C892
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:02:50 PM |
|
"Unexchanged" issue is getting more and more scary... How long does it usually take for unexchanged and immature to mature? Cause I have unexchanged for atleast 14 hours now. Let the pool do their work. exchanging for the best value may take a few hours/days, i think?
|
|
|
|
pengoau
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:10:16 PM |
|
Getting high rejects now, 20%+. Was 4-8% for the past 24hrs.
Could really do with the new servers. Seems the servers are struggling with the load. The longer the problem exists more and more people won't bother with CM.
Once you get a bad rep, its hard to get your good rep back. As you make money off this pool, its worth bringing these servers online ASAP.
|
|
|
|
eyecoins
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:17:19 PM |
|
Im at 27% rejects right now, up from the usual 5-7%.
|
|
|
|
Quenouille79
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:18:20 PM |
|
Getting high rejects now, 20%+. Was 4-8% for the past 24hrs.
Could really do with the new servers. Seems the servers are struggling with the load. The longer the problem exists more and more people won't bother with CM.
Once you get a bad rep, its hard to get your good rep back. As you make money off this pool, its worth bringing these servers online ASAP.
Give the guy a break, he's almost working 24/7 on it. just read his previous posts. anyway it's not important for now as the profit is really good even with the hight reject rate. just relax and enjoy the ride, stop being so nervous.
|
|
|
|
mcofko
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:24:56 PM |
|
Could somebody explain me the reason for bouncing of hash rate from 1.5MH/s to 2MH/s, the diff is +-500kH/s from time to time. Is this because of the pool problems, or am I pushing the cards too much? Have three MSI 280x cards, running C:1050 M:1500 and thread concurrency:14336...it's really annoying to see that the cards aren't doing its max profit.
|
|
|
|
Quenouille79
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:27:27 PM |
|
Could somebody explain me the reason for bouncing of hash rate from 1.5MH/s to 2MH/s, the diff is +-500kH/s from time to time. Is this because of the pool problems, or am I pushing the cards too much? Have three MSI 280x cards, running C:1050 M:1500 and thread concurrency:14336...it's really annoying to see that the cards aren't doing its max profit.
read the last 10 pages
|
|
|
|
Vbs
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:34:49 PM |
|
Could somebody explain me the reason for bouncing of hash rate from 1.5MH/s to 2MH/s, the diff is +-500kH/s from time to time. Is this because of the pool problems, or am I pushing the cards too much? Have three MSI 280x cards, running C:1050 M:1500 and thread concurrency:14336...it's really annoying to see that the cards aren't doing its max profit.
http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2012/10/71-variable-pool-difficulty.htmlThe number of shares submitted by a miner with a contant hashrate follows a Poisson distribution. The standard deviation - a measure of how much a variable varies - increases only as the square root of the average number of shares per time period. Thus the more shares submitted in a given time period the lower the variability in shares submitted for that time period. So the lower the difficulty, the lower the variance, and the longer the time period over which the number of shares is assessed, the lower the variance. Check your U value (submitted shares/minute). At that hashrate, I'd expect you to be around 1-2 shares/min, which consulting the table above yields an hourly ~18% variance (~3.6% daily).
|
|
|
|
Terk (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:38:21 PM |
|
Payouts. There were no payouts in the last hours because there's a problem at Cryptsy. Our withdrawals are pending and their support usually needs hours to respond to a ticket. I think it's the same problem wafflepool faced - "Cryptsy API isn't working properly (getting unauthorized errors for trading)" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=433634.msg5296676#msg5296676EDIT: clever better be the first to fix large amount of "Unexchanged" to keep profitability high (other pools will be dumping as soon as they fix I think) This is not a trading problem. We trade our coins on an ongoing basis. Most of the unexchanged balance is actually traded, but they're not withdrawn from Cryptsy yet. It's marked as “ready to pay” only after it gets back into our wallet. I have a ticket opened at Cryptsy about this. Could someone help my think? Here's my math: 0.01092 advertised BTC/MHs* 2.740 my average MHs to CM, rejects included * 0.98 fee = 0.029322384 BTC/day for my rig on CM I can. Numbers on CM website already include substracted fee so you shouldn't substract it a second time.
|
|
|
|
UdjinM6
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1318
Merit: 1040
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:40:48 PM |
|
Payouts. There were no payouts in the last hours because there's a problem at Cryptsy. Our withdrawals are pending and their support usually needs hours to respond to a ticket. I think it's the same problem wafflepool faced - "Cryptsy API isn't working properly (getting unauthorized errors for trading)" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=433634.msg5296676#msg5296676EDIT: clever better be the first to fix large amount of "Unexchanged" to keep profitability high (other pools will be dumping as soon as they fix I think) This is not a trading problem. We trade our coins on an ongoing basis. Most of the unexchanged balance is actually traded, but they're not withdrawn from Cryptsy yet. It's marked as “ready to pay” only after it gets back into our wallet. I have a ticket opened at Cryptsy about this. Could someone help my think? Here's my math: 0.01092 advertised BTC/MHs* 2.740 my average MHs to CM, rejects included * 0.98 fee = 0.029322384 BTC/day for my rig on CM I can. Numbers on CM website already include substracted fee so you shouldn't substract it a second time. cool! thanks for the reply!
