Gamdom.com - 3 Million+ users - Jackpots, Rains - unique games modes

[Text]

It seems like I want to start playing here as well. This is because @btcltcdigger is already envying his account level. haha. Maybe when I make a deposit, then the representative will appear and give an update about the first deposit bonus. lol 😆

Anyway, I was able to play the crash game again, it was good to study how to apply the strategy. Try it tonight.

[1714619751]

1714619751

[1714619751]

1714619751

[1714619751]

1714619751

[1714619751]

1714619751

[fiulpro]

Please allow me to make a little suggestion . When we go on the website too see the most wagered player , the player with most profit and such , but the top button only shows most ,most . Which does not have any problems when you actually click on it and see , you can analyze by yourself but for the new players I do think it would be advantageous if we have something like : Most(W), Most(P) .

Your screen is too small that’s why it’s not fitted. I’m viewing it as complete “Most Wagered” and “Most Profit” using my Ipad without any problem. That is the typical disadvantage of using mobile in browsing online web based casino. But it’s a good suggestion to adjust with that so that users can’t be confused on that redundant word.

Gandom UI/UX design is on par to some famous casino like sportsbet. I will definitely try there live casino using my signature payment next week.


I saw some minor issue. The website was not responsive whenever I click the icon of Live Casino under the Casino category. I believe the reason is because the live game history pop-up too fast that result for the website to become laggy. Maybe you should check that.

Yes I already am aware of the fact  but I do think we cannot ignore the amount of mobile casino users , since it's like on the go thing , we can open it up anywhere , therefore I did think it would look good and professional if we do a little adjustment , this way it won't look weird for the first time users .

But then again it's very minor and not much attention nor much changes are needed to make it a little better . Rest as for the lagging issue , the live one always lags a little but when I resume after refreshing most of the times it's gone.

[deisik]

I think that the response of the team to these dilemmas would be crucial on how people would accept them. Clearing reputation would require tremendous efforts, and they should start to do so

Could you please expand more on this? You make it look like they already did something wrong and now should start to clean up their reputation. What "dilemmas" are you talking about, more specifically? If you refer to KYC requirements, I don't like them either, and, as I'm inclined to think, no one does. But that's not the reason for "clearing reputation" as there's nothing to clear (let alone reputation)

So what am I missing, exactly?

[dunfida]

Please allow me to make a little suggestion . When we go on the website too see the most wagered player , the player with most profit and such , but the top button only shows most ,most . Which does not have any problems when you actually click on it and see , you can analyze by yourself but for the new players I do think it would be advantageous if we have something like : Most(W), Most(P) .

Your screen is too small that’s why it’s not fitted. I’m viewing it as complete “Most Wagered” and “Most Profit” using my Ipad without any problem. That is the typical disadvantage of using mobile in browsing online web based casino. But it’s a good suggestion to adjust with that so that users can’t be confused on that redundant word.

Gandom UI/UX design is on par to some famous casino like sportsbet. I will definitely try there live casino using my signature payment next week.

Their meta tag is just fine
<meta name="viewport" content="user-scalable=no, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1, minimum-scale=1, width=device-width, height=device-height" />

but they missed out in mobile i guess which they should at least add it up for mobile users to see it in full scale.
https://gist.github.com/gokulkrishh/242e68d1ee94ad05f488

[Kemarit]

I think that the response of the team to these dilemmas would be crucial on how people would accept them. Clearing reputation would require tremendous efforts, and they should start to do so

Could you please expand more on this? You make it look like they already did something wrong and now should start to clean up their reputation. What "dilemmas" are you talking about, more specifically? If you refer to KYC requirements, I don't like them either, and, as I'm inclined to think, no one does. But that's not the reason for "clearing reputation" as there's nothing to clear (let alone reputation)

So what am I missing, exactly?

LOL, when I read that post, I try to back read if there was any issues or 'dilemmas', so I don't know what @john_nautica is talking about here. The discussions evolves around some 'bug' on the mobile phone display but I don't consider this a dilemma.

Clearing reputation?  Gamdom doesn't have any scam accusations, so I'm also at lost at what this user is trying to say here.
I haven't tested the game in mobile though, but so far the desktop version UI and response itself is good on my end.

[ultrloa]

I think that the response of the team to these dilemmas would be crucial on how people would accept them. Clearing reputation would require tremendous efforts, and they should start to do so

Could you please expand more on this? You make it look like they already did something wrong and now should start to clean up their reputation. What "dilemmas" are you talking about, more specifically? If you refer to KYC requirements, I don't like them either, and, as I'm inclined to think, no one does. But that's not the reason for "clearing reputation" as there's nothing to clear (let alone reputation)

So what am I missing, exactly?

