Xenocyde
|
|
April 16, 2014, 02:32:08 PM |
|
i switched 1 rig to test this service. Rejects % is awesome. 15% or even more. It kills all the potential profit. Could it be resolved somehow?
OK looks like noone wants to pay attention and add this to OP and site so I have to repeat myself: Guys, Terk specifically said that the REJECTS RATE is much lower than the miner program reports on the upper line and that is caused by a communication issue between the stratum and the miner. Untracked rejects are accounted for by the pool, only JOB NOT FOUND rejects are real rejects and these last ones are around 1-2% max. Somebody needs to put this in the OP and in the FAQs on the pool site so people understand what's going on. Also, Terk said he's working on a new stratum server and this rejects display error won't be featured there.
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Mymine
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
April 16, 2014, 02:36:40 PM |
|
Anyone have issues with GridSeeds and using CM? I notice my HW error rate jumps up 10-15% when using this pool.
It's bad for me too My 10GS's report 3.6Mh/s on average; reject: 1.67% HW error: 0.06% in scripta But on CM: 3.0Mh/s 24h average; now even as low as 2.8 ... Any ideas on how to improve this?
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
April 16, 2014, 02:37:11 PM |
|
i switched 1 rig to test this service. Rejects % is awesome. 15% or even more. It kills all the potential profit. Could it be resolved somehow?
OK looks like noone wants to pay attention and add this to OP and site so I have to repeat myself: Guys, Terk specifically said that the REJECTS RATE is much lower than the miner program reports on the upper line and that is caused by a communication issue between the stratum and the miner. Untracked rejects are accounted for by the pool, only JOB NOT FOUND rejects are real rejects and these last ones are around 1-2% max. Somebody needs to put this in the OP and in the FAQs on the pool site so people understand what's going on. Also, Terk said he's working on a new stratum server and this rejects display error won't be featured there.If you still don't understand what that means, I'll lay it simply for you: "Rejected share er349fifw (Job not Found)" = Real Reject. "Rejected Untracked Stratum Share from pool 0" = Fake Reject.
|
|
|
|
alt21moke
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
April 16, 2014, 05:05:40 PM |
|
i switched 1 rig to test this service. Rejects % is awesome. 15% or even more. It kills all the potential profit. Could it be resolved somehow?
OK looks like noone wants to pay attention and add this to OP and site so I have to repeat myself: Guys, Terk specifically said that the REJECTS RATE is much lower than the miner program reports on the upper line and that is caused by a communication issue between the stratum and the miner. Untracked rejects are accounted for by the pool, only JOB NOT FOUND rejects are real rejects and these last ones are around 1-2% max. Somebody needs to put this in the OP and in the FAQs on the pool site so people understand what's going on. Also, Terk said he's working on a new stratum server and this rejects display error won't be featured there.If you still don't understand what that means, I'll lay it simply for you: "Rejected share er349fifw (Job not Found)" = Real Reject. "Rejected Untracked Stratum Share from pool 0" = Fake Reject. I have 4 grids on cm. Changed scan time to 15 and exp to 30. Average 0.9% rejects according to cm stats page.
|
|
|
|
dreamreamer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
April 16, 2014, 09:37:32 PM |
|
Anyone have issues with GridSeeds and using CM? I notice my HW error rate jumps up 10-15% when using this pool.
Not here. I have 4 of them @ 850mhz connected to a PI. I usually get like 1 HW errror every other day for each of them. Now, I get a lot more if I go up to 900mhz so I just keep it at 850. What speed do you have it set to?
|
|
|
|
brwn8484
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2014, 01:44:37 AM |
|
Started to mine on clevermining 3 days ago. .025BTC balance but no payouts? How do I get payout?
|
|
|
|
Burnie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2014, 02:17:52 AM |
|
Started to mine on clevermining 3 days ago. .025BTC balance but no payouts? How do I get payout?
1. You need to have entered a correct BTC address for username when you started mining. Any upper/lowercase errors in your username when you started will prevent you from getting paid. If you suspect you made this mistake, PM Terk with your BTC address and he will correct this. (Also double-check your address in your miner) 2. You need to have at least 0.01 BTC "Ready For Payout" at around 01:00 GMT for daily payout (Immature/Unexchanged/Total Expected does not count for payouts) 3. You need to have at least 0.001 BTC "Ready For Payout" on sunday around 01:00 GMT for weekly payout
|
|
|
|
zevrus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:32:48 AM |
|
i switched 1 rig to test this service. Rejects % is awesome. 15% or even more. It kills all the potential profit. Could it be resolved somehow?
