luke997
|
|
March 03, 2014, 09:07:06 PM |
|
Huge wall of text
- Alexander
Wow. I learned more in one post on a bitcoin forum than I did from a college level course on US economic policy. Anyway, this just re-assured why I have felt this coin was a good investment from the start. I am very excited about the future of this coin, and now cannot wait for it to hit a major exchange. Good things are coming with this coin. Couldn't have put it better...
|
|
|
|
AIRCOINDEV O
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
Proteus?
|
|
March 03, 2014, 09:51:10 PM |
|
I'm trying to compile from source the aircoind git clone https://github.com/Allied-Investors-Association/AIRcoincd AIRcoin/src make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- Almost completes then: obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<char, CBigNum>(char const&, CBigNum&)': /mine/AIRcoin/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [AIRcoind] Error 1 Apologies for the late reply. You may want to use (instead): make clean -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-
|
"Let's make money out of AIR,". - an AIRcoin user
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
March 03, 2014, 10:27:55 PM |
|
I'm trying to compile from source the aircoind git clone https://github.com/Allied-Investors-Association/AIRcoincd AIRcoin/src make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- Almost completes then: obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<char, CBigNum>(char const&, CBigNum&)': /mine/AIRcoin/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [AIRcoind] Error 1 Apologies for the late reply. You may want to use (instead): make clean -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- Thanks! Is: git clone https://github.com/Allied-Investors-Association/AIRcoinCorrect? It pulls around 288MB of data while most are just a few MB. :~/AIRcoin/src# make clean -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- rm -f AIRcoind test_AIRcoin rm -f obj/*.o rm -f obj-test/*.o rm -f obj/*.P rm -f obj-test/*.P rm -f obj/build.h cd leveldb && make clean || true /bin/sh: 1: ./build_detect_platform: Permission denied make[1]: Entering directory `/mine/AIRcoin/src/leveldb' rm -f db_bench leveldbutil arena_test autocompact_test bloom_test c_test cache_test coding_test corruption_test crc32c_test db_test dbformat_test env_test filename_test filter_block_test issue178_test log_test memenv_test skiplist_test table_test version_edit_test version_set_test write_batch_test db_bench_sqlite3 db_bench_tree_db libleveldb.a libleveldb.so libleveldb.so.1 libleveldb.so.1.13 libmemenv.a */*.o */*/*.o ios-x86/*/*.o ios-arm/*/*.o build_config.mk rm -rf ios-x86/* ios-arm/* make[1]: Leaving directory `/mine/AIRcoin/src/leveldb'
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
instacalm
|
|
March 03, 2014, 10:39:47 PM Last edit: March 03, 2014, 10:57:53 PM by instacash |
|
bin/sh: 1: ./build_detect_platform: Permission denied make[1]: Entering directory `/mine/AIRcoin/src/leveldb' rm -f db_bench leveldbutil arena_test autocompact_test bloom_test c_test cache_test coding_test corruption_test crc32c_test db_test dbformat_test env_test filename_test filter_block_test issue178_test log_test memenv_test skiplist_test table_test version_edit_test version_set_test write_batch_test db_bench_sqlite3 db_bench_tree_db libleveldb.a libleveldb.so libleveldb.so.1 libleveldb.so.1.13 libmemenv.a */*.o */*/*.o ios-x86/*/*.o ios-arm/*/*.o build_config.mk rm -rf ios-x86/* ios-arm/* make[1]: Leaving directory `/mine/AIRcoin/src/leveldb'
cd leveldb chmod +x build_detect_platform make
cd .. make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- => compiles fine sky@7w:~/air/AIRcoin/src# ./AIRcoind -daemon sky@7w:~/air/AIRcoin/src# AIRcoin server starting
|
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
March 03, 2014, 10:53:09 PM |
|
g++: error: /mine/AIRcoin/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a: No such file or directory make: *** [AIRcoind] Error 1
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
AIRCOINDEV O
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
Proteus?
