Tathata
Member
 Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
 |
July 10, 2015, 01:18:33 PM |
|
Defending the scam logical  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Tathata
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:21:53 PM |
|
And they are the same just different sizes. You can actually call anything a ponzi if it collapses in the end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThePhwner
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:25:48 PM |
|
And they are the same just different sizes. You can actually call anything a ponzi if it collapses in the end.
That might be the most retarded thing any of you PQs have written yet. Here we go again with you and your quest to refute facts with airy philosophical drivel that doesn't mean anything or prove/disprove anything. So, you're now claiming BTC is a Ponzi? Well lay it out for us professor. Let's hear your wisdom on how BTC is a ponzi just like ScryptCC. Please. Enlighten me and the others here. Clearly the facts are on your side? |
|
|
|
|
D4RK5T4R
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:26:44 PM |
|
And they are the same just different sizes. You can actually call anything a ponzi if it collapses in the end.
Just because something collapses does not make it a ponzi. The fact that the operator is using new investment to pay old investors makes it a ponzi. In case you missed it earlier: Doubt scc ever said 850 was online mining.
As you seem to have trouble reading/researching , I will help you out.
Right now I can officially say that our market is 100% ran by users as we have no more KHS to sell.
The users currently own 500GHS, a 350GHS batch just arrived last week but we don't plan in selling those KHS for the time being.
Do you honestly think he would allegedly purchase that much hashrate and just have it sitting there in boxes? Of course if he had it , it would be mining, but we already know he is not mining, so the point is moot. However the quote does prove that marshmallow scamtos claimed he had 850ghs and that you are a Magoogle.  |
|
|
|
Tathata
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:27:34 PM |
|
Two words. "Fools Gold".
|
|
|
|
|
Tathata
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:31:33 PM |
|
@D4RK5T4R I also already said even if scc is mining with 1kh its mining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThePhwner
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:32:11 PM |
|
And they are the same just different sizes. You can actually call anything a ponzi if it collapses in the end.
Just because something collapses does not make it a ponzi. The fact that the operator is using new investment to pay old investors makes it a ponzi. In case you missed it earlier: Doubt scc ever said 850 was online mining.
As you seem to have trouble reading/researching , I will help you out.
Right now I can officially say that our market is 100% ran by users as we have no more KHS to sell.
The users currently own 500GHS, a 350GHS batch just arrived last week but we don't plan in selling those KHS for the time being.
Do you honestly think he would allegedly purchase that much hashrate and just have it sitting there in boxes? Of course if he had it , it would be mining, but we already know he is not mining, so the point is moot. However the quote does prove that marshmallow scamtos claimed he had 850ghs and that you are a Magoogle. Obvious troll is obvious. This fake 2nd/3rd/Umpteenth acct is on Bitcointalk claiming Bitcoin is a ponzi and slave currency. Best just leave this one alone until the little boy can formulate an actual thought backed by some facts and not just expound faux philosophical tripe. |
|
|
|
wlefever
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1173
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:33:13 PM |
|
Today Morning, Admin Hot Wallet Balance 87 BTC Today Now Admin Hot Wallet Balance 488 BTC 7 Hours = 400 BTC WOW So that's who caused the LTC drop converting some coins to BTC  |
|
|
|
Tathata
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:33:24 PM
Last edit: July 10, 2015, 02:20:07 PM by Tathata |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ripzombie
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:37:43 PM |
|
"What wallet address? I want to check it out myself on blockchain.info or whatever explorer, thanks. Please post it here, thanks."sccstats.com (Android Application) my smartphone screencapture 
|
|
|
|
|
|
D4RK5T4R
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:38:09 PM |
|
@D4RK5T4R I also already said even if scc is mining with 1kh its mining.
I was just relieving you of any doubt that marcelo did claim to be mining with 850 ghs, as you seemed to be under the impression that he had never stated that. |
|
|
|
Tathata
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:42:26 PM |
|
@D4RK5T4R I also already said even if scc is mining with 1kh its mining.
I was just relieving you of any doubt that marcelo did claim to be mining with 850 ghs, as you seemed to be under the impression that he had never stated that. Ok still all the proof is in the sentence scc wrote. Go with it or don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
kitey
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:49:03 PM |
|
And they are the same just different sizes. You can actually call anything a ponzi if it collapses in the end.
Just because something collapses does not make it a ponzi. The fact that the operator is using new investment to pay old investors makes it a ponzi. In case you missed it earlier: Doubt scc ever said 850 was online mining.
As you seem to have trouble reading/researching , I will help you out.
Right now I can officially say that our market is 100% ran by users as we have no more KHS to sell.
The users currently own 500GHS, a 350GHS batch just arrived last week but we don't plan in selling those KHS for the time being.
Do you honestly think he would allegedly purchase that much hashrate and just have it sitting there in boxes? Of course if he had it , it would be mining, but we already know he is not mining, so the point is moot. However the quote does prove that marshmallow scamtos claimed he had 850ghs and that you are a Magoogle. Obvious troll is obvious. This fake 2nd/3rd/Umpteenth acct is on Bitcointalk claiming Bitcoin is a ponzi and slave currency. Best just leave this one alone until the little boy can formulate an actual thought backed by some facts and not just expound faux philosophical tripe. "expound faux philosophical tripe" OOOOoooooooooo Big man |
|
|
|
|
|
dickyCOY
|
|
July 10, 2015, 01:54:46 PM |
|
how long it take time to proces the withdrawl?
|
|
|
|
|
chrzczonki
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2015, 02:07:19 PM |
|
hey guys,
can you log in right now?
|
|
|
|
|
Tathata
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2015, 02:11:02 PM |
|
Nope its 500 error.
|
|
|
|
|
MagicMarcDH
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
July 10, 2015, 02:11:30 PM |
|
actually not, something happen right now, good or bad we will see soon  |
|
|
|
|
cryptodevil
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1240
Thread-puller extraordinaire
|
|
July 10, 2015, 02:32:49 PM |
|
@D4RK5T4R I also already said even if scc is mining with 1kh its mining.
I was just relieving you of any doubt that marcelo did claim to be mining with 850 ghs, as you seemed to be under the impression that he had never stated that. Ok still all the proof is in the sentence scc wrote. Go with it or don't. How about the fact that he's sold at least 500GH/s-worth of his 'KHS'? That means scrypt.cc should be mining with 500GH/s of Scrypt for the holders of those sold 'KHS'. Which they aren't, because . . . math. |
WARNING!!! Check your forum URLs carefully and avoid links to phishing sites like 'thebitcointalk' 'bitcointalk.to' and 'BitcointaLLk' |
|
|
mefisto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
July 10, 2015, 02:34:00 PM |
|
Nope its 500 error.
The site works .... stupid troll |
|
|
|
|
|
D4RK5T4R
|
|
July 10, 2015, 02:37:34 PM |
|
@D4RK5T4R I also already said even if scc is mining with 1kh its mining.
I was just relieving you of any doubt that marcelo did claim to be mining with 850 ghs, as you seemed to be under the impression that he had never stated that. Ok still all the proof is in the sentence scc wrote. Go with it or don't. The sentence that scc wrote is a statement, not a proof, you seem to have the two things mixed up. |
|
|
|
|
