[ANN][XMY] Myriad | Multi-Algo, Fair, Secure

[Rainer4256]

Hi Dear Administrator and Owner MyRiadCoin Currency.

I Have Business Proposal For You -
We have Anonymous VPN Service and Partnership 30% to all pays your client.
We Add Your Currency - myRiadCoin to My VPN Service.
We have all CryptoCoin money in our vpn service site.
Our Vpn Service here - www.in-disguise.com

We want add banner or stick on your Site - With Your Referral Url - You have 30 % all payments your clients.
http://www.myriadcoin.org/
With Your Referral Url - You have 30 % all payments your clients.

Please Contact me, i want to talk with you for advertise.
www.in-disguise.com

ICQ: 6906911
E-mail: manager@in-disguise.com
Jabber: In-Disguise-VPN@jabber.org
Skype: In-Disguise-VPN


Please Add my Contact - I Very Want Talk With You and have business with you!!!

I am the owner, send 1btc to 16vXjYYY4tfyuTAkTDkTmDp7nfMpaqdgRp to proceed.

I am the co-founder so please send 0.5 BTC to 16PgSQKGhs6BE7HdJWHM4RcY9v5iB3Vnnb for an agreement. Thank you!

[Rainer4256]

Hi Dear Administrator and Owner MyRiadCoin Currency.

I Have Business Proposal For You -
Please Add my Contact - I Very Want Talk With You and have business with you!!!

Hi, don't mind upper 2 posts please .... They have nothing good intended with the scene.
It's 8bitcoder, neuromode, Foodies123 and think Ahmedbodi that pull the strings here ! PM first 3 if needed.


And I have bad trust level ... good system indeed.  

Is Ahmed Bodi running cryptopools.com? What's wrong with him?

[subseaguru]

since i have started using this Electrum wallet i have noticed that my transactions are not getting through to my wallet. my latest transaction 858d37ac279403d14e059cd8ac2e729d7f2deaba62953a812f7d870bbdd77d40 says "not yet redeemed" but was sent on march 14. is this transaction going to appear or do i need to get rid of this wallet?
this is what the explorer is showing:

    Not yet redeemed    112.01511754    MCxywmo7CCiJdtbq9jfb2dfkVi3pTGWgWR    DUP HASH160 20:3791...e7de EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG

Can you report this bug to the stickied Electrum post on /r/myriadcoin?

I certainly will.

[SavageWS6]

Is there a already compiled version of the Electrum wallet? I see the windows.zip on Github but doesn't look like its compiled

[spankyminer]

Is there a already compiled version of the Electrum wallet? I see the windows.zip on Github but doesn't look like its compiled

For windows? Yes its compiled. The betav1 includes many files which may have looked like uncompiled for you xD Betav2 consists of 2 files only.

[neuroMode]

MyriadSwitcher version 0.1.3 Windows build

just rolled out with new functionality:

You can now set your switcher to reboot your system if your miners crap out

check it out:

http://bit.ly/MyriadSwitcherGUI

Awesome! I updated the Reddit Side-bar and added a link to the bug report thread on Reddit.

[8bitcoder]

Please report all dead pools for Myriad here so we can consolidate our list of pool links easier: http://www.reddit.com/r/myriadcoin/comments/25usa0/please_report_dead_pools_here/

Thank you.

[Wiseman]

OK, so I was curious about how to make best use of my CPUs.

... an i7, a Core2 Duo & the i5 in my lappy.

I ran them for a couple of days using Myr-Gr (suprnova) & was getting around 1.8 Myr/hr.

37 hours ago I switched them to Cubit (cpu-pool) & I now appear to be somewhere around 1.5 Myr/hr.

Yes, it's hard to get truly accurate numbers on such a short run, esp as cpu-pool takes a long time to solve blocks & most of them seem to run 200% +.

But I suppose my point really is, why aren't my 3 CPUs on Cubit not getting around the same 'reward' as my 3 GPUs on Myr-Gr? (25-33 Myr/hr)

I'd say they were 'technologically comparable' (i7 = HD7990, i5 = HD5870, Duo = GTX 540) so why so low on Cubit? I thought the whole point of the multi-algo was to equalise the playing field?

Or am I missing something?

Actually, I have the same question. I thought the hi-end CPU on CPU-algo will produce nearly the same MYR quantity as hi-end GPU on GPU-algo. What's the problem?

[primer-]

OK, so I was curious about how to make best use of my CPUs.

... an i7, a Core2 Duo & the i5 in my lappy.

I ran them for a couple of days using Myr-Gr (suprnova) & was getting around 1.8 Myr/hr.

37 hours ago I switched them to Cubit (cpu-pool) & I now appear to be somewhere around 1.5 Myr/hr.

Yes, it's hard to get truly accurate numbers on such a short run, esp as cpu-pool takes a long time to solve blocks & most of them seem to run 200% +.

