24hralttrade
|
|
September 05, 2014, 10:52:21 PM |
|
I just registerd. You have to wait 7 days till you can deposit some money they say. Yes, directly with Euros from your bank account. I use "Sofort..." its like instant payment.
Wohoo, depends where you at or which payment option you use. But for me it`s done. Under 1 hour, great! I just recived a mail.Your bankaccount is verified. You are now allowed to make payments. If you want to verify another bankaccount please make sure the name is still relative to your first verified bankaccount.
LiteBit.eu There response is really fast. Everything looks really solid and the support when i asked them to add Digibyte went really good.
|
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
September 06, 2014, 12:23:23 AM |
|
I just registerd. You have to wait 7 days till you can deposit some money they say. Yes, directly with Euros from your bank account. I use "Sofort..." its like instant payment.
Wohoo, depends where you at or which payment option you use. But for me it`s done. Under 1 hour, great! I just recived a mail.Your bankaccount is verified. You are now allowed to make payments. If you want to verify another bankaccount please make sure the name is still relative to your first verified bankaccount.
LiteBit.eu There response is really fast. Everything looks really solid and the support when i asked them to add Digibyte went really good. This is awesome! Please keep us informed as to how effective their service is. Do they cater to US bank accounts?
|
|
|
|
ycagel
|
|
September 06, 2014, 12:30:47 AM |
|
This would be massive if they catered to US bank accounts. One of the biggest pains about Coinbase is the 5 business delay for larger deposits. YC I just registerd. You have to wait 7 days till you can deposit some money they say. Yes, directly with Euros from your bank account. I use "Sofort..." its like instant payment.
Wohoo, depends where you at or which payment option you use. But for me it`s done. Under 1 hour, great! I just recived a mail.Your bankaccount is verified. You are now allowed to make payments. If you want to verify another bankaccount please make sure the name is still relative to your first verified bankaccount.
LiteBit.eu There response is really fast. Everything looks really solid and the support when i asked them to add Digibyte went really good. This is awesome! Please keep us informed as to how effective their service is. Do they cater to US bank accounts?
|
|
|
|
istvandv
|
|
September 06, 2014, 01:13:40 AM |
|
nice, i was mining at your pool using algo skein till hashrate went up to 42 Gh/s i just switched my miner
|
|
|
|
tarzanbigcity
|
|
September 06, 2014, 04:16:50 AM |
|
So many dumpers on the exchanges. Expect major buys when the price hits 20. The rebound should come slowly afterward. Ill take all the cheap coins in the meantime!
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
September 06, 2014, 08:31:57 AM |
|
Wow, I was going to ask if anyone knew how to buy BTC in Europe with fiat, and https://www.litebit.eu/en/ looks really interesting. Now, I've got to take a closer look. Don't have much time this weekend, but I'll have to make some time because I really want to get aggressively on the buy side of all that dumping! I finally got around to doing a 24 hour analysis comparing the block find numbers between algos (much easier that I thought due to some block explorer features I was overlooking). Groest........541 Qubit..........556 Scrypt.........177 SHA-256.....515 Skein..........572 Total blocks found 2361. If we add the averaged 369 blocks that scrypt should also be finding to that total, we’d we looking at a total of 2730, which would be very close to theoretical. I’m not at all sure about what could be causing this, but with the issue having to do with scrypt, and with scrypt being the “old” algo, my first inclination is to ask if active “old” wallets, or previously configured and still not updated pool servers, or exchanges, or the like, might not be causing this.
|
|
|
|
lucazane
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1198
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 06, 2014, 09:14:22 AM |
|
Wow, I was going to ask if anyone knew how to buy BTC in Europe with fiat, and https://www.litebit.eu/en/ looks really interesting. Now, I've got to take a closer look. Don't have much time this weekend, but I'll have to make some time because I really want to get aggressively on the buy side of all that dumping! I finally got around to doing a 24 hour analysis comparing the block find numbers between algos (much easier that I thought due to some block explorer features I was overlooking). Groest........541 Qubit..........556 Scrypt.........177 SHA-256.....515 Skein..........572 Total blocks found 2361. If we add the averaged 369 blocks that scrypt should also be finding to that total, we’d we looking at a total of 2730, which would be very close to theoretical. I’m not at all sure about what could be causing this, but with the issue having to do with scrypt, and with scrypt being the “old” algo, my first inclination is to ask if active “old” wallets, or previously configured and still not updated pool servers, or exchanges, or the like, might not be causing this. It because of the multipool mining scrypt, they put the difficulty so high that it take hours to generate a block when they leave.
|
|
|
|
24hralttrade
|
|
September 06, 2014, 09:28:06 AM |
|
Wow, I was going to ask if anyone knew how to buy BTC in Europe with fiat, and https://www.litebit.eu/en/ looks really interesting. Now, I've got to take a closer look. Don't have much time this weekend, but I'll have to make some time because I really want to get aggressively on the buy side of all that dumping! I finally got around to doing a 24 hour analysis comparing the block find numbers between algos (much easier that I thought due to some block explorer features I was overlooking). Groest........541 Qubit..........556 Scrypt.........177 SHA-256.....515 Skein..........572 Total blocks found 2361. If we add the averaged 369 blocks that scrypt should also be finding to that total, we’d we looking at a total of 2730, which would be very close to theoretical. I’m not at all sure about what could be causing this, but with the issue having to do with scrypt, and with scrypt being the “old” algo, my first inclination is to ask if active “old” wallets, or previously configured and still not updated pool servers, or exchanges, or the like, might not be causing this. It because of the multipool mining scrypt, they put the difficulty so high that it take hours to generate a block when they leave. So renting some scrypt mining will help this issue?