|
DASH: XsV4GHVKGTjQFvwB7c6mYsGV3Mxf7iser6
|
|
|
pengoau
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:03:10 PM |
|
Can you bring the others servers online? Or someone fix the existing server. I'm getting poor performance, high rejects and well cgwatcher is restarting the miner as the server is not giving me enough work.
Are you able to give an eta on when the new servers will come online? Or are we to get silence from you?
Yes I'm a bit frustrated.
|
|
|
|
C892
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:10:06 PM |
|
Can you bring the others servers online? Or someone fix the existing server. I'm getting poor performance, high rejects and well cgwatcher is restarting the miner as the server is not giving me enough work.
Are you able to give an eta on when the new servers will come online? Or are we to get silence from you?
Yes I'm a bit frustrated.
The servers are online. And you have a pretty bad attitude. You're free to move to somewhere else actually instead of bitching and demanding like this. Read 2 posts above yours and you see a post from the pool owner. He's working almost 24/7 to fix the pool.
|
|
|
|
talisin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:13:07 PM |
|
The server is online and he cant give an ETA as he has to test and rewrite code, if you bothered to read the thread you would see that this is being worked on and it will be ready when its ready.
If an ETA is provided you would be kicking and screaming if the severs were not online at the specified time, i would rather the software be ready for the new servers and for it to be deployed correctly and working than have a bodge job done on it.
with regards to the silence, so far the only time Terk hasnt been replying is because he's been getting some sleep, this is a basic human need that everyone needs.
|
|
|
|
SirGeekalot
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:14:14 PM |
|
Can you bring the others servers online? Or someone fix the existing server. I'm getting poor performance, high rejects and well cgwatcher is restarting the miner as the server is not giving me enough work.
Are you able to give an eta on when the new servers will come online? Or are we to get silence from you?
Yes I'm a bit frustrated.
how about, get back in your corner and have some patience. there has been an update from Terk in the last couple of hours stating that he is fixing a problem with the Stratum server and when that is complete he will be deploying international servers. if you are frustrated, take the gamble and move to a less profitable Pool with less rejection rate. Or, sit it out, DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING and still make some Coins. Being a faceless account on the internet doesn't give you the right to be impatient and rude. Setup a Failover Pool if you're worried about losing out in making money from doing nothing all day long..
|
|
|
|
tpaclassic
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:16:58 PM |
|
I'm using 5, 0, 30. Not sure if it's helping me or not. It sure isn't hindering anything. You want to find a nice even balance between your hash rate and your WU to get as close to 1:1 as you can with them with as low rejects as possible. Once you have that and things are stable, you should have your best settings. I found these two pages very helpful for my current xintensity and thread settings. And yeah, any hardware errors at all is bad. Posts 1189 and 1194 specifically - https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=6842.1185Post 129 - https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=13190.msg112035#msg112035I'm trying to adapt this to my 290X's (Sapphire as well). I had to bump my threads back to 27400 because I was getting scores of hardware errors. May I ask what scantime/queue/expiry settings you would advise?
So far things look hopeful, though I'm not sure why my old settings would be any worse than this. Thanks for taking the time to share this!
|
|
|
|
pengoau
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:20:36 PM Last edit: February 22, 2014, 04:46:26 PM by pengoau |
|
Can you bring the others servers online? Or someone fix the existing server. I'm getting poor performance, high rejects and well cgwatcher is restarting the miner as the server is not giving me enough work.
Are you able to give an eta on when the new servers will come online? Or are we to get silence from you?
Yes I'm a bit frustrated.
how about, get back in your corner and have some patience. there has been an update from Terk in the last couple of hours stating that he is fixing a problem with the Stratum server and when that is complete he will be deploying international servers. if you are frustrated, take the gamble and move to a less profitable Pool with less rejection rate. Or, sit it out, DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING and still make some Coins. Being a faceless account on the internet doesn't give you the right to be impatient and rude. Setup a Failover Pool if you're worried about losing out in making money from doing nothing all day long.. I'm just a bit angry as I've tried to reduce the reject rate (to no avail) and even tho he is trying to fix the reject rate, no additional servers are forthcoming to help with the load balancing (util he fixes the code). So its just a bit frustrating having to wait for more than a few hours, with no additional server and what I've tried. You are right I can go elsewhere, so I guess its time to switch to Waffle until the issue(s) are fixed. At the end of the day, he'll do what he wants to do. Complaint(s) or no complaints.
|
|
|
|
_r2h
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:39:45 PM |
|
Can you bring the others servers online? Or someone fix the existing server. I'm getting poor performance, high rejects and well cgwatcher is restarting the miner as the server is not giving me enough work.
