[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[salmion]

XPY BTC could be about to head this way IMO.

If anyone here ever says "gawsome" they should be castrated. It would be for their own good. And a positive thing for Crypto.

[1713891790]

1713891790

[1713891790]

1713891790

[cAPSLOCK]

Gawsome?

[Bitdicesupport]

Hello Dash users!

www.bitdice.me has added "DASH" to the site so you can now play dice with DASH. We also have an investing option allowing users to invest DASH!

If you are interested in learning about BitDice have a look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=975399.msg10648171#msg10648171

Hope to see you on the site!

[salmion]

Gawsome?

The phrase of the paycoin crowd.. go look at hashtalk.org

*edit And in my current spirit of positivity sorry for your loss paycoiners.

[DonQuijote]

Hello Dash users!

www.bitdice.me has added "DASH" to the site so you can now play dice with DASH. We also have an investing option allowing users to invest DASH!

If you are interested in learning about BitDice have a look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=975399.msg10648171#msg10648171

Hope to see you on the site!

A small giveaway to celebrate?   

[BrainShutdown]

ATH!  

[etoque]

ATH!  

So the amount of DASH in circulation are at his lowest point with this masternode ratio...

Interesting  

I call it - opportunity

[alex-ru]

One crazy idea for you guys.

We all know that the main vulnerability of Bitcoins, which prevents it from becoming full-fledged money - the lack of fungibility of coins. Fungibility of Bitcoins is spoiled by the fact that each amount contains previous history of operations. And a bad "history-legacy" can be used as a factor of discrimination in the subsequent use of coins (So we can talk about "clean" bitcoins vs "dirty" bitcoins).
For example, if you recive coins that were previously stolen, passed through darkmarkets etc. - They in some sense are "corrupted" and you may have problems with their further usage.

Dash resolves that vulnerability - darksend mechanism are used to anonymize - clean up the history of previous operations for your DASH. As a result DASH becomes real fungible digital cash (money).

So why do not we call processes of anonymization - just a "Cleaning"!
It sounds simple, understandable, positive(!) and not as "criminal" as "Anonymization".

Thus users will have in their wallets:
1. Standard Dash
2. Cleaned Dash
3. And "To Clean" button.
Even your grandmother would understand this principle and do not have to explain for everybody what is "Anonymization", "Mixing", "Darksend", ... and why is it necessary for ordinary people.

"KISS" principle in action - because we need an acceptance of ordinary people.

What do you think about it? Please discuss there: https://dashtalk.org/threads/the-rolling-thread.4536/page-4#post-50784

[strix]

One crazy idea for you guys.

We all know that the main vulnerability of Bitcoins, which prevents it from becoming full-fledged money - the lack of fungibility of coins. Fungibility of Bitcoins is spoiled by the fact that each amount contains previous history of operations. And a bad "history-legacy" can be used as a factor of discrimination in the subsequent use of coins (So we can talk about "clean" bitcoins vs "dirty" bitcoins).
For example, if you recive coins that were previously stolen, passed through darkmarkets etc. - They in some sense are "corrupted" and you may have problems with their further usage.

Dash resolves that vulnerability - darksend mechanism are used to anonymize - clean up the history of previous operations for your DASH. As a result DASH becomes real fungible digital cash (money).

So why do not we call processes of anonymization - just a "Cleaning"!
It sounds simple, understandable and not as "criminal" as "Anonymization".

Thus users will have in their wallets:
1. Standard Dash
2. Cleaned Dash
3. And "To Clean" button.
Even your grandmother would understand this principle and do not have to explain for everybody what is "Anonymization", "Mixing", "Darksend", ... and why is it necessary for ordinary people.

"KISS" principle in action - because we need an acceptance of ordinary people.

What do you think about it? Please discuss there: https://dashtalk.org/threads/the-rolling-thread.4536/page-4#post-50784

+1 I like the way you think alex-ru.

In thinking about the fungibility issue the first thought that comes to mind for an alternative to darksend is "fungicide," but strictly speaking that implies "fungability killer." Maybe something like Anti-fungicide, but that lacks something as well. Fungifier maybe, or refungifier?

OK--never mind...

In any event, it is clear that Bitcoin has a problem with fungicide, and we have the solution.

[salmion]

Cleaning implies dirty.. Privacy is clearer.

Privatise. or Make private.

[ddink7]

Cleaning implies dirty.. Privacy is clearer.