|
|
March 03, 2014, 11:07:07 PM Last edit: March 03, 2014, 11:34:22 PM by AIRCOINDEV O |
|
g++: error: /mine/AIRcoin/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a: No such file or directory make: *** [AIRcoind] Error 1
Check to make sure libmemenv.a is actually in leveldb. If it is, this is most likely a problem with g++. If it isn't, then you could try re-installing the libleveldb-dev package. On another note, assuming you have the correct source and you followed instacash's post above: cd src/leveldb make libmemenv.a then cd src make clean -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-
|
"Let's make money out of AIR,". - an AIRcoin user
|
|
|
UrsaMajorisBeta
|
|
March 04, 2014, 01:43:41 AM |
|
Thus, the dev team skills were unleashed
|
|
|
|
▄▄▄▄▄ ████████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████████████ ███▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████▄███████████████████████ ████ ████ ███████▄ ▄████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████████ ██████████ ▄▄█▄ ▄▄████▄▄ ▀████ █████████▄ ▄███ ██████▄ █████████ ██████████████ ▀██ ██████████ ███ ▄▄▄▄▄ ████████ ██ ███████ ██████ ████████ ██ █████▀████ ███ █████▄▄▄▄▄███████ █████████████ ████████ ████ ███████▀██ ███ ███ ██████ █████▄██████ █████ ████ ███████▀ ███ ▀████ █████ ▀██▀ ▀▀████ █████ █ █████▄▄▄▄▄▄███████ ████ ███▀ ██ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄██████████████▀ ▀█████ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄█████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██ ▀███▀ ▀████▄ ██ █████ ██ ██ ██ ███▄ ██████▄ ██ ███ ▄██▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ████ █████ ██▄ ▀▀▀▀██████████▄ ██▄▄ █ ███████ █████████████ ▀▀▀▀ ████▄ ▀██████████ ███ ███████ █████████ ▄███▀▀▀▀▀██▄▄ ██████████ ███ █ █ ███████ ▄▄▄▄█████████ ██ ▀████ ▀▀ ██████████ ███ ██ ██ ███████ ██████ ████ ██▄ ▀██▄▄ ███████▀███ ██▀▀ ▀▀█ ███ ██▀▀▀ ██ ██ ▀███▄ ▄██████████▀█ ██ ██████ ██ ██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████████████████ ██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████████████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | | | | | FIRST P2P BETTING PLATFORM | | | | | TRY NEW BETA FIFA WORLD CUP | | | | | [ | | See our website: | | ] |
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
March 04, 2014, 04:17:04 AM |
|
Thus, the dev team skills were unleashed Yes seriously, I must have this coin haha, the developers are ON TOP OF IT.
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
AIRcoin Theseus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2014, 04:50:04 AM |
|
In the result of failure, as insurmountable as it seems, AIRcoin doesn't technically fail, it simply becomes just another cryptocurrency that doesn't offer market services. If my entire development team were to die overnight, it would still operate with the same support of any other cryptocoin. And that's the beauty of it. That's what makes this whole endeavor unique: Upon absolute failure of our development team, it is still a good cryptocoin with usable code.
- Alexander
I'd like to reemphasize this point. Coins have been experimenting for a while with different block rewards, different ways to structure the block reward (dynamically or not), ways to retarget difficulty (our respect to Kimoto), different fees, different premines, and much more besides. Except for the straight up clones, every coin has approached these questions in different ways. After several years of experimentation and growth, we have a pretty good idea of the right combination of these characteristics that make a coin successful. But the original creators of Bitcoin never could have known the answers to some of these questions; it has taken years of experimentation and iteration to get us to where we are. With that said, we've studied altcoins to figure out what they've done right and what they've done wrong. And even some of the scams have helped inform the community about the upper limit of inflation that can be sustainable. We take a dim view on that question. After studying the unsustainable increases in supply that the animal coins pioneered, we realized that a moderate increase in supply over time is the single best way to introduce stability into the market. This is a criticism for both animal coins and Bitcoin itself. The animal coins debase their currencies in their impatience. Bitcoin hits its ceiling too soon. To be clear, no one could have reasonably expected the Bitcoin creators to have understood the second order effects of limiting increases in supply over time. Fortunately, with years of hindsight, we do. This is a topic that we will go into depth about in the coming days and weeks. So even if you completely discount our efforts to increase stability and liquidity for our coin, we still have a damn fine coin. And excitingly, this is an area that we are pioneering. Market making is not new to the stock market. But this is the first time that the development team behind a coin has set out to deliberately and rigorously provide stability and liquidity to a coin after it's already being traded. All of the experimentation over the past few years has been in the code of the coin itself. This is our contribution: a perfection of coin characteristics and an ecosystem of trading services to ensure the success of our coin in the long run.
