Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 08:48:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 [290] 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 ... 557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][C2.1] Coin2 | Pow/PoS | ChainOfConflict[FPS] The Future of Gaming is Now  (Read 499694 times)
thilon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 06:57:20 AM
 #5781

NO, absolutely do not increase the supply any further, and definitely not 500m that will make all coins near worthless, not to mention the attacker can just dump his remaining coins


i suggested this a few pages back. I propose a solution similar to asiacoin

Figure out the attacker's wallet. invalidate the attacker's coins (prevent him from trading in for the new coins).

This will leave us with a surplus of 28m coins or whatever.
Convert all 60m coins into a new coin (with the same total supply) then redistribute the amount of coins that the attacker held to the community and those who took a loss.  or keep some to fund the game development, I'm not sure how the logistics of redistributing coins to hundreds of people will work out.

also make the top wallet list transparent so whoever tries this again will be taking a huge risk

whatever the solution is, it cannot benefit the attacker or they will do this again

I agreed with you
gts476
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 07:00:53 AM
 #5782

This could work.
Glen Hoddle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 419
Merit: 253


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 07:03:50 AM
 #5783

Where is the evidence that there's a wallet with 28m in it?

Also, whoever did this can't have scammed 28m surely. They must have bought millions legitimately.

I know it's not possible to know yet but I would be interested to know how many were actually scammed.
wood7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 17, 2014, 07:04:29 AM
 #5784

Please hold tight and be patient, your coins are safe.  Thank you.
but I can't do that,because it is my money
Glen Hoddle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 419
Merit: 253


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:03:36 AM
 #5785

SUGGESTION FROM THE COIN2TALK TROLL BOX THAT I WOULD LIKE TO EXPAND ON.

Everybody with a relatively significant number of coins (Say 50,000 or 100,000) take a screen shot of your wallet and previous transactions covering the double spend period.

Apply for your coins by some sort of system to be decided (email with your wallet address or PM to board members on here)

Wallet addresses and previous transactions can then be verified as authentic.

Anyone under the pre determined amount receives their coins would not have to apply. The amount is set to make it almost impossible for the scammer to create hundreds or thousands of accounts/addresses to receive all their 28 million coins back.

It's just an idea at the moment and I've got to run now as I'm going away for a few days.

Sure this process would take a long time and still needs some thought but what does everyone think?
Glen Hoddle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 419
Merit: 253


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:04:12 AM
 #5786

SUGGESTION FROM THE COIN2TALK TROLL BOX THAT I WOULD LIKE TO EXPAND ON.

Everybody with a relatively significant number of coins (Say 50,000 or 100,000) take a screen shot of your wallet and previous transactions covering the double spend period.

Apply for your coins by some sort of system to be decided (email with your wallet address or PM to board members on here)

Wallet addresses and previous transactions can then be verified as authentic.

Anyone under the pre determined amount receives their coins would not have to apply. The amount is set to make it almost impossible for the scammer to create hundreds or thousands of accounts/addresses to receive all their 28 million coins back.

It's just an idea at the moment and I've got to run now as I'm going away for a few days.

Sure this process would take a long time and still needs some thought but what does everyone think?
gts476
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:06:57 AM
 #5787

SUGGESTION FROM THE COIN2TALK TROLL BOX THAT I WOULD LIKE TO EXPAND ON.

Everybody with a relatively significant number of coins (Say 50,000 or 100,000) take a screen shot of your wallet and previous transactions covering the double spend period.

Apply for your coins by some sort of system to be decided (email with your wallet address or PM to board members on here)

Wallet addresses and previous transactions can then be verified as authentic.

Anyone under the pre determined amount receives their coins would not have to apply. The amount is set to make it almost impossible for the scammer to create hundreds or thousands of accounts/addresses to receive all their 28 million coins back.

It's just an idea at the moment and I've got to run now as I'm going away for a few days.

Sure this process would take a long time and still needs some thought but what does everyone think?

Labour intensive. Find scam wallets, move all coins to exchange, swap coin. Scam wallets obviously barred from this, problem solved.

dotcoin.info
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 252


www.cd3d.app


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:12:44 AM
 #5788

any instruction on how to handle this matter?

venmo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:19:21 AM
 #5789

Good morning all!

While the tech guys see to the coin I will be getting game stuff done to ensure we don't fall behind.

