Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2024, 03:08:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 [371] 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 ... 7012 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency  (Read 9723501 times)
camosoul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2014, 07:23:32 AM
 #7401

The 7970 will get ~12% lower hashrate than the 290x(assuming 2.2mhs for the 7970, and 2.5mhs for the 290x), but the 7970 is clearly still a much better deal.

I have a 7970 that I bought with part of a BitCoin that I originally only paid $4 to get. It was a 7970 for approximately $1.92. I mined some LTC with it. I'm mining DRK with it now and only getting 550Kh/s, nowhere near 2.2Mh/s..." or a "-lGL"? What letter is that even? Git? This is from a .zip file, the only thing available...

550 is way too low. Try different intensity levels (higher) and use the latest sph-sgminer.


Is latest sph. Intensity at 22.

Still trying to fix my missing libGL.so issue... purged all packages found here:

http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libGL.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=saucy&arch=amd64

Re-installed same packages, still the file is missing...

Why did it disappear, and why does re-installing the packages which contain it not result in it being installed? Stupid...

.
.OROCOIN.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
anonymousxx1503
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 07:25:07 AM
 #7402

I just finished a twitter tipping system for a different coin that I am mining. At the same time I am also mining this coin and would like to know if this is something darkcoin community is interested in.

Please pm me if you would like something like this setup.


A DRK twitter bot would definitely be very useful. You could anonymously tip your favorite posters and/or worthy causes. It's the perfect coin for that.

I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash." - Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
March 09, 2014, 07:28:25 AM
 #7403

The 7970 will get ~12% lower hashrate than the 290x(assuming 2.2mhs for the 7970, and 2.5mhs for the 290x), but the 7970 is clearly still a much better deal.

I have a 7970 that I bought with part of a BitCoin that I originally only paid $4 to get. It was a 7970 for approximately $1.92. I mined some LTC with it. I'm mining DRK with it now and only getting 550Kh/s, nowhere near 2.2Mh/s..." or a "-lGL"? What letter is that even? Git? This is from a .zip file, the only thing available...

550 is way too low. Try different intensity levels (higher) and use the latest sph-sgminer.


Is latest sph. Intensity at 22.

Still trying to fix my missing libGL.so issue... purged all packages found here:

http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libGL.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=saucy&arch=amd64

Re-installed same packages, still the file is missing...

Ok maybe you should go in reverse and try gradually lowering intensity (?). Also play with thread concurrency, various values. It doesn't make any sense.
camosoul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2014, 07:29:43 AM
 #7404

The 7970 will get ~12% lower hashrate than the 290x(assuming 2.2mhs for the 7970, and 2.5mhs for the 290x), but the 7970 is clearly still a much better deal.

I have a 7970 that I bought with part of a BitCoin that I originally only paid $4 to get. It was a 7970 for approximately $1.92. I mined some LTC with it. I'm mining DRK with it now and only getting 550Kh/s, nowhere near 2.2Mh/s..." or a "-lGL"? What letter is that even? Git? This is from a .zip file, the only thing available...

550 is way too low. Try different intensity levels (higher) and use the latest sph-sgminer.


Is latest sph. Intensity at 22.

Still trying to fix my missing libGL.so issue... purged all packages found here:

http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libGL.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=saucy&arch=amd64

Re-installed same packages, still the file is missing...

Ok maybe you should go in reverse and try gradually lowering intensity (?). Also play with thread concurrency, various values. It doesn't make any sense.

What are you using for 7970? Anyone else have 7970 settings? Intensity at 19 gives me 565Kh/s 18 goes lower and 20 goes lower... That's as fast as she goes.

.
.OROCOIN.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
TanteStefana
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 100


The Future Of Work


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 07:31:26 AM
 #7405

Hey guys I'm trying to help create a Darkcoin community so we aren't all just stuck in this one little thread Cheesy

Anyway I'm giving away 100 DRK come join me https://www.darkcointalk.org/threads/100-drk-giveaway.12/

Hey, that's a great initiative, I've made a reddit post about it http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1zy9pk/theres_a_100_darkcoin_giveaway_on_darkcointalkorg/

You know, I was just coming back to say how nice it is to have an entire forum just for the coin so that all the subjects that are spread all over this thread here can be organized for easy searching.  I mean, so many people are asking the same questions over and over, and they've been answered, but get lost in the pages and are not really searchable (forum search ability everywhere is abysmal)

Anyway, this looks really great!  Lets all move over!

