|
miniZ (OP)
|
 |
August 24, 2019, 09:40:12 PM |
|
Really waiting for it! You can send me a beta in PM to test it before public release if you want.
Hi MineOrDie, thanks! Cheers |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
darkneorus
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 3
|
|
August 24, 2019, 10:23:23 PM |
|
something is broken with 150,5,3 on P104-100 GPUs. the hashrate is low, 20-30 Sol/s max, expected 40+.
|
|
|
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
August 24, 2019, 11:05:49 PM |
|
something is broken with 150,5,3 on P104-100 GPUs. the hashrate is low, 20-30 Sol/s max, expected 40+.
Hi darkneorus, if you try adding --oc1 to your command line do you get the same hashrate? Thanks. Cheers |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
August 24, 2019, 11:32:52 PM |
|
Hi everyone, Thank you for your precious feedback!  You can find miniZ v1.5q2 here. In brief: * Fixed support ZEL mining on 3GB GPU, on Windows 10. * (Hopefully!) Fixed slow start for some GPUs/rigs. * Fixed failover pools. * Fixed --pers=auto for 150,5,3. * Improved performance for 192,7 (GTX 1660 GPUs). * Other minor bug fixes. For additional information check our Usage or FAQ pages. Happy mining! |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
darkneorus
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 3
|
|
August 24, 2019, 11:41:47 PM |
|
something is broken with 150,5,3 on P104-100 GPUs. the hashrate is low, 20-30 Sol/s max, expected 40+.
Hi darkneorus, if you try adding --oc1 to your command line do you get the same hashrate? Thanks. Cheers yup. way lower than it should be 0>P104-100 ` 100% [41°C/68%]* 9.17 I/s 18.1(18.1)Sol/s 106(112.3)W clk=1911MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.16
1>P104-100 ` 100% [48°C/62%]* 7.74 I/s 15.0(15.0)Sol/s 124(114.0)W clk=1885MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.13
2>P104-100 ` 100% [38°C/62%] 9.19 I/s 18.8(18.8)Sol/s 136(136.6)W clk=1898MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.14
3>P104-100 ` 100% [50°C/90%] 14.02 I/s 29.2(29.2)Sol/s 148(152.3)W clk=1797MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.19
4>P106-100 ` 100% [48°C/84%] 8.49 I/s 16.7(16.7)Sol/s 98(103.0)W clk=1885MHz mclk=4006MHz Sol/W=0.16
5>P104-100 ` 100% [55°C/100%]*13.86 I/s 27.6(27.6)Sol/s 149(151.3)W clk=1784MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.18
6>P106-100 ` 100% [44°C/77%]* 8.53 I/s 16.8(16.8)Sol/s 89( 93.3)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4006MHz Sol/W=0.18
7>P104-100 ` 100% [44°C/77%]*14.00 I/s 27.5(27.5)Sol/s 146(154.2)W clk=1822MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.18
8>P104-100 ` 100% [51°C/92%] 14.03 I/s 28.1(28.1)Sol/s 139(143.4)W clk=1797MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
August 25, 2019, 12:14:04 AM |
|
something is broken with 150,5,3 on P104-100 GPUs. the hashrate is low, 20-30 Sol/s max, expected 40+.
Hi darkneorus, if you try adding --oc1 to your command line do you get the same hashrate? Thanks. Cheers yup. way lower than it should be Hi darkneorus, thanks for the information. We don't have your card so, for the moment we cannot test it. Maybe you can help us understand this GPU You could try test other mode values by adding --mode=x, with x=[1,2,4,6,8,9] to your command line, and see if you can get a better hashrate. Let us know which performs better. Cheers |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
invizion
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
August 25, 2019, 02:36:36 AM |
|
Mining AION with v1.5q_cuda10_linux-x64 - perhaps an issue with the fee pool in this release? when I get to 98% share submits I start getting: [ERROR ] Cannot connect to any mining pool!!! Hi invizion, this can happen if connection to all your pools is lost. Generally the message disappears when the pool is online again. The miner also stops mining after a while if the pools stay down (and it cannot connect to any of your mining pool). If you specified failover pools the miner should connect to the second (or third) pool. Unfortunately there is a bug in the latest version and failover pools are not working... We got this error now and it will be fixed in the next update. Cheers v1.5q2 fixed the issue thanks! Question, does OC1/OC2 work for all algos? What determines "power saving" to use OC1 vs OC2? |
|
|
|
|
2h4u
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
August 25, 2019, 05:44:13 AM |
|
* (Hopefully!) Fixed slow start for some GPUs/rigs.