Its sounds funny when I read the clearing reputation word since there's no something bad happen as of this moment, maybe the one needed to clear out here is those little things found on website and some sort of suggestions that needed to look up for improving the users experience in the site, so overall theirs no really huge problem here.

And for sure no one really like KYC since its an awful to give out our personal details to anywhere and provably this will be needed in huge amount only.

[Lanatsa]

I think that the response of the team to these dilemmas would be crucial on how people would accept them. Clearing reputation would require tremendous efforts, and they should start to do so

Could you please expand more on this? You make it look like they already did something wrong and now should start to clean up their reputation. What "dilemmas" are you talking about, more specifically? If you refer to KYC requirements, I don't like them either, and, as I'm inclined to think, no one does. But that's not the reason for "clearing reputation" as there's nothing to clear (let alone reputation)

So what am I missing, exactly?

Its sounds funny when I read the clearing reputation word since there's no something bad happen as of this moment, maybe the one needed to clear out here is those little things found on website and some sort of suggestions that needed to look up for improving the users experience in the site, so overall theirs no really huge problem here.

And for sure no one really like KYC since its an awful to give out our personal details to anywhere and provably this will be needed in huge amount only.

Actually have same impression about that clearing reputation thing yet theyve done nothing for him to say so. When it comes to KYC it do only ask primary details to raise up your level

but when you do decide to raise up another level then you would need another verification but this time you would sent out actual documents.If thats the case then it wont really be that

much of a problem or an issue.

[famososMuertos]

..:://::..
//...
 I think this do only particular for those who do play with fiat.I dont know if
crypto users will have exclusions into this one or will really need before they can withdraw.

Friend! I just made the minimum deposit, 0.0005 BTC took by the way only about 5 minutes to confirm. ALREADY with a confirmation it was made effective in my Wallet, available to use in the casino.

In reference to the retreat in a few days, I will make one and tell my experience. For sure nothing will happen and I will have my withdrawal without any kind of restriction.

Regards.

[Savemore]

I think that the response of the team to these dilemmas would be crucial on how people would accept them. Clearing reputation would require tremendous efforts, and they should start to do so

Could you please expand more on this? You make it look like they already did something wrong and now should start to clean up their reputation. What "dilemmas" are you talking about, more specifically? If you refer to KYC requirements, I don't like them either, and, as I'm inclined to think, no one does. But that's not the reason for "clearing reputation" as there's nothing to clear (let alone reputation)

So what am I missing, exactly?

Its sounds funny when I read the clearing reputation word since there's no something bad happen as of this moment, maybe the one needed to clear out here is those little things found on website and some sort of suggestions that needed to look up for improving the users experience in the site, so overall theirs no really huge problem here.

And for sure no one really like KYC since its an awful to give out our personal details to anywhere and provably this will be needed in huge amount only.

In terms of choosing a online casino, one of the factors is the KYC. We are always being reminded that uploading personal documents online have risks because we do not know if our identity is safe or not. But there are online casinos out there that have good security like the Gamdom because they said that the date is 100% secured. The KYC is required as they said but the good thing is they only asking personal information and not requiring any valid i.d in order to increase the level.

[serjent05]

This time I deposit a fund in ETH, took sometime than BTC to reflect on the account. Unlike in BTC which the transaction reflects instantly once the transaction is made, ETH took some time and I have to wait for around 55 confirmation before the transaction of ETH reflects on the account.  And I just noticed that live support is not yet available.

[cryptomaniac_xxx]

This time I deposit a fund in ETH, took sometime than BTC to reflect on the account. Unlike in BTC which the transaction reflects instantly once the transaction is made, ETH took some time and I have to wait for around 55 confirmation before the transaction of ETH reflects on the account.  And I just noticed that live support is not yet available.

It's because most online gambling casino accepts 0 bitcoin confirmation as opposed to ETH which obviously requires more. And then there is the problem with the gas fees on ETH network, it's more clogged than bitcoin network and it is very expensive as compare to BTC itself. I haven't tested Gamdom but it seems a fair and decent, will definitely try slot games.

[deisik]

This time I deposit a fund in ETH, took sometime than BTC to reflect on the account. Unlike in BTC which the transaction reflects instantly once the transaction is made, ETH took some time and I have to wait for around 55 confirmation before the transaction of ETH reflects on the account.  And I just noticed that live support is not yet available.

