|
bitcodo
|
 |
March 19, 2014, 03:48:55 PM |
|
Only 600 km from my home:) and 0 km from halibit's home  |
|
|
|
|
blueangel01
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Hello! Send me a message.
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:11:00 PM
Last edit: March 19, 2014, 04:21:55 PM by blueangel01 |
|
Thank you halibit, that really is a great news. About the new coins, why don't we just wait for them to mature? for example, Auroracoin has to distribute the 50% 1st before we add them. For Particlecoin, they need to release their final version of their wallet before adding them. There are several exchanges out there that is like cryptsy trading all the altcoins. Having a lot of competition is hard. If we focus on the top 5 coins, our main competition would be this: https://holytransaction.com/ - they are aiming to be like coinbase. I think we should try futures for lump sum speculation, or atleast options. I would like to request 2 features on the exchange, deposit via private key and a built in paper wallet for cold storage. |
Msg me if you want me to put anything here.
|
|
|
schnötzel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1041
Bitcoin is a bit**
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:26:25 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
|
|
|
|
|
|
okaynow
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:34:53 PM |
|
and 0 km from halibit's home seems that the address for the registry is a house actually  |
1PeecNu1J8VNKpgR13nasMZWLcMZrwNJfc |
|
|
|
lemfuture
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:38:48 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 |
1ADLcfwTofFXb95pKhebpeRkJ4WTWsvQXB
|
|
|
|
okaynow
|
|
March 19, 2014, 04:54:57 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. |
1PeecNu1J8VNKpgR13nasMZWLcMZrwNJfc |
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:05:53 PM |
|
and 0 km from halibit's home seems that the address for the registry is a house actually Yes. For some reason they want physical address, Even I live more in virtual world than physical  |
|
|
|
|
blueangel01
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Hello! Send me a message.
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:06:15 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. there is no way.. that is the price of anonymous and open source. |
Msg me if you want me to put anything here.
|
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:10:44 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. there is no way.. that is the price of anonymous and open source. I think we are still talking on public level. Later, we can make own forum for share holders only. |
|
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFries
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:13:44 PM |
|
How about this, make an announcement on the shareholder's dashboard at Cryptostocks where the private board is and maybe restrict it so only shareholders who contact the OP of the board are given permission to post.
That should only be visiible to shareholders and make it easier to make a private board for discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
muliukov
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:15:46 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. there is no way.. that is the price of anonymous and open source. Why no way? They know emails of the shareholders, so everyone can prove he is shareholder:) |
|
|
|
|
blueangel01
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Hello! Send me a message.
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:16:15 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. there is no way.. that is the price of anonymous and open source. I think we are still talking on public level. Later, we can make own forum for share holders only. I don't think it will work because anybody can just buy 1 share and be able to call themselves a shareholder. |
Msg me if you want me to put anything here.
|
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:17:44 PM |
|
i just saw that there is an unreleased vote on six coins, over at CS.
I like where this is going guys, keep it up!
I test cryptostock vote system and then I jump another job... so it is not the vote list. So much to do. I will cleary inform in here, when I release voting. We will make vote on cryptostock. |
|
|
|
|
halibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1006
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:18:30 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. there is no way.. that is the price of anonymous and open source. I think we are still talking on public level. Later, we can make own forum for share holders only. I don't think it will work because anybody can just buy 1 share and be able to call themselves a shareholder. Then he/she is shareholder |
|
|
|
|
blueangel01
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Hello! Send me a message.
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:35:51 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. there is no way.. that is the price of anonymous and open source. I think we are still talking on public level. Later, we can make own forum for share holders only. I don't think it will work because anybody can just buy 1 share and be able to call themselves a shareholder. Then he/she is shareholder In the wallstreet, shareholders vote for board members and discuss their business in closed doors and make announcement to the public when there is news or changes in the company. The drawback is that board members should made their trading public, else they will be able to create insider trading - which is illegal. Im thinking maybe its useless to create a shareholder only forum because if someone want to know what we are discussing, they can just buy 1 share. Atleast if we discuss it here, we will have more exposure to bitcointalk and ideas will just keep flowing. Since there is no patent or restriction in copying, all exchanges are free to copy what they want. |
Msg me if you want me to put anything here.
|
|
|
schnötzel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1041
Bitcoin is a bit**
|
|
March 19, 2014, 05:47:32 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. there is no way.. that is the price of anonymous and open source. I think we are still talking on public level. Later, we can make own forum for share holders only. I don't think it will work because anybody can just buy 1 share and be able to call themselves a shareholder. Then he/she is shareholder In the wallstreet, shareholders vote for board members and discuss their business in closed doors and make announcement to the public when there is news or changes in the company. The drawback is that board members should made their trading public, else they will be able to create insider trading - which is illegal. Im thinking maybe its useless to create a shareholder only forum because if someone want to know what we are discussing, they can just buy 1 share. Atleast if we discuss it here, we will have more exposure to bitcointalk and ideas will just keep flowing. Since there is no patent or restriction in copying, all exchanges are free to copy what they want. How about: Discuss public but sent good ideas or offers to op first (via pm)? |
|
|
|
|
blueangel01
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Hello! Send me a message.
|
|
March 19, 2014, 06:11:39 PM |
|
Just my two cents:
We should discuss the details in a closed stakeholder forum!?
Because i think too many eyes aren´t good for the project now. Rivals never rest....
+1 well there is no absolute way to verify a shareholder, so how would you go about this? anyone can claim he is a shareholder, only CS+the issuer can see some of them. there is no way.. that is the price of anonymous and open source. I think we are still talking on public level. Later, we can make own forum for share holders only. I don't think it will work because anybody can just buy 1 share and be able to call themselves a shareholder. Then he/she is shareholder In the wallstreet, shareholders vote for board members and discuss their business in closed doors and make announcement to the public when there is news or changes in the company. The drawback is that board members should made their trading public, else they will be able to create insider trading - which is illegal. Im thinking maybe its useless to create a shareholder only forum because if someone want to know what we are discussing, they can just buy 1 share. Atleast if we discuss it here, we will have more exposure to bitcointalk and ideas will just keep flowing. Since there is no patent or restriction in copying, all exchanges are free to copy what they want. How about: Discuss public but sent good ideas or offers to op first (via pm)? The reason im giving ideas in the public is to get public opinion. How would we knows if the idea is good or not? I think we are going in circles here with public vs private discussions |
Msg me if you want me to put anything here.
|
|
|
|
WutriCoin
|
|
March 19, 2014, 06:16:20 PM |
|
@halibit I can have forum online in a few hours - just drop me a PM
We can have public and private sections - shareholders choose
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BeeFer310
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 06:33:07 PM |
|
Great! @ the other topic why not contact all shareholder which have 1000(500?) shares and above and make a hangout or something to discuss things a little more private EDIT:
@halibit
what is the procedure after the voting?
will all coins which result in yes be availble at the start?
Will all coin which result in no be never on the exchange?
how many coins will be availble at the start? |
|
|
|
|
|
