100% anonymous? Who is the escrow? Why we should trust the escrow? For me the most important question: An escrow need to receive the Fiat via bank wire transfer, Paypal or what ever. So, nobody think about that the escrow will expect the same problems like the exchangers? The Banksters will ask the account holder if he es running a money laundering business Or do i get something wrong? Will be the integrated exchange with an Bid and Ask price and order books like the trading on btc-e? For example: Trading BTC for NXT @market price with one click. Or do we speak only about an exchange for arranged transactions between two parties?
|
|
|
|
maco
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:14:59 AM |
|
+1 thanks.. yep it is up to the community and BCNext! And the future release isn't too far away. I think we should have the app ready to launch by next week. Need to get that bounty accumulated!
|
|
|
|
XMaleWolfX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:15:30 AM |
|
致NXT团队和DGEX:
对于NXT,现在最重要的是要把原始股东的NXT分散开来,这样NXT才能有长远发展。如果原始股东手中一直持有那么多NXT,将是NXT发展的最大障碍。 以前,DGEX提现NXT费用为0,这样是鼓历NXT参与者持有NXT,从而有利于分散持有NXT,有利于NXT的长远发展,这是非常正确的。 但是,现在DGEX大幅提升NXT的交易费和NXT的提现费用,是把NXT参与者拒之于门外,这是分散持有NXT的一大障碍!不利于NXT的长远发展! 一个最明显的事实是,现在DGEX的交易量由之前的1000BTC/天,降到了现在的不到300BTC/天. 我们强烈要求NXT团队和DGEX协调以下事项: 1、把NXT提现费用降为0 ; 2、把NXT交易费用降为0或0.05%以下; 3、BTC提现费用可以不变或稍为降低。
谢谢!
To NXT devs and DGEX, I think every NXT users agree that to distribute NXT into small parts is the most important thing now. So that big invester are dare to put their money in to the market make NXT grow. It will be an obstacle for nxt's development if the original shareowners keep most of the NXT in hand. In past times, users trade NXT on DGEX.com with low fee and ZERO withdraw fee. This is great cause this encourages NXT users to take the NXT in hand which is good for NXT distribution. However, now dgex set an extremely high fee on withdraw and trading. This totally block users to trade. You can see the trading amount drop from 1000BTC/day to 300BTC/day. Hope NXT dev can negotiate with DGEX. My suggestion: 1. NXT withdraw fee should be 0 2. NXT trading fee 0.05% or lower 3.BTC withdraw a little bit lower (Not that important)
|
|
|
|
V4V
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:19:25 AM |
|
hello everybody I have been involved with NXT since early December. I am a firm believer in its technologies and have become a full convert to NXT. Being an advocate for NXT, I decided to make several infographics to help promote NXT. I have originally posted them on nextcoin.org, under the username silversurfer. I am submitting my work here to partake in the bounty and hopefully in generates some positive feedback. In addition I hope the stakeholders can find some value in my work and consider me for the bounty. Either way, I am a firm believer in NXT and hope everyone enjoys the infographics. Here they are: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qgagt6cxcpx4l7u/nxt%20vs%20qrk.pnghttps://www.dropbox.com/s/d0bvchrxqahwwu1/NXTvsBTC.pnghttps://www.dropbox.com/s/1ucwbhutar5t8f2/nxtvslite.pnghttps://www.dropbox.com/s/d4rkob6fgmh6307/NXTVSPPC.pngI would like to give a special thanks to Uniqueorn over at nextcoin.org He has been doing some wonderful things in trying to collaborate, coordinate, and organize the promotional efforts for NXT. I firmly believe he deserves one of the biggest bounties and has recognized talented individuals within the community to bring NXT to the masses. Thanks NXT: 5464489754473015994
|
|
|
|
yan83
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:29:32 AM |
|
致NXT团队和DGEX:
对于NXT,现在最重要的是要把原始股东的NXT分散开来,这样NXT才能有长远发展。如果原始股东手中一直持有那么多NXT,将是NXT发展的最大障碍。 以前,DGEX提现NXT费用为0,这样是鼓历NXT参与者持有NXT,从而有利于分散持有NXT,有利于NXT的长远发展,这是非常正确的。 但是,现在DGEX大幅提升NXT的交易费和NXT的提现费用,是把NXT参与者拒之于门外,这是分散持有NXT的一大障碍!不利于NXT的长远发展! 一个最明显的事实是,现在DGEX的交易量由之前的1000BTC/天,降到了现在的不到300BTC/天. 我们强烈要求NXT团队和DGEX协调以下事项: 1、把NXT提现费用降为0 ; 2、把NXT交易费用降为0或0.05%以下; 3、BTC提现费用可以不变或稍为降低。
谢谢!