Are you able to give an eta on when the new servers will come online? Or are we to get silence from you?
Yes I'm a bit frustrated.
how about, get back in your corner and have some patience. there has been an update from Terk in the last couple of hours stating that he is fixing a problem with the Stratum server and when that is complete he will be deploying international servers. if you are frustrated, take the gamble and move to a less profitable Pool with less rejection rate. Or, sit it out, DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING and still make some Coins. Being a faceless account on the internet doesn't give you the right to be impatient and rude. Setup a Failover Pool if you're worried about losing out in making money from doing nothing all day long.. He is making money off our backs.... so....(quite a lot, if he wasn't making so much I wouldn't be so demanding). Well just agree to disagree, I just hope people have more patience than me, the pools rep isn't damaged and this doesn't take more than a few hours to resolve. If you don't complain, nothing will get fixed... I'm frustrated so I lack patience. So I'm seeing red. That sad, he is no cryptsy. Go the fuck somewhere else then if you are so angry. I'm sure middlecoin would love to add you to the pool since they lost 10 GH/s over the last few days.
|
|
|
|
zneww
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:41:37 PM |
|
Can you bring the others servers online? Or someone fix the existing server. I'm getting poor performance, high rejects and well cgwatcher is restarting the miner as the server is not giving me enough work.
Are you able to give an eta on when the new servers will come online? Or are we to get silence from you?
Yes I'm a bit frustrated.
how about, get back in your corner and have some patience. there has been an update from Terk in the last couple of hours stating that he is fixing a problem with the Stratum server and when that is complete he will be deploying international servers. if you are frustrated, take the gamble and move to a less profitable Pool with less rejection rate. Or, sit it out, DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING and still make some Coins. Being a faceless account on the internet doesn't give you the right to be impatient and rude. Setup a Failover Pool if you're worried about losing out in making money from doing nothing all day long.. He is making money off our backs.... so....(quite a lot, if he wasn't making so much I wouldn't be so demanding). Well just agree to disagree, I just hope people have more patience than me, the pools rep isn't damaged and this doesn't take more than a few hours to resolve. If you don't complain, nothing will get fixed... I'm frustrated so I lack patience. So I'm seeing red. That sad, he is no cryptsy. Go the fuck somewhere else then if you are so angry. I'm sure middlecoin would love to add you to the pool since they lost 10 GH/s over the last few days. Always astonishing how people defend a pool owner that should have this shit fixed.
|
|
|
|
pengoau
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:47:18 PM |
|
I switch to CM from MD, time to try Waffle.
Lets hope this pool doesn't lose out the hash due to these issues taking awhile to fix.
|
|
|
|
SirGeekalot
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:53:07 PM |
|
I'm just a bit angry as I've tried to reduce the reject rate (to no avail) and even tho he is trying to fix the reject rate, no additional servers are forthcoming to help with the load balancing (util he fixes the code). So its just a bit frustrating having to wait for more than a few hours, with no additional server and what I've tried. You are right I can go elsewhere, so I guess its time to switch to Waffle until the issue(s) are fixed.
At the end of the day, he'll do what he wants to do. Complaint(s) or no complaints.
These servers dont just grow on trees out the back of your house.. although Amazon EC2 makes it easy to setup a server in a region easier than usual, it still takes time to get it setup, test it, get the load balance right, then release it in to the wild and fix any bugs that might araise when he does. never mind the mulitplication of cost. please remember, this pool only started making any serious kinda money in the last few days. lord know what kind of costs he's incurring due to exponential growth. perhaps you need to step back and have a look at how much effort you're putting into the whole mining side before you bitch about someone thats running a pool.. Mining is easy.. Sys ops isn't..
|
|
|
|
Terk (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2014, 06:13:29 PM |
|
I understand you might be frustrated but believe me I'm even more so. I apologize for all problems and I assure you that I'm really working hard on solving this issue.
And I have some good news!
I finished bugfixing another 3rd party stratum server to replace the previous one. I also rewrote it to be multi-threaded instead of single threaded (which is a big issue). I am testing it on some percent of the pool hashpower and results are very promising - number of rejected shares is significantly lower. I'll let it run serving part of the pool for an full hour and monitor logs and stats to see if no other problems arise and if nothing unexpected happens, I'll be switching the whole pool to it.
|
|
|
|
|