[ANN] [BLTZ] [IPO Hybrid] BlitzCoin | proof of concept coin | pure speculative

[mr.pj]

About the P2P Nodes....  Most must notice now that there are curretnly two P2P networks for this coin.  Omarg and P2Phash are the ones that I can confirm are on the GOOD one, might be others, but can not confirm.  Not to say the other nodes are on incorrect fork, but at least one of nodes on that P2P network is.  

I believe any P2P owner that has posted recently saying they are on the correct chain is correct, however someone on that P2P network is not and everyone is missing some of the payouts because of it.

If you look at all the blocks found on that network, you will notice that some of the found blocks are not generating a payout for you.  Check the block explorer for yourself and others to confirm this.

I noticed this yesterday and brought it up on this threadG, Omarg responded and (please excuse my lack of knowledge on P2P) changed some hex code or something to make the new P2P network. so that we were mining on a network without any Nodes on the wrong fork, every block we have found has paid out since he did this.  Mind you we are not finding as many blocks because the hashrate is much lower than the other one, none the less we are getting paid for all the blocks we find.

For the other P2P owners out there, if you contact omarg and prove your Node is on the correct chain, he will give you the new "hex code".

There are 2 p2p networks because Omarg switched at night - which was plausible to do but does lead now to more confusion.
I am in contact with "the big p2pnode" owners in the old network, and once the admin of the wrong node this morning woke up, we solved the issue within minutes.
Yes it is said to say that in this some blocks got lost - but only the ones submitted on the node with the wrong chain. All other nodes submitted perfectly fine shares.

OmarG changed the code, but only on his pool and then announcing he will provide this only per PM and stuff. Really great, since it got lost in the thread and please forgive me, I am following this thread as a pool owner closely - but with all the spam happening in here. 1 post can easily get lost ... aaand OmarG did take time to respond for this.

It was not even changed in the sourcecode he provided, so anyone now wanting to run his own p2pnode has to contact omarG and so forth ... not a great situation for the p2p network ain't it?!?!

The current p2pnode status is as follows

• all nodes are on the correct chain
• the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
• omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
• omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners

For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..

[1715432145]

1715432145

[1715432145]

1715432145

[1715432145]

1715432145

[1715432145]

1715432145

[1715432145]

1715432145

[TsaktuO]

Please help me finish block real fast : ) https://blitz.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=dashboard
This pool died at 112 diff : (
Ive been paid out from this pool, so I should get my coins?

they appeared to be on the wrong chain... Sorry, dude, you've chosen the wrong pool...

Alright, so those coins are gone. Sweet.

[bocyaj]

UP & READY!

Attention: We are in the right P2Pool Network with >166 MHs P2Pool Speed and several Nodes!
The other one has only 25 MHs!

p2pool
bltz.hashhunter.com:9333
login: wallet adress
pass: any

p2pool
bltz.hashhunter.com:9333
login: wallet adress
pass: any

Just because your p2p pool has more hash, does not make it the right one..... We suspect one of the nodes connected to 'your' p2p network is on the wrong fork and causing that whole P2P network issues.

Take a look at the block explorer for any addresses currently mining on it... do you see transactions for any found blocks recently.  Any of the addresses I verify with do not....

IF YOU ARE MINING ON THE 'LARGER' P2P NETWORK, CHECK THE FOUND BLOCKS AND VERIFY THAT YOU GOT PAID FOR THEM.  OF THE 3 OR SO ADDRESSES I VERIFIED, THE ANSWER IS NO.

If you can find an address that has got payments for all blocks recently, please show me.

here are the last bunch of blocks found by the larger P2P pool:  (If you are mining here, check to see if you got payments for all or even any of these blocks)