Hmm... With rhminer as 2nd miner: ************ miniZ v1.5q2 ************
Number of CUDA[10.0] devices found: 12
Algo: EQ[150,5,3]
Pool#0: user[32K5Fu9b6uK3Gjk6vtqjo1y1c1iLDi54ub.ch3]
server[beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Logging:: file[/var/log/miner/miniz/miniz.log] period[10] delay[0]
Optimisation: oc2[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11]
Temp. limit: [75°C]
miniZ<150,5,3>[0:1:00:2933]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
miniZ<150,5,3>[0:1:00:2933]: Selecting GPU#11[11] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[ 0d 0h 0m02s|12:38:31 25/08/2019] S: 0/0 6( 6.2)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 140ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [0°C/ 0%] 3.51 I/s 6.1( 6.1)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=inf
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2081792MHz mclk=30868253MHz Sol/W=-nan
[ 0d 0h 0m12s|12:38:41 25/08/2019] S: 0/0 22(21.6)Sol/s 128(127.8)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 140ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [60°C/82%] 10.43 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s 99( 98.8)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.22
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [57°C/53%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 29.0)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
[ 0d 0h 0m22s|12:38:51 25/08/2019] S: 2/0 22(21.9)Sol/s 133(132.5)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 121ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 2/0 [61°C/82%]*10.89 I/s 21.9(21.9)Sol/s 104(103.5)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.21
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [55°C/53%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 29.0)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
miniZ<150,5,3>[0:1:00:2933]: Selecting GPU#9[9] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[ 0d 0h 0m32s|12:39:01 25/08/2019] S: 3/0 21(21.5)Sol/s 139(139.0)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 114ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 3/0 [61°C/82%]*11.03 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s 110(110.1)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.20
9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1544554496MHz mclk=1623655180MHz Sol/W=-nan
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [54°C/53%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 28.9)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
miniZ<150,5,3>[0:1:00:2933]: Selecting GPU#7[7] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[ 0d 0h 0m42s|12:39:11 25/08/2019] S: 4/0 21(21.3)Sol/s 176(174.7)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 109ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 4/0 [61°C/82%]*11.08 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 115(113.7)W clk=1923MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.19
7>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=944242688MHz mclk=-1879631077MHz Sol/W=-nan
9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [52°C/66%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 32( 32.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4314MHz Sol/W=0.00
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [53°C/53%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 28.8)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
[ 0d 0h 0m52s|12:39:21 25/08/2019] S: 4/0 22(21.6)Sol/s 213(211.2)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 109ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 4/0 [61°C/82%] 11.12 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s 118(116.1)W clk=1974MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.19
7>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [52°C/79%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 34( 34.2)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4212MHz Sol/W=0.00
9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [51°C/66%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 32( 32.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4314MHz Sol/W=0.00
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [52°C/53%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 28.8)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
[ 0d 0h 1m02s|12:39:31 25/08/2019] S: 4/0 22(21.7)Sol/s 204(206.7)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 109ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 4/0 [61°C/82%] 11.14 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s 109(111.7)W clk=1898MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.19
7>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [51°C/79%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 34( 34.2)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4212MHz Sol/W=0.00
9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [50°C/66%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 32( 32.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4314MHz Sol/W=0.00
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [51°C/53%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 28.7)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
miniZ<150,5,3>[0:1:00:2933]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[ 0d 0h 1m12s|12:39:41 25/08/2019] S: 5/0 23(22.9)Sol/s 203(205.6)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 105ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 4/0 [62°C/82%] 11.16 I/s 22.0(22.0)Sol/s 108(110.7)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.20
7>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [50°C/79%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 34( 34.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4212MHz Sol/W=0.00
9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 1/0 [48°C/66%]* 0.03 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 32( 32.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4314MHz Sol/W=0.00
