Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 05:00:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 [658] 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 ... 1832 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit  (Read 3055616 times)
ycagel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 10:07:18 AM
 #13141

DGB is listed as #1 sleeper alt coin!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=731471.0
ycagel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 10:14:18 AM
 #13142

Another sign of things to come in the future!


Quote
Fidor, Kraken Unite to Launch 'World's First Cryptocurrency Bank'

Stan Higgins | Published on October 31, 2014 at 18:00 GMT   

German Internet direct bank Fidor and digital currency exchange Kraken are teaming up on what the two companies say will be the first “specialized bank for crypocurrencies”.

The platform is expected to enter the first stages of development by the end of this year.

San Francisco-based Kraken reported it will be responsible for the technological aspects of the project, while Fidor will handle regulatory and licensure logistics, drawing from its connections in the broader financial sector.

The partnership builds on an existing cooperation between Fidor and Kraken, which cemented an European market exchange services pact in October 2013. The move to build a cryptocurrency-focused bank echoes previous statements from Fidor’s leadership, including COO Michael Maier who hinted at next-generation digital currency banking services in a June interview with CoinDesk.

Fidor CEO Matthias Kröner said that ultimately, the goal of the partnership is to create a “marketplace” for digital currency services, which will include mechanisms for trading, payment and currency exchange.

He continued:

    “We want to build a regulated and specialized banking home for entrepreneurs and retail customers who are intrigued by the idea and vision of a virtual currency system. But this, we cannot and we will not do on our own."

Name vote underway

On the project’s official website, visitors are being asked to vote on a name for the proposed cryptocurrency bank. The three names are: BICONDO, BYSE Bank and Cryptocurrency Bank.

According to the website, a workshop scheduled for 15th–16th December will focus on the results of the vote. The workshop, to be held in Fidor's Munich headquarters, is now open for registration.

Kraken CEO Jesse Powell noted that he would like to see a more open environment emerge as a result of the partnership in which regulators and digital currency stakeholders can work together.

“We hope that in opening up our relationship and expanding our circle of trust, we'll see the industry grow, regulators become more comfortable and other banks thaw out,” he said.
Door open for partners

Though many details surrounding the project remain unclear, the two companies are already actively seeking additional partners from the banking and technology sectors.

Any prospective partners should be “accepting of regulatory rules, restrictions” related to know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) statutes and equipped with sufficient funding and institutional knowledge to actively contribute to the project.

Kröner said that the banking industry has an interest in supporting the project, adding:

    “It should be in the interest of all of us to create a network which is as wide as possible. All partners will be shareholders of this platform, which also means that we will only kick it off with a sufficient group of partners and shareholders."

Representatives for Kraken and Fidor were unavailable for comment at press time.

Source: http://www.coindesk.com/fidor-kraken-digital-currency-banking/
ReSl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 02, 2014, 01:21:14 PM
 #13143

As a side note, new kernels for Groestl-MYR are in the works here for a while.
They were supposed to be released by the half of this month but due to hardware failure, they will likely be pushed over.

Nice to know, do you develop the new kernels? Whats the purpose to develop new kernels?
ReSl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 02, 2014, 01:27:18 PM
Last edit: November 02, 2014, 01:53:47 PM by ReSl
 #13144

New Multi Miner:

https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multi/releases
Version 1.0.7 - VC2013 + MinGW 64 (Tanguy Pruvot)

    Add NIST5 and QUBIT algos
    Show current stratum bloc height
    Fix wallet solo mining

Will try Qubit on DGB as i speak Smiley

Results so far on my gaming rig:

DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051


Official DigiByte Account


View Profile WWW
November 02, 2014, 02:15:34 PM
 #13145

New Multi Miner:

https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multi/releases
Version 1.0.7 - VC2013 + MinGW 64 (Tanguy Pruvot)

    Add NIST5 and QUBIT algos
    Show current stratum bloc height
    Fix wallet solo mining

Will try Qubit on DGB as i speak Smiley

Results so far on my gaming rig:



Thank you for sharing! We are definitely going to check this out!

MadGhost
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 02:31:18 PM
 #13146

New Multi Miner:

https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multi/releases
Version 1.0.7 - VC2013 + MinGW 64 (Tanguy Pruvot)

    Add NIST5 and QUBIT algos
    Show current stratum bloc height
    Fix wallet solo mining

Will try Qubit on DGB as i speak Smiley

Results so far on my gaming rig:



Thank you for sharing! We are definitely going to check this out!

results looks promising.

