Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:19:09 PM |
|
Can someone (that had upgrade to .23) give us here the status of the vote (don't have access to my MN at the moment).
|
|
|
|
orangecycle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:21:19 PM |
|
Can someone (that had upgrade to .23) give us here the status of the vote (don't have access to my MN at the moment).
You can follow me on twitter. I'll continue to post updates throughout the day. https://twitter.com/Node_40Currently: Yea: 156 Nay: 13
|
|
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:23:34 PM |
|
Can someone (that had upgrade to .23) give us here the status of the vote (don't have access to my MN at the moment).
You can follow me on twitter. I'll continue to post updates throughout the day. https://twitter.com/Node_40Currently: Yea: 156 Nay: 13 Thanks, seams that the yea will win easily
|
|
|
|
pille
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:28:54 PM |
|
I get different results:
YEA: 606 NAY: 5 ABSTAIN: 1872
|
|
|
|
orangecycle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:33:13 PM |
|
I get different results:
YEA: 606 NAY: 5 ABSTAIN: 1872
Interesting. How are you checking results. dashd masternode list votes | grep -c YEA dashd masternode list votes | grep -c NAY dashd masternode list votes | grep -c ABSTAIN EDIT: My daemon wasn't updated. Your results were correct.
|
|
|
|
pille
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:34:48 PM |
|
Exactly this way. And I'm in sync.
|
|
|
|
Voter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:39:31 PM |
|
Can someone (that had upgrade to .23) give us here the status of the vote (don't have access to my MN at the moment).
You can follow me on twitter. I'll continue to post updates throughout the day. https://twitter.com/Node_40Currently: Yea: 156 Nay: 13 Thanks, seams that the yea will win easily According to the rules, "This vote requires 51% of the masternodes to success" http://oi59.tinypic.com/2ikyslk.jpghttps://dashtalk.org/threads/vote-self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4825There are, currently, 2509 MNs, as http://178.254.18.153/~pub/Darkcoin/masternode_payments_stats.html registers. So, to be approved, the proposal will demand about 1,280 YEA votes.... I get different results:
YEA: 606 NAY: 5 ABSTAIN: 1872
This must be checked.
|
|
|
|
orangecycle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:40:05 PM |
|
Exactly this way. And I'm in sync.
I had a couple of different terminal windows open and was querying the daemon that wasn't updated.
|
|
|
|
Limx Dev
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1348
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:53:27 PM |
|
10 % ?? masternode vote nay Sorry that I find too much.
|
Bitcore BTX - a UTXO fork of Bitcoin - since 2017
|
|
|
|
Kuriso
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:59:42 PM |
|
Damn. I just moved my buys down. Missed that dump by just a few minutes.
|
|
|
|
salmion
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:01:39 PM |
|
10 % ?? masternode vote nay Sorry that I find too much.
Just think of all that funded development you can just port over to your clone. Sorry I would take your criticisms more seriously if you were contributing to the code not just cloning. And you won't say it's too much if you come up with something amazing that requires funding and said funding gets approved. To compete in the global leagues without having to give in to seed funding it's a drop in the ocean.
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:04:43 PM |
|
Damn. I just moved my buys down. Missed that dump by just a few minutes. Someone's just desperate to need money now or it's a pre-dump announcement. I hate to say it but I think DASH will go much lower today. Hopefully I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
Limx Dev
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1348
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:15:10 PM |
|
10 % ?? masternode vote nay Sorry that I find too much.
Just think of all that funded development you can just port over to your clone. Sorry I would take your criticisms more seriously if you were contributing to the code not just cloning. And you won't say it's too much if you come up with something amazing that requires funding and said funding gets approved. To compete in the global leagues without having to give in to seed funding it's a drop in the ocean. Is just my opinion. And our code also has differences. e.g. QT Paperwallet, 5 min BlockTime, static reward.
|
Bitcore BTX - a UTXO fork of Bitcoin - since 2017
|
|
|
WastedLTC
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:15:53 PM |
|
RE: Voting. Right now I'm set to abstain. How do I participate in a vote?
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns: Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:17:42 PM |
|
I get different results:
YEA: 606 NAY: 5 ABSTAIN: 1872
Interesting. How are you checking results. dashd masternode list votes | grep -c YEA dashd masternode list votes | grep -c NAY dashd masternode list votes | grep -c ABSTAIN EDIT: My daemon wasn't updated. Your results were correct. Let me get this straight. 51% Yea is required to pass. However, 1872 Abstain? That means no pass. Or, are we saying 1872 have yet to vote because vote starts with default set to abstain? Or, are we saying 51% yea votes vs. nay votes, ignoring abstainers? Sorry, only got one brain cell, and its thinking about the one thing it likes to think about most.
|
|
|
|
orangecycle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:19:43 PM |
|
RE: Voting. Right now I'm set to abstain. How do I participate in a vote?
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns: Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
Your MN does not need to be upgraded. Only the QT needs to be at .23. If you have more than one masternode listed in your local masternode.conf file, use masternode vote-many yea
|
|
|
|
Voter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:20:23 PM |
|
I get different results:
YEA: 606 NAY: 5 ABSTAIN: 1872
Interesting. How are you checking results. dashd masternode list votes | grep -c YEA dashd masternode list votes | grep -c NAY dashd masternode list votes | grep -c ABSTAIN EDIT: My daemon wasn't updated. Your results were correct. Let me get this straight. 51% Yea is required to pass. However, 1872 Abstain? That means no pass. Or, are we saying 1872 have yet to vote because vote starts with default set to abstain? Or, are we saying 51% yea votes vs. nay votes, ignoring abstainers? Sorry, only got one brain cell, and its thinking about the one thing it likes to think about most. "Voting will begin immediately and be open for 2 weeks. We will consider the vote successful if at any time we have 51% of the masternodes support." https://dashtalk.org/threads/vote-self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4825So it means ABSTAIN counts as NAY.
|
|
|
|
WastedLTC
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:23:27 PM |
|
RE: Voting. Right now I'm set to abstain. How do I participate in a vote?
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns: Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
Your MN does not need to be upgraded. Only the QT needs to be at .23. If you have more than one masternode listed in your local masternode.conf file, use masternode vote-many yea Thanks, I was looking at the single MN command and not the many. All is well, voted.
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 07, 2015, 02:27:57 PM |
|
I get different results:
YEA: 606 NAY: 5 ABSTAIN: 1872
Interesting. How are you checking results. dashd masternode list votes | grep -c YEA dashd masternode list votes | grep -c NAY dashd masternode list votes | grep -c ABSTAIN EDIT: My daemon wasn't updated. Your results were correct. Let me get this straight. 51% Yea is required to pass. However, 1872 Abstain? That means no pass. Or, are we saying 1872 have yet to vote because vote starts with default set to abstain? Or, are we saying 51% yea votes vs. nay votes, ignoring abstainers? Sorry, only got one brain cell, and its thinking about the one thing it likes to think about most. "Voting will begin immediately and be open for 2 weeks. We will consider the vote successful if at any time we have 51% of the masternodes support." https://dashtalk.org/threads/vote-self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4825So it means ABSTAIN counts as NAY. Well, get off your backsides and vote (actually, get on your backsides, turn on your pc and vote )
|
|
|
|
|