This will be fixed try not to worry.

We will ensure no one loses anything.

The vision is still alive and my determination to see it come to fruition is as strong as ever.

It will be business as usual soon enough.

Glen Hoddle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 419
Merit: 253


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:20:45 AM
 #5790

SUGGESTION FROM THE COIN2TALK TROLL BOX THAT I WOULD LIKE TO EXPAND ON.

Everybody with a relatively significant number of coins (Say 50,000 or 100,000) take a screen shot of your wallet and previous transactions covering the double spend period.

Apply for your coins by some sort of system to be decided (email with your wallet address or PM to board members on here)

Wallet addresses and previous transactions can then be verified as authentic.

Anyone under the pre determined amount receives their coins would not have to apply. The amount is set to make it almost impossible for the scammer to create hundreds or thousands of accounts/addresses to receive all their 28 million coins back.

It's just an idea at the moment and I've got to run now as I'm going away for a few days.

Sure this process would take a long time and still needs some thought but what does everyone think?

Labour intensive. Find scam wallets, move all coins to exchange, swap coin. Scam wallets obviously barred from this, problem solved.



I agree it is labour intensive. How do we know we can isolate the scam wallet. Obviously your solution is the better one and much simpler but if we can't isolate the scammer's wallet then we need another solution.

I was under the impression that we can't ring fence the scammer's wallet??
dotcoin.info
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 252


www.cd3d.app


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:22:37 AM
 #5791

Good morning all!

While the tech guys see to the coin I will be getting game stuff done to ensure we don't fall behind.

This will be fixed try not to worry.

We will ensure no one loses anything.

The vision is still alive and my determination to see it come to fruition is as strong as ever.

It will be business as usual soon enough.



is our fix plug-and-play case?

can we isolate the scammer without any supply expansion? 

declensions
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:27:24 AM
 #5792

Where is the evidence that there's a wallet with 28m in it?

Also, whoever did this can't have scammed 28m surely. They must have bought millions legitimately.

I know it's not possible to know yet but I would be interested to know how many were actually scammed.

doesnt matter how many they scammed, if they were behind this mess they dont deserve to hold any coins

C2.1: CfAMDL4FJomN8bLpsPKZz3mBtdQVg7Sgbp
gts476
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:27:29 AM
 #5793

SUGGESTION FROM THE COIN2TALK TROLL BOX THAT I WOULD LIKE TO EXPAND ON.

Everybody with a relatively significant number of coins (Say 50,000 or 100,000) take a screen shot of your wallet and previous transactions covering the double spend period.

Apply for your coins by some sort of system to be decided (email with your wallet address or PM to board members on here)

Wallet addresses and previous transactions can then be verified as authentic.

Anyone under the pre determined amount receives their coins would not have to apply. The amount is set to make it almost impossible for the scammer to create hundreds or thousands of accounts/addresses to receive all their 28 million coins back.

It's just an idea at the moment and I've got to run now as I'm going away for a few days.

Sure this process would take a long time and still needs some thought but what does everyone think?

Labour intensive. Find scam wallets, move all coins to exchange, swap coin. Scam wallets obviously barred from this, problem solved.



I agree it is labour intensive. How do we know we can isolate the scam wallet. Obviously your solution is the better one and much simpler but if we can't isolate the scammer's wallet then we need another solution.

I was under the impression that we can't ring fence the scammer's wallet??

you don't need to ring fence it, just find it, track it and exclude it (and where those coins flow) from the redistribution.
declensions
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:28:35 AM
Last edit: May 17, 2014, 08:43:58 AM by declensions
 #5794

seems like nobody posting here is knowledgeable on this, you're better off making a new thread about it and maybe asking digibyte or some other coin devs that might know a fix. im goin to bed

i dont think the above method will work either, there are many people holding at least a million coins + labour intensive.
The exchange devs will have a better chance at figuring out which address was behind this

i dont understand whats going on with this wallet explorer though, how come we cant see where the 28m came from or where it went?

if someone is good at digging through transactions, we can narrow down the attacker's wallet and try to invalidate them. If we invalidate the wrong person we could always reimburse them once they provide proof where they got the coins

C2.1: CfAMDL4FJomN8bLpsPKZz3mBtdQVg7Sgbp
syntek
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:34:45 AM
 #5795

Price to return to the starting point, as well as the opportunity to once again soar thing?
dotcoin.info
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 252


www.cd3d.app


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 08:35:38 AM
 #5796

Price to return to the starting point, as well as the opportunity to once again soar thing?

only we figure out a way to clean the mess up.

brightlight
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 09:48:20 AM
 #5797

Is it possible to get a brief review of what happened?
DailyModo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000


www.gamebet.gg


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 10:05:21 AM
 #5798

OK WE NEED INPUT:

WHAT DO YOU GUYS WANT US TO DO?