Kayahoga
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 146
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 02:34:59 PM
 #13147

I am guessing the Qubit CPU results are with Hyper-threading enabled, have you tried disabling hyper-threading to see if the total Kh is any higher?
ReSl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 02, 2014, 02:52:21 PM
 #13148

I am guessing the Qubit CPU results are with Hyper-threading enabled, have you tried disabling hyper-threading to see if the total Kh is any higher?

No not yet will try without HT.
bogglor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


DigiByte? Yes!


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 02:57:58 PM
 #13149

New Multi Miner:

https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multi/releases
Version 1.0.7 - VC2013 + MinGW 64 (Tanguy Pruvot)

    Add NIST5 and QUBIT algos
    Show current stratum bloc height
    Fix wallet solo mining

Will try Qubit on DGB as i speak Smiley


Does this miner work on Linux? I see that there are compile instructions, have you ever tried it on Linux?



As a side note these are Linux CPU/GPU miners that I have compiled/tested

I'm not making any claims about how fast these are, but these are what I use (or have used) - they all work for the algorithms listed:

---------------------------------------------------
CPU:
For DGB Groestl:
https://github.com/ig0tik3d/myriadcoin-groestl-cpuminer-v1.0b

For DGB Qubit:
https://github.com/ig0tik3d/QubitCoin-cpuminer-v.1.1

For DGB Skein:
https://github.com/skeincoin/skeincoin-cpuminer

---------------------------------------------------
GPU:
For DGB Groestl:
https://github.com/prettyhatemachine/sph-sgminer

For DGB Qubit:
https://github.com/prettyhatemachine/sph-sgminer

For DGB Skein:
https://github.com/reorder/cgminer_skein

My current miner setup: Linux - Ubuntu 12.04, Two 1.3Mh/s Scrypt ASICs, Two Radeon HD 7850 GPU mining different algos (usually qubit or skein).
Click here for my DGB Address QR code.   DGB Address: D6ZLjbSWu2mse3EqtoSn93nFrJ85wPKBF5
I have the DGB Gaming Wallet on my Galaxy S6
ReSl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 02, 2014, 03:12:40 PM
 #13150

I am guessing the Qubit CPU results are with Hyper-threading enabled, have you tried disabling hyper-threading to see if the total Kh is any higher?

KH without Hyper-threading is nearly Double. This makes sence. Seems the 4th core (thread 0,1,2) is not used! Not bad if you working besides. Otherwise ive to rebuild it Wink to get best performance.

ReSl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 02, 2014, 03:15:48 PM
 #13151

Does this miner work on Linux? I see that there are compile instructions, have you ever tried it on Linux?

No not yet compiled! But should work.

Build
=====

#### Basic *nix build instructions:
 * ./autogen.sh   # only needed if building from git repo
 * ./nomacro.pl   # only needed if building on Mac OS X or with Clang
 * ./configure CFLAGS="*-march=native*"
   * # Use -march=native if building for a single machine
 * make

#### Notes for AIX users:
 * To build a 64-bit binary, export OBJECT_MODE=64
 * GNU-style long options are not supported, but are accessible via configuration file

#### Basic Windows build with Visual Studio 2013
 * All the required .lib files are now included in tree (windows only)
 * AVX enabled by default for x64 platform (AVX2 and XOP could also be used)

#### Basic Windows build instructions, using MinGW:
 * Install MinGW and the MSYS Developer Tool Kit (http://www.mingw.org/)
   * Make sure you have mstcpip.h in MinGW\include
 * If using MinGW-w64, install pthreads-w64
 * Install libcurl devel (http://curl.haxx.se/download.html)
   * Make sure you have libcurl.m4 in MinGW\share\aclocal
   * Make sure you have curl-config in MinGW\bin
 * Install openssl devel (https://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html)
 * In the MSYS shell, run:
   * for 64bit, you can use ./mingw64.sh else :
     ./autogen.sh   # only needed if building from git repo
   * LIBCURL="-lcurldll" ./configure CFLAGS="*-march=native*"
     * # Use -march=native if building for a single machine
   * make

