pjv
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 03:45:18 PM |
|
Yes i can do
one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850 doing 434/410/393 Kh/s one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing 393/392/391/393 Kh/s
I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....
................. CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth
Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion. http://k-dev.net/cgminer/--- 2014-02-04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch and the official 3.7.2 branch. If not aware, the most interesting development in cgminer forks for scrypt is happening HERE. With discussion HERE.
|
|
|
|
Planethill
Member
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
|
|
February 27, 2014, 03:48:54 PM |
|
--- 2014-02-04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch and the official 3.7.2 branch.
Your kind of not getting it, it's not a new VERSION of cgminer it's a new branch of cgminer, so give it a new name, like the sgminer lot did. Yeah. Should stick to common conventions to avoid confusion.
|
|
|
|
SirGeekalot
|
|
February 27, 2014, 04:38:44 PM |
|
did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about over 20% of my total payout? You Received
0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)
Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC
Hash 46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947... Sent Time 2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm) Confirmations 4 Confirmations Double Spend No Double Spend Detected Transaction Fee 0.0035 BTC
|
|
|
|
zneww
|
|
February 27, 2014, 04:47:37 PM |
|
did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about over 20% of my total payout? You Received
0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)
Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC
Hash 46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947... Sent Time 2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm) Confirmations 4 Confirmations Double Spend No Double Spend Detected Transaction Fee 0.0035 BTC ahaha, well theres your awesome fee for ya
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
February 27, 2014, 04:50:14 PM |
|
Little disappointed that we fell below 0.01/MH ... Waffle stayed a lot closer to 0.01. But I have faith in Terk!
Well, even DOGE, MINT and LEAF are at 115% LTC.... It should be better once all backend stuff is sorted out did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about over 20% of my total payout? You Received
0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)
Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC
Hash 46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947... Sent Time 2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm) Confirmations 4 Confirmations Double Spend No Double Spend Detected Transaction Fee 0.0035 BTC ahaha, well theres your awesome fee for ya Give us full transaction hash or your address...
|
|
|
|
Terk (OP)
|
|
February 27, 2014, 04:58:08 PM |
|
did anyone else get hit with a massive fee in the last payout? mine took about over 20% of my total payout? You Received
0.0116469 BTC (£ 4.09)
Value at time of transaction 0.0116469 BTC
Hash 46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947... Sent Time 2014-02-27 16:09:03 (+1 minutes to confirm) Confirmations 4 Confirmations Double Spend No Double Spend Detected Transaction Fee 0.0035 BTC It's this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947b5b9b8493f02a01110e5f308f65d05b6a8c2122There were 1000 users paid in a single transaction with a total payout of 18.98095953 BTC and a total fee 0.0035 BTC (for sending payout to 1000 users). This was not a fee for sending to you alone, it was for sending to 1000 users. 0.0035 / 18.98095953 = 0.018%. Besides, the pool is covering payout fees from its own operational fees, so this is not being subtracted from your earnings.
|
|
|
|
Starscream
|
|
February 27, 2014, 05:38:13 PM |
|
I hope EU servers are gonna go up soon. Really enjoyed the pool so far, but past 2 days I've been getting 8-20% reject rates again, so I had to move onto another pool.
|
|
|
|
|
SirGeekalot
|
|
February 27, 2014, 06:12:05 PM |
|
It's this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/46fbdaa87c59135a6eff78947b5b9b8493f02a01110e5f308f65d05b6a8c2122There were 1000 users paid in a single transaction with a total payout of 18.98095953 BTC and a total fee 0.0035 BTC (for sending payout to 1000 users). This was not a fee for sending to you alone, it was for sending to 1000 users. 0.0035 / 18.98095953 = 0.018%. Besides, the pool is covering payout fees from its own operational fees, so this is not being subtracted from your earnings. Ah, thanks terk. Thought something was missing with my calculations. Been a long week.
|
|
|
|
nowaltcoin
|
|
February 27, 2014, 07:18:25 PM |
|
Maybee those people with high reject rate try this for me queue=0 (1) scan-time=1 (60) and expiry=1 (120) and have a look to the new reject rate some feedback would be nice
|
8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org 12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
|
|
|
RLutz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 07:18:39 PM |
|
I'm currently running queue:1, expiry: 30, and scan-time: 30
Are these okay settings, or should I change something to reduce reject rate?
|
|
|
|
dreamreamer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 08:13:54 PM |
|
Is there a worksize to set? I dont have one set. Im getting a large number of rejects using the same settings that another pool/coin give no rejects. Heres my settings for 2 7970's giving 1.1Mh/s. Anything to change?
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333 -u 1DJoPhTG5iS9dLZCXiYbdd1Kw8UYJrVjZe -p anything --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -I 13 --gpu-fan 85 --temp-overheat 84 --temp-cutoff 85 --gpu-engine 1020 --gpu-memclock 1450
|
|
|
|
Axco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 08:19:15 PM Last edit: February 27, 2014, 08:30:31 PM by Axco |
|
Mine is same as yours except I have -w256 in mine where as I do not see that in yours.
Try it and keep us updated.
Hope it helps.
|
|
|
|
nowaltcoin
|
|
February 27, 2014, 08:41:30 PM |
|
Hi
if you use this this way : just one command i think cgminer will use for all other not mentioned parameters the defaults or detected optimal parameter
So just create a cgminer.conf and play with scan-time expiry and queue
|
8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org 12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
|
|
|
williamj2543
|
|
February 27, 2014, 09:10:17 PM |
|
The reject rate is confirmed fixed for me. I live in eastern america, in Toronto, Canada (near New York). I get 1-3% rejects, which is actually better than most non-profit switching pool. Nice work terk!
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
joshua3m
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 09:17:22 PM |
|
Overall it's nice to see that reject are lower but with KGW implemented in most of new coins profit's will go down even more...
In addition to this is looking like with more people on boat profits are lower then in beta testings...
|
|
|
|
dreamreamer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 09:19:51 PM |
|
Setting to -w 256 fixed my reject problem. I am getting almost no rejects at all.
|
|
|
|
ryancpwalsh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 10:03:52 PM |
|
Setting to -w 256 fixed my reject problem. I am getting almost no rejects at all.
I thought worksize was forced by the server to 512 in this case?
|
|
|
|
Axco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 10:03:59 PM |
|
That's great news.
If you are getting less rejects than the ave pool reject rate in your user dashboard that is good news.
|
|
|
|
Ninetoe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 11:13:10 PM |
|
why are people talking about worksize and difficulty ?
-w command in cgminer has nothing to do with the static difficulty.
|
|
|
|
|