[ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast

[Anotheranonlol]

Have we got a number of the beast bot on mintpal 

[massiveman]

Have we got a number of the beast bot on mintpal 

the what?

[massiveman]

lol i get you.

[massiveman]

haha. people dont seem to learn that if they dont dump into the buy walls then the price has only one direction to go in.

[roy7]

Is there an existing p2pool network for heavycoin?

[roy7]

Isn't 1gh a version of p2pool? I don't have a worker and I am using my hvc address....

Other pools do that too that aren't using p2pool.

[massiveman]

actually damn HVC is gaining upwards momentum on mintpal, probably just a stupid pump and dump though

[massiveman]

hope im wrong but i think it will be several days at least before HVC has doubled in value and is holding there.

[massiveman]

yeah i mean apart from the fact it isnt widely adopted it shits all over litecoin.

[blacklig]

Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.

The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.

I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.

Of course, that's just me ...

Just 30+ times since Aug 2013? Lucky you! I ve done it like 100+ times since Nov 2013
but I cannot agree with you more..

[Fermin]

Look, the discussion of 1GH having to much hash rate and the need to move to other pools, is correct on short-term, but ends up being flawed in the big picture.

The core issue is the hassle of using a MPOS vs an anonymous, no-login pool where you use wallet address as username like 1GH. This is what should be looked into, in the long term.

I gladly moved from 1GH to dwarfpool when I was mining MAX, due to excessive hash rate. It was easy and hassle free to move from one no-login pool to another. I will not gladly do so if I have to deal with MPOS registration, login, email confirmation to unlock, set up workers and other redundant crap, because I'm FUCKING fed up of it. I've done it 30+ times at least since Aug 2013. I believe enough is enough.

Of course, that's just me ...

Just 30+ times since Aug 2013? Lucky you! I ve done it like 100+ times since Nov 2013
but I cannot agree with you more..

+10000

[incin]

Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Beta will not be supported.

Just a heads up no starting .bat in the windows zip download. Might throw some newer users off.

[incin]

HVC @ Mintpal trying to go up....

[gpuminer]

http://hvc.nonce-pool.com getting some serious hash rate. My payout is actually better than mining in 1gh. Getting a few blocks per hour. Very nice. The whole site is mainly supported by 1 guy which has around 1.2 GH. he is the main block finder. There you have it, finally a pool which can compete with 1gh in terms of payout.

[Vanderi]

http://hvc.nonce-pool.com getting some serious hash rate. My payout is actually better than mining in 1gh. Getting a few blocks per hour. Very nice. The whole site is mainly supported by 1 guy which has around 1.2 GH. he is the main block finder.

Yeah same here, better payout from there and I've tried heavycoinpool(seemed ddosed) and GH1. The Nonce guy just seems to know wtf he's doing.

[incin]

http://hvc.nonce-pool.com getting some serious hash rate. My payout is actually better than mining in 1gh. Getting a few blocks per hour. Very nice. The whole site is mainly supported by 1 guy which has around 1.2 GH. he is the main block finder.

Big miner on smaller pool gets his "vote" counted the most (finding blocks). Hopefully he don't run or it might put the pool in a considerable slump. Regardless nice to see hash getting spread out though!

[gpuminer]

http://hvc.nonce-pool.com getting some serious hash rate. My payout is actually better than mining in 1gh. Getting a few blocks per hour. Very nice. The whole site is mainly supported by 1 guy which has around 1.2 GH. he is the main block finder.

Big miner on smaller pool gets his "vote" counted the most (finding blocks). Hopefully he don't run or it might put the pool in a considerable slump. Regardless nice to see hash getting spread out though!

I will stay in the pool as long as he stays. If he leaves, i go back to 1gh.

[TheRealSteve]

http://hvc.nonce-pool.com getting some serious hash rate.

pool	rate (Mh/s)	miners	Mh/s/miner	pool fee (%)	payout
http://hvc.1gh.com/	17,653.25	331	53.33	1	RBPPS
http://hvc.nonce-pool.com/	1,793.46	167	10.74	1	PPLNS
https://heavycoinpool.com/	209.61	105	2	1	PROP
http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/	140.85	35	4.02	1	PPLNS
http://heavy.stablehash.com/	0.00	0	0	1	PROP
https://hvc.crunchharder.net/	0.00	0	0	2	PPLNS
http://hvc.pool.mn/	0.00	0	0	0	site broken
total	19,797.17

* miner count for 1gh is an estimate based on total hash rate (T), summed top 100 (Sc) hash rate (Sh), extrapolation of miners 81-100 progression through to 1Mh/s (Xh, Xc) dividing the remainder (T-Sh-Xh) by 1Mh/s (Rc) and summing these 3 results together (Sc+Xc+Rc), and is likely wildly inaccurate

Edit: As a slight indication, just the top 100 at gh is good for 12,921.37 Gh/s.

[gpuminer]

http://hvc.nonce-pool.com getting some serious hash rate.

pool	rate (Mh/s)	miners	Mh/s/miner	pool fee (%)	payout
http://hvc.1gh.com/	17,653.25	331	53.33	1	RBPPS
http://hvc.nonce-pool.com/	1,793.46	167	10.74	1	PPLNS
https://heavycoinpool.com/	209.61	105	2	1	PROP
http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/	140.85	35	4.02	1	PPLNS
http://heavy.stablehash.com/	0.00	0	0	1	PROP
https://hvc.crunchharder.net/	0.00	0	0	2	PPLNS
http://hvc.pool.mn/	0.00	0	0	0	site broken
total	19,797.17

* miner count for 1gh is an estimate based on total hash rate (T), summed top 100 (Sc) hash rate (Sh), extrapolation of miners 81-100 progression through to 1Mh/s (Xh, Xc) dividing the remainder (T-Sh-Xh) by 1Mh/s (Rc) and summing these 3 results together (Sc+Xc+Rc), and is likely wildly inaccurate

Edit: As a slight indication, just the top 100 at gh is good for 12,921.37 Gh/s.

http://hvc.nonce-pool.com growing fast. i guess because people start to realize they get paid more mining compare to 1gh.

[hoosen]

Wait so now the Hefty1 cryptography has been cracked where is the miner download for mining using GPU? I cant seem to find it anywhere or is it being hoarded by the hoards of all thine hoards?