burntroach85
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
September 27, 2019, 07:17:15 PM |
|
waiting for that 5700 support as well
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
badbart
Member
Offline
Activity: 449
Merit: 24
|
|
September 27, 2019, 09:50:08 PM |
|
RX 5700 support also!
|
|
|
|
uy3srm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
September 28, 2019, 06:45:00 AM |
|
Team Red Miner v0.5.9 releasedhttps://github.com/todxx/teamredminer/releasesChanges in v0.5.9 - Added x16rv2 for the upcoming Ravencoin fork.
- Optimization work on x16r: +8-10% hashrate depending on clocks.
- Optimization work on x16r: mem clock no longer as important.
- Issue fix: kernels split into multiple binaries to fix linux amdgpu-pro driver issues.
We've added x16rv2 algo for the upcoming Ravencoin fork! (Also BitCash and a few others) We've also put a ton of effort to squeeze out as much performance as we could for the x16* algos in this release, with an up to 10% speed-up. before this version ,teamredminer did not recognize AMD RX 5700. This version recognize AMD RX 5700 as 'gfx1010' and stop working , log statements are: { [2019-09-28 09:45:46] Initialize error, unknown device name: 'gfx1010' [2019-09-28 09:45:46] Failed to initialize device idx 0 (-9) [2019-09-28 09:45:46] Successful clean shutdown. } Please update teamredminer to utilize AMD RX 5700?
|
|
|
|
kerney666
Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
|
|
September 28, 2019, 11:34:05 AM |
|
Team Red Miner v0.5.9 releasedhttps://github.com/todxx/teamredminer/releasesChanges in v0.5.9 - Added x16rv2 for the upcoming Ravencoin fork.
- Optimization work on x16r: +8-10% hashrate depending on clocks.
- Optimization work on x16r: mem clock no longer as important.
- Issue fix: kernels split into multiple binaries to fix linux amdgpu-pro driver issues.
We've added x16rv2 algo for the upcoming Ravencoin fork! (Also BitCash and a few others) We've also put a ton of effort to squeeze out as much performance as we could for the x16* algos in this release, with an up to 10% speed-up. before this version ,teamredminer did not recognize AMD RX 5700. This version recognize AMD RX 5700 as 'gfx1010' and stop working , log statements are: { [2019-09-28 09:45:46] Initialize error, unknown device name: 'gfx1010' [2019-09-28 09:45:46] Failed to initialize device idx 0 (-9) [2019-09-28 09:45:46] Successful clean shutdown. } Please update teamredminer to utilize AMD RX 5700? We are still waiting for 3rd party tools to add proper support for Navi. As soon as we can, we’ll start working on Navi ports of eg x16r and MTP.
|
|
|
|
Grizzly866
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
September 29, 2019, 06:16:36 PM |
|
I have a rig of 4 VEGA 56 sapphire on the Samsung dvuhkonturniy. the algo of monero and sumo crashes then one card then the other. the tortoise and console norms plow all 4.what could be the problem? core 1400 memory 930 voltage 900.
|
|
|
|
RebTech-Blockchain
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
September 30, 2019, 08:10:49 AM |
|
On RX470 8G 0.5.9: 10-11MH/RX470 GPU: 1090 Mem: 2100 VDDC: -850
Is the X15rv2 algo an GPU intensive algo? even at 1200 GPU hash is about the same or lower.
|
|
|
|
Ursul0
|
|
September 30, 2019, 06:52:33 PM |
|
I have a rig of 4 VEGA 56 sapphire on the Samsung dvuhkonturniy. the algo of monero and sumo crashes then one card then the other. the tortoise and console norms plow all 4.what could be the problem? core 1400 memory 930 voltage 900.
you can reduce the voltage Vegas run well below 850(as low as 800) at over 1300MHz core clocks. Also try reducing your memory frequency on the problematic cards. and watch for HBM temps
|
|
|
|
Lucky - Luciano
|
|
September 30, 2019, 09:40:31 PM |
|
What do these errors mean (I mine Veil and I do not have a problem on Suprnova pool but only on BSOD pool.):
|
|
|
|
kerney666
Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
|
|
September 30, 2019, 09:51:42 PM |
|
What do these errors mean (I mine Veil and I do not have a problem on Suprnova pool but only on BSOD pool.):
Hi! Bsod is a bit more picky with what timestamp you can use since it also determines the hash order. You need to add "--no_ntime_roll" as a cmd line argument (or in your start.bat). From our help: --no_ntime_roll Prevents the miner from rolling ntime in the block header, only using the value provided by the pool. This needs to be enabled for some pools when mining x16rt.
|
|
|
|
Lucky - Luciano
|
|
September 30, 2019, 10:23:50 PM |
|
What do these errors mean (I mine Veil and I do not have a problem on Suprnova pool but only on BSOD pool.):
Hi! Bsod is a bit more picky with what timestamp you can use since it also determines the hash order. You need to add "--no_ntime_roll" as a cmd line argument (or in your start.bat). From our help: --no_ntime_roll Prevents the miner from rolling ntime in the block header, only using the value provided by the pool. This needs to be enabled for some pools when mining x16rt.