1. Start a new coin, reimburse the exchanges, and keep a bigger "safety wallet"
2. Try to get people to pull their coins from exchanges and make sure they are staking.  This will still leave Mintpal short and we might lose them as an exchange.  It will also leave the attacker with all of the stolen coins. 

WE NEED SUGGESTIONS FROM THE COMMUNITY.

If you started a new coin would we get an equal amount of the new coin as we have of NC2?

Yes same as before....this time we would make roughly 500 million and keep 400 million in a public account where everyone can check on it.  This would give us enough coins to reimburse Mintpal and all C2 users.  This time someone would never be able to buy a 51% of the total staking coin.

Is this a joke?

Mintpal has identified the hacker and most-likely still own the hacker coins.

500M coins = 10X the previous amount this is completly ridiculous knowing the coins is goign to be worth 10X lower overall.

So the only winners here are going to be mintpal and the hacker?

I am 100% against this, mintpal still has the hacker coins thats for sure all you got to do is either ask mintpal to send you these coins or ban the actual adress and make the total coins 32M.

500M coins is out of question.

Betting on esports with crypto's and steam items has never been easier.
CONTACT
dailymodo@gamebet.gg @GamebetGg
brightlight
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 10:09:07 AM
 #5799

OK WE NEED INPUT:

WHAT DO YOU GUYS WANT US TO DO?

1. Start a new coin, reimburse the exchanges, and keep a bigger "safety wallet"
2. Try to get people to pull their coins from exchanges and make sure they are staking.  This will still leave Mintpal short and we might lose them as an exchange.  It will also leave the attacker with all of the stolen coins. 

WE NEED SUGGESTIONS FROM THE COMMUNITY.

If you started a new coin would we get an equal amount of the new coin as we have of NC2?

Yes same as before....this time we would make roughly 500 million and keep 400 million in a public account where everyone can check on it.  This would give us enough coins to reimburse Mintpal and all C2 users.  This time someone would never be able to buy a 51% of the total staking coin.

Is this a joke?

Mintpal has identified the hacker and most-likely still own the hacker coins.

500M coins = 10X the previous amount this is completly ridiculous knowing the coins is goign to be worth 10X lower overall.

So the only winners here are going to be mintpal and the hacker?

I am 100% against this, mintpal still has the hacker coins thats for sure all you got to do is either ask mintpal to send you these coins or ban the actual adress and make the total coins 32M.

500M coins is out of question.

I think all of us agree to be against hundreds million coin.
thilon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 17, 2014, 10:14:42 AM
 #5800

OK WE NEED INPUT:

WHAT DO YOU GUYS WANT US TO DO?

1. Start a new coin, reimburse the exchanges, and keep a bigger "safety wallet"
2. Try to get people to pull their coins from exchanges and make sure they are staking.  This will still leave Mintpal short and we might lose them as an exchange.  It will also leave the attacker with all of the stolen coins. 

WE NEED SUGGESTIONS FROM THE COMMUNITY.

If you started a new coin would we get an equal amount of the new coin as we have of NC2?

Yes same as before....this time we would make roughly 500 million and keep 400 million in a public account where everyone can check on it.  This would give us enough coins to reimburse Mintpal and all C2 users.  This time someone would never be able to buy a 51% of the total staking coin.

Is this a joke?

Mintpal has identified the hacker and most-likely still own the hacker coins.

500M coins = 10X the previous amount this is completly ridiculous knowing the coins is goign to be worth 10X lower overall.

So the only winners here are going to be mintpal and the hacker?

I am 100% against this, mintpal still has the hacker coins thats for sure all you got to do is either ask mintpal to send you these coins or ban the actual adress and make the total coins 32M.

500M coins is out of question.

I think all of us agree to be against hundreds million coin.

I disagree to start a new hundreds million coin.
Pages: « 1 ... 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 [290] 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 ... 557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!