#### Architecture-specific notes:
 * ARM:
   * No runtime CPU detection. The miner can take advantage of some instructions specific to ARMv5E and later processors, but the decision whether to use them is made at compile time, based on compiler-defined macros.
   * To use NEON instructions, add "-mfpu=neon" to CFLAGS.
 * x86:
   * The miner checks for SSE2 instructions support at runtime, and uses them if they are available.
 * x86-64:   
   * The miner can take advantage of AVX, AVX2 and XOP instructions, but only if both the CPU and the operating system support them.
     * Linux supports AVX starting from kernel version 2.6.30.
     * FreeBSD supports AVX starting with 9.1-RELEASE.
     * Mac OS X added AVX support in the 10.6.8 update.
     * Windows supports AVX starting from Windows 7 SP1 and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1.
   * The configure script outputs a warning if the assembler doesn't support some instruction sets. In that case, the miner can still be built, but unavailable optimizations are left off.
Arsenay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 03:26:06 PM
 #13152

Debian 6 Amd64
cpu fx-8350:

$ ./minerd -a qubit --benchmark
��������������������������������������������������ͻ
�  qubit cpu-miner (v1.1a)                         �
�  author: ig0tik3d                                �
�  http://www.q2c.cc                               �
��������������������������������������������������ͼ
Launching miner...
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] Binding thread 6 to cpu 6
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] 8 miner threads started, using 'qubit' algorithm.
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2014-11-02 17:21:35] Binding thread 7 to cpu 7
[2014-11-02 17:22:00] thread 4: 2097152 hashes, 85.28 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:00] thread 1: 2097152 hashes, 85.23 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:00] thread 7: 2097152 hashes, 85.14 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:00] thread 5: 2097152 hashes, 84.79 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:00] thread 6: 2097152 hashes, 84.77 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:00] thread 2: 2097152 hashes, 84.55 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:01] thread 3: 2097152 hashes, 81.97 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:01] thread 0: 2097152 hashes, 81.26 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:05] thread 7: 425725 hashes, 87.23 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:05] Total: 675.09 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:05] thread 1: 426147 hashes, 86.69 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:05] thread 6: 423849 hashes, 86.92 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:05] thread 4: 426398 hashes, 82.83 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:05] thread 2: 422748 hashes, 80.04 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:05] thread 5: 423957 hashes, 78.69 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:06] thread 3: 409845 hashes, 86.99 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:06] thread 0: 406321 hashes, 85.64 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:10] thread 1: 433426 hashes, 86.96 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:10] thread 7: 436174 hashes, 87.02 khash/s
[2014-11-02 17:22:10] Total: 675.09 khash/s
...
Arsenay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 04:22:39 PM
 #13153


and next:

./start_cpu_qubit.sh
��������������������������������������������������ͻ
�  qubit cpu-miner (v1.1a)                         �
�  author: ig0tik3d                                �
�  http://www.q2c.cc                               �
��������������������������������������������������ͼ
Launching miner...
[2014-11-02 18:19:43] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://digihash.co:3012
[2014-11-02 18:19:43] 4 miner threads started, using 'qubit' algorithm.
[2014-11-02 18:19:43] Stratum detected new block
[2014-11-02 18:20:03] thread 3: 2097152 hashes, 111.17 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:03] thread 0: 2097152 hashes, 110.37 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:03] thread 1: 2097152 hashes, 108.82 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:03] thread 2: 2097152 hashes, 107.88 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:15] Stratum detected new block
[2014-11-02 18:20:15] thread 2: 1382350 hashes, 113.28 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:15] thread 3: 1437992 hashes, 112.53 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:15] thread 1: 1400031 hashes, 113.17 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:15] thread 0: 1426343 hashes, 112.82 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:25] Stratum detected new block
[2014-11-02 18:20:25] thread 2: 1165503 hashes, 116.21 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:25] thread 3: 1154996 hashes, 115.16 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:25] thread 0: 1110128 hashes, 110.69 khash/s
[2014-11-02 18:20:25] thread 1: 1096932 hashes, 109.37 khash/s
HR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011


Transparency & Integrity


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 05:44:51 PM
 #13154

ALSO:

I’ve got the original Myriad-Groestl srcxxx github optimized files if anyone is interesting in forking them - basically changing the name (since they’re open source to begin with) and then posting it to github. Send me a PM if you’re interested.