It works great. Thank you very much .
|
|
|
|
joseph32
Member
Offline
Activity: 413
Merit: 21
|
|
October 01, 2019, 05:14:59 PM |
|
Since the hashrate of X16rv2 is a range, has anybody some numbers for Vega64? Just to compare a bit, thanks!
|
|
|
|
kerney666
Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
|
|
October 01, 2019, 05:35:58 PM |
|
Since the hashrate of X16rv2 is a range, has anybody some numbers for Vega64? Just to compare a bit, thanks!
You typically use a benchmark order 0123456789abcdef where all hashes are represented once to produce quoted hashrate(s), since this order will be close to your long term average. A Vega 64 can do 28 MH/s or more if you don't care about power. Running with efficiency in mind, you should clock down core to 1130-1175 MHz and mem to 500 MHz, and also make sure you get a soc clk drop. When you see your soc clk (in HWiNFO64) is down to 600 or 800 MHz (and def not at 1107 MHz), you will be able to pull power all the way down to 800mV. A properly tweaked Vega 64 can do 150-153 kh/s/w, but not all people have been able to reproduce this setup.
|
|
|
|
joseph32
Member
Offline
Activity: 413
Merit: 21
|
|
October 01, 2019, 06:14:24 PM |
|
Since the hashrate of X16rv2 is a range, has anybody some numbers for Vega64? Just to compare a bit, thanks!
You typically use a benchmark order 0123456789abcdef where all hashes are represented once to produce quoted hashrate(s), since this order will be close to your long term average. A Vega 64 can do 28 MH/s or more if you don't care about power. Running with efficiency in mind, you should clock down core to 1130-1175 MHz and mem to 500 MHz, and also make sure you get a soc clk drop. When you see your soc clk (in HWiNFO64) is down to 600 or 800 MHz (and def not at 1107 MHz), you will be able to pull power all the way down to 800mV. A properly tweaked Vega 64 can do 150-153 kh/s/w, but not all people have been able to reproduce this setup. Awesome Kerney, thanks! Will test this later with more time.
|
|
|
|
kristikun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2019, 07:40:18 PM |
|
Since the hashrate of X16rv2 is a range, has anybody some numbers for Vega64? Just to compare a bit, thanks!
You typically use a benchmark order 0123456789abcdef where all hashes are represented once to produce quoted hashrate(s), since this order will be close to your long term average. A Vega 64 can do 28 MH/s or more if you don't care about power. Running with efficiency in mind, you should clock down core to 1130-1175 MHz and mem to 500 MHz, and also make sure you get a soc clk drop. When you see your soc clk (in HWiNFO64) is down to 600 or 800 MHz (and def not at 1107 MHz), you will be able to pull power all the way down to 800mV. A properly tweaked Vega 64 can do 150-153 kh/s/w, but not all people have been able to reproduce this setup. Im using veg56 flashed to 64 , with those setting i get insta crash any stable safe settings i could use for x16rv2 ? with memory timings or without ? With my CN settings i get 22-28 mhs but cards die soon
|
|
|
|
GKumaran
Member
Offline
Activity: 204
Merit: 10
|
|
October 01, 2019, 08:37:32 PM |
|
Since the hashrate of X16rv2 is a range, has anybody some numbers for Vega64? Just to compare a bit, thanks!
https://ibb.co/vstL6hhResults on Vega 64: Cards : 6x Vega 64, Air Cooled, Samsung Memory, Reference Design Core : 1135mhz(p3) Mem : 500mhz(p1) Volt : 825mV SOC : 599mhz Timing mod : None, x16rv2 needs no memory tuning Hashrate : 24.2 mh/s (Average After 43 minutes of mining) Power : 195-200 watts
|
|
|
|
ayiphelmy
Copper Member
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 105
|
|
October 02, 2019, 10:59:31 PM |
|
miner cant run on 2miner pool algo mtp and x16rv2 please fix this
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
|
October 02, 2019, 11:58:13 PM |
|
I get about 32.5 on a Radeon VII, uses ~220 watts average power with a modest undervolt. It was quite nice on RVN for the first 24 hours or so.
|
|
|
|
GKumaran
Member
Offline
Activity: 204
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2019, 03:03:44 AM |
|
miner cant run on 2miner pool algo mtp and x16rv2 please fix this
Running for weeks on 2miner for MTP and can confirm it works fine. What errors are you getting?
|
|
|
|
sockpuppet1911
|
|
October 03, 2019, 06:47:51 AM |
|
Thank you for adding $CCX Outperforming everything else I've tried so far with my vegas.
|
|
|
|
kerney666
Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 86
|
|
October 03, 2019, 10:44:32 PM |
|
miner cant run on 2miner pool algo mtp and x16rv2 please fix this
Hi! Can you describe your issues please? I don't have any problems with 2miners myself when testing.
|
|
|
|
|