[ANN]🚀 OPTHERIUM🚀 Synergy of Blockchain solutions

[CoffeOfficial]

Cryptocurrency has bad reputation because a lot of scammers. Scammers are not punished for their scams and this provokes them to a new fraud.

While the cryptocurrency is anonymous scammers will be difficult to punish.

Many users of cryptocurrencies consider their anonymity to be the main advantage of cryptocurrencies. And you offer to refuse from anonymity.

Because of this reputation, people prefer not to mess with cryptocurrency, on the other hand, anonymity has attracted not only scammers.

We mainly witnessed or were victims of fraudsters using the advantage of anonymity, which worsened the history of the cryptoindustry.

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.

This is why goverment authorities and requlators are against of anonimity and they want that all cryptocurrency holders will pass KYC procedures.

[zoya2019]

Cryptocurrency has bad reputation because a lot of scammers. Scammers are not punished for their scams and this provokes them to a new fraud.

While the cryptocurrency is anonymous scammers will be difficult to punish.

Many users of cryptocurrencies consider their anonymity to be the main advantage of cryptocurrencies. And you offer to refuse from anonymity.

Because of this reputation, people prefer not to mess with cryptocurrency, on the other hand, anonymity has attracted not only scammers.

We mainly witnessed or were victims of fraudsters using the advantage of anonymity, which worsened the history of the cryptoindustry.

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.

This is why goverment authorities and requlators are against of anonimity and they want that all cryptocurrency holders will pass KYC procedures.

Government authorities and regulators wants to control the income of traders and investors. That is why they against of anonymity.

[Dorvei]

There are constant disputes about anonymity. Some people for anonymous, others against it, explaining that anonymity breeds impunity.

[BitMaximum]

[cut out]

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.

Most cryptocurrencies are not anonymous. You can find a user by transactions that connected to a crypto exchange or exchange for material values. Therefore, there are mixers for BTC. In addition, it is difficult to prove the fact of scam.

That is why many people do not use exchanges with KYC procedures and use mixers to mix up transactions. Bitcoin mixers are rather popular.

[vera152515]

[cut out]

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.

Most cryptocurrencies are not anonymous. You can find a user by transactions that connected to a crypto exchange or exchange for material values. Therefore, there are mixers for BTC. In addition, it is difficult to prove the fact of scam.

That is why many people do not use exchanges with KYC procedures and use mixers to mix up transactions. Bitcoin mixers are rather popular.

Now the authorities of various goverment autorities tighten the control over cryptocurrencies and mixers also began to check. Anonymity decreases.

[skybot13x]

[cut out]

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.

Most cryptocurrencies are not anonymous. You can find a user by transactions that connected to a crypto exchange or exchange for material values. Therefore, there are mixers for BTC. In addition, it is difficult to prove the fact of scam.

That is why many people do not use exchanges with KYC procedures and use mixers to mix up transactions. Bitcoin mixers are rather popular.

Now the authorities of various goverment autorities tighten the control over cryptocurrencies and mixers also began to check. Anonymity decreases.

You have to be very cautious if you want to stay anonymous when using Bitcoin and I don't know how safe mixers actually are.

[CryptoFlowers]

[cut out]

The positive idea of anonymity has led to the appearence of a large number of fraudsters and scammers who, thanks to anonymity, avoid the punishment.

Most cryptocurrencies are not anonymous. You can find a user by transactions that connected to a crypto exchange or exchange for material values. Therefore, there are mixers for BTC. In addition, it is difficult to prove the fact of scam.

That is why many people do not use exchanges with KYC procedures and use mixers to mix up transactions. Bitcoin mixers are rather popular.

Now the authorities of various goverment autorities tighten the control over cryptocurrencies and mixers also began to check. Anonymity decreases.

You have to be very cautious if you want to stay anonymous when using Bitcoin and I don't know how safe mixers actually are.

Therefore, it is necessary to work only with the proven exchangers, which you trust and proven mixers.

[Dorvei]

The experience of 2018 and a huge number of scams proved to people that it is necessary to check everything, ICO, IEO, exchanges, mixers before transferring money to them.

[upline]

Sometimes it is very difficult to stick to the roadmap, as not everything depends on the developers, for example, market conditions.

I think the market conditions are now very favorable.

[gaihulkfat]

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.

I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.

It is not surprising how different the attitude to this procedure is for some KYC is inconvenient and ineffective.

[Simonenko1967]

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.

I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.

The state always wants to control monetary movements, only KYC on the cryptocurrency market looks meaningless at the moment.

[Dorvei]

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.

I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.

The state always wants to control monetary movements, only KYC on the cryptocurrency market looks meaningless at the moment.

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

[zoya2019]

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.

I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.

The state always wants to control monetary movements, only KYC on the cryptocurrency market looks meaningless at the moment.

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

State authorities wanted traders to pay taxes on all their income they received from the growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

[Enyanha]

Government authorities regulate cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges. That is why KYC procedures are obligatory that government authorities can control everything.

I did not see a direct relations between regulation and KYC. As a rule, scammers from investors require KYC to the collect data; nowhere is there an explanation for collecting data about investors.

KYC is necessary for the state authorities to monitor the incomes of traders, for this person regulation is necessary.

[CoffeOfficial]

If in 2019 cryptocurrencies will grow and traders will be able to earn a lot of money on trading in 2020 again, state control will be tightened.

[upline]

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.

[Svobodniy2019]

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.

A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

[BitMaximum]

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.

A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

Many users of cryptocurrencies in favour of anonymity and the lack of state control.

[cryptomia62]

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.

A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

Many users of cryptocurrencies in favour of anonymity and the lack of state control.

Unfortunately, the anonymity in cryptocurrency becomes less and less. The KYC procedures should be held everywhere - during ICO, IEO and verification on exchanges.

[Twinkledoe]

The sharp tightening of state control began in 2018, after a strong growth of cryptocurrencies in 2017.

Started, but never ended. In most countries, there has only been a discussion for several years.

A surge of activity has caused debate and there is no consensus about when the state control on the cryptocurrency will be in full swing.

Many users of cryptocurrencies in favour of anonymity and the lack of state control.

Unfortunately, the anonymity in cryptocurrency becomes less and less. The KYC procedures should be held everywhere - during ICO, IEO and verification on exchanges.

And the problem from the clients's side, we don't know who owns those exchanges. We are required to submit KYC docs before accessing some levels but we are blindly obliged to do that even if we don't know them, if we badly want to use their platform.