█ ANN THREAD █
﹝Whitepaper﹞
【BLACKBOX OS】
The Future of Work. Decentralized.
TELEGRAM﹞﹝FACEBOOK
TWITTERYOUTUBE
TanteStefana
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 100


The Future Of Work


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 07:33:12 AM
 #7406

I just finished a twitter tipping system for a different coin that I am mining. At the same time I am also mining this coin and would like to know if this is something darkcoin community is interested in.

Please pm me if you would like something like this setup.


I think we're supposed to have one, but I haven't figured it out yet??  Can you fix/find it?  LOL

█ ANN THREAD █
﹝Whitepaper﹞
【BLACKBOX OS】
The Future of Work. Decentralized.
TELEGRAM﹞﹝FACEBOOK
TWITTERYOUTUBE
cflocation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 327
Merit: 250

it's a hardware thing!


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 07:36:04 AM
 #7407

I just finished a twitter tipping system for a different coin that I am mining. At the same time I am also mining this coin and would like to know if this is something darkcoin community is interested in.

Please pm me if you would like something like this setup.


I think we're supposed to have one, but I haven't figured it out yet??  Can you fix/find it?  LOL

I can set one up no problem. I just want to make sure it's something you all think we can use.

AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
March 09, 2014, 07:42:51 AM
 #7408

The 7970 will get ~12% lower hashrate than the 290x(assuming 2.2mhs for the 7970, and 2.5mhs for the 290x), but the 7970 is clearly still a much better deal.

I have a 7970 that I bought with part of a BitCoin that I originally only paid $4 to get. It was a 7970 for approximately $1.92. I mined some LTC with it. I'm mining DRK with it now and only getting 550Kh/s, nowhere near 2.2Mh/s..." or a "-lGL"? What letter is that even? Git? This is from a .zip file, the only thing available...

550 is way too low. Try different intensity levels (higher) and use the latest sph-sgminer.


Is latest sph. Intensity at 22.

Still trying to fix my missing libGL.so issue... purged all packages found here:

http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libGL.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=saucy&arch=amd64

Re-installed same packages, still the file is missing...

Ok maybe you should go in reverse and try gradually lowering intensity (?). Also play with thread concurrency, various values. It doesn't make any sense.

What are you using for 7970? Anyone else have 7970 settings? Intensity at 19 gives me 565Kh/s 18 goes lower and 20 goes lower... That's as fast as she goes.

I don't have a 7970, maybe if you search the thread you'll find some settings or someone will give you some? But it's too low, for sure.
camosoul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2014, 07:55:59 AM
 #7409

The 7970 will get ~12% lower hashrate than the 290x(assuming 2.2mhs for the 7970, and 2.5mhs for the 290x), but the 7970 is clearly still a much better deal.

I have a 7970 that I bought with part of a BitCoin that I originally only paid $4 to get. It was a 7970 for approximately $1.92. I mined some LTC with it. I'm mining DRK with it now and only getting 550Kh/s, nowhere near 2.2Mh/s..." or a "-lGL"? What letter is that even? Git? This is from a .zip file, the only thing available...

550 is way too low. Try different intensity levels (higher) and use the latest sph-sgminer.


Is latest sph. Intensity at 22.

Still trying to fix my missing libGL.so issue... purged all packages found here:

http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libGL.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=saucy&arch=amd64

Re-installed same packages, still the file is missing...

Ok maybe you should go in reverse and try gradually lowering intensity (?). Also play with thread concurrency, various values. It doesn't make any sense.

What are you using for 7970? Anyone else have 7970 settings? Intensity at 19 gives me 565Kh/s 18 goes lower and 20 goes lower... That's as fast as she goes.

I don't have a 7970, maybe if you search the thread you'll find some settings or someone will give you some? But it's too low, for sure.

-g8 managed to push it over 600... But this is still way too slow for a 7970... Still busted libGL.so too, can't build qt client...

.
.OROCOIN.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
tifozi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 08:16:33 AM
 #7410

It is most likely defaulting to scrypt since you are not passing -k darkcoin

Post your full config here in case it is still unclear.
camosoul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2014, 08:19:50 AM
 #7411

It is most likely defaulting to scrypt since you are not passing -k darkcoin

Post your full config here in case it is still unclear.

Quote
./sgminer -k darkcoin \
-o stratum+tcp://lotterymining.com:4444 -u un -p pw \
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 19 -g 1 \
--gpu-engine 1450 \
--gpu-memclock 1450

I've got it pretty well stripped out since nothing makes a difference. Scrypt doesn't mine that fast on this card... Yes, -k darkcoin is the very first option.