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [50°C/53%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 28.7)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
[ 0d 0h 1m22s|12:39:51 25/08/2019] S: 8/0 27(27.5)Sol/s 268(250.0)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 99ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [47°C/74%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 29.3)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.00
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 4/0 [62°C/79%] 11.17 I/s 22.2(22.2)Sol/s 109(110.6)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.20
7>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [49°C/76%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 34( 34.0)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4212MHz Sol/W=0.00
9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 4/0 [54°C/62%]*10.94 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 67( 47.5)W clk=1898MHz mclk=4314MHz Sol/W=0.45
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [49°C/49%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 28( 28.6)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
miniZ<150,5,3>[0:1:00:2933]: Selecting GPU#10[10] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[ 0d 0h 1m32s|12:40:01 25/08/2019] S: 11/0 31(31.1)Sol/s 281(258.5)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 126ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [47°C/71%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 29.3)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.00
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 7/0 [62°C/77%]*11.18 I/s 22.4(22.4)Sol/s 105(108.7)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.21
7>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [48°C/73%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 34( 33.9)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4212MHz Sol/W=0.00
9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 4/0 [56°C/59%] 10.96 I/s 22.8(22.8)Sol/s 84( 58.2)W clk=1898MHz mclk=4314MHz Sol/W=0.39
10>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1556090752MHz mclk=16188950MHz Sol/W=-nan
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [48°C/46%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 28( 28.5)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.00
2:33 from start and still not all GPUs started: [ 0d 0h 2m33s|12:41:01 25/08/2019] S: 30/0 59(59.0)Sol/s 513(423.3)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 99ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [46°C/35%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 28( 28.4)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.00
1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 14/0 [61°C/75%]*11.19 I/s 22.1(22.1)Sol/s 109(109.1)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.20
4>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [41°C/35%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 28.7)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4556MHz Sol/W=0.00
5>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [42°C/35%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 27( 27.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4117MHz Sol/W=0.00
7>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 3/0 [54°C/41%]*10.48 I/s 20.0(20.0)Sol/s 78( 47.2)W clk=1873MHz mclk=4212MHz Sol/W=0.42
9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 9/0 [61°C/55%] 10.93 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 93( 82.7)W clk=1911MHz mclk=4314MHz Sol/W=0.26
10>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 2/0 [52°C/36%]*10.10 I/s 21.0(21.0)Sol/s 67( 42.0)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4233MHz Sol/W=0.50
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 2/0 [58°C/43%] 10.47 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s 82( 58.3)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4414MHz Sol/W=0.37 |
|
|
|
|
lordcryptocurrency
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
August 25, 2019, 06:00:16 AM |
|
Hi, I recently did an update on windows 10 and mining is no longer stable, windows automatically restarts.
I did not have this problem, started to appear after windows 10 upgrade
I have 2 1080TI, my settings are:
Power: 65
Core: +75
Memory: -475
All help is welcome, in advance I thank
|
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
August 25, 2019, 02:05:36 PM |
|
So, v1.5q2 seems to have fix issue with low h\r in 144.5 on my 1080s. After <5min run I even see higher I\s, though by 0.15%  But at least it is on pair with v1.3 Question, does OC1/OC2 work for all algos? What determines "power saving" to use OC1 vs OC2?
oc1 gives you max power saving and efficiency. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
August 25, 2019, 03:31:48 PM |
|
something is broken with 150,5,3 on P104-100 GPUs. the hashrate is low, 20-30 Sol/s max, expected 40+.
Feel free to add +500 for memory, use the pill and enjoy 40+ |
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:04:25 PM |
|
v1.5q2 fixed the issue thanks!
Question, does OC1/OC2 work for all algos? What determines "power saving" to use OC1 vs OC2?
Hi invizion, thanks! Good to know! oc1/oc2 is implemented for almost all GPUs and algorithms (not yet 96,5). For each algorithm, there are still a few GPUs that may not have the oc implemented. Generally, oc1 performs better when we lower power from the stock settings level, oc2 when it is increased. However, the best is to try both because the OC settings used (core and mem clock) have big impact on this. We plan to work a bit more on this and extend oc to all gpus and algos. We realize that also it will be nice to have a option to show which gpus have them implemented. We will work on this Cheers |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:05:24 PM |
|
* (Hopefully!) Fixed slow start for some GPUs/rigs.
