gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
July 27, 2014, 09:00:43 PM |
|
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital
I'll certainly have a go, I'll take a look this evening at what's involved. It's just a matter of calculating the residual balance of all the txIns and txOuts to each address, isn't it? Cheers, Graham
|
|
|
|
wgd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 27, 2014, 09:59:54 PM |
|
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital
I'll certainly have a go, I'll take a look this evening at what's involved. It's just a matter of calculating the residual balance of all the txIns and txOuts to each address, isn't it? Cheers, Graham As for predicting address rich lists
|
|
|
|
penambang
|
|
July 28, 2014, 01:59:15 AM |
|
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital
You mean like this? https://coinplorer.com/Q2C/Addresses/0/Top
|
|
|
|
blg425
|
|
July 28, 2014, 06:34:06 AM |
|
Lets bring this coin back to daily trading and usage! I think we need to get this on Bittrex and/or Mintpal
|
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
July 28, 2014, 01:09:41 PM |
|
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital
You mean like this? https://coinplorer.com/Q2C/Addresses/0/Top Yes, except we need all the wallet addresses that have a transaction recorded somewhere in the blockchain, i.e. received or sent Q2C at some point. Note: only those wallet addresses/accounts that have been referenced in a transaction recorded in the blockchain can be identified for possible retention. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|
wgd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 28, 2014, 03:03:25 PM Last edit: July 28, 2014, 03:34:03 PM by wgd |
|
https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_q2c ekhem? XD DING on 128 satpenambang gjhiggins thx, there you can see how many people did not move their coins from the time of extraction. Potentially you can think of the number of coins in circulation is a lot less than the declared MAX MONEY
|
|
|
|
ahmed_bodi
|
|
July 28, 2014, 04:48:47 PM |
|
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
|
Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:07:42 PM |
|
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
I know from experience that the QubitCoin community is not shy about raising objections (c.f. other erstwhile devs' proposals), so if there aren't any raised, we can reasonably assume broad agreement. Unless anyone feels like organising a vote thread in the interests of improved transparency --- or even, possibly, representational responsibility? It's not an especially demanding task, community respect and fame beckons, plus an opportunity to publish a donation address (I'm confident that this resurgent community will appreciate an opportunity to demonstrate solidarity of purpose). Cheers Graham (currently stacked out)
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 28, 2014, 11:15:31 PM |
|
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
i disagree ....
|
|
|
|
ahmed_bodi
|
|
July 28, 2014, 11:25:41 PM |
|
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
i disagree .... May i ask why? Do you not want your coin to have an increase in network security?. Do you not want your coin to have better profitability?. Do you not want more devs helping your coin with essential features?
|
Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
July 28, 2014, 11:30:07 PM |
|
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
i disagree .... Ha ha, very funny. You're already mining qubit via myriad ... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710089.msg8027265#msg8027265so I guess you're leg-pulling/trolling. (Well, I did enourage people to post ) Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|
iamphoenix
|
|
July 29, 2014, 01:34:23 AM |
|
i love to mine qubit via myriad, i would love it even more to get qubitcoins out of it especially since the Qubit team and community continues to hold steady despite hard times. honestly i think it may be a win-win for both parties
|
|
|
|
Ngaio
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 29, 2014, 11:05:20 AM |
|
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
i disagree .... Because?
|
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
July 30, 2014, 09:57:13 PM |
|
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
i disagree .... ... also we could contact MYR coin ... for making Deepcoin with MYR merged mining
Ooooo, Mary, Mary quite contrary Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|
zex24
|
|
August 03, 2014, 06:10:19 AM |
|
Graham,
Any news about development plan?
|
|
|
|
Ahha
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
August 05, 2014, 06:23:31 PM |
|
Qubitcoin clone coming out: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=722102.0Xryptbit is a new crytocurrency that uses the Qubit algorithm (Luffa, Cubehash, Shavite, Simd and Echo) proving to be more secure and energy efficient than X11/X13/X15 consuming 15-20% less power.
|
|
|
|
CashCat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
August 05, 2014, 07:25:50 PM |
|
Let´s clone back ... (if Xryptbit has some new useful code).
|
|
|
|
wgd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 05, 2014, 08:05:55 PM |
|
real qubit is the only one still bravely drifting on the ocean altcoins !!
|
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
August 08, 2014, 05:32:44 PM |
|
Hmm, a sr member reporting a similar experience of low power consumption with Deepcoin, a Peter Bushnell fresh fork of 0.8.x changed to use qubit: In and mining. Power consumption is very nice. Using less than any other algo available thus far.
Another useful datum point to reference. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|
skeem
|
|
August 12, 2014, 05:35:07 PM |
|
still watching ...
|
Coin Revolution
|
|
|
|