OK looks like noone wants to pay attention and add this to OP and site so I have to repeat myself: Guys, Terk specifically said that the REJECTS RATE is much lower than the miner program reports on the upper line and that is caused by a communication issue between the stratum and the miner. Untracked rejects are accounted for by the pool, only JOB NOT FOUND rejects are real rejects and these last ones are around 1-2% max. Somebody needs to put this in the OP and in the FAQs on the pool site so people understand what's going on. Also, Terk said he's working on a new stratum server and this rejects display error won't be featured there.If you still don't understand what that means, I'll lay it simply for you: "Rejected share er349fifw (Job not Found)" = Real Reject. "Rejected Untracked Stratum Share from pool 0" = Fake Reject. I dont think that this is fake Rejects. http://content.screencast.com/users/zevrus/folders/Jing/media/de092063-3a7f-448c-9c95-bbf08c9f8f06/2014-04-17_1031.pngHardware rejects is 2-3 times more.
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
April 17, 2014, 07:53:48 AM |
|
i switched 1 rig to test this service. Rejects % is awesome. 15% or even more. It kills all the potential profit. Could it be resolved somehow?
OK looks like noone wants to pay attention and add this to OP and site so I have to repeat myself: Guys, Terk specifically said that the REJECTS RATE is much lower than the miner program reports on the upper line and that is caused by a communication issue between the stratum and the miner. Untracked rejects are accounted for by the pool, only JOB NOT FOUND rejects are real rejects and these last ones are around 1-2% max. Somebody needs to put this in the OP and in the FAQs on the pool site so people understand what's going on. Also, Terk said he's working on a new stratum server and this rejects display error won't be featured there.If you still don't understand what that means, I'll lay it simply for you: "Rejected share er349fifw (Job not Found)" = Real Reject. "Rejected Untracked Stratum Share from pool 0" = Fake Reject. I dont think that this is fake Rejects. Hardware rejects is 2-3 times more. What exactly do you see in your miner? More "Job Not Found" rejects or more "Untracked Share" rejects? The graph on the site displays what is reported by the miner's first line, thus adding all the fake rejects to the total count.
|
|
|
|
woytas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2014, 10:37:39 AM |
|
i switched 1 rig to test this service. Rejects % is awesome. 15% or even more. It kills all the potential profit. Could it be resolved somehow?
OK looks like noone wants to pay attention and add this to OP and site so I have to repeat myself: Guys, Terk specifically said that the REJECTS RATE is much lower than the miner program reports on the upper line and that is caused by a communication issue between the stratum and the miner. Untracked rejects are accounted for by the pool, only JOB NOT FOUND rejects are real rejects and these last ones are around 1-2% max. Somebody needs to put this in the OP and in the FAQs on the pool site so people understand what's going on. Also, Terk said he's working on a new stratum server and this rejects display error won't be featured there.If you still don't understand what that means, I'll lay it simply for you: "Rejected share er349fifw (Job not Found)" = Real Reject. "Rejected Untracked Stratum Share from pool 0" = Fake Reject. I dont think that this is fake Rejects. http://content.screencast.com/users/zevrus/folders/Jing/media/de092063-3a7f-448c-9c95-bbf08c9f8f06/2014-04-17_1031.pngHardware rejects is 2-3 times more. Have you tried the us/canada server? I was getting high reject on EU but on US I'm getting 1% And btw Terk keep up the good work, results are great!
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
April 17, 2014, 11:24:05 AM |
|
DO NOT use the rejects graph, it represents nothing. Look at the green circle which circles your hashrate. Below that, there is the reject percentage.
|
|
|
|
Peoplerun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2014, 12:59:32 PM |
|
OK. I understand now
|
|
|
|
pjv
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2014, 02:42:20 PM |
|
unless we are just getting extremely lucky, i'd say @terk's profitability tweaks are working pretty well... https://i.imgur.com/4wFIErb.png
|
|
|
|
vm_mpn
|
|
April 17, 2014, 02:59:02 PM |
|
Yep, looks impressive
|
|
|
|
Xenocyde
|
|
April 17, 2014, 03:05:58 PM |
|
Tweaks for sure plus the rising BTC.
|
|
|
|
FoFFiFFe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2014, 04:19:16 PM |
|
unless we are just getting extremely lucky, i'd say @terk's profitability tweaks are working pretty well...
Terk has always done a good job since the beginning of this project. You just need to be a bit patient.
|
|
|
|
chadwickx16
|
|
April 17, 2014, 04:34:20 PM |
|
unless we are just getting extremely lucky, i'd say @terk's profitability tweaks are working pretty well...
Terk has always done a good job since the beginning of this project. You just need to be a bit patient. Terk for Pool Op of the Year!!
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
April 17, 2014, 04:38:49 PM |
|
unless we are just getting extremely lucky, i'd say @terk's profitability tweaks are working pretty well...
Terk has always done a good job since the beginning of this project. You just need to be a bit patient. Terk for Pool Op of the Year!! I have been with Terk since the beta. Trust him.
|
|
|
|
Prima Primat
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
April 17, 2014, 04:43:15 PM |
|
Profits have increased on all pools recently.
|
|
|
|
byt411
|
|
April 17, 2014, 04:51:08 PM |
|
Profits have increased on all pools recently. Not as much as CleverMining.
|
|
|
|
|