To NXT devs and DGEX, I think every NXT users agree that to distribute NXT into small parts is the most important thing now. So that big invester are dare to put their money in to the market make NXT grow. It will be an obstacle for nxt's development if the original shareowners keep most of the NXT in hand. In past times, users trade NXT on DGEX.com with low fee and ZERO withdraw fee. This is great cause this encourages NXT users to take the NXT in hand which is good for NXT distribution. However, now dgex set an extremely high fee on withdraw and trading. This totally block users to trade. You can see the trading amount drop from 1000BTC/day to 300BTC/day. Hope NXT dev can negotiate with DGEX. My suggestion: 1. NXT withdraw fee should be 0 2. NXT trading fee 0.05% or lower 3.BTC withdraw a little bit lower (Not that important) THANKS!
|
|
|
|
ZeroTheGreat
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:36:18 AM |
|
Really basic questions: Does anyone explained the Decentralized Exchange yet? I mean, how it works to get Fiat money traded against the coins with this function? How can be a transaction from Fiat to coins 100% anonymous? Who is the escrow? Why we should trust the escrow? For me the most important question: An escrow need to receive the Fiat via bank wire transfer, Paypal or what ever. So, nobody think about that the escrow will expect the same problems like the exchangers? The Banksters will ask the account holder if he es running a money laundering business Or do i get something wrong? Will be the integrated exchange with an Bid and Ask price and order books like the trading on btc-e? For example: Trading BTC for NXT @market price with one click. Or do we speak only about an exchange for arranged transactions between two parties? Like Ripple with gateways, but without center. Anyone could create asset and trade it inside Nxt. As I see it.
|
|
|
|
mnightwaffle
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:36:59 AM |
|
In the future will the alias system be less fucking finicky? I have a solid macro in the making but I thus far it looks like nxt isn't built to even take 5 outputs (400ms apart) from one address. It'll work, rarely - not consistently at all though.
edit: I'll prob just open diff tabs and send 1x alias on separate accounts.
|
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:44:34 AM |
|
everyone keeps talking about the 2 .nxt file but what is that blockchain.nrs for?
|
|
|
|
msin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:44:49 AM |
|
honnestly I would not go to dgex, what is holding him to increase the fees again tomorrow.
Pin
Just for the record, this constant downplay from the former nextcoin.org moderator who has been jumping back and forth with utter incoherence, this nice chap asked yesterday for a 24/7 support section which he would moderate, right after that leaving newbies in the cold without any word or response to anyone's queries. Everything is not what it seems guys, sometimes the bad are the good and the trolls know how to lead us to not seeing the forest from the trees. DGEX works just fine and is lowering fees on Jan 5th.Still helping people just not on your forum, I would rather not be associated with you, sorry. You…, you can pay employees to help you out on your forum and exchange from the huge fees you ask. What you did and the timing was scandalous. I wonder were you get the time to engage with trolls, I read from some people still waiting on money for more than 2 days, and that your support has a backlog of FEW days. People with questions are welcome to the decentralized forum: https://forum.nxtcrypto.orgPin Regardless if he lowers fees, the damage is done, nextcoin.org is turning into a troll newbie board anyway, Nxtcrypto will be better.
