Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[ripzombie]

I take into account the rating of ICO sites. but I do not trust them and always conduct my own research of the project in which I want to participate

In fact, I practically do not pay attention to these ICO ratings because I know that they are not done objectively. The most important thing is to study the project yourself.

[Robertqueen2]

you can depend on ICO rating sites a little, but not to build up our decisions completely on them regarding investing or buying because they serve the interests of some giant traders and companies. 

 

[Larochka]

No, I do not trust such sites, it seems to me they are only advertising their character and they want to make money. If they are paid by scammers, they will put them the highest ball, all the same, it all depends on how much they will be given money.

[memFISTO]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

I try to use such resources. For me, this is something that was missing for so long before the market became popular. Now choose a project in which it is worth investing money is a matter of 5 minutes and one familiar site. I think it's worth it.

[bboyjohn]

No, i dont trust them. The points you see on these sites are being purchased with money. If a project gives money to these sites, they show a high score. In fact we cannot say that they have examined or evaluated anything

[Trixie28]

For me these are one of the factors that I am looking for a good project to be successful. In determining the best ico is we can should check, study and do some research in regards to the projects so that we cannot be got scammed.

[BlackSociety]

I often use the ICO rating website as a pre-investment reference, but I will not fully believe in these rating websites! I prefer to use my own analysis to decide the investment!

[CEOKEY]

The Web site used to evaluate the ICO has given me a reference base for selecting ICO investments. But I believe in my knowledge, experience and ability to analyze, predict my ICO more.

[JGreg96]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

The icorantig sites are very good to find new icos, not to evaluet them. The evaluation has to be made personally, and if there is no time, no problem, we have saved some money  

[Pokemon Go]

for now I still believe it, because all this time I choose ICO with a high ICO rating and the ICO very successful, so for now I am very trust with ICO rating sites.

[koralan]

I do not believe in ICO rankings. I only use this information as a reference for my choice. Knowledge, experience of myself is more trust me

[petrcoin]

no not all, most of them are paid reviewers so i don't trust them, they can shill the project as they like to get paid.

[profitbezpredela]

I do not believe in ratings, because they give false information. It seems to me that we have to independently do a project analysis in order to choose the right projects for investment.

[Zufox]

Of course,ratings are bought, so you should not focus on ratings when investing in projects.
I'm wondering if there are really honest and incorruptible ratings? it seems to me that all ratings are sold

[ngocdhbk2]

The criteria for evaluating and ranking an ICOS campaign i find very rewarding and meaningful. Because this has been the newspaper, community, forum ratings. I believe in trust the ICO Rating sites.

[olayadave]

The rating of the ico is not the only and far not the most important pokazateli to select the ico. In my opinion, first of all it is necessary to pay attention to the product itself, and whether it will be useful to society

[ugur2222]

They cannot be fully trusted . A lot of scams and with high ratings. Therefore, it does not guarantee to find a good promising project . Study the project yourself - do not believe them

[zero714309]

ICO rating just for another option and not the main factor ICO can succeed.Observation and introduction the project that is important in the sense of understanding of team developer is competent or not.Roadmap and whitepaper we need to learn and then join forum that discusses the ICO so you can collect people's opinions and then find conclusions.

[I Love Crypto Noda]

 Some ICO rating sites are ok to be trusted cause rating algorithm is pretty accurate. For example, foundico.

[Ashong Salonga]

I do not believe in ratings, because they give false information. It seems to me that we have to independently do a project analysis in order to choose the right projects for investment.

I always trust the ico ratings because they will not give a good ratings if the project is not good. And i believe that having a good ratings can definitely attract a lot of investor to invest on the ico but aside on ico ratings we should also look on the project if they have a good whitepaper.