But I suppose my point really is, why aren't my 3 CPUs on Cubit not getting around the same 'reward' as my 3 GPUs on Myr-Gr? (25-33 Myr/hr)

I'd say they were 'technologically comparable' (i7 = HD7990, i5 = HD5870, Duo = GTX 540) so why so low on Cubit? I thought the whole point of the multi-algo was to equalise the playing field?

Or am I missing something?

Actually, I have the same question. I thought the hi-end CPU on CPU-algo will produce nearly the same MYR quantity as hi-end GPU on GPU-algo. What's the problem?

There are no CPU algos, all are GPU and ASIC

[LionOfNarnia]

OK, so I was curious about how to make best use of my CPUs.

... an i7, a Core2 Duo & the i5 in my lappy.

I ran them for a couple of days using Myr-Gr (suprnova) & was getting around 1.8 Myr/hr.

37 hours ago I switched them to Cubit (cpu-pool) & I now appear to be somewhere around 1.5 Myr/hr.

Yes, it's hard to get truly accurate numbers on such a short run, esp as cpu-pool takes a long time to solve blocks & most of them seem to run 200% +.

But I suppose my point really is, why aren't my 3 CPUs on Cubit not getting around the same 'reward' as my 3 GPUs on Myr-Gr? (25-33 Myr/hr)

I'd say they were 'technologically comparable' (i7 = HD7990, i5 = HD5870, Duo = GTX 540) so why so low on Cubit? I thought the whole point of the multi-algo was to equalise the playing field?

Or am I missing something?

Actually, I have the same question. I thought the hi-end CPU on CPU-algo will produce nearly the same MYR quantity as hi-end GPU on GPU-algo. What's the problem?

There are no CPU algos, all are GPU and ASIC

Then that should be made very clear on the OP & your 'advertising' SHOULD NOT be implying 'a coin for everyone' as it does - just be honest & say it's still a coin for whales with asic-farms.

VERY disappointed

[DLow]

OK, so I was curious about how to make best use of my CPUs.

... an i7, a Core2 Duo & the i5 in my lappy.

I ran them for a couple of days using Myr-Gr (suprnova) & was getting around 1.8 Myr/hr.

37 hours ago I switched them to Cubit (cpu-pool) & I now appear to be somewhere around 1.5 Myr/hr.

Yes, it's hard to get truly accurate numbers on such a short run, esp as cpu-pool takes a long time to solve blocks & most of them seem to run 200% +.

But I suppose my point really is, why aren't my 3 CPUs on Cubit not getting around the same 'reward' as my 3 GPUs on Myr-Gr? (25-33 Myr/hr)

I'd say they were 'technologically comparable' (i7 = HD7990, i5 = HD5870, Duo = GTX 540) so why so low on Cubit? I thought the whole point of the multi-algo was to equalise the playing field?

Or am I missing something?

Actually, I have the same question. I thought the hi-end CPU on CPU-algo will produce nearly the same MYR quantity as hi-end GPU on GPU-algo. What's the problem?

There are no CPU algos, all are GPU and ASIC

Then that should be made very clear on the OP & your 'advertising' SHOULD NOT be implying 'a coin for everyone' as it does - just be honest & say it's still a coin for whales with asic-farms.

VERY disappointed

That is not completely correct. Qubit is GPU mineable, however it's the best we've got for CPU right now. If the incentive is big enough every algorithm gets GPU'd and then ASIC'd.

But you can't make a claim like "A coin for everyone except CPU miners because while it's ok it's not the best solution yet but we're working on it."

[xfelinho]

is a true cpu algo even possible?

[LionOfNarnia]

OK, so I was curious about how to make best use of my CPUs.

... an i7, a Core2 Duo & the i5 in my lappy.

I ran them for a couple of days using Myr-Gr (suprnova) & was getting around 1.8 Myr/hr.

37 hours ago I switched them to Cubit (cpu-pool) & I now appear to be somewhere around 1.5 Myr/hr.

Yes, it's hard to get truly accurate numbers on such a short run, esp as cpu-pool takes a long time to solve blocks & most of them seem to run 200% +.

But I suppose my point really is, why aren't my 3 CPUs on Cubit not getting around the same 'reward' as my 3 GPUs on Myr-Gr? (25-33 Myr/hr)

I'd say they were 'technologically comparable' (i7 = HD7990, i5 = HD5870, Duo = GTX 540) so why so low on Cubit? I thought the whole point of the multi-algo was to equalise the playing field?

Or am I missing something?

Actually, I have the same question. I thought the hi-end CPU on CPU-algo will produce nearly the same MYR quantity as hi-end GPU on GPU-algo. What's the problem?

There are no CPU algos, all are GPU and ASIC

Then that should be made very clear on the OP & your 'advertising' SHOULD NOT be implying 'a coin for everyone' as it does - just be honest & say it's still a coin for whales with asic-farms.