Hi HR, thank you for keeping us up to date with your stats. I will have a look on the original Myriad-Groestl srcxxx optimized bins. I thougt these bins only work on his pool. Maybe i can change this to get it work on every pool. Since difficulty is dropping again i could be profitable again to put a bit more power to my cards.

He originally developed two different optimized kernels that significantly increased hashrates over the previous sph-sgminer ( https://github.com/prettyhatemachine/sph-sgminer ). His miner, grs-sgminer, allowed you to use the "-k groestlcoin" switch on any pool, or the "-k optimized" switch that only worked on his pool.

My understanding is that he depreciated the github files for his original grs-sgminer that allowed you to use either switch. I could be mistaken though, but the idea that I have is that his current grs-sgminer only works with his proprietary "-k optimized" switch. If that's the case, then I think it would be interesting to fork his original grs-sgminer making available new installs once again that permit the use of any of the non-optimized kernels on any pool of the miner's choosing (grs-sgminer, using the "-k myriadcoin-groestl" switch, more than doubles the hashrate of sph-sgminer with only about a 20% increase in electrical usage - not bad at all).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652849.msg7503640#msg7503640

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652849.0



HR,

We would love to have a link to the original source. We have been looking into this & we have someone who can break it down even farther for us. Right now groestlmyriad is the weakest of the five DigiByte algos. We need to get it sorted out and more mining pools online.

Thanks for sharing this!


I've sent you a PM.


DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051


Official DigiByte Account


View Profile WWW
November 02, 2014, 06:34:35 PM
 #13155

Awesome HR, thank you!

Also, to everyone, it appears Myriadcoin has fallen victim to a successful timewarp attack in the past 12 hours. They have issued two hard forks to correct the problem.

It does appear someone is attempting to do something similar to DigiByte on Groestl & other algos. All appears well for the moment, but as always the more hash we can get the better.

If anyone has more details on this please feel free to share. We have been doing a lot of research the past few hours. Since our difficulty adjustment is different than Myriad we have some more protection for this. We are working on an update to fix this issue. We may have to issue an immediate hard fork in the next couple days.

Ooriginal ArtForx Explanation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43692.msg521772#msg521772

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=608893.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=114751.0

http://www.reddit.com/r/myriadcoin/comments/2l1xfh/myriadcoin_required_update_0925/

http://www.reddit.com/r/myriadcoin/comments/2l22fd/myriadcoin_required_update_0926/

esotericizm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 02, 2014, 06:38:48 PM
 #13156

Awesome HR, thank you!

Also, to everyone, it appears Myriadcoin has fallen victim to a successful timewarp attack in the past 12 hours. They have issued two hard forks to correct the problem.

It does appear someone is attempting to do something similar to DigiByte on Groestl & other algos. All appears well for the moment, but as always the more hash we can get the better.

If anyone has more details on this please feel free to share. We have been doing a lot of research the past few hours. Since our difficulty adjustment is different than Myriad we have some more protection for this. We are working on an update to fix this issue. We may have to issue an immediate hard fork in the next couple days.

Ooriginal ArtForx Explanation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43692.msg521772#msg521772

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=608893.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=114751.0

http://www.reddit.com/r/myriadcoin/comments/2l1xfh/myriadcoin_required_update_0925/

http://www.reddit.com/r/myriadcoin/comments/2l22fd/myriadcoin_required_update_0926/

heh! Long day for the myr guys I bet.


Kayahoga
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 146
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 07:08:16 PM
 #13157

This certainly seems to be wrecking havoc on the MYR blockchain. 

What are the suggested fixes for DGB?  I thought I remembered that it wasn't possible to mine more than 6 blocks in a row of a single algorithm.  Wouldn't that successfully mitigate this threat? 
HR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011


Transparency & Integrity


View Profile
November 02, 2014, 07:24:13 PM
 #13158

ALSO:

I’ve got the original Myriad-Groestl srcxxx github optimized files if anyone is interesting in forking them - basically changing the name (since they’re open source to begin with) and then posting it to github. Send me a PM if you’re interested.


Hi HR, thank you for keeping us up to date with your stats. I will have a look on the original Myriad-Groestl srcxxx optimized bins. I thougt these bins only work on his pool. Maybe i can change this to get it work on every pool. Since difficulty is dropping again i could be profitable again to put a bit more power to my cards.