|
|
|
|
dcoinz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2014, 05:22:07 AM |
|
If anybody is still mining on CtrlAltDefeated for this coin, please be advised that the pool owner has made off with all of my auroracoins and has not responded to any of my messages, public or private.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
TheMightyX
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Vires in Numeris
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:21:50 AM |
|
Wall of text
- Alexander
I appreciate the amount of thought put into your reply. It shows that your team is not flying by the seat of their pants, and has taken the time to plan and prepare. All though I still have doubts, I know it is impossible to dispel them. I will be investing a small amount into aircoin and following its progress.
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
March 04, 2014, 07:13:16 AM |
|
If anybody is still mining on CtrlAltDefeated for this coin, please be advised that the pool owner has made off with all of my auroracoins and has not responded to any of my messages, public or private.
Good luck.
Just two minutes ago, I manually withdrew my 14 AIR from the pool to my wallet no problem at all.
|
|
|
|
mudshark79
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2014, 07:46:18 AM |
|
@Teamaircoin:
I'm not sure if this question already came up somewhere in the past 20 pages ... so: why didn't you choose some fancy algo or some POS ingredient to the asset? To keep things simple (in terms of avoiding POS) or to even attract ASICS in the near future?
Regards
|
|
|
|
AIRcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
AIRcoin Alexander
|
|
March 04, 2014, 09:56:54 AM Last edit: March 04, 2014, 10:10:09 AM by AIRcoin |
|
@Teamaircoin:
I'm not sure if this question already came up somewhere in the past 20 pages ... so: why didn't you choose some fancy algo or some POS ingredient to the asset? To keep things simple (in terms of avoiding POS) or to even attract ASICS in the near future?
Regards
Initially, simplicity. Our time and energy is spent on the economics of the coin, and we didn't feel that (at least at launch) the effort and complexity put forth in a POS system would have significantly improved the economics of the coin. Instituting such a system (especially if Scrypt ASICs move in faster than we anticipate, we believe we'll be able to adapt the code earlier) is not out of the question though. In the longer term (months), adopting to a more environmentally-friendly or economically viable POS system may be advantageous.
|
|
|
|
mudshark79
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2014, 10:55:52 AM |
|
@Teamaircoin:
I'm not sure if this question already came up somewhere in the past 20 pages ... so: why didn't you choose some fancy algo or some POS ingredient to the asset? To keep things simple (in terms of avoiding POS) or to even attract ASICS in the near future?
Regards
Initially, simplicity. Our time and energy is spent on the economics of the coin, and we didn't feel that (at least at launch) the effort and complexity put forth in a POS system would have significantly improved the economics of the coin. Instituting such a system (especially if Scrypt ASICs move in faster than we anticipate, we believe we'll be able to adapt the code earlier) is not out of the question though. In the longer term (months), adopting to a more environmentally-friendly or economically viable POS system may be advantageous. As my question did cover POS and alternative Algos also and your answer didn't clearly reflect on the second: If I got you right, you do consider moving on to a Proof-Of-Stake AND/OR a different Mining-Algo (Scrypt-N, SHA-3) also, if this gives advantage to the project as a whole? It is said that both this options can be applied to an existing coin afterwards forcing a hard-fork, but if I think about it no example where this actually really happened comes to my mind, not counting "blockchain-resets" ala Memorycoin. Regards
|
|
|
|
AIRcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
AIRcoin Alexander
|
|
March 04, 2014, 11:13:09 AM |
|
@Teamaircoin:
I'm not sure if this question already came up somewhere in the past 20 pages ... so: why didn't you choose some fancy algo or some POS ingredient to the asset? To keep things simple (in terms of avoiding POS) or to even attract ASICS in the near future?
