[ANN]🚀 OPTHERIUM🚀 Synergy of Blockchain solutions

[zarad0]

Optherium B2C products we are working on now: VivexPay + Bitrox

​​➖ VivexPay™ - payment platform & mobile banking app that allows users and businesses to make instant local and global payments, conversions and confirmations in any fiat or digital currency for low to zero fees.

➖ Bitcrox - the first and the only multidecentralized exchange. It provides liquidity for any operation, instantaneously converting and confirming transactions. Bitcrox supports up to 150 digital currencies and has a trading platform for OTC desk with transaction volumes exceeding $1 million. Best of all, there is no network commission and low to zero withdrawal fees.

A good plan. They have a realy useful products and a good marketing for development. Hope Optherium will have a lot of cliens that will use the servicies of Optherium.

[upline]

4 years is too long period for many startups. Many crypto-startups will not survive for such big period of time and may become bankrupt.

If the price does not change much during this time, then this state of affairs will only benefit the real projects. There will be time to hone all the technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that 4 years is a long time, most investors are not ready to wait and there is a possibility of changes, market needs change, what the project suggests may become uninteresting.

Then it is not investors, but fast speculators. A real investor always calculates possible market fluctuations.

[kojektea]

Optherium B2C products we are working on now: VivexPay + Bitrox

​​➖ VivexPay™ - payment platform & mobile banking app that allows users and businesses to make instant local and global payments, conversions and confirmations in any fiat or digital currency for low to zero fees.

➖ Bitcrox - the first and the only multidecentralized exchange. It provides liquidity for any operation, instantaneously converting and confirming transactions. Bitcrox supports up to 150 digital currencies and has a trading platform for OTC desk with transaction volumes exceeding $1 million. Best of all, there is no network commission and low to zero withdrawal fees.

A good plan. They have a realy useful products and a good marketing for development. Hope Optherium will have a lot of cliens that will use the servicies of Optherium.

if the optherium project has many users, of course the optherium product has many benefits and the optherium project will also be able to achieve success in the future easily, it is a very sure thing

[darkcerebral]

I am familiar with several developers. They prefer $. Unfortunately, this can speak about not the best attitude of people to cryptocurrency. If this is a widespread situation, then for startups who have long hold their funds in cryptocurrency, it is hard to work now.

To avoid unforeseen situations with a fall in the price of cryptocurrency and in connection with this lack of funds, some projects prudently chose $. But in general, this does not mean a general negative perception of cryptocurrency.

And you didn’t think that those projects that raised funds and fixed them in dollars influenced the fact that the price of the ethereum collapsed?

[flarenial]

4 years is too long period for many startups. Many crypto-startups will not survive for such big period of time and may become bankrupt.

If the price does not change much during this time, then this state of affairs will only benefit the real projects. There will be time to hone all the technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that 4 years is a long time, most investors are not ready to wait and there is a possibility of changes, market needs change, what the project suggests may become uninteresting.

Then it is not investors, but fast speculators. A real investor always calculates possible market fluctuations.

Any investor investing money in cryptocurrency projects must understand the risks and that it takes time to earn money.

[zarad0]

4 years is too long period for many startups. Many crypto-startups will not survive for such big period of time and may become bankrupt.

If the price does not change much during this time, then this state of affairs will only benefit the real projects. There will be time to hone all the technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that 4 years is a long time, most investors are not ready to wait and there is a possibility of changes, market needs change, what the project suggests may become uninteresting.

Then it is not investors, but fast speculators. A real investor always calculates possible market fluctuations.

Many fast speculators have left the market. But now the price of the tokens is very cheap and it is not good for developers. I do not know for how long time investors are ready to wait the rise of the tokens. They may stop to wait and sell their tokens and the price of the tokens will become cheaper.

[lylya75]

Optherium White label solutions include:

— Payment platforms
— Mobile eWallets
— Debit Cards
— Exchanges
— IBANs
— MultiDecentralized Data Storages

With white label solutions, you do not have to worry about risks and efforts on financial operations, data storage, compliance, development, and management. Optherium will do it all for you.



