FalconFly
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Sentinel
|
|
January 19, 2014, 11:50:05 AM |
|
Just my 2 cents :
- miners have RoHS, FCC and CE Logos -> AFAIK no mining product ever went through all (any?) of these certification processes, as they are expensive and consume way too much time in this fast-moving industry ( we all know time-to-market is literally everything )
- miners have one important specification missing -> onboard RAM (Scrypt requires large amounts of RAM as a core design feature, which is the reason they're still limited to CPU/GPU)
I give it a >98% chance of being a fraud. (after all, there's a ton of eager customers who would like a power-efficient Scrypt ASIC as soon as possible -> lots of potential profit -> lots of potential fraud targets and fraud profit potential)
PS. What are the odds of a supposedly completely new device with significantly updated components/features having apparently exactly the same shape & dimensions of a Block Erupter ? Am I the only one looking at what 100% seems like "repainted Block Erupters" in the images ?
|
This forum signature is like its owner - it can't be bought
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
brucemangy
|
|
January 19, 2014, 01:58:53 PM |
|
beware : this is an obvious scam.
Previous post is really wise ^^
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
January 19, 2014, 10:42:07 PM |
|
Just my 2 cents :
- miners have RoHS, FCC and CE Logos -> AFAIK no mining product ever went through all (any?) of these certification processes, as they are expensive and consume way too much time in this fast-moving industry ( we all know time-to-market is literally everything )
- miners have one important specification missing -> onboard RAM (Scrypt requires large amounts of RAM as a core design feature, which is the reason they're still limited to CPU/GPU)
I give it a >98% chance of being a fraud. (after all, there's a ton of eager customers who would like a power-efficient Scrypt ASIC as soon as possible -> lots of potential profit -> lots of potential fraud targets and fraud profit potential)
PS. What are the odds of a supposedly completely new device with significantly updated components/features having apparently exactly the same shape & dimensions of a Block Erupter ? Am I the only one looking at what 100% seems like "repainted Block Erupters" in the images ?
You see Erupters, whereas I see Drills. BTW, that image is no longer available on dualminer.com. Jun Zhu commented that the mybitcoinrig.com site was for testing content (paraphrased) for the dualminer.com site, of which the image above representing a finished product that was for sale.
|
|
|
|
dualminer_3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
January 20, 2014, 08:58:00 AM |
|
Just my 2 cents :
- miners have RoHS, FCC and CE Logos -> AFAIK no mining product ever went through all (any?) of these certification processes, as they are expensive and consume way too much time in this fast-moving industry ( we all know time-to-market is literally everything )
- miners have one important specification missing -> onboard RAM (Scrypt requires large amounts of RAM as a core design feature, which is the reason they're still limited to CPU/GPU)
I give it a >98% chance of being a fraud. (after all, there's a ton of eager customers who would like a power-efficient Scrypt ASIC as soon as possible -> lots of potential profit -> lots of potential fraud targets and fraud profit potential)
PS. What are the odds of a supposedly completely new device with significantly updated components/features having apparently exactly the same shape & dimensions of a Block Erupter ? Am I the only one looking at what 100% seems like "repainted Block Erupters" in the images ?
just give some comments: 1. The scrypt hash function used by litecoin is just 1024 length, it can be done with on chip SRAM. Just have a look of the scrypt_1024_1_1_256 function in cpuminer and get some idea. GC3355 has on chip sram for scrypt. 2. It's true that this usb miner looks similar with "Block Erupter". But the size is different. Also the heaksink design is slightly different. The logo looks better. :-) 3. Please just wait reviewer's report for more information of Dualminer
|
|
|
|
WinterParker
|
|
January 20, 2014, 10:17:52 AM |
|
Are you finished with production of a substantial amount?
|
|
|
|
cxboyminer
|
|
January 20, 2014, 11:46:54 AM |
|
Haven't heard from the user - DualMiner for a while. Anyone receive any usb from them for reviews? Want to make one for my youtube channel!
|
|
|
|
dualminer (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2014, 04:12:25 AM |
|
Here is the latest update. The 1st batch of 50 DualMiner USB has arrived SF Bay Area. We expect to ship out certain samples to our selected reviewers in next few days. Stay in tune!
|
|
|
|
ipxtreme
|
|
January 22, 2014, 05:42:45 AM |
|
I would like to test one please.
|
BTC tips: 14PkHaJH5GexLG9P7MYxHRNvZeCq2t8DWX
|
|
|
demonmaestro
|
|
January 22, 2014, 11:00:34 AM |
|
Here is the latest update. The 1st batch of 50 DualMiner USB has arrived SF Bay Area. We expect to ship out certain samples to our selected reviewers in next few days. Stay in tune!