395231   Thu Mar 27 2014 10:31:26 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   02daf04db2d1348c4ae612df6f699938adf6bd347f265449ad78042dcf3a72fd
394940   Thu Mar 27 2014 06:22:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   a38da5814a738321903ac67b08532fc94e62aee975a84dd1e29ac3f17a41d96e
394928   Thu Mar 27 2014 06:08:35 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   9091f7f668e83f291ffb75f34b7c718b0e6a6b25e84181fef4ca4cecf1458814
394927   Thu Mar 27 2014 06:07:57 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   dca9cca6dface09901005a59b5efb0b09850d6b8afb5f5d881c41c4592f89f0c
394926   Thu Mar 27 2014 06:05:13 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   1c9db186b3305b2368507c893f08b78c25fb176bfc2d3ac8c8726a91ff971c1c
393988   Thu Mar 27 2014 02:14:34 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   e710c39bdcdd934cc984adc38f44674c05626a8eb0dedafb8f50482ddd1e4f73
393987   Thu Mar 27 2014 02:11:07 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   2f1c6c415ba5b711b41c5ffb15cfbd1f17f4f872e825f2c04b1a1598360c81f7
393986   Thu Mar 27 2014 01:47:16 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   d601bf21a5c206b7724dae7a1d7cb45b4f663138d9a1e3c57ff3f5b7bd9dd952
393982   Thu Mar 27 2014 01:04:44 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   6530fad23e94be23ae4ca93f474e1e21ce838d53ff92056fbb92ab812e507acc
393981   Thu Mar 27 2014 01:02:44 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   9a8910d626f20411f33110c3e3b6c67e93ed5b69e9b4ab17417ddc6378262e3e
393979   Thu Mar 27 2014 00:52:39 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   8c124203f842f7eed261a4463d097260287a2ef39f92bdec24558c6dd46d3d26
393978   Thu Mar 27 2014 00:50:53 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   71cd90dca58e998c6add33a064b73bf5ac7523ad41cfbfcafe66a5451e07a2e2
394576   Thu Mar 27 2014 00:32:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   b442beaca6aecde14ebb2ecd08480ddef381888009b4d16ce9347724bb9caec0
393977   Thu Mar 27 2014 00:30:49 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   d3c438b366261ba3beea38a936c88ad29c2fbabd4a73c45706f4974c73bb4cd3
393973   Wed Mar 26 2014 23:38:48 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   e8830a78498ac4ddf729e200d02f4642ffc4f0b0c69d68cda82d72cf33bda788
393972   Wed Mar 26 2014 23:35:27 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   14be9f5502753c8ee6929cb2a36f53a8d20165935aba191a2748f436afe4006e
393971   Wed Mar 26 2014 23:22:50 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   d1440c39b2378336864fe9de5e2b8c613fb1f2fc92028af9031e65b87a4636c6
393970   Wed Mar 26 2014 23:08:18 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   11a9b220b0c0ef6e1083d949c13cb74f053c7357fa7735417ed3603032814660
393969   Wed Mar 26 2014 23:02:57 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   2d16a15baa35c785f8034da997feb4e0e748d48252fad58e1a6943ed1901b826
393968   Wed Mar 26 2014 23:01:34 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   2c75628ce591fbb48d7d7ca1664e39bc8f2f26c5dbdfb9624fea5888a369e7ae
393967   Wed Mar 26 2014 22:45:01 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   f3bfabdcff336771cddc4eaf6f403b8c88e7785a0c1abdc560f3e3d7f4fed147
393966   Wed Mar 26 2014 22:38:11 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   a277ad1a90d960e7837d80199de72df39b99227ab7c2848ef08c45be9f867140
394440   Wed Mar 26 2014 22:35:58 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   a97a100e98070a64961296b51457bc5d54c2ecdebf2736a7a8b30f45c2a38acf
394432   Wed Mar 26 2014 22:25:34 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   7bac6dd45d198f5736294d67d69073ef954e18fcee73af7661b3c741606a1ee2
393964   Wed Mar 26 2014 21:54:43 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   66770c53d9354b8e327ce14b43eae59a1047b6394a47481061723e5978f7d646
394393   Wed Mar 26 2014 21:46:47 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   1daf2e6854af7629cc9b0acb4c4246ef6f93ddda277eae12cac2ea00a0b8d7f7
393963   Wed Mar 26 2014 21:45:34 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   2685fc81cfe6ba542b33056c876190707785084da75a534111e4bb47576c5d53

Here are the 3 blocks that the smaller P2P network has found so far:

