★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit

[legday]

FOMO is starting to kick in. Buying/selling on Polo is starting to skip Satoshis. Price went from 167 straight to 170.
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing  

We have a new target on the 15 minute chart of 204 SAT.

I wouldn't be surprised with 300+ in the next few hours though.

It's all the same to me though since I won't be selling until we get to .001 BTC . . . which could be the first week of July.  

This is a major ball bustin' bull market!

This is what you wrote just 2 days ago. I don't understand what happened. did you sell all your coins and now trying to undermine value of DGB?

Valid point! HR flip floped, obviously trying to create smart FUD here.

@HR how it comes, you are now in other position?

maybe he is upset that price didn't reach 0.001 BTC, but I thought he was gonna wait until July.
In all seriousness, it looks like his offer was turned down and now he's upset. 

[legday]

There are 10 times as many miners on DGB than there were just 2 weeks ago.

5 times as many as 2 days ago!

DGB is in the spotlight.

Next up, a CoinDesk article.

Great news. Thanks HR

[bpanther]

Coming from the guy privately trying to extort 40 BTC out of us that is pretty brazen.

And that's all we get out of you? A baseless, defamatory lie? Libel?

I presented you with an offer to work together: a straightforward business proposal that included proprietary analysis and trade secrets that could not be divulged without serious collaboration, which you refused.

You want to refer to that as extortion? It's your prerogative to make yourself out to be a fool, so I can't stop you, but is that really what you want to do?

I have clearly just called you a liar and accused you of character defamation. You can either apologize or publish the information you have (that doesn't exists, but in case it did, you could) to show that you haven't libelled me.

Nice job showing who you are and confirming my thesis just presented above in such quick and succinct fashion.

Hi HR, we were not looking forward to such negativity from you. We look forward to some very good analysis which you do, not this. Please try to understand.

[brightlight]

FOMO is starting to kick in. Buying/selling on Polo is starting to skip Satoshis. Price went from 167 straight to 170.
I've been in from day 1 and I can't remember it getting this high since the initial fall from several hundred Satoshi post-exchange listing  

We have a new target on the 15 minute chart of 204 SAT.

I wouldn't be surprised with 300+ in the next few hours though.

It's all the same to me though since I won't be selling until we get to .001 BTC . . . which could be the first week of July.  

This is a major ball bustin' bull market!

This is what you wrote just 2 days ago. I don't understand what happened. did you sell all your coins and now trying to undermine value of DGB?

Valid point! HR flip floped, obviously trying to create smart FUD here.

@HR how it comes, you are now in other position?

maybe he is upset that price didn't reach 0.001 BTC, but I thought he was gonna wait until July.
In all seriousness, it looks like his offer was turned down and now he's upset.  

Of course, 0.001BTC price is way too optimistic. 0.00001000BTC is much healthier prediction. It's unpredictable, how Polo whales will act with X or Y coin.

DGB is much better than BCN, it has some real usage, it is blazing fast (a lot of alts must have the transactions speed to be dramatically increased), but look at market caps. Polo whales didn't hesitate to bump BCN high.

Crypto is all about unfairness!

DGB and BCN should swap their market caps. It would be fair.

[lyfwhw]

What's the best place to storage DGBs?

local dgb wallet is best place

[cryptodax]

What's the best place to storage DGBs?

local dgb wallet is best place

Local you mean an offilne?

[HR]

Where’s the inconsistency with what I’ve written? Price speculation has nothing to do with Dev integrity, does it? All targets were met (okay, except for the .001, but I still have until July, and for those of you who still haven't read my post giving further explanation on that one, I'll just say ). What more do you want? I mean, what more do you want for free? The next levels are buy levels, but, hey, with attitudes like what I’m seeing here, maybe I’ll just forget about posting those.

Dev integrity and price speculation do meet when there are major revelations though, and today’s public accusation is one of those. Credibility falls drastically when you falsely accuse someone, more so when that someone has been a long term positive contributor, and even more so when the data is twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented.

The 40 BTC, for example, was for a fully refundable escrow account upon NDA completion.

What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?

[frinvestment]

Where’s the inconsistency with what I’ve written? Price speculation has nothing to do with Dev integrity, does it? All targets were met (okay, except for the .001, but I still have until July, and for those of you who still haven't read my post giving further explanation on that one, I'll just say ). What more do you want? I mean, what more do you want for free? The next levels are buy levels, but, hey, with attitudes like what I’m seeing here, maybe I’ll just forget about posting those.

