[ANN] ⚡ IceChain - Scalable blockchain ⚡ Shards ⚡ Double Chain ⚡

[icechain]

https://twitter.com/theicechain/status/1060108374333968386

[ishinn99]

https://twitter.com/theicechain/status/1060108374333968386

Hi dev, I just clicked the link and it's good to know that you are joining the blockchainsummit in february 2019. But I think posting a twitter link is not enough, add some details or introductions about it.

[UpsilonTrooper]

The name of the project is very consonant and similar to other projects. Is it really impossible to come up with a more original name?

IceChain doesn't strike any similarities here i think they are good to go and considering their shards and double chain technologies i think is just an ok name to use but personally i think it sound less fancy than the project but is not that bad

The other dude is referring to how the name is generic af and they could have used a little bit of you know, creativity to make the name sound better atleast

[Junralz]

I have visited and read some information on the site and saw that investors need KYC to be able to join the ICO sale? Is that little strict?

KYC has been recently regulated for some ICO project and we know that this is a bit annoying but we can't do nothing if that is their rules. Yes, it's really strict and maybe this is also to help to avoid some duplicate account.

[Zianingbu]

I hope that the tokens will be on the top exchanges, which will increase confidence in the token and will contribute to large trading volumes .

Though i think the team always want to add their token in the a big exchangers,but they can't work here.so they need  to work hard to be a part 

I hold such opinion. Initially, tokens have to be placed at least though on some exchanges, and already then to try to get on larger exchanges if the popularity increases.

Yes, of course it would be much better, but as the team thought it would be better it will. They can not always do as they advise users here. Because there are such tips where they are simply inappropriate.

I think it still better for this project to be listed in more known and popular exchanges, if this happen then more investors will be attracted to this project because investors will prove that the project is really serious.

We can find out about this only when they give us full information about the project and tell us which updates came from the team.

[connecoin]

I have visited and read some information on the site and saw that investors need KYC to be able to join the ICO sale? Is that little strict?

KYC has been recently regulated for some ICO project and we know that this is a bit annoying but we can't do nothing if that is their rules. Yes, it's really strict and maybe this is also to help to avoid some duplicate account.

Yes. I also noticed that in some ICO's where most investors undergo KYC procedure inorder to participate the token sales. Perhaps, there could be something good effect in doing this kind of way inorder for the event equally and fair for all interested people who wants to join.

[Dua]

I hope that the tokens will be on the top exchanges, which will increase confidence in the token and will contribute to large trading volumes .

Though i think the team always want to add their token in the a big exchangers,but they can't work here.so they need  to work hard to be a part 

I hold such opinion. Initially, tokens have to be placed at least though on some exchanges, and already then to try to get on larger exchanges if the popularity increases.

Yes, of course it would be much better, but as the team thought it would be better it will. They can not always do as they advise users here. Because there are such tips where they are simply inappropriate.

I think it still better for this project to be listed in more known and popular exchanges, if this happen then more investors will be attracted to this project because investors will prove that the project is really serious.

We can find out about this only when they give us full information about the project and tell us which updates came from the team.

Well, more news from the project team is just a necessity for good project development. In any case, the team should pay attention to this.

[johnleo]

I have visited and read some information on the site and saw that investors need KYC to be able to join the ICO sale? Is that little strict?

KYC has been recently regulated for some ICO project and we know that this is a bit annoying but we can't do nothing if that is their rules. Yes, it's really strict and maybe this is also to help to avoid some duplicate account.

I think KYC relate with legal thing that developer need when they register the company to the government, as we know government need to know who are the investor.

[NewCenturyBTC]

Are the team planning to launch other promotional stuff like campaigns, airdrop giveaways to those early and whitelist investors?

I think they will do it at suitably time. Need for waiting to collecg Icechain token.

[HMember]

Are the team planning to launch other promotional stuff like campaigns, airdrop giveaways to those early and whitelist investors?

I think they will do it at suitably time. Need for waiting to collecg Icechain token.

The developers are obliged to work constantly on the project irrespective of as quickly there takes place collecting necessary funds. Only such approach will provide investor confidence.

[RasenShuriken]

What a kind of a great conductor. I wish they could do an opportunity to make the platform better than it should. Don't worry about the developer.

[damniatx_]

I have visited and read some information on the site and saw that investors need KYC to be able to join the ICO sale? Is that little strict?

KYC has been recently regulated for some ICO project and we know that this is a bit annoying but we can't do nothing if that is their rules. Yes, it's really strict and maybe this is also to help to avoid some duplicate account.

I think KYC relate with legal thing that developer need when they register the company to the government, as we know government need to know who are the investor.

I agree with you. Sometimes KYC checking is very necessary. Unfortunately, many users do not like such checks and want to remain anonymous. It turns out that they will not be able to take part in sales?

[TechComputer]

I think KYC relate with legal thing that developer need when they register the company to the government, as we know government need to know who are the investor.