____________________

🚀🚀🚀Link to the news https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=418632292298664&set=gm.2237757013208349&type=3&theater&ifg=1
P.s. 🚀🚀🚀This is the official news of Optherium, published with the consent of Optherium from official facebook page of Optherium.
More news about Optherium can be found here https://www.facebook.com/groups/optherium/

[CryptoFlowers]

Optherium White label solutions include:

— Payment platforms
— Mobile eWallets
— Debit Cards
— Exchanges
— IBANs
— MultiDecentralized Data Storages

With white label solutions, you do not have to worry about risks and efforts on financial operations, data storage, compliance, development, and management. Optherium will do it all for you.

It is very good that Optherium projects will have the whole ecosystem with payment system, banks account, data storage, wallets, ecxhange. More people can use such servicies for different needs.

[dzonikg28]

In such a way that there is demand for these assets? It is very different and many of them lack demand because there is nothing that creates demand.

Yes, over the whole year, demand (relative to supply) has steadily decreased. But some projects are approaching the start of operation. I hope this will change the situation for the better - some assets will trade successfully due to natural demand rather than pumps.

That's really when we all will find out what crypto can do for us and whether these applications have the potential to replace their centralized counterparts.

Decentralise technologies have problems with users and liquidity. Not many people knows about blockhain and how to use it. That is why advertising for crypto startups is so important.

Advertising is only one part of the story. Education is also very important in order to get more acceptance. They need to understand the technology.

[upline]

4 years is too long period for many startups. Many crypto-startups will not survive for such big period of time and may become bankrupt.

If the price does not change much during this time, then this state of affairs will only benefit the real projects. There will be time to hone all the technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that 4 years is a long time, most investors are not ready to wait and there is a possibility of changes, market needs change, what the project suggests may become uninteresting.

Then it is not investors, but fast speculators. A real investor always calculates possible market fluctuations.

Many fast speculators have left the market. But now the price of the tokens is very cheap and it is not good for developers. I do not know for how long time investors are ready to wait the rise of the tokens. They may stop to wait and sell their tokens and the price of the tokens will become cheaper.

The fact that fast speculators left the market is definitely good. So the projects now have time to do product refinement and not be distracted by trifles.

[Nasbacyar]

4 years is too long period for many startups. Many crypto-startups will not survive for such big period of time and may become bankrupt.

If the price does not change much during this time, then this state of affairs will only benefit the real projects. There will be time to hone all the technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that 4 years is a long time, most investors are not ready to wait and there is a possibility of changes, market needs change, what the project suggests may become uninteresting.

Then it is not investors, but fast speculators. A real investor always calculates possible market fluctuations.

Many fast speculators have left the market. But now the price of the tokens is very cheap and it is not good for developers. I do not know for how long time investors are ready to wait the rise of the tokens. They may stop to wait and sell their tokens and the price of the tokens will become cheaper.

Do you think that investors will sell tokens cheaper than they bought? I do not think so.

[hina98334]

In such a way that there is demand for these assets? It is very different and many of them lack demand because there is nothing that creates demand.

Yes, over the whole year, demand (relative to supply) has steadily decreased. But some projects are approaching the start of operation. I hope this will change the situation for the better - some assets will trade successfully due to natural demand rather than pumps.

That's really when we all will find out what crypto can do for us and whether these applications have the potential to replace their centralized counterparts.

Decentralise technologies have problems with users and liquidity. Not many people knows about blockhain and how to use it. That is why advertising for crypto startups is so important.

Advertising is only one part of the story. Education is also very important in order to get more acceptance. They need to understand the technology.

I agree with you. And I also think that you should always strive to become leaders in your direction if you have competitors.

[Dorvei]

In such a way that there is demand for these assets? It is very different and many of them lack demand because there is nothing that creates demand.

Yes, over the whole year, demand (relative to supply) has steadily decreased. But some projects are approaching the start of operation. I hope this will change the situation for the better - some assets will trade successfully due to natural demand rather than pumps.

That's really when we all will find out what crypto can do for us and whether these applications have the potential to replace their centralized counterparts.

Decentralise technologies have problems with users and liquidity. Not many people knows about blockhain and how to use it. That is why advertising for crypto startups is so important.

Advertising is only one part of the story. Education is also very important in order to get more acceptance. They need to understand the technology.

If crytpocurency became more popular more people start to interested in it and they will study if they want to yearn money.

