Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[dearbesz1219]

It could be a great source of information but you cant trust them at all, I mean if some ICO has a good rating it is a good sign that it could be a good ICO, but also it can be only paid good rating...

[Glen1989]

You can't just rely on project ratings. You need to make a good analysis of the product, ideas, team and documentation-and only then make a decision about working in this company

[daglordjames]

as a bounty hunter i really dont trust about ratings but i read their white paper and not all of it.

[Ulya63]

This factor should not be taken into account when choosing an ico project for investment, so basically there are false estimates. Any such site can be bought if you have a lot of money and you can also create it yourself. If the project has a good grade or it has some kind of technology or it has bought its own grade. You can look at such sites for interest and then analyze it yourself, since your own assessment is always better.

[zedaq]

Sometimes I see that some projects can really show the hidden information about the project, which is very difficult to find, in such cases I really pay attention to such sites, but in general I would like to see some other service.

[Lolox]

We can trust the ICO rating site as one of our references in knowing the level of ICO worthiness that we follow. But that doesn't mean we are only racing on the site. There are many angles that need to be known because the ICO rating site is not entirely a determinant in knowing whether or not the ICO is good.

[deus030518]

Sometime it is good to look at the ICO rating but for me what is I look is if the ICO already stsrted I checked the money ghat they have reached the the white paper to know what is the project is all about it is important that you check what is the project is for then I also check the timeline of the project to know when is the next sale so if you I want to buy I know  when is the time I should buy.

[myhoho]

Most of ICO rating websites are only publishing ads. They get money and give them the best rating to get more investments.
I think we need un moderated discussion about ICOs. Self moderated topics are not good also incentivized places are giving false info too.

[raidenplus0327]

True this is a common problem in Crypto space there are so many biased ICO Review sites , i hope the governments take it seriously like China banning ICO to protect their people from getting scam projects popping out . Much better to check the full details before investing like me i don't rely on Review sites , One of the decent project for me as of now is the Gemstra , a new marketplace place for social selling gig that will operate in a blockchain technology to give a transparent ecosystem for brands , sellers and consumers where they can interact with no barriers on performing a transaction with a seamless manner by using their application !

[kolonel_x]

playing ico is the same as gambling at this time .ico rating can no longer be used as a good benchmark for whether or not an ico.project is a lot of ico ratting which in my opinion is not right and is reversed.
even many bad rating projects are successful and good

[Bim abk]

maybe in the 50% percentage I believe and the rest I have to analyze myself about a project. if I give 100% trust on the site maybe I will get a lot of loss on the funds that I have

[Spider A4]

Sometimes i trust ICO rating sites. But don't judge any project by rating. How we can realized it's real rating or fake.
Your self analysis is the best in everywhere. Some project buying positive rating for showing as a trusted project in investor.

[Lovykitty]

I introduce studies that are very careful of groups, if they have made successful theological projects, etc., in short, the whole analysis only then understands. Of course, people cannot trust one hundred percent of their opinions, but the main characteristics of the project can and should be used for independent project analysis.

[Businesscase]

There is a lot of ICO rating sites, but you don`t need to trust only them, you must make your own research work on it. The ICO rating sites good for finding some promising project which you would like to invest in.

[SkvorNyc777]

I think that it is basically how they work and here's nothing surprising, there is no other aim for them to exist, I saw a lot of times A (5) ratings for shady ICOs.

[Itjoker]

There are many ICO rating sites as icomarks.com icorating.com icobench.com trackico.io and etc. But I think that most of these ratings were made by bribed experts, which was once proved by the results of ICOs or by experienced members of the crypto community.

[xumit]

no I don't trust sites. I doing research because it's more secure do research like me

[suhoy]

No, but I think that they are convenient in terms of getting systematized information.

[halpi]

I do trust. I like ICO Bench rating system, where people called "experts"  put their marks. Need to take in the coincidence that some of them were paid for their reviews but watch carefully if community have some general line and ICO project seems fine - reviews and rating are trustable

[gabriela1999]

All ICO rating websites just for reference. You should not trust 100% on those reviews. Please carefully study and evaluate the ICO before deciding to participate in the investment.