[ANN][ICO] ⚡️⚡️ SKYNET 🚀 Infinity Chain Blockchain + First Blockchain Chip ⚡️⚡️

[Lonelly_Mode]

But apart from all that there is a question. Although still in one container organization is usually big companies are not origin in taking decisions to establish partnerships with fellow members. Of all the partners that Sknet has in a Foundation that is intertwined in this project do they all agree to use their core? And is Skynet sure that their partners will give full support to this project?

The latest information on the partners has not yet determined whether to use the core of this project. Between Skynet and the partners are still doing a conversation to discuss it. I think this is because until now Skynet does not have a functioning product. And so far their relationship is only limited to technology partners and there is no work relationship. Until now there has been no further confirmation from the team about how clear their work relationship.

[ERossin]

But apart from all that there is a question. Although still in one container organization is usually big companies are not origin in taking decisions to establish partnerships with fellow members. Of all the partners that Sknet has in a Foundation that is intertwined in this project do they all agree to use their core? And is Skynet sure that their partners will give full support to this project?

The latest information on the partners has not yet determined whether to use the core of this project. Between Skynet and the partners are still doing a conversation to discuss it. I think this is because until now Skynet does not have a functioning product. And so far their relationship is only limited to technology partners and there is no work relationship. Until now there has been no further confirmation from the team about how clear their work relationship.

we should be patient with this project like this because it's a very big project and it's combined with some new hardwares to be produced for many blockchains and also the partners in the skynet network.

[BigDarma]

But apart from all that there is a question. Although still in one container organization is usually big companies are not origin in taking decisions to establish partnerships with fellow members. Of all the partners that Sknet has in a Foundation that is intertwined in this project do they all agree to use their core? And is Skynet sure that their partners will give full support to this project?

The latest information on the partners has not yet determined whether to use the core of this project. Between Skynet and the partners are still doing a conversation to discuss it. I think this is because until now Skynet does not have a functioning product. And so far their relationship is only limited to technology partners and there is no work relationship. Until now there has been no further confirmation from the team about how clear their work relationship.

we should be patient with this project like this because it's a very big project and it's combined with some new hardwares to be produced for many blockchains and also the partners in the skynet network.

Yes, right, but if until now there has been no recent confirmation of this matter from the team it is very unfortunate, considering the concept they made is quite interesting for many parties. Especially with the latest news about their Co-Founders coming out because of differences in interests. Will this affect the change in interest in this project, both from the investors and the users later?

[Lonelly_Mode]

But apart from all that there is a question. Although still in one container organization is usually big companies are not origin in taking decisions to establish partnerships with fellow members. Of all the partners that Sknet has in a Foundation that is intertwined in this project do they all agree to use their core? And is Skynet sure that their partners will give full support to this project?

The latest information on the partners has not yet determined whether to use the core of this project. Between Skynet and the partners are still doing a conversation to discuss it. I think this is because until now Skynet does not have a functioning product. And so far their relationship is only limited to technology partners and there is no work relationship. Until now there has been no further confirmation from the team about how clear their work relationship.

we should be patient with this project like this because it's a very big project and it's combined with some new hardwares to be produced for many blockchains and also the partners in the skynet network.

Yes, right, but if until now there has been no recent confirmation of this matter from the team it is very unfortunate, considering the concept they made is quite interesting for many parties. Especially with the latest news about their Co-Founders coming out because of differences in interests. Will this affect the change in interest in this project, both from the investors and the users later?

I don't think it has any influence to change someone's interest. Because in my opinion it's normal when in a team there are differences in ideas or interests. The most important thing is how the remaining team can process and develop this project according to the target. If later there are additional teams or not it depends on the needs.

[HarryJoett]

How does SON solve problems such as scalability, overhead, and application limitations in traditional blockchain networks? Could anyone have read about this?

They have the Skynet protocol as it was prompted on that official website OpenSingularity aggregated all the design propositions into Skynet, a safe end-to-end, distributed artificial intelligence system that will foster collaboration and intelligence between all the devices in its network. To address both the adoption of cryptocurrency and limitations of intelligence in hardware, Skynet is com- prised of Skynet Core, a neuro-processing blockchain chip. That what I see on whitepaper.

[Ryuuma]

Skynet combines innovative solutions for scalable distributed ledger networks with purpose-built hardware to create an IoT-ready high transaction throughput architecture of unprecedented scale.

