[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[solariis]

waffepool today so far = 0.00844659
here today so far        = 0.00614

ouch

Take it for what you will...Clever mining has consistently been better when averaged throughout the past month. Jump around if you like, I'll trust this pool any given day over the others. I trust consistency over variable profits.

Here's the past week broken down daily:

Date                Middlecoin  CleverMining  WafflePool  HashCows     Coinshift
2014-03-18      0.0053626   0.006637      0.0057547   0.005987    0.0056726
2014-03-17      0.0068538   0.006595      0.0066297   0.005600    0.0054815
2014-03-16      0.0096588   0.005445      0.0061009   0.008300    0.0052234
2014-03-15      0.0043988   0.006425      0.0053657   0.005700    0.0075447
2014-03-14      0.0010460   0.006612      0.0058229   0.006000    0.0066656
2014-03-13      0.0032652   0.004853      0.0061376   0.005800    0.0054182

Here's the Average payout per MHs averaged for the past: 1 day, 3 days, 7 days and 14 days.
Days   Middlecoin       CleverMining  WafflePool      HashCows        Coinshift
01      0.0053626       0.0066370    0.0057547       0.0059870      0.0056726
03      0.0072917       0.0062257    0.0061618       0.0066290      0.0054592
07      0.0055590       0.0061690    0.0060190       0.0060981      0.0059959
14      0.0055884       0.0065725    0.0063329       0.0060348      0.0059328

[1714676315]

1714676315

[1714676315]

1714676315

[1714676315]

1714676315

[chadwickx16]

I have Gridseed miners which require Cpuminer, which does not have a --scrypt flag
but a algo=scrypt flag. I point my farm at Clevermining and get no report of hashing.

How can this be addressed?

I'm using BFG and Windows to point my 10 GridSeeds to clever, no issue here. Best of luck!

[Xenocyde]

Why are we below LTC and not mining Aurora now?

[phzi]

waffepool today so far = 0.00844659
here today so far        = 0.00614

ouch

That's pretty significant. But wth are they mining to get .0084/mh? None of the big coins even come close to that atm.

WafflePool just switched to a new fully custom stratum layer, and changed what qualifies as a rejected share.  Because of the change to rejected share determination, the WP stats are going to (for the first time) be more roughly equivalent to CM's stats.  Classically, CM stats always appeared falsely higher then WP - this should decrease now.

Why are we below LTC and not mining Aurora now?

Aurora has a very long maturation time before it can be traded, and is a highly volatile market.  You can mine AUR, it isn't unlikely it will be worth half as much when you can actually sell it at market.

"Below LTC" is really a misnomer.  CM's profitability to currently below the "statistically average LTC profit", which is a lot different then actually being less profitable then LTC mining.  PPLNS LTC pools will have periods far below and far above average LTC profit as well.

[Xenocyde]

If Aurora wouldn't be a good idea, what about Vertcoin?

[MobileWill]

Hi  all,

I have been mining for a few months now and recently switched to CM. So far it has been very good. I just wanted to see if anyone has a drop in reported hash rate in the last 12hrs. Mine dropped a lot even thought CGMiner shows my normal ~830kh/s.

clevermining. com / users / 1MCpNkP56FHciFcRSs8eyobZPLAMTdCf1V

Also should I be concerned that CM shows more rejects than CGMiner?


Thanks!

[phzi]

If Aurora wouldn't be a good idea, what about Vertcoin?

Vertcoin requires different mining software.  There is no multi-pool capable of mining Vertcoin so far.

[EmileMarks]

https://i.imgur.com/kIPqRJZ.png

What do you think about switching to mBTC?

[Xenocyde]

Lol, you think not seeing any more 0.00xxxxxx will actually make us feel better about our crappy earnings?  

[Flep182]

I'd rather have the correct numbers. Unless it's going to be a 100 fold smaller, then it might be usefull.

[tiburonic]

My cgminer shows a constant 6.0 MH/s for the past 15 hours but the website sits at 5.5/5.6MH/s ?
Whats up with that?

[solariis]

waffepool today so far = 0.00844659
here today so far        = 0.00614

ouch

That's pretty significant. But wth are they mining to get .0084/mh? None of the big coins even come close to that atm.

WafflePool just switched to a new fully custom stratum layer, and changed what qualifies as a rejected share.  Because of the change to rejected share determination, the WP stats are going to (for the first time) be more roughly equivalent to CM's stats.  Classically, CM stats always appeared falsely higher then WP - this should decrease now.

Why are we below LTC and not mining Aurora now?

Aurora has a very long maturation time before it can be traded, and is a highly volatile market.  You can mine AUR, it isn't unlikely it will be worth half as much when you can actually sell it at market.