It's because most online gambling casino accepts 0 bitcoin confirmation

I'm not sure whether it is a good idea

In case Gamdom does actually allow 0 confirmations. In the early days of cryptocurrency gambling, PD had been accepting Bitcoin transfers and allowed gambling immediately (I used that feature when I ran out of funds in the middle of a martingale routine), without having to wait for a network confirmation. Until someone successfully pulled off a double-spend. Really, you could send your bitcoins to PD, stake them at once, and having lost your bet, send the same coins from your wallet elsewhere once again, but with a higher network fee. Then your second transaction might have been confirmed first, effectively canceling the first TX to PD

[TitanGEL]

So you guys need KYC to withdraw or not? I'm curious about this before I try the casino.
From my experience, just by looking at the site at a glance, KYC is mandatory.

To my own personal opinion verification should not be a thing to worry about for most players, since you are not doing anything illegal, KYC is beneficial to both parties, it's for the security of both the clients and casino itself. Kyc is not mandatory up to a certain level on the site, level 1 is most common among all users and this is just to have few information about the user

That's true that KYC is not mandatory after all so it is up to us if we will increase our level or not. The KYC became a issue in these past years because there is someone who created a thread about the bad sides of the KYC if I'm not mistaken. The level 1 KYC in the website is just asking personal info like name, age, and address. It is good that they are not asking some personal documents but for me it is not beneficial in both parties after all because there are some who really want privacy and they are avoiding Kyc.

[lebregone]

I see that your thread has been launched last 2018 but I didn't see any latest update yet that were posted here. I am wondering whether
the creator of this topic is part of this project or not as I like to see if what are the latest and useful update with your platform.

And upon checking your FAQ, I can't see if what currencies you are currently accepting in your platform.

[deisik]

I see that your thread has been launched last 2018 but I didn't see any latest update yet that were posted here. I am wondering whether the creator of this topic is part of this project or not as I like to see if what are the latest and useful update with your platform

If you were reading the forum, you would know that the casino is now running the signature campaign on the forum with one of the (reportedly) top signature campaign managers hired. But seriously, do you really think it is someone trying to play a dirty trick here? Anyway, it will be clear in a few days (keep my fingers crossed)

And upon checking your FAQ, I can't see if what currencies you are currently accepting in your platform

It is right under the deposit menu (though you may have to register with the casino):



And I'm not sure what Ukraine refers to here (as I'm not from that country)

[john_nautica]

I think that the response of the team to these dilemmas would be crucial on how people would accept them. Clearing reputation would require tremendous efforts, and they should start to do so

Could you please expand more on this? You make it look like they already did something wrong and now should start to clean up their reputation. What "dilemmas" are you talking about, more specifically? If you refer to KYC requirements, I don't like them either, and, as I'm inclined to think, no one does. But that's not the reason for "clearing reputation" as there's nothing to clear (let alone reputation)

So what am I missing, exactly?

Oops sorry everyone I think I mistakenly posted it here it's supposed to be on 1xbit's new ann thread I think i just misclicked this. I don't have any intention to do any harm to the image of Gamdom nor do I want to confuse people. I am sorry again and I'll be more careful next time.

[gadado]

And I'm not sure what Ukraine refers to here (as I'm not from that country)

Mine works properly may I ask are you using a VPN or something?

[lebregone]

Thanks @deisik I already saw it I tried to register to it. I just thought that I can see supported currency on their FAQs it's a good thing that there's a variety of options in order to deposit on their casino i hope they will accept more cryptocurrency soon i would love seeing doge coin among them.

[deisik]

Oops sorry everyone I think I mistakenly posted it here it's supposed to be on 1xbit's new ann thread I think i just misclicked this. I don't have any intention to do any harm to the image of Gamdom nor do I want to confuse people. I am sorry again and I'll be more careful next time

You can always delete your post. Or, even better, you can edit it so that no one would feel there might be some truth to your words in respect to Gamdom while they are actually directed toward 1xbit as you say

And I'm not sure what Ukraine refers to here (as I'm not from that country)

Mine works properly may I ask are you using a VPN or something?

I'm using Opera's VPN and it should show something like Belgium or the Netherlands. Where I live (Russia) most online casinos are quickly banned by the authorities (yeah, I know). For example, Wolf.bet was blacklisted in a matter of a couple months after they had become active a little over a year ago

[gadado]

I'm using Opera's VPN and it should show something like Belgium or the Netherlands. Where I live (Russia) most online casinos are quickly banned by the authorities (yeah, I know). For example, Wolf.bet was blacklisted in a matter of a couple months after they had become active a little over a year ago

I think you can click it and choose your country, I don't think it would be a problem at all. I hope Gamdom wouldn't ban by your authorities it would be really hassle if you stored some funds in Gamdom and gets banned by the authorities afterwards.