★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit

[halinyo]

Wallets should upgrade to the version, especially those SOLO miners and mining POOLs.
Here is the wallets: http://digibyte.co/digibyte-wallets

[1715055866]

1715055866

[1715055866]

1715055866

[1715055866]

1715055866

[1715055866]

1715055866

[1715055866]

1715055866

[ifightformerkel]

Awesome, we reach now 66,75% for the Segwit, and we need 70%.

This mean 3,25% more and the Segwit can begin. 

https://segwit.digiexplorer.info/

[IloveDigibyte]

Edit: Disappointed whale dumps 66 million DGB, but before I posted this. Not my fault!  

Just now: 80 million on a hammer down to 51 that closed at 57 (5 min chart). Ouch. The same guy?

Maybe it´s not a guy but a Coinexchange like Litebit.eu dumping a few of the coins they "bought" in the last days.

https://www.litebit.eu/en/buy/digibyte

Could be, but that kind of dumping is indicative of poor money/trade management and I wouldn't expect companies like Litebit to be guilty of that. But anything is possible. They also have restrictions on much they buy and sell at any one time, which you can get around a bit by storing up credits, but even then the amount of coins "available" to be bought or sold is still no where near the amount necessary to cause them to have to immediately "offload" risk in such drastic fashion. That price action looks very emotional to me . . . anything but professional money management.

Edit: the "pros" were most likely on the buy side.

During the last pump I saw a trader place 400 million at 100 sat and remove it, was a fake sell wall. There is 1 or 2 huge holders of digibyte on Poloniex.

[HR]

DigiExplorer is sure giving weird data.

[DigiByte]

I say we run a contest and give the winner "the boot".

The contest is to see which is the last algo to signal SegWit, and the winner gets "the algo swap" in favor of a more widely distributed, fairer, and more end user friendly algo.

Let it be known and make it happen.

You can't have your cake and eat it too!

Send those ingrates packin'.    


Edit: looks like The Blocks Factory (scrypt, sha-256, skein) and Mining Pool Hub (all pools) still haven't upgraded .

groestl is the algo currently keeping us from 70%. Looks to be a single miner, changing address on every new block mined.

[HR]

groestl is the algo currently keeping us from 70%. Looks to be a single miner, changing address on every new block mined.

And explanation for the different reporting on DigiExplorer?

The DigiHash and Miners Pool reporting is the same. The data for The Blocks Factory looks "hybred". The reporting on zPool and Mining Pool looks like what we had before.

What does this tell us?

[DigiByte]

groestl is the algo currently keeping us from 70%. Looks to be a single miner, changing address on every new block mined.

And explanation for the different reporting on DigiExplorer?

The DigiHash and Miners Pool reporting is the same. The data for The Blocks Factory looks "hybred". The reporting on zPool and Mining Pool looks like what we had before.

What does this tell us?

Which different reporting?

Break Down Last 500 blocks = 67.8% signaling

Scrypt-Signal: 79 /500 = 15.8 %
Scrypt: 24 /500= 4.8%

Sha-Signal: 67 /500 = 13.4%
Sha: 35 /500 = 7%

Groestl-Signal: 14 /500 = 2.8%
Groestl: 87 /500 = 17.4 %

Skein-Signal 80 /500 = 16%
Skein: 19 /500 = 3.8%

Qubit-Signal: 99 /500 = 19.8%
Qubit: 0 /500 = 0%

[HR]

groestl is the algo currently keeping us from 70%. Looks to be a single miner, changing address on every new block mined.

And explanation for the different reporting on DigiExplorer?

The DigiHash and Miners Pool reporting is the same. The data for The Blocks Factory looks "hybred". The reporting on zPool and Mining Pool looks like what we had before.

What does this tell us?

Which different reporting?

Break Down Last 500 blocks = 67.8% signaling

Scrypt-Signal: 79 /500 = 15.8 %
Scrypt: 24 /500= 4.8%

Sha-Signal: 67 /500 = 13.4%
Sha: 35 /500 = 7%

Groestl-Signal: 14 /500 = 2.8%
Groestl: 87 /500 = 17.4 %

Skein-Signal 80 /500 = 16%
Skein: 19 /500 = 3.8%

Qubit-Signal: 99 /500 = 19.8%
Qubit: 0 /500 = 0%

I'm referring to the data as seen in the screen shots of each mining pool that I posted 4 posts ago.

[DigiByte]

DigiExplorer is sure giving weird data.

This was a change we were experimenting with to display OP_RETURN data. It is simply hex data being converted to ASCII.  Please ignore and will fix.

[HR]

DigiExplorer is sure giving weird data.

This was a change we were experimenting with to display OP_RETURN data. It is simply hex data being converted to ASCII.  Please ignore and will fix.

Shouldn't it be consistent across all pools? Or is Miners Pool participating more closely in the experimental process? (And the hybrid reporting for The Blocks Factory?)

[DigiByte]

DigiExplorer is sure giving weird data.