|
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:46:00 AM |
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Version 0.5.0 is now available at: http://info.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.ziphttp://www.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.ziphttp://forums.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.0.zip(it may take some time to get it uploaded to all the above, so try whichever works) sha256: c0676985f9ef08852250ba1d3fe980ee1392c3f70be6917f384f3636fa6f06e3 This is to be considered stable release. Change log: Fixed more concurrency issues, performance optimizations and code cleanup. I have fixed all the visible code issues that I consider to be bugs, the remaining TODO's on my list are a matter of code cleanup and refactoring. Added a checkpoint at block 30000 (the start of transparent forging block). Added wesleyh's update checker: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4294180#msg4294180Use https://localhost:7875/update.html to check for updates - this feature may still have bugs, but including it in the package is a good way to get people to test it on multiple browsers. I have not been able to find any possible cause yet for the most critical in my opinion bug reported so far, transactions being sent to a recipient different than the one selected. I have read through the relevant code again, but don't see any obvious way how this could happen. I am not ignoring those reports and believe it may be a real bug and not a user error, but without a way to reproduce the problem, it is very hard to track it down. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSyB4TAAoJEFOhyXc7+e2AJ2kP+waLjbK+mhaNHxWUqruv0jrD 74xzaZ4AqZ0jseM95CEqanolrRhWqYJYrxvX5X+JVyG1ERQBj159jp6OuEjdn4G4 NWwTI5uP3QghrIZ1KCh0bG3uUYB3pSrGvjP7n10YH4er2kWtUzT+EZltSlTblUMB SufMnr/9IbIm6d30hhTh9cUW7jzkQbP0Q1YqdOJsrmEuyWW+ZSGuOcU25naglQ2G RV/7sIKN0JCebe0Xe3qjwI12E5yq2DccTjgTwP74o1aVOHcdonIgocu963X49kql /j8uB6ue8rxQ+fhwXpHTwZYC4ysZP1kFP0NKxNh0S0PoPfdlH51aAO2pJhQyOQBB 06BH8NSXKvJx7SUmBP85X9Q1oYXHggTc6RPM3quvLd4B5zkZuztG03i6jIRBVAQ6 lnyq8SJTabfmHK0F1qyyLSZkGwirWZUSrOP04uA3XE6zRT1FSmv/eRx+Mio/0ryE XOAnIraWEMz7/12hYEdDWtsZWXMstdTrWPOveTODeko4gEppx3b/xgon/EVP4q4O 1pl/pBD0KOXv50XWF9488137RUy6EHRPy6ErF0IPIs3sZQTo+o8X2PJ+yK6dmkEN owAr7Yu9tJ0AcLhltkXBxxCcTXQj9MohCics0/CJs51wHv+rrvMFPexHqd1Z2E4V 1p/VUMYOjcG0zcCuWUnd =VNK0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- When I start the client I get a java.lang.NullPointerException right away in the pop-up. Tried to delete and re-copy the whole nxt folder, restarted my laptop, still the same. Use transactions.nxt and blocks.nxt files from your last version. did it, still the same EDIT: deleted transactions and block.nxt, it resynced in 2 mins and now it´s working perfectly.
|
|
|
|
loopgate88
|
|
January 05, 2014, 02:47:56 AM |
|
hello everybody I have been involved with NXT since early December. I am a firm believer in its technologies and have become a full convert to NXT. Being an advocate for NXT, I decided to make several infographics to help promote NXT. I have originally posted them on nextcoin.org, under the username silversurfer. I am submitting my work here to partake in the bounty and hopefully in generates some positive feedback. In addition I hope the stakeholders can find some value in my work and consider me for the bounty. Either way, I am a firm believer in NXT and hope everyone enjoys the infographics. Here they are: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qgagt6cxcpx4l7u/nxt%20vs%20qrk.pnghttps://www.dropbox.com/s/d0bvchrxqahwwu1/NXTvsBTC.pnghttps://www.dropbox.com/s/1ucwbhutar5t8f2/nxtvslite.pnghttps://www.dropbox.com/s/d4rkob6fgmh6307/NXTVSPPC.pngI would like to give a special thanks to Uniqueorn over at nextcoin.org He has been doing some wonderful things in trying to collaborate, coordinate, and organize the promotional efforts for NXT. I firmly believe he deserves one of the biggest bounties and has recognized talented individuals within the community to bring NXT to the masses. Thanks NXT: 5464489754473015994 World class work. Thank you for your contribution. I would like to add a tiny correction to the NXT vs Peercoin infograph. "Peercoin was the first crypto-currency to offer a PoS system in it's protocol." should be "Peercoin was the first crypto-currency to offer a PoS system in its protocol." Thank you again.
|
|
|
|
|