Quote
04:21:58] Started sgminer 4.1.0-85-gccc7d
[04:21:58] ADL found less devices than opencl!
[04:21:59] There is possibly more than one display attached to a GPU
[04:21:59] Use the gpu map feature to reliably map OpenCL to ADL
[04:21:59] WARNING: Number of OpenCL and ADL devices did not match!
[04:21:59] Hardware monitoring may NOT match up with devices!
[04:21:59] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[04:21:59] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!
[04:21:59] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[04:21:59] Probing for an alive pool
[04:21:59] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.008
[04:22:00] Network diff set to 290
[04:22:35] Network diff set to 290
[04:22:35] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block

It's 4:30am, going to sleep...

.
.OROCOIN.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
chaeplin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 08:38:29 AM
 #7412

http://darkcoin.mine.nu/graph.html

I have updated 'Darkcoin block generation time graph'

badman74
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 09, 2014, 08:52:41 AM
 #7413

The 7970 will get ~12% lower hashrate than the 290x(assuming 2.2mhs for the 7970, and 2.5mhs for the 290x), but the 7970 is clearly still a much better deal.

I have a 7970 that I bought with part of a BitCoin that I originally only paid $4 to get. It was a 7970 for approximately $1.92. I mined some LTC with it. I'm mining DRK with it now and only getting 550Kh/s, nowhere near 2.2Mh/s..." or a "-lGL"? What letter is that even? Git? This is from a .zip file, the only thing available...

550 is way too low. Try different intensity levels (higher) and use the latest sph-sgminer.


Is latest sph. Intensity at 22.

Still trying to fix my missing libGL.so issue... purged all packages found here:

http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libGL.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=saucy&arch=amd64

Re-installed same packages, still the file is missing...

Ok maybe you should go in reverse and try gradually lowering intensity (?). Also play with thread concurrency, various values. It doesn't make any sense.

this sounds kinda like what happens when the driver crashes and sets mem clock to 100 and engine to 300
if this is the case then try lowering your clocks some till it stops crashing
tifozi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 08:54:56 AM
 #7414

./sgminer -k darkcoin \
-o stratum+tcp://lotterymining.com:4444 -u un -p pw \
--thread-concurrency 8192 -I 19 -g 1 \
--gpu-engine 1450 \
--gpu-memclock 1450

[04:21:59] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[04:21:59] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!

It's 4:30am, going to sleep...


Way too high core clock. Start with 1050 and you can move up a bit maybe around 1140.

Memclock to 1500

This generally works good for most 7970 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8192.

Very rarely you can't use 2 threads (search for The Stilt's bioses), in that case -I 20 -g 1 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 24000 and tweak TC to higher numbers upto stability.

Also add to the startup script for sgminer

Code:
#!/bin/bash
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

bregge
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 09:33:22 AM
 #7415

Is it possible to implement the heavy algo of heavycoin into the optimized avx aes miner?
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 09:44:53 AM
 #7416

Is it possible to implement the heavy algo of heavycoin into the optimized avx aes miner?

it would be easier to just take the heavycoin miner and optimise that instead

node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
bregge
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 09:47:09 AM
 #7417

Is it possible to implement the heavy algo of heavycoin into the optimized avx aes miner?

it would be easier to just take the heavycoin miner and optimise that instead

Do you have the skills for doing that? How is it running with your new hw, you wanted to mine heavy or not?
blajde
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

Pre-sale - March 18


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 10:04:30 AM
 #7418

As time goes by

It is time for some new energy in here! Let us bring back the hype of the possibilities of this coin and how close we really are getting to achieve the dev teams goals!

Let us rise, friends!
chaeplin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 10:07:23 AM
 #7419

I'll be speaking at the Cryptocurrency Convention on Apr 9th in NewYork, detailing how DarkSend works and promoting DarkCoin. If anyone will be in NewYork at that time I'd love to meet you!

http://cryptocurrencyconvention.com/


*My details should be up on the site soon


speakers .. . what happen ?
ShadowOfScales
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 138
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 09, 2014, 10:09:26 AM
 #7420

How's 1.1mhash for a laptop AMD 7970m?
It never goes above 65c while mining DRK, and never seems to go above 72c regardless of Overclocking, so don't be one of those "don't mine on a laptop!" people.
Pages: « 1 ... 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 [371] 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 ... 7012 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!