This was a change we were experimenting with to display OP_RETURN data. It is simply hex data being converted to ASCII.  Please ignore and will fix.

Shouldn't it be consistent across all pools? Or is Miners Pool participating more closely in the experimental process? (And the hybrid reporting for The Blocks Factory?)

Its just a data conversion from hex to ascii. Those other pools just had multiple tx's instead of a single one. Nothing to worry about.

[HR]

DigiExplorer is sure giving weird data.

This was a change we were experimenting with to display OP_RETURN data. It is simply hex data being converted to ASCII.  Please ignore and will fix.

Shouldn't it be consistent across all pools? Or is Miners Pool participating more closely in the experimental process? (And the hybrid reporting for The Blocks Factory?)

Its just a data conversion from hex to ascii. Those other pools just had multiple tx's instead of a single one. Nothing to worry about.

Okay.

Not really worried though. Since zpool said they still hadn't upgraded their stratum servers for SegWit, and MiningPoolHub wasn't signaling before, and with TheBlocksFactory still reporting 100 confirms on their site, there just seemed to be a very high correlation between the data reported by DigiExplorer and those facts regarding who was completely updated and who wasn't - the only data reported by DigiExplorer that is the same as that for DigiHash is the data reported for MinersPool-eu (or format as it were). Based on the assumption that DigiHash is correctly confirgured, and given those facts just mentioned above, it would seem that only MinersPool-eu is 100% compliant. Those are the assumptions and logic I was applying, more to try and isolate the most reliable places to point miners, and not so much to suggest any issue. Just looks like some folks are still a bit out of step.

Thanks for the information. Much appreciated.

[HR]

So here's my "refined" retweet (to all of my 86 followers      . . . but if people start retweeting . . .).
https://twitter.com/HR_DGB/status/853182368735211521

Better safe than sorry. Point those Groestl miners to either http://digihash.co/ or https://www.miners-pool.eu/ just to be sure.  


Edit: according to the data Jared reported above, I estimate that with around 1.25Ghs more on Groestl, we'd make the 70% global figure.

Time to rent hash power like Jared mentioned on the last round table? (Edit 2: of course that could be a waste if they don't have their wallets upgraded . . .)

[DigiByte]

Found the Groestl miners address they are mining too https://digiexplorer.info/address/DLPgKoaJA6VAREBBzgWvkcncbtj7PB3JKr

Over 114 million DigiBytes mined. Considering we only have about 5.1 million new DGB per day, this guy has probably been a loyal DGB miner for a year or more. Probably has just not heard of the update yet. Don't think they are intentionally trying to stop us. Let's keep getting the update word out!

[benjamoyne]

So here's my "refined" retweet (to all of my 60 followers      . . . but if people start retweeting . . .).
https://twitter.com/HR_DGB/status/853182368735211521

Better safe than sorry. Point those Groestl miners to either http://digihash.co/ or https://www.miners-pool.eu/ just to be sure.  


Edit: according to the data Jared reported above, I estimate that with around 1.25Ghs more on Groestl, we'd make the 70% global figure.

Time to rent hash power like Jared mentioned on the last round table? (Edit 2: of course that could be a waste if they don't have their wallets upgraded . . .)

Digihash Groestl isn't working, confirmed by Jared.
They just said on Telegram that Suprnova and Mining pool Hub were both updated, but now I'm unsure.

Going to point my miners at miner-pool.eu for the time being

[HR]

So here's my "refined" retweet (to all of my 60 followers      . . . but if people start retweeting . . .).
https://twitter.com/HR_DGB/status/853182368735211521

Better safe than sorry. Point those Groestl miners to either http://digihash.co/ or https://www.miners-pool.eu/ just to be sure.  


Edit: according to the data Jared reported above, I estimate that with around 1.25Ghs more on Groestl, we'd make the 70% global figure.

Time to rent hash power like Jared mentioned on the last round table? (Edit 2: of course that could be a waste if they don't have their wallets upgraded . . .)

Digihash Groestl isn't working, confirmed by Jared.
They just said on Telegram that Suprnova and Mining pool Hub were both updated, but now I'm unsure.

Going to point my miners at miner-pool.eu for the time being

Suprnova is currently down too (or at least reporting 0 MHs for the pool).

Adding up all the hash of the remaining pools, the 17.4% figure would confirm that they are indeed signalling. The problem is with the private farm that doesn't seem to be aware of the update.

We need some push technology incorporated sometime in the future to be able to inform end users who aren't "glued to their screens".

[lucazane]

https://segwit.digiexplorer.info/ is down

[lucazane]

Theblocksfactory DGB groeslt Pool is running a 20 DGB block finder reward.

[jorse]

I seeing this project as good . But i see no an announcement on campaign bounty .
If such only a few going to be interested with this project

[HR]

I seeing this project as good . But i see no an announcement on campaign bounty .
If such only a few going to be interested with this project

I fully agree. Communication and information dissemination have got to be improved ASAP.