[Enyanha]

4 years is too long period for many startups. Many crypto-startups will not survive for such big period of time and may become bankrupt.

If the price does not change much during this time, then this state of affairs will only benefit the real projects. There will be time to hone all the technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that 4 years is a long time, most investors are not ready to wait and there is a possibility of changes, market needs change, what the project suggests may become uninteresting.

Then it is not investors, but fast speculators. A real investor always calculates possible market fluctuations.

Many fast speculators have left the market. But now the price of the tokens is very cheap and it is not good for developers. I do not know for how long time investors are ready to wait the rise of the tokens. They may stop to wait and sell their tokens and the price of the tokens will become cheaper.

The fact that fast speculators left the market is definitely good. So the projects now have time to do product refinement and not be distracted by trifles.

Cryptocurency became more stable and it good for the sellers of the goods. But the price of crypto is vey low. It is not good for investors and for crypto startups they lost money

[Heptapolis]

The fact that fast speculators left the market is definitely good. So the projects now have time to do product refinement and not be distracted by trifles.

Who are the quick speculators? Why is it good that they left the market? I thought that the more market participants, the greater the market liquidity.

That is why advertising is important that many people will know about crypto. Articles in press. People must use crypto for payment, sellers must exept it. Crypto will became in demand and people will use it, the liquidity will appear.

[evagap]

In such a way that there is demand for these assets? It is very different and many of them lack demand because there is nothing that creates demand.

Yes, over the whole year, demand (relative to supply) has steadily decreased. But some projects are approaching the start of operation. I hope this will change the situation for the better - some assets will trade successfully due to natural demand rather than pumps.

That's really when we all will find out what crypto can do for us and whether these applications have the potential to replace their centralized counterparts.

Decentralise technologies have problems with users and liquidity. Not many people knows about blockhain and how to use it. That is why advertising for crypto startups is so important.

Advertising is only one part of the story. Education is also very important in order to get more acceptance. They need to understand the technology.

I agree with you. And I also think that you should always strive to become leaders in your direction if you have competitors.

The competition among experts in the blockchain has grown, an understanding of the technology has come, and even today there is a high demand for specialists in the blockchain and cryptocurrency sphere.

[francavul]

4 years is too long period for many startups. Many crypto-startups will not survive for such big period of time and may become bankrupt.

If the price does not change much during this time, then this state of affairs will only benefit the real projects. There will be time to hone all the technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that 4 years is a long time, most investors are not ready to wait and there is a possibility of changes, market needs change, what the project suggests may become uninteresting.

Then it is not investors, but fast speculators. A real investor always calculates possible market fluctuations.

Many fast speculators have left the market. But now the price of the tokens is very cheap and it is not good for developers. I do not know for how long time investors are ready to wait the rise of the tokens. They may stop to wait and sell their tokens and the price of the tokens will become cheaper.

Do you think that investors will sell tokens cheaper than they bought? I do not think so.

There are many supporters of short-term strategies in the market, but for example, I don’t want to sell my tokens cheaper only if there is a need for money and I have to sell some or all of my tokens.

[iHaveDreams]

[cut out]

Decentralise technologies have problems with users and liquidity. Not many people knows about blockhain and how to use it. That is why advertising for crypto startups is so important.

Yes, crypto needs to be promoted to the masses. In addition, it is necessary to simplify the use of cryptocurrency. Many refuse it as soon as they begin to encounter a new array of information.

for those new users in crypto, they need to try it in a simple way, salag one example is to be a user of the OPTHERIUM platform because in my opinion this is not too confusing and all are simple

[upline]

Cryptocurency became more stable and it good for the sellers of the goods. But the price of crypto is vey low. It is not good for investors and for crypto startups they lost money

Low asset prices are always good for the investor. This is a good shopping time.

[flarenial]

Of course, those funds raised in the dollar amount became much smaller, but the number of cryptocurrencies remained premature. If you develop a project and pay all your costs with a cryptocurrency, then implementation is still possible.

Unfortunately, most people consider cryptocurrency as a way to make money. It seems that a lot of time will pass before such widespread use appears that cryptocurrencies will be universally used as money.

Anyone who invests in cryptocurrency, trades them or just participates in the bounty wants to make money on it. This is normal. Mass introduction will occur only when there is no such big volatility.