4 hours ago   Thu Mar 27 2014 08:15:15 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   395040   4d71244949f3b8d962348c775ff0ea9347491184218681b13ab2577a75b28355
6 hours ago   Thu Mar 27 2014 06:26:42 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   394944   8fb6f3a08c74db3b8ad42662ff5eb28e2e8537858cf23ff0eb7b0765386060b8
14 hours ago   Wed Mar 26 2014 22:21:33 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time)   394430      8d8d12be285d3c33a87e0320b504fddce4ceaa3c6d56ed6bd9110afeca801796

My address is BJ22X2fMeFurhjZdgecEdXqweX3xFm4iQG if you want to check the block explorer and verify I got a payment for each of those blocks.

honestly, I am fine whether anyone switches or not, I am getting paid for all blocks found on the 'smaller' P2P network.  It would just be nice if the blocks were found a little more often.
But in the long run, it should work out the same for me.

I just feel bad for all those miners not getting anything in return.

I am in no way a P2P guru... but these are my findings and I fell the need to share with everyone what I found.  If you see something different, please prove me wrong.

If this helped you and you are feeling a little Blitzed, feel free to throw some blitz my way... hehe.

[BlitzCoinDev]

The current p2pnode status is as follows

• all nodes are on the correct chain
• the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
• omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
• omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners

For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..

what code are you using now? do I need to remove source code from OP?

[mr.pj]

This is the last block found by p2pool

http://cryptexplorer.com/block/a01f26a6319322e40293dfa77ffb21c75caeab044394b48c11ca1c1e1965a5cd

18:24 <[CV]-BLTZ-92> BLITZCOIN BLOCK FOUND by BLitzVz92iy9uN2LBhb9cQBujgkTEeCQ5A! http://cryptexplorer.com/block/a01f26a6319322e40293dfa77ffb21c75caeab044394b48c11ca1c1e1965a5cd

so proof that it is on the right chain

[bocyaj]

About the P2P Nodes....  Most must notice now that there are curretnly two P2P networks for this coin.  Omarg and P2Phash are the ones that I can confirm are on the GOOD one, might be others, but can not confirm.  Not to say the other nodes are on incorrect fork, but at least one of nodes on that P2P network is.  

I believe any P2P owner that has posted recently saying they are on the correct chain is correct, however someone on that P2P network is not and everyone is missing some of the payouts because of it.

If you look at all the blocks found on that network, you will notice that some of the found blocks are not generating a payout for you.  Check the block explorer for yourself and others to confirm this.

I noticed this yesterday and brought it up on this threadG, Omarg responded and (please excuse my lack of knowledge on P2P) changed some hex code or something to make the new P2P network. so that we were mining on a network without any Nodes on the wrong fork, every block we have found has paid out since he did this.  Mind you we are not finding as many blocks because the hashrate is much lower than the other one, none the less we are getting paid for all the blocks we find.

For the other P2P owners out there, if you contact omarg and prove your Node is on the correct chain, he will give you the new "hex code".

There are 2 p2p networks because Omarg switched at night - which was plausible to do but does lead now to more confusion.
I am in contact with "the big p2pnode" owners in the old network, and once the admin of the wrong node this morning woke up, we solved the issue within minutes.
Yes it is said to say that in this some blocks got lost - but only the ones submitted on the node with the wrong chain. All other nodes submitted perfectly fine shares.

OmarG changed the code, but only on his pool and then announcing he will provide this only per PM and stuff. Really great, since it got lost in the thread and please forgive me, I am following this thread as a pool owner closely - but with all the spam happening in here. 1 post can easily get lost ... aaand OmarG did take time to respond for this.

It was not even changed in the sourcecode he provided, so anyone now wanting to run his own p2pnode has to contact omarG and so forth ... not a great situation for the p2p network ain't it?!?!

The current p2pnode status is as follows

• all nodes are on the correct chain
• the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
• omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
• omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners

For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..

I saw this post after sending out mine....  I haven't found a wallet address that has gotten paid for ALL the blocks I listed....

I checked a few others and see payments, but not for all blocks... I guess its possible they stopped minnig for a bit... but don't think so since the payouts would have deviated more I think..

which Node/Nodes were bad ?