Dev integrity and price speculation do meet when there are major revelations though, and today’s public accusation is one of those. Credibility falls drastically when you falsely accuse someone, more so when that someone has been a long term positive contributor, and even more so when the data is twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented.

The 40 BTC, for example, was for a fully refundable escrow account upon NDA completion.

What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?

You have been a great contributor to this thread and your effort is well  appreciated.Kindly settle whatever rift you have with dev personally.Thank you

[lislks]

What's the best place to storage DGBs?

local dgb wallet is best place

Local you mean an offilne?

yeah offline

[Viper1]

What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?

lol.. Really? Not sure how you could possibly ask those questions when all the majority care about is "to the moon!!!!!".

The reality is that it says more about them wanting you to be a one dimensional yes man/drone than it says about you. Anyone that puts money into something without all the details needed to make a real risk assessment is just looking to have someone take their money from them. It's sort of amusing.

[frinvestment]

Glad I got back into this a while ago, this was and is my gamble coin which I hope will work out.  To find all the information is a bit of a pain but after seeing all the things that are planned this could be something decent.

I has one suggestion, if a one sheeter could be put together showing where DGB started, what it has already accomplished, it's current state and future plans I think that would be a great way for new investors to easily digest DGB, it would also make it easier for people to share.

I know there is a roadmap but something pretty and straight to the point would be great.

tiggytomb,

That has been asked for, and requested for years, with no result other than the implicit: the dev simply refuses to do it for whatever the reason. Is it incapability? Laziness? Aloofness? Stupidity? Who knows? The point is that the reason why is not important. The only thing that is important for real investors' decision making is the fact that clear and thorough documentation is systematically refused by the dev.

By the way, I've been telling this to Jared both publicly and privately for the better part of two years now, and there's been no change. If anything, there's been a circling of wagons on his part with increasing obstinacy and further entrenchment refusing to take direction from others and surrounding himself with very dubious advisors to say the least.

You're right to say that it's a gamble, but I think you've got better odds in Vegas . . . where, even though the work against you, the rules are at least clearly stated.  

There’s always the hope that things will change, but, as time goes by, that hope obviously dwindles in an ever accelerated manner.

Hope this helps not only you, but also everyone to better evaluate DGB's real prospects.

HR

Coming from the guy privately trying to extort 40 BTC out of us that is pretty brazen.

Kindly address whatever issue you have with HR personally and BTW a road map will prove your professionalism.

[HR]

Kindly settle whatever rift you have with dev personally.Thank you

At this point that is out of my hands. "Whatever rift", as you put it, that needs to be "settled" is something the Dev needs to do very PUBLICLY.

The rest of what I have to say here on this board is my analysis and opinion, and has nothing to do with the Dev's libelous statement. I am capable of differentiating between and not mixing the two.  

Thanks for your advice though. I know it was well intentioned.

[frinvestment]

Kindly settle whatever rift you have with dev personally.Thank you

At this point that is out of my hands. "Whatever rift", as you put it, that needs to be "settled" is something the Dev needs to do very PUBLICLY.

The rest of what I have to say here on this board is my analysis and opinion, and has nothing to do with the Dev's libelous statement. I am capable of differentiating between and not mixing the two.  

Thanks for your advice though. I know it was well intentioned.

We love your analysis and opinion,pls carry on.

[legday]

Where’s the inconsistency with what I’ve written? Price speculation has nothing to do with Dev integrity, does it? All targets were met (okay, except for the .001, but I still have until July, and for those of you who still haven't read my post giving further explanation on that one, I'll just say ). What more do you want? I mean, what more do you want for free? The next levels are buy levels, but, hey, with attitudes like what I’m seeing here, maybe I’ll just forget about posting those.

Dev integrity and price speculation do meet when there are major revelations though, and today’s public accusation is one of those. Credibility falls drastically when you falsely accuse someone, more so when that someone has been a long term positive contributor, and even more so when the data is twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented.

The 40 BTC, for example, was for a fully refundable escrow account upon NDA completion.

What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?

I will appreciate your analyses, regardless its positive or negative if its objective analyses. But you sound upset and I get the feeling its getting personal for you, and if thats the case, I won't be able to trust your objectivity. Plus you are contradicting yourself. First your price estimate is ridiculously high and then you give it worse odds than Las Vegas casino. I didn't like your .001 prediction or arguments you gave to back it up, and I don't like your negative analyses either. Both of them are biased, based on emotion not on logic. 

[ICO INVESTOR]

i have 0 conections on my wallet please help me!

[ghostycc]

i have 0 conections on my wallet please help me!

Did you download the new one ? https://www.digibyte.co/digibyte-wallets
Save your .dat file then use a new wallet. On old one you had to add some nodes. But it's fixed with the new one.