"Below LTC" is really a misnomer.  CM's profitability to currently below the "statistically average LTC profit", which is a lot different then actually being less profitable then LTC mining.  PPLNS LTC pools will have periods far below and far above average LTC profit as well.

That being said, is Waffle pool really going to have an actual higher per day earnings than CM from now forward?

[Xenocyde]

My cgminer shows a constant 6.0 MH/s for the past 15 hours but the website sits at 5.5/5.6MH/s ?
Whats up with that?

No pool is going to display the currect MH/s ever. What CGMiner is displaying is the correct speed. Most pools calculate Work Units actually.

[dragonmike]

The reason Wafflepool's return was higher lately is (I think) because they jumped on ghash.io's "1.25x" bandwagon. That wil end tomorrow around midday.

[uranian]

WafflePool just switched to a new fully custom stratum layer, and changed what qualifies as a rejected share.  Because of the change to rejected share determination, the WP stats are going to (for the first time) be more roughly equivalent to CM's stats.  Classically, CM stats always appeared falsely higher then WP - this should decrease now.

Just a lol from me in that "classically" in cryptoworld means over the past couple of weeks 

[joeventura]

I have Gridseed miners which require Cpuminer, which does not have a --scrypt flag
but a algo=scrypt flag. I point my farm at Clevermining and get no report of hashing.

How can this be addressed?

I'm using BFG and Windows to point my 10 GridSeeds to clever, no issue here. Best of luck!

I have 50 of them and BFGMiner won't run that many

[phzi]

The reason Wafflepool's return was higher lately is (I think) because they jumped on ghash.io's "1.25x" bandwagon. That wil end tomorrow around midday.

Not the case.  PoolWaffle did build a stratum proxy and was testing proxying 25% of the pool when GHash implemented the tiered reward scheme.   However, WafflePool stopped mining at GHash as soon as they posted info about the 1.25x bonus.

The reason WafflePool's rates are higher now is probably: luck, or, the new custom stratum server that PoolWaffle built is really doing it's job. 

Time will tell.

Just a lol from me in that "classically" in cryptoworld means over the past couple of weeks 

Classically, in this sense, would mean "before now".  CM's BTC/MH rate has always been inflated because of reject rate skew.  WafflePool has had a consistent <1% reject rate for almost all users over it's life as a pool - even if you set your intensity through the roof (say, 23).  This is because WP only considered shares stale if they were 2 blocks behind, not just 1.  Under the new switcher scheme, shares are rejected in a different way, and this encourages more reasonable tuning settings to maintain a ~2% reject rate (so far in my tests).

[z0rr0]

The reason Wafflepool's return was higher lately is (I think) because they jumped on ghash.io's "1.25x" bandwagon. That wil end tomorrow around midday.

Not the case.  PoolWaffle did build a stratum proxy and was testing proxying 25% of the pool when GHash implemented the tiered reward scheme.   However, WafflePool stopped mining at GHash as soon as they posted info about the 1.25x bonus.

The reason WafflePool's rates are higher now is probably: luck, or, the new custom stratum server that PoolWaffle built is really doing it's job. 

Time will tell.

Just a lol from me in that "classically" in cryptoworld means over the past couple of weeks 

Classically, in this sense, would mean "before now".  CM's BTC/MH rate has always been inflated because of reject rate skew.  WafflePool has had a consistent <1% reject rate for almost all users over it's life as a pool - even if you set your intensity through the roof (say, 23).  This is because WP only considered shares stale if they were 2 blocks behind, not just 1.  Under the new switcher scheme, shares are rejected in a different way, and this encourages more reasonable tuning settings to maintain a ~2% reject rate (so far in my tests).

Well, that's not true.
Waffle admin said that he is pointing part of pools hashrate directly to ghash until the promotion end, cause even with 1.25 it is better.

[phzi]

Not the case.  PoolWaffle did build a stratum proxy and was testing proxying 25% of the pool when GHash implemented the tiered reward scheme.   However, WafflePool stopped mining at GHash as soon as they posted info about the 1.25x bonus.

Well, that's not true.
Waffle admin said that he is pointing part of pools hashrate directly to ghash until the promotion end, cause even with 1.25 it is better.

Yes it was true... What you are saying is not true. Show me a quote of WafflePool saying that - because he didn't.  A Chinese whale with ~20GH that has been mining at WafflePool (used to mine at MC for a while) is mining at GHash until the promotion is over.  But WafflePool has NOT been proxying to GHash at all.

[romario]

hey there

I'm curious if Clevermining might be interested in cryptocurrency exchange rates calculator widget or real-time cryptocurrency rates on their website? we could provide it via our Cryptonator API