Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining

[xtoff]

Well, lookie here reward 4.3077 Sat. Looking good, admin is delivering piecemally as promised. More to come soon hopefully.

Good luck, g

OK.
Whose words are these?

Admin reward is around 40. He has 20 for his 350ghs and 16 from our 500ghs

I have seen maximum 17 sat.
Electric not reduced maybe,
some people are never happy

You mean electricity for scrypt.cc server running? Even with maintenance and hosting I dont think so much satoshi needed for that.
I just wonder when and where from did the info about admins reward around 40 come? The same about "He has 20 for his 350ghs and 16 from our 500ghs".
And how possible is to believe it at current time?






@xtoff

BTW do you(xtoff) mean admins "around 40" comes from the 20 + 16??? OMG!!!

Admin reward is around 40. He has 20 for his 350ghs and 16 from our 500ghs

I can explain

when 2 months ago the reward was around 13,5 satoshis but LTC was under 2$
Now LTC is over 4 $ so I think reward must be around 20 or more
That is why I said Admin has 20 satoshis per 350ghs and 16 satoshis pers 500ghs (ours) he gives us only 4

16*500=8000   our reward stolen   8000/350=22,8 Admin rewards is like 20+ 22,8 = 42,8 more than I said

so 350ghs ==> reward is 42,8 satoshis for ADMIN
   500ghs ==> reward is  4 for users

I don't think it is a ponzi Admin is only a thief. I know a lot of users who lost hundreds of BTC with the rate manipulation and the price divided per 3  or 4

I have only lost over 30 BTC, I am lucky
Stop saying this site is the most profitable, that is only for new users but remember 2 months ago the price was over 1100 satoshis.

I only say to new users becareful the same thing can happen to you.
One day you have 300 BTC and  the other day you wake up with 80BTC, that is scrypt.cc

nobody claims because Admin bans them or close the chat.

[1715019003]

1715019003

[1715019003]

1715019003

[Borgminer]

The site is a joke to many errors . and most of all 0 account recovery .

[Mayer Amschel]

So no one got their money back?

[suchmoon]

Now LTC is over 4 $ so I think reward must be around 20 or more

[...]

I don't think it is a ponzi Admin is only a thief.

"Only a thief" ?

All problems with "farm move" and "hacks" happened as LTC value started to climb up. For a real Scrypt mining farm this would have been a massive windfall. The loss from the "hack" would have been recovered in a few days with their 500 or 850 GH/s or whatever.

If you prefer to think that he's "only a thief" that's fine but Occam's razor tells us that scrypt.cc is not mining.

[ThePhwner]

Calling me a dumbass and douche. It doesn't get more eloquent than that. I stand by original statement Hashnest shill.

You beat your dead horse and I will beat mine.

I am sure you will with this and your 20 other brand new accounts. Let's assume I'm a "Hashnest shill."

Does that make Marcelo less of a liar or ScryptCC less of a scam? Does it mean he really does have 850 magical Gh/s and that everyone who has proven he doesn't is wrong? That this pile of shit HYIP is actually legitimate?

Survey says... nope.

[ThorSWO]

So no one got their money back?

I get paid like clockwork.

Now LTC is over 4 $ so I think reward must be around 20 or more

[...]

I don't think it is a ponzi Admin is only a thief.

"Only a thief" ?

All problems with "farm move" and "hacks" happened as LTC value started to climb up. For a real Scrypt mining farm this would have been a massive windfall. The loss from the "hack" would have been recovered in a few days with their 500 or 850 GH/s or whatever.

If you prefer to think that he's "only a thief" that's fine but Occam's razor tells us that scrypt.cc is not mining.

You're claiming they could have recovered the coins that were stolen in the hack in a few days.
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

[Soylent_Green]

You're claiming they could have recovered the coins that were stolen in the hack in a few days.
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

1500 BTC

Easy to find out.
I watched the hotwallet while they cleaned it.

People still believe he has 850 GH/s. Hilarious.

Every halfbrain see that this is a (partial) Ponzi.
Yes, he mine. But at the most with 200 GH/s.
And that's a very good-natured estimate.
Especially since this corresponds roughly to the drops in the LTC Hashrate.

The remaining payouts will be paid in advance by the members.
Just observe a couple of days the Hotwallet. It's really not hard.

It is undoubtedly for the most part a Ponzi.

But do not get me wrong, this is not a criticism.
The system worked perfectly up to a certain point.
And the hack was real. We found the old pre-hack Server. Still running.

The Admin has no reason to continue to run it. Besides, he has no more control over it.

This semi-Ponzi could have run years without any problems.
Even without anyone would have made losses in the end.

The low rewards have only one reason at the moment:
Not enough deposits.

If he set the rewards up to 100%, many people would cash out.
and the system would collaps.

[suchmoon]

Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

I don't really need you answering for me, but whatever. According to "admin" it's 1500BTC. Do you not trust admin?

http://sccstats.com/admin-history
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=444495.msg11687621#msg11687621

There are some addresses in there too, feel free to research.