[yesiam6]

my wallet is synced with only 1256 blocks 

[TLHN]

Hi there,

i just did a manual payout at hashing.at

but it does not show up in my wallet and the block sys n/a

anyone a idea what happended there?

http://666kb.com/i/cmzxe9r40fltan6hf.gif

[chango]

HashFever is getting a lot of DDOS  Can someone recommend a good pool that is in the right fork and that doesn't have much attention from the DDOSers ?

[mr.pj]

Just because your p2p pool has more hash, does not make it the right one..... We suspect one of the nodes connected to 'your' p2p network is on the wrong fork and causing that whole P2P network issues.

That has been resolved by 8am this morning - anyone mining in the large p2pnetwork pool is receiving payouts. Just verify the blocks

Take a look at the block explorer for any addresses currently mining on it... do you see transactions for any found blocks recently.  Any of the addresses I verify with do not....

IF YOU ARE MINING ON THE 'LARGER' P2P NETWORK, CHECK THE FOUND BLOCKS AND VERIFY THAT YOU GOT PAID FOR THEM.  OF THE 3 OR SO ADDRESSES I VERIFIED, THE ANSWER IS NO.

If you can find an address that has got payments for all blocks recently, please show me.



here are the last bunch of blocks found by the larger P2P pool:  (If you are mining here, check to see if you got payments for all or even any of these blocks)
[...]

My address is BJ22X2fMeFurhjZdgecEdXqweX3xFm4iQG if you want to check the block explorer and verify I got a payment for each of those blocks.

honestly, I am fine whether anyone switches or not, I am getting paid for all blocks found on the 'smaller' P2P network.  It would just be nice if the blocks were found a little more often.
But in the long run, it should work out the same for me.

I just feel bad for all those miners not getting anything in return.

I am in no way a P2P guru... but these are my findings and I fell the need to share with everyone what I found.  If you see something different, please prove me wrong.

If this helped you and you are feeling a little Blitzed, feel free to throw some blitz my way... hehe.

Terms
Network A - old network
Network B - network changed by Omarg

to clarify

If you mine on network B how can you expect to be paid in network A?

These two networks act like 2 different pools and you wont find payment addresses of the other in the other one.
Does not matter what chain both are on - wont happen ....
So please look for an addr like the biggest one from the last block BLitzVz92iy9uN2LBhb9cQBujgkTEeCQ5A

You will see in the normal explorer that the addr is receiving payouts. So stop the FUD and ask questions instead of making conclusions ... seriously making me just mad and angry here.

Yesterday the p2pool launch was a disaster - omarG provided only his seed node without even asking any other pool owner if he is willing to provide another initial seed node .. WTF?!?!!

We could not run the network without the initial seednode properly and had a lot of trouble working it out. Serously man!

[BlitzCoinDev]

Just because your p2p pool has more hash, does not make it the right one..... We suspect one of the nodes connected to 'your' p2p network is on the wrong fork and causing that whole P2P network issues.

That has been resolved by 8am this morning - anyone mining in the large p2pnetwork pool is receiving payouts. Just verify the blocks

Take a look at the block explorer for any addresses currently mining on it... do you see transactions for any found blocks recently.  Any of the addresses I verify with do not....

IF YOU ARE MINING ON THE 'LARGER' P2P NETWORK, CHECK THE FOUND BLOCKS AND VERIFY THAT YOU GOT PAID FOR THEM.  OF THE 3 OR SO ADDRESSES I VERIFIED, THE ANSWER IS NO.

If you can find an address that has got payments for all blocks recently, please show me.



here are the last bunch of blocks found by the larger P2P pool:  (If you are mining here, check to see if you got payments for all or even any of these blocks)
[...]

My address is BJ22X2fMeFurhjZdgecEdXqweX3xFm4iQG if you want to check the block explorer and verify I got a payment for each of those blocks.

honestly, I am fine whether anyone switches or not, I am getting paid for all blocks found on the 'smaller' P2P network.  It would just be nice if the blocks were found a little more often.
But in the long run, it should work out the same for me.

I just feel bad for all those miners not getting anything in return.

I am in no way a P2P guru... but these are my findings and I fell the need to share with everyone what I found.  If you see something different, please prove me wrong.