[YaoShang]

What distinguishes SON architecture from its predecessors such as Bitcoin or Etherium when viewed from Transaction Speed, Transaction Fees, Block Confirmation, and Consensus?

[YaoShang]

What distinguishes SON architecture from its predecessors such as Bitcoin or Etherium when viewed from Transaction Speed, Transaction Fees, Block Confirmation, and Consensus?

Why do you compare it with Bitcoin or Etherium isn't that too far? Why not with a new token or a new coin that has almost the same characteristics?

I just want to know. And it's better to compare things with those who are far experienced or have survived, rather than compare with the new ones who don't necessarily have good prospects. So I want to know if the SON architecture compared to the two big coins. By the way, do you know about that?

[GrahamHood]

What distinguishes SON architecture from its predecessors such as Bitcoin or Etherium when viewed from Transaction Speed, Transaction Fees, Block Confirmation, and Consensus?

I have read that comparison, there it's said for Transaction Speed, SON can reach 1 Million + TPS, while for Bitcoin 7 TPS, and Etherium 15 TPS. When comparing Transaction Fees, SON is only around <0.01, and two other coins such as Etherium and Bitcoin range from 0.45 and 1 Dollar. That's the only thing I know about that comparison, if it's wrong please correct it.

[AndreiYoung]

What distinguishes SON architecture from its predecessors such as Bitcoin or Etherium when viewed from Transaction Speed, Transaction Fees, Block Confirmation, and Consensus?

I have read that comparison, there it's said for Transaction Speed, SON can reach 1 Million + TPS, while for Bitcoin 7 TPS, and Etherium 15 TPS. When comparing Transaction Fees, SON is only around <0.01, and two other coins such as Etherium and Bitcoin range from 0.45 and 1 Dollar. That's the only thing I know about that comparison, if it's wrong please correct it.

Regarding the comparison of Block Confirmation and Consensus of the three items clearly have their respective differences. Like Consensus on Bitcoin and Etherium using Proof of Work but on Etherium there is (Future PoS), while SON uses BFT Proof of Stake. And for each Block Confirmation, the SON has a relatively low time of only about 1 Second, while the other two coins have a relatively higher time of about 14 Seconds for Etherium, and Bitcoin 10 Minutes.

[Asimmo]

Which project can we name as our competitor?
Which one participates/plays in our niche and is more established then us?

[keinelaa]

Which project can we name as our competitor?
Which one participates/plays in our niche and is more established then us?

Sorry sir, are you part of the team?

[MachNotMark]

Which project can we name as our competitor?
Which one participates/plays in our niche and is more established then us?

Sorry sir, are you part of the team?

I think he's not part of the team, and only as a signatur campaign bounty participant. Sorry this is just my speculation only, because if he's part of the team why it's just seen now, and unlike the team that is active in the community. Don't be upset if I am wrong to speculate. 

[alfaisal890]

I think it just wants to help the team to know how big the community cares about this project, it does not matter, the most important is when this project succeeds the community also can keep this project stay favored

[BigDarma]

As far as I know each token is still on the Etherium network. For this project itself, will it be during Eth's chains or will it launch its own chain?

[HarryJoett]

As far as I know each token is still on the Etherium network. For this project itself, will it be during Eth's chains or will it launch its own chain?

From the latest information I've heard that Skynet is their own blockchain and has been launched. Skynet has several nodes running now. Skynet can interoperate with existing blockchain.

[keinelaa]

If this project manages to exceed the team's expectations, and get big profits. Is there a possibility that Skynet will switch to coins? Or still be a token? Given that on this project there are three tokens with different functions.

[Lonelly_Mode]

If this project manages to exceed the team's expectations, and get big profits. Is there a possibility that Skynet will switch to coins? Or still be a token? Given that on this project there are three tokens with different functions.

In my opinion even though Skynet had success beyond expectations and also had a big profit. I think they will stick to the original plan as already on the roadmap. Because developing this project is more important than turning into a coin that has a process that is not short and certainly costs a lot. Even though the possibility remains.

[MachNotMark]

When I was finding out about the team profile, I found interesting facts. That there are some who study medicines, is that true? And what's the point for this project?

[AndreiYoung]

When I was finding out about the team profile, I found interesting facts. That there are some who study medicines, is that true? And what's the point for this project?

Maybe because Skynet brings the latest blockchain technology into the IoT space, where health care is an important part. When viewed carefully if the patient's personal information and sensitive information in the hospital or clinic can be secured and only accessed by those with the right permission to use Skynet blockchain technology, it's very helpful. I guess so.