[Vulpixx]

I will appreciate your analyses, regardless its positive or negative if its objective analyses. But you sound upset and I get the feeling its getting personal for you, and if thats the case, I won't be able to trust your objectivity. Plus you are contradicting yourself. First your price estimate is ridiculously high and then you give it worse odds than Las Vegas casino. I didn't like your .001 prediction or arguments you gave to back it up, and I don't like your negative analyses either. Both of them are biased, based on emotion not on logic. 

Agreed, I tried bringing it up again but his backup for it was still 'anything can happen' and then gave an article to another coin rising 1000% (We'd need to hit 1000 SAT and THEN rise 1000% to get to 0.001 by the way and he had no reason to say why we'd follow suit).  Your 'analysis' isn't backed up by anything real and always seems to sway wildly to the extremes (here and in other threads) and that's why people don't take kindly to your aggressive turn of face, which to your own admission comes right after the DGB devs turned down a deal you offer them .  Likewise I would hope the DGB devs can keep these matters private in the future.  For the first time since the initial rise from 20 SAT I'm getting concerned, only mildly but I thought I'd add my 2 cents to the matter.

In the meantime I'm seeing lots of people on twitter trying to make a case for DGB on other exchanges, keep it up guys and keep up the positive image of DGB that you all worked hard to achieve. 

[ICO INVESTOR]

i have 0 conections on my wallet please help me!

Did you download the new one ? https://www.digibyte.co/digibyte-wallets
Save your .dat file then use a new wallet. On old one you had to add some nodes. But it's fixed with the new one.

i have the new wallet  V6.14.2 DIGISYNC + SEGWIT 32bit

[HR]

I will appreciate your analyses, regardless its positive or negative if its objective analyses. But you sound upset and I get the feeling its getting personal for you, and if thats the case, I won't be able to trust your objectivity. Plus you are contradicting yourself. First your price estimate is ridiculously high and then you give it worse odds than Las Vegas casino. I didn't like your .001 prediction or arguments you gave to back it up, and I don't like your negative analyses either. Both of them are biased, based on emotion not on logic.  

Agreed, I tried bringing it up again but his backup for it was still 'anything can happen' and then gave an article to another coin rising 1000% (We'd need to hit 1000 SAT and THEN rise 1000% to get to 0.001 by the way and he had no reason to say why we'd follow suit).  Your 'analysis' isn't backed up by anything real and always seems to sway wildly to the extremes (here and in other threads) and that's why people don't take kindly to your aggressive turn of face, which to your own admission comes right after the DGB devs turned down a deal you offer them .  Likewise I would hope the DGB devs can keep these matters private in the future.  For the first time since the initial rise from 20 SAT I'm getting concerned, only mildly but I thought I'd add my 2 cents to the matter.

In the meantime I'm seeing lots of people on twitter trying to make a case for DGB on other exchanges, keep it up guys and keep up the positive image of DGB that you all worked hard to achieve.  

I've reposted below, for the 3rd time, the tongue-in-cheek, have a little fun reference to the OFFICIAL 1000:1 DGB:BTC ratio, with an explanation regarding possibilities based on FACTS that are seen not only in the representative example posted, but in the dozens of cases where a 1000% short term pump has occurred (if you'd done your math, you'd have realized that to get to .001, or the 1000:1 ratio, it was exactly 1000% more or less from where we were at the time . . . ironically).

With your insistence over and over again for an answer that's already been given twice before now, it looks like you are bent on getting something else that you'd prefer to hear, which suggests that the emotion and lack of objectivity is coming from you.

Enough miners for you to stick to 0.001 by July?  Even now I still find this quite the claim.

I already answered you here:

Regarding .001 BTC by the first week of July:

1) This is crypto, and anything can happen. Witness XBC just a couple of months ago: https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@lokisullivan/bitcoin-plus-gains-over-1000-in-24-hours


https://i.imgur.com/w3JGWum.jpg

Anything can happen.

2) Seasonality in crypto is strong into July (but that could extend this year given current bullishness).

3) .001 = the 1000:1 DGB:BTC ratio

4) Just having fun with a not completely impossible eventuality.  


P.S. How many more examples like XBC can you find? Dozens? It's not that far fetched.

And if you'd like to get some more insight into my objectivity, please read my other posts in this thread too.

[HR]

. . . and that's why people don't take kindly to your aggressive turn of face, which to your own admission comes right after the DGB devs turned down a deal you offer them . . . 

BTW, the offer was turned down over 2 weeks ago.

Who's talking objectively based on the facts?