|
|
|
|
24hralttrade
|
|
September 06, 2014, 09:32:12 AM Last edit: September 06, 2014, 09:51:19 AM by 24hralttrade |
|
Wow, I was going to ask if anyone knew how to buy BTC in Europe with fiat, and https://www.litebit.eu/en/ looks really interesting. Now, I've got to take a closer look. Don't have much time this weekend, but I'll have to make some time because I really want to get aggressively on the buy side of all that dumping! Digibyte - litepaid.eu 100000 Digibyte = 8.53 euro. 11,- Dollar exchange price 20 sat 100000 0.01995000 BTC 7.4 euro "BTC price 481" 9.59 Dollar 8,53 euro gets you 0,02119020 BTC @Bitonic.nl +/- 15%
|
|
|
|
|
MinersPoolEU
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2014, 10:56:08 AM |
|
Hmmm why? I know why. I think we all do.
Why ? I'm telling you srcxxx uses NOMP backend, this backend uses "sendtomany" command to reward the miners. This command is not fully operationnel, there are errors. https://github.com/zone117x/node-open-mining-portal/blob/master/libs/paymentProcessor.js#L384In payout process, if the error code is -6 (ie "Not enough funds to cover the tx fees"), tx fees are increased until command is accepted by the wallet. I'm using the same backend, but I had to modify the payout process, to be compatible with the Digibyte wallet and not decrease the proportional rewards. I think than srcxxx don't apply tx fees (I hope, but I'm not 100% sure).
|
|
|
|
ReSl
|
|
September 06, 2014, 11:21:06 AM |
|
Hmmm why? I know why. I think we all do.
Why ? I'm telling you srcxxx uses NOMP backend, this backend uses "sendtomany" command to reward the miners. This command is not fully operationnel, there are errors. https://github.com/zone117x/node-open-mining-portal/blob/master/libs/paymentProcessor.js#L384In payout process, if the error code is -6 (ie "Not enough funds to cover the tx fees"), tx fees are increased until command is accepted by the wallet. I'm using the same backend, but I had to modify the payout process, to be compatible with the Digibyte wallet and not decrease the proportional rewards. I think than srcxxx don't apply tx fees (I hope, but I'm not 100% sure). Interesting, looks solid. In the end im on your pool now. It is very nice. Where your EU Server location? OVH in France? Nice performance!
|
|
|
|
24hralttrade
|
|
September 06, 2014, 12:07:52 PM |
|
Hmmm why? I know why. I think we all do.
Why ? I'm telling you srcxxx uses NOMP backend, this backend uses "sendtomany" command to reward the miners. This command is not fully operationnel, there are errors. https://github.com/zone117x/node-open-mining-portal/blob/master/libs/paymentProcessor.js#L384In payout process, if the error code is -6 (ie "Not enough funds to cover the tx fees"), tx fees are increased until command is accepted by the wallet. I'm using the same backend, but I had to modify the payout process, to be compatible with the Digibyte wallet and not decrease the proportional rewards. I think than srcxxx don't apply tx fees (I hope, but I'm not 100% sure). Interesting, looks solid. In the end im on your pool now. It is very nice. Where your EU Server location? OVH in France? Nice performance! No response from srcxxx, Pool getting removed. Something is not that solid if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
September 06, 2014, 01:12:23 PM |
|
Yeah, with his kind of "transparency" and data reporting:"You need to understand that daily profits will be different each day. There is a fee that pool operator takes and it is undisclosed currently. Our pool likes to keep things simple.
Q: Why is my hashrate so low? I used to have 16.7MH/s on R9 290 and now I have like 930KH/s A: That is normal. Because boostpool can switch netween different algorithms, you would be getting different hashrate otherwise (depending on current algo). So it was decided to scale the hashrate to be consistent. So grs-sgminer shows hashrate similar to Scrypt hashrate on the same equipment."https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770959It's sooooo much easier to scam.
|
|
|
|
MinersPoolEU
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2014, 01:18:39 PM |
|
Interesting, looks solid. In the end im on your pool now. It is very nice. Where your EU Server location? OVH in France? Nice performance!
Thanks, the servers are located in France, OVH and Online.
|
|
|
|
lucazane
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1198
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 06, 2014, 01:34:47 PM |
|
I'am using OVH too for more than 6 years, they are cheap and reliable.
|
|
|
|
Litejavichu
|
|
September 06, 2014, 02:22:25 PM |
|
Care with cryptohunger and the electricity bill ... What wanting more, what is the electric company and the owner of the pool
|
|
|
|
appbox
|
|
September 06, 2014, 05:56:09 PM |
|
about 2500 blocks / day about 19,200,000 digibytes / day price will hit 10 satoshi again. Digibyte released 8 months, Jared said 1$/DGB... Yes, we have 3 months pump the price hit 1$/DGB
|
|
|
|
racer2012
|
|
September 06, 2014, 06:00:47 PM |
|
That is messed up I think we should reduce the total supply to 10.5 billions And reduce the block reward will stable the price Any suggestions
|
|
|
|
BRUCELLA
|
|
September 06, 2014, 06:11:58 PM |
|
That is messed up I think we should reduce the total supply to 10.5 billions And reduce the block reward will stable the price Any suggestions No the only thing to do is use this coin, buy some reel things with it. If we can use it, people will buy it more and more... and more and more merchants will accept it... If we reduce total supply and block reward, yes for the short term the price could stay stable but who will buy DGB and for what... on the long run nobody will buy it. The problem will be the same for the next month if we do that.. DigiByte need to be a reel currency and not a support for speculation...
|
|
|
|
|