He originally developed two different optimized kernels that significantly increased hashrates over the previous sph-sgminer ( https://github.com/prettyhatemachine/sph-sgminer ). His miner, grs-sgminer, allowed you to use the "-k groestlcoin" switch on any pool, or the "-k optimized" switch that only worked on his pool.

My understanding is that he depreciated the github files for his original grs-sgminer that allowed you to use either switch. I could be mistaken though, but the idea that I have is that his current grs-sgminer only works with his proprietary "-k optimized" switch. If that's the case, then I think it would be interesting to fork his original grs-sgminer making available new installs once again that permit the use of any of the non-optimized kernels on any pool of the miner's choosing (grs-sgminer, using the "-k myriadcoin-groestl" switch, more than doubles the hashrate of sph-sgminer with only about a 20% increase in electrical usage - not bad at all).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652849.msg7503640#msg7503640

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652849.0



I would like to correct something in the above post (it's been a while since things have been on "autopilot" and my memory didn't serve me too well, and, today, when I was putting together some stuff for DigiByte, I realized my mistake):

It was grs-sgminer's original "-k groestlcoin" kernel that doubled sph-sgminer's hashrate, not the "-k myriadcoin-groestl".

The "-k myriadcoin-groestl" kernel quadruples the original sph-sgminer's hashrate! (I even understated it to you DigiByte in the PM I sent by saying it tripled the hash rate . . . it's actually a quadruple!)

More specifically, with a 7950, sph-sgminer ran at about 5 Mh/s, grs-sgminer with -k groestlcoin at about 10 Mh/s, and grs-sgminer with -k myriadcoin-groestl has a hashrate of 20 Mh/s.


esotericizm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 02, 2014, 07:35:09 PM
 #13159

ALSO:

I’ve got the original Myriad-Groestl srcxxx github optimized files if anyone is interesting in forking them - basically changing the name (since they’re open source to begin with) and then posting it to github. Send me a PM if you’re interested.


Hi HR, thank you for keeping us up to date with your stats. I will have a look on the original Myriad-Groestl srcxxx optimized bins. I thougt these bins only work on his pool. Maybe i can change this to get it work on every pool. Since difficulty is dropping again i could be profitable again to put a bit more power to my cards.

He originally developed two different optimized kernels that significantly increased hashrates over the previous sph-sgminer ( https://github.com/prettyhatemachine/sph-sgminer ). His miner, grs-sgminer, allowed you to use the "-k groestlcoin" switch on any pool, or the "-k optimized" switch that only worked on his pool.

My understanding is that he depreciated the github files for his original grs-sgminer that allowed you to use either switch. I could be mistaken though, but the idea that I have is that his current grs-sgminer only works with his proprietary "-k optimized" switch. If that's the case, then I think it would be interesting to fork his original grs-sgminer making available new installs once again that permit the use of any of the non-optimized kernels on any pool of the miner's choosing (grs-sgminer, using the "-k myriadcoin-groestl" switch, more than doubles the hashrate of sph-sgminer with only about a 20% increase in electrical usage - not bad at all).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652849.msg7503640#msg7503640

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652849.0



I would like to correct something in the above post (it's been a while since things have been on "autopilot" and my memory didn't serve me too well, and, today, when I was putting together some stuff for DigiByte, I realized my mistake):

It was grs-sgminer's original "-k groestlcoin" kernel that doubled sph-sgminer's hashrate, not the "-k myriadcoin-groestl".

The "-k myriadcoin-groestl" kernel quadruples the original sph-sgminer's hashrate! (I even understated it to you DigiByte in the PM I sent by saying it tripled the hash rate . . . it's actually a quadruple!)

More specifically, with a 7950, sph-sgminer ran at about 5 Mh/s, grs-sgminer with -k groestlcoin at about 10 Mh/s, and grs-sgminer with -k myriadcoin-groestl has a hashrate of 20 Mh/s.



If you wouldn't mind sending me the source code I'll take a crack at it.
ReSl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 02, 2014, 07:42:23 PM
 #13160

If you wouldn't mind sending me the source code I'll take a crack at it.

This sounds great. Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 [658] 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 ... 1832 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!