Cant wait to see. I wish i was one of the lucky ones to get to test.
|
Feel Like Donating? bc1q0v5nfdejapffewu67gft7zw7zsmnfmmkt3lf02 Buy/Sell BitCoin & LiteCoin Click here! | Looking for a great exchange? CoinBase Has you covered.
|
|
|
wunch
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2014, 11:23:51 AM |
|
Just my 2 cents :
- miners have RoHS, FCC and CE Logos -> AFAIK no mining product ever went through all (any?) of these certification processes, as they are expensive and consume way too much time in this fast-moving industry ( we all know time-to-market is literally everything )
ASICMINERS cubes and sticks have these logo's as well but i highly doubt they went through approval so this means nothing. Merely stops it from getting rejected at customs, IIRC BFL did similar as things were being stopped for wrong power cords etc.
|
|
|
|
KyrosKrane
|
|
January 22, 2014, 11:57:15 AM |
|
Can these (and other, similar, dual-use devices) mine both BTC and LTC simultaneously? Or is the user (or perhaps mining software) supposed to pick one at a time to mine?
|
|
|
|
fsb4000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 22, 2014, 12:27:49 PM |
|
I wish one for test and review
|
|
|
|
WhiteyZ
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2014, 01:37:28 PM |
|
Can these (and other, similar, dual-use devices) mine both BTC and LTC simultaneously? Or is the user (or perhaps mining software) supposed to pick one at a time to mine?
Quote from first page and from the website: Hash Rate: Dual Mode: 40KH/s LTC, 500MH/s BTC, or LTC Mode: 70KH/s LTC, BTC Off
|
|
|
|
KyrosKrane
|
|
January 22, 2014, 02:49:30 PM |
|
Can these (and other, similar, dual-use devices) mine both BTC and LTC simultaneously? Or is the user (or perhaps mining software) supposed to pick one at a time to mine?
Quote from first page and from the website: Hash Rate: Dual Mode: 40KH/s LTC, 500MH/s BTC, or LTC Mode: 70KH/s LTC, BTC Off Thanks, I missed that on their Web site. But on the first page of this thread, there's no performance info from the OP. I reviewed all posts by the OP, in fact, and he doesn't mention the specs in any of them. Another poster posted the theoretical stats of the chip they're using: BTC mode up to 2.25G/s BTC Hash Rate, with 2.4W/GHash LTC mode up to 60K/s LTC Hash Rate Due-Coin mode up to 1.75G/s BTC Hash Rate + 60K/s LTC Hash Rate, or up to 2.25G/s BTC Hash Rate + 38K LTC Hash Rate So two things jump out at me: First, why is there such a difference between the theoretical stats and the quoted performance, particularly on BTC? And why is the BTC-only mode eliminated? Second, what software would be able to use this gizmo to dual-mine simultaneously? On their site, they say "Customized Windows software with GUI" but they also mention Linux; and their screenshots are of a command-line miner. Depending on how the software is implemented, it may not be able to run on unusual hardware like a Raspberry Pi or Beaglebone. Custom-developed miners are sometimes less efficient than dedicated software like cgminer or bfgminer, so we could be giving up precious hashes. Definitely need more info on this front.
|
|
|
|
drmadison
|
|
January 22, 2014, 04:56:38 PM |
|
Here is the latest update. The 1st batch of 50 DualMiner USB has arrived SF Bay Area. We expect to ship out certain samples to our selected reviewers in next few days. Stay in tune!
I'm in the SF bay area. I'd be more than happy to swing by and help verify the existence / functioning of these.
|
|
|
|
drmadison
|
|
January 22, 2014, 04:57:50 PM |
|
First, why is there such a difference between the theoretical stats and the quoted performance, particularly on BTC? And why is the BTC-only mode eliminated?
Second, what software would be able to use this gizmo to dual-mine simultaneously? On their site, they say "Customized Windows software with GUI" but they also mention Linux; and their screenshots are of a command-line miner. Depending on how the software is implemented, it may not be able to run on unusual hardware like a Raspberry Pi or Beaglebone. Custom-developed miners are sometimes less efficient than dedicated software like cgminer or bfgminer, so we could be giving up precious hashes. Definitely need more info on this front.
Not at all related to this but I'm assuming the lower spec is because of lower power (needs to run off 2.5w total power)
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7863
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 23, 2014, 02:38:30 AM |
|
Using chrome /google it is the controller it appears you need this and a usb hub and the dual mining usb sticks. the translation reads this allows you to not use a pc. but the chip does not hash much in terms of ltc 40kh along with 50mh btc or 70kh alone so lets say it is 55kh not 70kh that means a hub of 10 sticks is 550kh almost a hd7950 . so the controller handles 20-30 sticks 1100 to 1650 kh . yeah you save some power but what does 3x 10 port hubs 30 sticks and a controller cost?
|
|
|
|
dualminer (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2014, 05:57:19 AM |
|
To whom interested in the DualMiner USB product, please check our latest update in the 1st page of this topic. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Mitron
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2014, 06:24:47 AM |
|
Wait, can't you just buy an R9 270X at 425kH/s and an U1 at 1.6GH/s for $300 instead of 3 of these at 120kH/s and 1.5GH/s for $300? I don't understand the advantage of these devices. Maybe at half the price? Looks like Ebay candy to me.
|
|
|
|
|