I agree with you. Sometimes KYC checking is very necessary. Unfortunately, many users do not like such checks and want to remain anonymous. It turns out that they will not be able to take part in sales?

Most of the projects ran KYC to prevent Anti Money Laundering which causes USD to fall. That's why they really need KYC for each supporters or investors.

[vickycoin05]

I hope that the tokens will be on the top exchanges, which will increase confidence in the token and will contribute to large trading volumes .

Though i think the team always want to add their token in the a big exchangers,but they can't work here.so they need  to work hard to be a part 

I hold such opinion. Initially, tokens have to be placed at least though on some exchanges, and already then to try to get on larger exchanges if the popularity increases.

Yes, of course it would be much better, but as the team thought it would be better it will. They can not always do as they advise users here. Because there are such tips where they are simply inappropriate.

I think it still better for this project to be listed in more known and popular exchanges, if this happen then more investors will be attracted to this project because investors will prove that the project is really serious.

We can find out about this only when they give us full information about the project and tell us which updates came from the team.

Definitely,  if we can help spread the project updates and progress if the team will post and launch information and detail about the progress. Since they are the one who is responsible about the updates. Accurate details are important.

[Momoamzad]

The name of the project is very consonant and similar to other projects. Is it really impossible to come up with a more original name?

what do u mean by original name? and also name is not fact. fact ia what will it can do in future. how it get successfull or thw team works.

Agree with you buddy Momoamzad. And for me, it is not that the name of the project is not original, in fact this project has its own unique to be recognize. What is more important is that the project can make a huge positive impact in the crypto currency commmunity and can bring more opportunities to us crypto people that would benefit an end to end which is both the entire Icechain project and its community.

I hope this project will be succeded and make a positive impact on crypto market as you are saying. market is now full of scam project  but hopefully thisproject will be lamboo one

[Jedzkie050617]

The name of the project is very consonant and similar to other projects. Is it really impossible to come up with a more original name?

what do u mean by original name? and also name is not fact. fact ia what will it can do in future. how it get successfull or thw team works.

Agree with you buddy Momoamzad. And for me, it is not that the name of the project is not original, in fact this project has its own unique to be recognize. What is more important is that the project can make a huge positive impact in the crypto currency commmunity and can bring more opportunities to us crypto people that would benefit an end to end which is both the entire Icechain project and its community.

I hope this project will be succeded and make a positive impact on crypto market as you are saying. market is now full of scam project  but hopefully thisproject will be lamboo one

True, that's the main reason why investors hard to invest in the project. Specialy offered by those well known individuals. We cant blame others to doubt about the project because we only  new the  doctor but nots its.

[DynoEarl]

I have visited and read some information on the site and saw that investors need KYC to be able to join the ICO sale? Is that little strict?

KYC has been recently regulated for some ICO project and we know that this is a bit annoying but we can't do nothing if that is their rules. Yes, it's really strict and maybe this is also to help to avoid some duplicate account.

That's utter bullshit, unless they are operating out of some first world country there's no way they need to take people's KYCs (and pretty sure they aren't)

[farhan28]

The name of the project is very consonant and similar to other projects. Is it really impossible to come up with a more original name?

Yeah the name can be common but look through the project,the project is very innovative & the team is hard working & managing the project very well.so look from the different angle

I think the name doesn't matter for now because it can be change as it grows and developed. But for now the team should focus on achieving success of the project through finding ways to make it more usable and attractive to gain more supporters and investors. They should also focus on different ideas to make the project more develop.

Yes name can't  give them fame as work will be a big factor.if they try they will be successful before the ICO.so need good advicement & correct plan for the success

[buldogers]

I hope that the tokens will be on the top exchanges, which will increase confidence in the token and will contribute to large trading volumes .

Though i think the team always want to add their token in the a big exchangers,but they can't work here.so they need  to work hard to be a part 

I hold such opinion. Initially, tokens have to be placed at least though on some exchanges, and already then to try to get on larger exchanges if the popularity increases.

Yes, of course it would be much better, but as the team thought it would be better it will. They can not always do as they advise users here. Because there are such tips where they are simply inappropriate.

I think it still better for this project to be listed in more known and popular exchanges, if this happen then more investors will be attracted to this project because investors will prove that the project is really serious.

We can find out about this only when they give us full information about the project and tell us which updates came from the team.

It's better to be patient and wait for the team to decide, since they also decide for the better of their project. Whichever their choices of exchange, just support them and if not encourage them to work hard on getting listed on much popular exchange.

[Assab101]

What a kind of a great conductor. I wish they could do an opportunity to make the platform better than it should. Don't worry about the developer.

I assure you mate that in the next few months this will be the best platform for crypto trading. Just be more patient right now.

How can you be so sure about it because this is still under development and having a lot of assets is isn't easy as what you may think. Unless, they have some announcement which is really makes it interesting especially about their development.