|
gustav
|
 |
June 09, 2016, 09:01:49 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to be a moderator, report many posts with accuracy. You will be noticed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Nick70001
|
|
June 10, 2016, 03:25:27 AM |
|
Great news for Counterparty over the last few days. I was wondering where all the discussion takes place. Is everyone on Reddit or Slack? Not much here.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
m4nki
|
|
June 10, 2016, 11:33:22 AM |
|
Following with interest!
First heard about Counterparty in summer 2014 at the Bitcoin meetup in Silicon Valley. Now got more involved and would love to experiment with the token creation feature!
|
|
|
|
tyz
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1530
|
|
June 10, 2016, 04:11:00 PM |
|
The most topics about Counterparty is discussed in the official counterparty forums on https://counterpartytalk.orgIt is not extensive discussion there but much more than here. At least, you stay up to date following the topics on countpartytalk. Great news for Counterparty over the last few days. I was wondering where all the discussion takes place. Is everyone on Reddit or Slack? Not much here.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
TrevorXCP
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
June 10, 2016, 05:18:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Y
|
|
June 10, 2016, 08:23:54 PM |
|
Following with interest!
First heard about Counterparty in summer 2014 at the Bitcoin meetup in Silicon Valley. Now got more involved and would love to experiment with the token creation feature!
Awesome! That was Robby and I. Join the Slack channel if you haven't already, lots of discussion\help to be had there. |
|
|
|
Corepolitics
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2016, 02:35:33 AM |
|
Just checked back in with things to see some renewed attention on CounterParty recently. Nice to see Also a very informative read, thanks for the links and kudos to Ruben.. the mans a machine. |
|
|
|
|
|
_nur
|
|
June 14, 2016, 12:26:30 AM |
|
Great news for Counterparty over the last few days. I was wondering where all the discussion takes place. Is everyone on Reddit or Slack? Not much here.
Cheers
yup or their official forum |
|
|
|
|
|
jokumat
|
|
June 18, 2016, 08:19:39 AM |
|
The idea of running Ethereum smart contracts on the bitcoin blockchain sounds problematic now. I know that smart contracts can be killed. But Ethereum needs to be forked to bailout smart contract holders. Smart contracts seem to be inherently insecure. Is it possible to fork Counterparty in this way on the bitcoin blockchain?
|
|
|
|
|
prophetx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
|
|
June 18, 2016, 12:32:42 PM |
|
The idea of running Ethereum smart contracts on the bitcoin blockchain sounds problematic now. I know that smart contracts can be killed. But Ethereum needs to be forked to bailout smart contract holders. Smart contracts seem to be inherently insecure. Is it possible to fork Counterparty in this way on the bitcoin blockchain?
well written and tested code is not inherently insecure.  the only problem here is people releasing untested code (apparently even aware of some issues) and not being patient. |
|
|
|
|
mmortal03
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1762
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 18, 2016, 02:47:31 PM |
|
The idea of running Ethereum smart contracts on the bitcoin blockchain sounds problematic now. I know that smart contracts can be killed. But Ethereum needs to be forked to bailout smart contract holders. Smart contracts seem to be inherently insecure. Is it possible to fork Counterparty in this way on the bitcoin blockchain?
well written and tested code is not inherently insecure. the only problem here is people releasing untested code (apparently even aware of some issues) and not being patient. ... and then other people putting their money into such untested code.  |
|
|
|
|
prophetx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
|
|
June 18, 2016, 05:03:29 PM |
|
The idea of running Ethereum smart contracts on the bitcoin blockchain sounds problematic now. I know that smart contracts can be killed. But Ethereum needs to be forked to bailout smart contract holders. Smart contracts seem to be inherently insecure. Is it possible to fork Counterparty in this way on the bitcoin blockchain?
well written and tested code is not inherently insecure. the only problem here is people releasing untested code (apparently even aware of some issues) and not being patient. ... and then other people putting their money into such untested code. every child needs to learn that putting your hands in the fire hurts |
|
|
|
|
|
donnyespo
|
|
June 18, 2016, 09:35:47 PM |
|
thanks for the links, have been looking for these |
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 19, 2016, 04:12:50 PM |
|
The idea of running Ethereum smart contracts on the bitcoin blockchain sounds problematic now. I know that smart contracts can be killed. But Ethereum needs to be forked to bailout smart contract holders. Smart contracts seem to be inherently insecure. Is it possible to fork Counterparty in this way on the bitcoin blockchain?
well written and tested code is not inherently insecure. the only problem here is people releasing untested code (apparently even aware of some issues) and not being patient. No code can be proved to be bug free no matter how well tested. |
|
|
|
|
|
jokumat
|
|
June 19, 2016, 06:52:44 PM |
|
I was trying to point out one big difference between Counterparty and Ethereum. Counterparty is running on a blockchain that cannot be forked. This is good.
But if it is really true that (all) smart contracts are a "security nightmare" then I have my doubts about Counterparty's implemetation of EVM.
|
|
|
|
|
prophetx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
|
|
June 20, 2016, 07:46:33 AM |
|
The idea of running Ethereum smart contracts on the bitcoin blockchain sounds problematic now. I know that smart contracts can be killed. But Ethereum needs to be forked to bailout smart contract holders. Smart contracts seem to be inherently insecure. Is it possible to fork Counterparty in this way on the bitcoin blockchain?
well written and tested code is not inherently insecure. the only problem here is people releasing untested code (apparently even aware of some issues) and not being patient. No code can be proved to be bug free no matter how well tested. not being able to prove something is bug free is not the same as being inherently insecure. in fact something can contain a bug and be secure. for example it is secure that this is a bug:  |
|
|
|
|
mmortal03
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1762
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 20, 2016, 07:59:08 PM |
|
Counterparty is running on a blockchain that cannot be forked. This is good. The Bitcoin blockchain can definitely be forked, if the economic incentives justify it. |
|
|
|
|
|
jokumat
|
|
June 21, 2016, 06:33:47 PM |
|
Counterparty is running on a blockchain that cannot be forked. This is good. The Bitcoin blockchain can definitely be forked, if the economic incentives justify it. Ok. You are right. I was thinking in terms of a relatively small importance of Counterparty compared to btc. We cannot expect the bitcoin blockchain to be forked because of some Counterparty trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
laugh2btc
|
|
June 21, 2016, 07:05:51 PM |
|
Counterparty is running on a blockchain that cannot be forked. This is good. The Bitcoin blockchain can definitely be forked, if the economic incentives justify it. Ok. You are right. I was thinking in terms of a relatively small importance of Counterparty compared to btc. We cannot expect the bitcoin blockchain to be forked because of some Counterparty trouble. Maybe with an 150mil $ asset?! |
|
|
|
|
|
donnyespo
|
|
June 22, 2016, 02:44:53 PM |
|
Looking like a nice bottom forming here, alts are heating up again.
|
|
|
|
|