Privatise. or Make private.

Cleaning is also too closely analogous to laundering.

[DonQuijote]

Cleaning implies dirty.. Privacy is clearer.

Privatise. or Make private.

+1
I dont like, sorry

If you want clean coins use darksend

[alex-ru]

Cleaning implies dirty.. Privacy is clearer.

Privatise. or Make private.

+1
I dont like, sorry

If you want clean coins use darksend

Sorry, I don't speak English good enough - so trust you in better word instead of "cleaning".

I just mention the principle.

Darkcoin -> DASH
Darksend, Anonimizing, mixing -> "new-name": something not-criminal, positive, clear that everybody will understand and use.

[TanteStefana2]

I think it's here, but the picture is so degraded and pixelized that it is almost impossible to tell.  No longer fun if you can't actually find something that you can tell is truly a panther.



forum doesn't like png images?

[spatula]

https://dashninja.pl/ says "Masternode operators MUST be running 0.11.2.21 or greater!"

But dashpay.io only has 0.11.2.17 listed to download.

[DonQuijote]

https://dashninja.pl/ says "Masternode operators MUST be running 0.11.2.21 or greater!"

But dashpay.io only has 0.11.2.17 listed to download.

For me:

Masternode operators MUST be running 0.11.2.17 or greater!

They are testing 0.11.2.20
https://dashtalk.org/threads/v0-11-2-x-testing.4202/page-35#post-50734

[ahoenk]

https://dashninja.pl/ says "Masternode operators MUST be running 0.11.2.21 or greater!"

But dashpay.io only has 0.11.2.17 listed to download.

For me:

Masternode operators MUST be running 0.11.2.17 or greater!

They are testing 0.11.2.20
https://dashtalk.org/threads/v0-11-2-x-testing.4202/page-35#post-50734

SSSssssssttttttt....dont let people dump their crave to buy dash... ,they will miss the train soon....

[TanteStefana2]

Cleaning implies dirty.. Privacy is clearer.

Privatise. or Make private.

it also implies laundering.  Seems to sound good outside of USA? or English speaking world??  but at least in the USA, Money Laundering is exactly what the FED wants to catch criminals doing

[TanteStefana2]

https://dashninja.pl/ says "Masternode operators MUST be running 0.11.2.21 or greater!"

But dashpay.io only has 0.11.2.17 listed to download.

For me:

Masternode operators MUST be running 0.11.2.17 or greater!

They are testing 0.11.2.20
https://dashtalk.org/threads/v0-11-2-x-testing.4202/page-35#post-50734

Yah, we're getting DarkSend to work faster, IX to not glitch (works pretty much every time) and smoothing out things like translations and little wallet issues like the slider bar.  So I think today or tomorrow, Evan will have an updated wallet that simply runs better.  Next time we start i2p or whatever, ip hiding technology

Oh, that's a mistake then, we're on 0.11.2.17 officially

[TaoOfSaatoshi]

One crazy idea for you guys.

We all know that the main vulnerability of Bitcoins, which prevents it from becoming full-fledged money - the lack of fungibility of coins. Fungibility of Bitcoins is spoiled by the fact that each amount contains previous history of operations. And a bad "history-legacy" can be used as a factor of discrimination in the subsequent use of coins (So we can talk about "clean" bitcoins vs "dirty" bitcoins).
For example, if you recive coins that were previously stolen, passed through darkmarkets etc. - They in some sense are "corrupted" and you may have problems with their further usage.

Dash resolves that vulnerability - darksend mechanism are used to anonymize - clean up the history of previous operations for your DASH. As a result DASH becomes real fungible digital cash (money).

So why do not we call processes of anonymization - just a "Cleaning"!
It sounds simple, understandable, positive(!) and not as "criminal" as "Anonymization".

Thus users will have in their wallets:
1. Standard Dash
2. Cleaned Dash
3. And "To Clean" button.
Even your grandmother would understand this principle and do not have to explain for everybody what is "Anonymization", "Mixing", "Darksend", ... and why is it necessary for ordinary people.

"KISS" principle in action - because we need an acceptance of ordinary people.

What do you think about it? Please discuss there: https://dashtalk.org/threads/the-rolling-thread.4536/page-4#post-50784

We are Dash (Digital Cash)
1. Dash Balance:
2. Digital Cash balance:
3. Make Digital Cash button.