Now 1500 BTC might take between 6-9 days to earn on 850 GH/s, depending on the power consumption. The "hack" happened more than a month ago.

Any wants to take a guess as to when scrypt.cc will go back to payouts matching actual LTC profitability?

[DumbModz]

You're claiming they could have recovered the coins that were stolen in the hack in a few days.
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

1500 BTC

Easy to find out.
I watched the hotwallet while they cleaned it.

People still believe he has 850 GH/s. Hilarious.

Every halfbrain see that this is a (partial) Ponzi.
Yes, he mine. But at the most with 200 GH/s.
And that's a very good-natured estimate.
Especially since this corresponds roughly to the drops in the LTC Hashrate.

The remaining payouts will be paid in advance by the members.
Just observe a couple of days the Hotwallet. It's really not hard.

It is undoubtedly for the most part a Ponzi.

But do not get me wrong, this is not a criticism.
The system worked perfectly up to a certain point.
And the hack was real. We found the old pre-hack Server. Still running.

The Admin has no reason to continue to run it. Besides, he has no more control over it.

This semi-Ponzi could have run years without any problems.
Even without anyone would have made losses in the end.

The low rewards have only one reason at the moment:
Not enough deposits.

If he set the rewards up to 100%, many people would cash out.
and the system would collaps.

That's all very possible but what is the explanation for not being able to recover accounts. I have been waiting a month or so now waiting to recover what is mine.

[wd40]

You're claiming they could have recovered the coins that were stolen in the hack in a few days.
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

1500 BTC

Easy to find out.
I watched the hotwallet while they cleaned it.

People still believe he has 850 GH/s. Hilarious.

Every halfbrain see that this is a (partial) Ponzi.
Yes, he mine. But at the most with 200 GH/s.
And that's a very good-natured estimate.
Especially since this corresponds roughly to the drops in the LTC Hashrate.

The remaining payouts will be paid in advance by the members.
Just observe a couple of days the Hotwallet. It's really not hard.

It is undoubtedly for the most part a Ponzi.

But do not get me wrong, this is not a criticism.
The system worked perfectly up to a certain point.
And the hack was real. We found the old pre-hack Server. Still running.

The Admin has no reason to continue to run it. Besides, he has no more control over it.

This semi-Ponzi could have run years without any problems.
Even without anyone would have made losses in the end.

The low rewards have only one reason at the moment:
Not enough deposits.

If he set the rewards up to 100%, many people would cash out.
and the system would collaps.

That's all very possible but what is the explanation for not being able to recover accounts. I have been waiting a month or so now waiting to recover what is mine.

and dissapearing with no communication ....

[BTC Buddy]

One day you have 300 BTC and  the other day you wake up with 80BTC, that is scrypt.cc

How is that different than any other stock market on the planet ?  We are not really dealing with a blue chip stock here.

[LsHallo]

Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

[Conbitcoin]

Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

Hey man! The minim Cashout is 0.01Btc.

Guys caution suspicious mail
http://i61.tinypic.com/28a58x0.jpg
Fuck Marcelo Santos big scammer.

[LsHallo]

Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

Hey man! The minim Cashout is 0.01Btc.

Guys caution suspicious mail

Fuck Marcelo Santos big scammer.

Minimimum is 0.002BTC

[ThorSWO]

Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

Hey man! The minim Cashout is 0.01Btc.

Guys caution suspicious mail

Fuck Marcelo Santos big scammer.

You do realize that this isn't from SCC, right?
Where does the link send you?

[LsHallo]

Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

Hey man! The minim Cashout is 0.01Btc.

Guys caution suspicious mail

Fuck Marcelo Santos big scammer.

You do realize that this isn't from SCC, right?
Where does the link send you?

You can easily hijack the "from" of an email so it looks that it was send from that adress but it wasn't. Just do a little research. I don't know how it's named in english, but there is a way. I think this email is originally from x@xzu.ru or so and the from shows "support@scrypt.cc". Getting tons of Spam Email where this is done.

[Meepers]

That's all very possible but what is the explanation for not being able to recover accounts. I have been waiting a month or so now waiting to recover what is mine.
[/quote]

Me, too.

[suchmoon]

THE REAL DEAL

Someone sent this to me so I am passing it on; it is a very interesting read - they obviously put a lot of work into it so I thought I should put it up.  If you have any interest in the future of scrypt.cc, for or against, give it a think.  It is a new perspective, and one that is undoubtedly closer to reality than what most are claiming on this board, for and against.

http://pastebin.com/sY2viGps

Nice essay for someone clinging to hope that this is somehow at least partially a legit operation. Why would a legit operation try so hard to look like a scam then?

Every major Bitcoin heist from Gox to Garza has had enough supporters and bagholders to come up with rationalizations even when the perpetrators themselves don't care anymore to keep the appearances.

Eventually it will sink in, just takes a bit of time.

[CanariAnali]

Even with a legit internet based business there are so much FUD spreding morons creating problems that the owner of the business might think to cash in and disappear instead of heaving a hard life Trying to do its best. It's not easy!

[ValleyOfTheWolves]

Look how the price is crashing obvious that some people got scammed by that email