VERY disappointed

That is not completely correct. Qubit is GPU mineable, however it's the best we've got for CPU right now. If the incentive is big enough every algorithm gets GPU'd and then ASIC'd.

But you can't make a claim like "A coin for everyone except CPU miners because while it's ok it's not the best solution yet but we're working on it."

It would have been more honest, anyway.

I've switched my CPUs back to myr-gr (suprnova) coz it seems to be about 10% more efficient than cubit.

Is anyone being successful with using ccminer on an Nvidia card? (myr-gr)
If so what version from where?
Everything I've tried so far (30, 35 & 50) SEEMS to connect to suprnova, but does not give ANY 'accepted' no matter how long I run it
I'm about to try the 'new' K-Bomba version - will update later.

[Conqueror]

Is it possible to add X11 and Blake256 or is it too chalenging?

[HashEngineering]

The android wallet will be ready for some testing soon.  Is there a vector graphics file that I can use for the icons?

[foodies123]

OK, so I was curious about how to make best use of my CPUs.

... an i7, a Core2 Duo & the i5 in my lappy.

I ran them for a couple of days using Myr-Gr (suprnova) & was getting around 1.8 Myr/hr.

37 hours ago I switched them to Cubit (cpu-pool) & I now appear to be somewhere around 1.5 Myr/hr.

Yes, it's hard to get truly accurate numbers on such a short run, esp as cpu-pool takes a long time to solve blocks & most of them seem to run 200% +.

But I suppose my point really is, why aren't my 3 CPUs on Cubit not getting around the same 'reward' as my 3 GPUs on Myr-Gr? (25-33 Myr/hr)

I'd say they were 'technologically comparable' (i7 = HD7990, i5 = HD5870, Duo = GTX 540) so why so low on Cubit? I thought the whole point of the multi-algo was to equalise the playing field?

Or am I missing something?

Actually, I have the same question. I thought the hi-end CPU on CPU-algo will produce nearly the same MYR quantity as hi-end GPU on GPU-algo. What's the problem?

There are no CPU algos, all are GPU and ASIC

Then that should be made very clear on the OP & your 'advertising' SHOULD NOT be implying 'a coin for everyone' as it does - just be honest & say it's still a coin for whales with asic-farms.

VERY disappointed

That is not completely correct. Qubit is GPU mineable, however it's the best we've got for CPU right now. If the incentive is big enough every algorithm gets GPU'd and then ASIC'd.

But you can't make a claim like "A coin for everyone except CPU miners because while it's ok it's not the best solution yet but we're working on it."

It would have been more honest, anyway.

I've switched my CPUs back to myr-gr (suprnova) coz it seems to be about 10% more efficient than cubit.

Is anyone being successful with using ccminer on an Nvidia card? (myr-gr)
If so what version from where?
Everything I've tried so far (30, 35 & 50) SEEMS to connect to suprnova, but does not give ANY 'accepted' no matter how long I run it
I'm about to try the 'new' K-Bomba version - will update later.

I've seen someone on reddit saying they were mining with cuda and on par or even better than my 280xs . As for the "for everyone part" it's only normal to presume that everyone with a computer has a gpu they can mine with and add some extra hashes from cpu I say it's pretty good considering other coins. Like I've always said it's not perfect but it's the best we got at the moment because if we add a cpu online algo like ric it would be worse because then your cpus won't be competing with some gpus , they'd be competing with huge swarms of botnets who will only mine and dump.

Is it possible to add X11 and Blake256 or is it too chalenging?

Both can be added with ease but there's no valid reason to do so except hype and we're not about that. x11 is on par with groestl in terms of heat and power and I'm not too sure about blake but from what I see it's not that big a deal.

[chiguireitor]

is a true cpu algo even possible?

Nope... interest on an algo will always lead to GPU miners and then ASIC miners... There's nothing a CPU can do that an ASIC can't (in fact, CPUs are the most common form of ASICs )

[novag]

Very stable coin!

[LionOfNarnia]

Clarification appreciated, Foodies

- and remarkably well-mannered, for you

To avoid a massive multi-quote (assuming this is one of the few threads where people read more than a couple of posts before posting - dangerous I know) have to report that K Bomba bombed too, same m.o. - starts, seems to connect, hashes, detects loadza new blocks, but no accepted & no hashrate on pool.

Anyone wanna swap a desktop with an HD5870 for an ASUS lappy (i5 GT540m 2Gb)?

[CodyF86]

2 Nvidia 770s at 1254 Core / 3703 (7406) memory plus my i3570k @ 4.5Ghz @ 1.18vcore...thanks Christian! =)

p.s. CPU mining is only running on 3 threads because it bogs the GPU mining if I use all 4 threads...CPU does 2MH! Both on Groestl!