Regards
Initially, simplicity. Our time and energy is spent on the economics of the coin, and we didn't feel that (at least at launch) the effort and complexity put forth in a POS system would have significantly improved the economics of the coin. Instituting such a system (especially if Scrypt ASICs move in faster than we anticipate, we believe we'll be able to adapt the code earlier) is not out of the question though. In the longer term (months), adopting to a more environmentally-friendly or economically viable POS system may be advantageous. As my question did cover POS and alternative Algos also and your answer didn't clearly reflect on the second: If I got you right, you do consider moving on to a Proof-Of-Stake AND/OR a different Mining-Algo (Scrypt-N, SHA-3) also, if this gives advantage to the project as a whole? It is said that both this options can be applied to an existing coin afterwards forcing a hard-fork, but if I think about it no example where this actually really happened comes to my mind, not counting "blockchain-resets" ala Memorycoin. Regards Depending on the effectiveness of this coin, we may launch different versions alongside it or run more experiments with the code, and both Proof of Stake and special algorithms are on our "to-do" list of experimentation. However, these are not high priorities with the code right now, but are future plans.
|
|
|
|
Moebius327
|
|
March 04, 2014, 11:15:30 AM |
|
Interesting coin.
|
|
|
|
LeFiste
|
|
March 04, 2014, 11:58:15 AM |
|
@Teamaircoin:
I'm not sure if this question already came up somewhere in the past 20 pages ... so: why didn't you choose some fancy algo or some POS ingredient to the asset? To keep things simple (in terms of avoiding POS) or to even attract ASICS in the near future?
Regards
Initially, simplicity. Our time and energy is spent on the economics of the coin, and we didn't feel that (at least at launch) the effort and complexity put forth in a POS system would have significantly improved the economics of the coin. Instituting such a system (especially if Scrypt ASICs move in faster than we anticipate, we believe we'll be able to adapt the code earlier) is not out of the question though. In the longer term (months), adopting to a more environmentally-friendly or economically viable POS system may be advantageous. As my question did cover POS and alternative Algos also and your answer didn't clearly reflect on the second: If I got you right, you do consider moving on to a Proof-Of-Stake AND/OR a different Mining-Algo (Scrypt-N, SHA-3) also, if this gives advantage to the project as a whole? It is said that both this options can be applied to an existing coin afterwards forcing a hard-fork, but if I think about it no example where this actually really happened comes to my mind, not counting "blockchain-resets" ala Memorycoin. Regards Depending on the effectiveness of this coin, we may launch different versions alongside it or run more experiments with the code, and both Proof of Stake and special algorithms are on our "to-do" list of experimentation. However, these are not high priorities with the code right now, but are future plans. What do you mean by different versions? Something like Bitcoin/Litecoin, where one coin is "gold" and the other "silver"? P.S: I want to thank the Dev-Team for the professionalism and the energy you put in EVERY post here in this thread. I've never seen this kind of commitment from other Devs. You really take the doubts of the Aircoin community serious, and answer all our questions! The politeness of this community also baffles me. Thank you all! It's always a pleasure to visit this thread and to read all the posts.
|
|
|
|
|
AIRcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
AIRcoin Alexander
|
|
March 04, 2014, 02:08:10 PM |
|
We do have a (yet unused) marketplace on our own forum: http://teamaircoin.org/forums/forum/market-place/ also. What do you mean by different versions? Something like Bitcoin/Litecoin, where one coin is "gold" and the other "silver"?
P.S: I want to thank the Dev-Team for the professionalism and the energy you put in EVERY post here in this thread. I've never seen this kind of commitment from other Devs. You really take the doubts of the Aircoin community serious, and answer all our questions! The politeness of this community also baffles me. Thank you all! It's always a pleasure to visit this thread and to read all the posts.
Yes, something like the Bitcoin / Litecoin relationship.
|
|
|
|
|