[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[SirGeekalot]

i can back this up with another UK based Improvement.



although the rejects are still bouncing up and down the improvement is undeniable.

[pengoau]

--expiry 1 --queue 1 --scan-time 1

after 1hr 1/2, reject is at 10.5%
after 6hrs, reject is at 8.5%

Location: Australia

[sgsdebruijn]

7 hours mining 5.52% rejects, stable now

"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"failover-only" : true,
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "5",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",

"scrypt" : true,
"kernel" : "scrypt",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

[sammy007]

Should I remove --no-submit-stale like for middlecoin?

[corsaro]

[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification

Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)

Yeah, we need EUropean server!

+1

+1

+1

[webbson]

[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification

Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)

Yeah, we need EUropean server!

+1

+1

+1

+1

I'm at 7-8% rejected

[phrozenspite]

Should I remove --no-submit-stale like for middlecoin?

You should never use that, your miner still generates stales, and there is a small chance that it will discard some valid ones. That is just for vanity.

[talisin]

to the people calling for an EU server, chill your beans, im in the uk and only have 4.6 % reject for last 24 hours, having a server in the EU is not going to make a hell of a diffrence especially while there are still technical adjustements being made.

I would much have a stable / fully working code before getting a locall sourced server to provide bad / not tweaked code. Plus Terk has already said its on the to do list so consistantly saying +1 is not going to help at all in this matter except provide further stress to Terk which can lead to mistakes being made.

I would like to take this opertunity to thank Terk for his efforts and rapid responses when issues have arrisen and taking the time and effort to make this pool great and hopefully things will get better.

[EdBoon]

Loving the user interface and the communications via twitter, but still getting 10-15% rejects on my 3.7 mh/s rig.  If it were lower i would definitely bring over an additional 12 mh/s.  

*based out of Atlanta

[aclass]

reject % in general does not really matter as different locations in EU have different ping results to the server

my ping is 222ms. what's yours?

to the people calling for an EU server, chill your beans, im in the uk and only have 4.6 % reject for last 24 hours, having a server in the EU is not going to make a hell of a diffrence especially while there are still technical adjustements being made.

I would much have a stable / fully working code before getting a locall sourced server to provide bad / not tweaked code. Plus Terk has already said its on the to do list so consistantly saying +1 is not going to help at all in this matter except provide further stress to Terk which can lead to mistakes being made.

I would like to take this opertunity to thank Terk for his efforts and rapid responses when issues have arrisen and taking the time and effort to make this pool great and hopefully things will get better.

[talisin]

reject % in general does not really matter as different locations in EU have different ping results to the server

my ping is 222ms. what's yours?

to the people calling for an EU server, chill your beans, im in the uk and only have 4.6 % reject for last 24 hours, having a server in the EU is not going to make a hell of a diffrence especially while there are still technical adjustements being made.

I would much have a stable / fully working code before getting a locall sourced server to provide bad / not tweaked code. Plus Terk has already said its on the to do list so consistantly saying +1 is not going to help at all in this matter except provide further stress to Terk which can lead to mistakes being made.

I would like to take this opertunity to thank Terk for his efforts and rapid responses when issues have arrisen and taking the time and effort to make this pool great and hopefully things will get better.

AS the server is not pingable as stated then i wouldnt know im afraid.

[SirGeekalot]

AS the server is not pingable as stated then i wouldnt know im afraid.

?? of course its pingable.

i'm in the south of England

PING us.clevermining.com (54.200.13.55): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 54.200.13.55: seq=0 ttl=47 time=176.951 ms
64 bytes from 54.200.13.55: seq=1 ttl=47 time=171.402 ms
64 bytes from 54.200.13.55: seq=2 ttl=47 time=174.863 ms
64 bytes from 54.200.13.55: seq=3 ttl=47 time=171.175 ms

PING eu.wafflepool.com (95.85.28.31) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from eu.coins (95.85.28.31): icmp_req=1 ttl=51 time=21.9 ms
64 bytes from eu.coins (95.85.28.31): icmp_req=2 ttl=51 time=16.4 ms
64 bytes from eu.coins (95.85.28.31): icmp_req=3 ttl=51 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from eu.coins (95.85.28.31): icmp_req=4 ttl=51 time=17.6 ms

PING middlecoin.com (54.194.173.83) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ec2-54-194-173-83.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com (54.194.173.83): icmp_req=1 ttl=53 time=30.4 ms
64 bytes from ec2-54-194-173-83.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com (54.194.173.83): icmp_req=2 ttl=53 time=29.9 ms
64 bytes from ec2-54-194-173-83.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com (54.194.173.83): icmp_req=3 ttl=53 time=28.7 ms
64 bytes from ec2-54-194-173-83.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com (54.194.173.83): icmp_req=4 ttl=53 time=27.5 ms

[talisin]

Must have changed with the server upgrade, i dont think terk wanted it pingable.

as im not at home and stuck in work still not able to give you my ping, sorry.

[KC82]

Terk, any chance that vardiff may come back to help reduce variance for us micro-miners?

[jbass350z]

You may want to to limit the users. It seems the higher the MH/s go the less profit there is to be had. People will just move on to the next pool once it reaches a breaking point.

[talisin]

You may want to to limit the users. It seems the higher the MH/s go the less profit there is to be had. People will just move on to the next pool once it reaches a breaking point.

but is it down to the new amount of users or the fact there was the server move and i think there may have been a software patch as well?

[sammy007]

to the people calling for an EU server, chill your beans, im in the uk and only have 4.6 % reject for last 24 hours, having a server in the EU is not going to make a hell of a diffrence especially while there are still technical adjustements being made.

But I am in russia, and EU is much better for me than US.

[SirGeekalot]

to the people calling for an EU server, chill your beans, im in the uk and only have 4.6 % reject for last 24 hours, having a server in the EU is not going to make a hell of a diffrence especially while there are still technical adjustements being made.

I would much have a stable / fully working code before getting a locall sourced server to provide bad / not tweaked code. Plus Terk has already said its on the to do list so consistantly saying +1 is not going to help at all in this matter except provide further stress to Terk which can lead to mistakes being made.

I would like to take this opertunity to thank Terk for his efforts and rapid responses when issues have arrisen and taking the time and effort to make this pool great and hopefully things will get better.

Just because you have a low reject, doesn't mean everyone in the EU needs to chill. being in the UK we have a relatively good connection to the rest of the world.

http://maps.level3.com/default/#.UwYJkfl_vbA

[shango]

[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification

Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)

Yeah, we need EUropean server!

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

[talisin]

Just because you have a low reject, doesn't mean everyone in the EU needs to chill. being in the UK we have a relatively good connection to the rest of the world.

http://maps.level3.com/default/#.UwYJkfl_vbA

I think you missed the point i was trying to make, I was trying to say that once the current server is up and running as it should do then Terk will look at implementing an EU server, at the moment he's trying to make sure the current setup/software can handle things the way they should otherwise there is no point adding another server to a bugged code as this could cause further complications.

Its already on the to do list so consistantly adding these +1 posts is not going to add a lot of value to the thread, But this is the internet and people are just impatient i guess and want things yesterday before things are fully fixed.