Hmm... With rhminer as 2nd miner: 2:33 from start and still not all GPUs started: Hi 2h4u, thanks for the feedback. We will keep working on this. Do you have any improvemement with the segmentation faults? Cheers |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:06:29 PM |
|
Hi, I recently did an update on windows 10 and mining is no longer stable, windows automatically restarts.
I did not have this problem, started to appear after windows 10 upgrade
I have 2 1080TI, my settings are:
Power: 65
Core: +75
Memory: -475
All help is welcome, in advance I thank
Hi lordcryptocurrency, that is unfortunate. Maybe the driver was updated and you need to adjust your OC values. We did try something different from your values. Maybe worth giving it a try. pl=165W (more or less your 65%) and core=+100, memory=+300. With --oc2 we got ~49 Sol/s. Hope this helps. Cheers |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:07:01 PM |
|
So, v1.5q2 seems to have fix issue with low h\r in 144.5 on my 1080s. After <5min run I even see higher I\s, though by 0.15% But at least it is on pair with v1.3 Question, does OC1/OC2 work for all algos? What determines "power saving" to use OC1 vs OC2?
oc1 gives you max power saving and efficiency. Hi Divinity666, thanks for letting us know that the regression is reverted! Cheers |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
|
miniZ (OP)
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:07:26 PM |
|
something is broken with 150,5,3 on P104-100 GPUs. the hashrate is low, 20-30 Sol/s max, expected 40+.
Feel free to add +500 for memory, use the pill and enjoy 40+ Hi Dr_Victor, thanks for the suggestion! Cheers |
miniZ is a fast and friendly Equihash & ProgPoW Cuda miner. Equihash algorithms: <144,5>, <144,5s> - BeamHash III, <125,4> <192,7> <210,9> <150,5> <96,5>. Ethash and Etchash. ProgPoW (KawPoW, ProgPoWZ, vProgPoW) More information: miniz.cc * Follow us: bitcointalk.org ~ Twitter |
|
|
darkneorus
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 3
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:09:16 PM |
|
something is broken with 150,5,3 on P104-100 GPUs. the hashrate is low, 20-30 Sol/s max, expected 40+.
Feel free to add +500 for memory, use the pill and enjoy 40+ pill does nothing for P104-100 GPUs. it's useful only for 1080 series. GMiner shows 40-42 H/s with mem at stock clock. something is clearly wrong with 150,5,3 implementation. on 150,5 algo GMiner and miniZ hashrates were about equal, on 150,5,3 miniZ is far behind. |
|
|
|
|
darkneorus
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 3
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:20:46 PM |
|
something is broken with 150,5,3 on P104-100 GPUs. the hashrate is low, 20-30 Sol/s max, expected 40+.
Hi darkneorus, if you try adding --oc1 to your command line do you get the same hashrate? Thanks. Cheers yup. way lower than it should be Hi darkneorus, thanks for the information. We don't have your card so, for the moment we cannot test it. Maybe you can help us understand this GPU You could try test other mode values by adding --mode=x, with x=[1,2,4,6,8,9] to your command line, and see if you can get a better hashrate. Let us know which performs better. Cheers no success. should --mode set the first digit here? miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5998]: Selecting GPU#4[4] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#0[0] P104-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#2[2] P104-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#3[3] P104-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#7[7] P104-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#8[8] P104-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#1[1] P104-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5998]: Selecting GPU#6[6] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#5[5] P104-100 if so then it's not working for P104-100s. the log above is miniZ launched with --mode=4. I don't really know what it means, you did not describe this option, but P104-100s always use the digit "7" there, no matter what mode value I set. hope it helps |
|
|
|
|
2h4u
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:33:40 PM |
|
Hi 2h4u,
thanks for the feedback.
We will keep working on this.
Do you have any improvemement with the segmentation faults?
Yep looks like they have gone. |
|
|
|
|
2h4u
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
August 25, 2019, 04:38:21 PM |
|
However, the best is to try both because the OC settings used (core and mem clock) have big impact on this.
I say it would be great if miniZ does it itself. 5 mins without OC, 5 mins on OC1, next 5 mins on OC2, then check the difference, set best and report to user. You said that I/s'es stabilize kinda quick, didn't you? |
|
|
|
|
|
