[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[Axco]

Quote Terk on page 76
Multi-region architecture still needs some finishing and testing. I'll continue working on it in the morning so the final ETA on new servers is Thursday afternoon.

[Axco]

I am from UK Europe,

I am running my rigs all R9 280x cards at I13 and am achieving ave 4-5% rejects, in my cgminer window the rejects counted are a lot higher but that comes from untracked shares which do count they have just not been tracked by my cgminer.

My reject rate is usually just under the pool average, so it is possible to achieve this from Europe but you will have to look at your config file and do some tweeking.

Other than this when mining fast coins with low diff and switching coins it is to be expected to get some rejects.

If you dnt like that you are not been forced to mine here on clevermining, but could also try again when the other servers are opened, they are already up and running but Terk is first tweaking the software side of things before he unleashes them to the wild, ( miners. ) We would only have lots of complaints if it was done any other way.

PS all this info is on page 76 of this thread and we are only on page 77.

Let Terk get on with his side of things, and then it will be better for us all.

[ekoice]

I will try with your suggestions nowaltcoin, thanks.

[nowaltcoin]

I tried every thing but it's still not possible to use it from Europe ? I have over 70% rejects on one rig and over 30% on another one, it's insane  
Even on middlecoin, I get between 2 and 6%.

When will the EU servers come ? Till then, I'll sadly go back to middlecoin.

So i'am working from germany and usualy i'am  between 4-5 % reject.

But i'am using cgminer 3.7.3 with xintensity and  gpu-thread =2 with some HD7850 and R9 270

This is working much smoother with fast-switching multipools as cgminer 3.7.2.

[Hotsauce]

crikey profit has dropped through the floor!

Wafflepool hashrate has spiked bigtime as well. Coincidence ?

https://i.imgur.com/gjfOw3x.gif

Hahahaha, haven't seen this in a while... so relevant! Thanks for the laugh

[elpsycongro]

I tried every thing but it's still not possible to use it from Europe ? I have over 70% rejects on one rig and over 30% on another one, it's insane  
Even on middlecoin, I get between 2 and 6%.

When will the EU servers come ? Till then, I'll sadly go back to middlecoin.

So i'am working from germany and usualy i'am  between 4-5 % reject.

But i'am using cgminer 3.7.3 with xintensity and  gpu-thread =2 with some HD7850 and R9 270

This is working much smoother with fast-switching multipools as cgminer 3.7.2.

You can do 2 gpu threads with a 7850? Whats your hash rate ? Can i see your settings?

[howardb]

I tried every thing but it's still not possible to use it from Europe ? I have over 70% rejects on one rig and over 30% on another one, it's insane  
Even on middlecoin, I get between 2 and 6%.

When will the EU servers come ? Till then, I'll sadly go back to middlecoin.

So i'am working from germany and usualy i'am  between 4-5 % reject.

But i'am using cgminer 3.7.3 with xintensity and  gpu-thread =2 with some HD7850 and R9 270

This is working much smoother with fast-switching multipools as cgminer 3.7.2.

Thought cgminer 3.7.2 was the last scrypt version!

[nowaltcoin]

Yes i can do

one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850  doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing  393/392/391/393 Kh/s

I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....



.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth

[howardb]

Yes i can do

one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850  doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing  393/392/391/393 Kh/s

I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....



.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth

Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.

[mistergee]

Little disappointed that we fell below 0.01/MH ... Waffle stayed a lot closer to 0.01.  But I have faith in Terk!

[Planethill]

This caused MEGA stales for me, like 40%.

Not too surprising, given that --expiry simply changes the definition of what a "stale" share is.

--expiry|-E <arg>   Upper bound on how many seconds after getting work we consider a share from it stale (default: 120)

So with --expiry 1 you're defining any share as stale if it's older than 1 second. Pointless. And probably doesn't even have any effect, because you're submitting it anyway (like you should).

Yup.  Seems my glee was shortlived.  While I am not getting "mega stales", my rejections shot back up overnight.  I must have made the tweak at the same time the pool changed to a slower coin.  Gave me the impression I hit on my issue.

Back to the drawing board.   

[watchmano]

Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.

[pallas]

Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.

payout is what counts ;-)

[talisin]

Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.

if you bothered to read you would see that terk is trying his best, but as he's on his own there are somethings that are on the to do list and will remain there for some time.

[zneww]

Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.

payout is what counts ;-)

Yeah well if you can make 10% more b/c 10% your hash is wasted. So..who wins there? Terk.

[pallas]

Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.

payout is what counts ;-)

Yeah well if you can make 10% more b/c 10% your hash is wasted. So..who wins there? Terk.

this is not the point: if I get more btc on clevermining with 10% rejects than on middlecoin with 1% rejects, where should I mine?
also high rejects may not always be fixable: it may depend on the coin mined.

[sgsdebruijn]

Holy cow, this pool needs to find a way to decrease reject rates... around 15% here... really want to try this but reject rates are way too high. Please put up some server at US EAST, until then i will stay on middlecoin, getting only 1,5% rejects there.

10% rejectrate with 0.01btc/mh/day
1.5% rejectrate with 0.006/7btc/mh/day

allergic for rejects?

[Capttech08]

I run GUIMiner-Scrypt (trying to learn SGMiner atm). I was running the newest version out with the green and white icon. I have noticed the stales I produce far out weigh the accepted I have been getting for the last 21 days or so. This is only an issue on my 280x's and 290's. 1 5870 and 1 6970 both run fine with the newer version. I tried dropping intensity down, overclocks down and everything else I could think of.

I have been testing an older version I had on a flash drive from about a year ago for about 2 hours. The orange icon one. My stale numbers have dropped signifcantly so far. I am going to run over night this way to verify.

Does anyone else use GUIMiner or is it pretty much just me? If so, which version do you use and what cards and accepted/stale ratios do you get? I'd be interested to see if anyone else has this issue and if this is a solid fix for it.

Keep up the great work Terk! Remember; haters gonna hate!    Off to bed. My Norco is making me loopy (maybe that's why SGMiner isn't making any sense tonight)

And if anyone is interested - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=489404.msg5392264#msg5392264

so after a 14 hour test run I can report, so far, my stale rate went from over 55% down to 7-9% inside of GUIMiner. Also, my estimated payout showing on clevermining is substantially higher than it usually is at this time of day. To be honest, what it is at now is what I have been making all day and I am actually down 1 r9 290 atm (down 830kh/s). So switch to the older orange version and see if this helps you. I cannot find a version number anywhere in the folder it is located in so I am not sure how to identify it other than the icon color.

Happy hunting!

[nowaltcoin]

Yes i can do

one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850  doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing  393/392/391/393 Kh/s

I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....



.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth

Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.

http://k-dev.net/cgminer/

--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.

[howardb]

Yes i can do

one rig has 2 R9-270 and one xfx 7850  doing 434/410/393 Kh/s
one rig has 4 HIS hd 7850 doing  393/392/391/393 Kh/s

I'am now remote with cgremote but i could not see the config-file from here.....



.................
CGMiner 3.7.3 by Karlroth

Oh thats real bright! branch cgminer from kolivas and keep the same name!! Bound to cause confusion.

http://k-dev.net/cgminer/

--- 2014-02-04 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE: New version number! it's now version 3.7.3, so people can differ between my branch
and the official 3.7.2 branch.

Your kind of not getting it, it's not a new VERSION of cgminer it's a new branch of cgminer, so give it a new name, like the sgminer lot did.