If this helped you and you are feeling a little Blitzed, feel free to throw some blitz my way... hehe.

Terms
Network A - old network
Network B - network changed by Omarg

to clarify

If you mine on network B how can you expect to be paid in network A?

These two networks act like 2 different pools and you wont find payment addresses of the other in the other one.
Does not matter what chain both are on - wont happen ....
So please look for an addr like the biggest one from the last block BLitzVz92iy9uN2LBhb9cQBujgkTEeCQ5A

You will see in the normal explorer that the addr is receiving payouts. So stop the FUD and ask questions instead of making conclusions ... seriously making me just mad and angry here.

Yesterday the p2pool launch was a disaster - omarG provided only his seed node without even asking any other pool owner if he is willing to provide another initial seed node .. WTF?!?!!

We could not run the network without the initial seednode properly and had a lot of trouble working it out. Serously man!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=509173.msg5935011#msg5935011

[ydrogios]

looks like a lot of pools are also on the wrong fork. noone knows how to get to the correct fork. many pools already dead. well...back to another coin

How to tell if I'm on the correct fork or not?

current block: 2182
current diff: 114.88

you can check it at http://cryptexplorer.com/chain/BlitzCoin
Block Explorer is correct

Ok so it seems like http://bltz.hashfever.com is on the correct fork, thankfully.

I think and http://bltz.okaypool.com/index.php?page=dashboard is in the correct chain

[mr.pj]

[...]

I saw this post after sending out mine....  I haven't found a wallet address that has gotten paid for ALL the blocks I listed....

I checked a few others and see payments, but not for all blocks... I guess its possible they stopped minnig for a bit... but don't think so since the payouts would have deviated more I think..

which Node/Nodes were bad ?

Only 1 node was compromised - and it is fixed now.

Do you even know how p2pool submits its blocks?!?!?! And why this problem happened?

I guess no, so here is more clarification:
The node with the miner that finds the block submits it against his blockchain..
Thus meaning if that daemon is in the wrong chain, it is submitted against the wrong chain, even though the shares and everything was correct.

So what happened was, that in the beginning the node with the forked chain did have a high difficulty as well, thus the miners on that node did not find a block that easily and it was equal amongst the whole p2pnetwork.
Once the chain issues started to get resolved, the difficulty on that node started to decrease and apparently their miners found blocks against the wrong chain and submitted the shares of the other p2pnodes as well.

Once this issue got resolved this morning, payouts on the "old p2p network" are back to normal

Now please stop the fud - if you need analysis come to irc and talk to me- the nick is mrpj

[xfranz]

URL: http://www.xhash.net

Pool info:

VARDIFF / Stratum / Prop / 1% fee / on the right chain / no downtime

[mr.pj]

The current p2pnode status is as follows

• all nodes are on the correct chain
• the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
• omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
• omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners

For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..

what code are you using now? do I need to remove source code from OP?

I am using the code from omarG and now it is working - but the network prefix is still on the old network.
As for now you can leave it since all nodes are on the correct chain and no more problems will occur.

I encourage omarG to move back to the old p2pnetwork and then its one big network.

Other option is that I push a new sourcecode to git and things can be resolved.


Either is fine - pm me for what solution you prefer

Edit: last block found by p2pool

Code:

18:41 <[CV]-BLTZ-92> BLITZCOIN BLOCK FOUND by BHGWRkznZR4dUtG4gHEqbVHtnx5L1tYSLm! http://cryptexplorer.com/block/25cb72699bccfaabaed23c7049e8121d3c8fceea4598e8825eea0abd1301661c 

This was found by http://p2pools.cryptoprojects.eu:9333

[BlitzCoinDev]

The current p2pnode status is as follows

• all nodes are on the correct chain
• the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
• omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
• omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners

For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..

what code are you using now? do I need to remove source code from OP?

I am using the code from omarG and now it is working - but the network prefix is still on the old network.
As for now you can leave it since all nodes are on the correct chain and no more problems will occur.

I encourage omarG to move back to the old p2pnetwork and then its one big network.

Other option is that I push a new sourcecode to git and things can be resolved.


Either is fine - pm me for what solution you prefer

I prefer one P2Pool network, hence I'll remove the code if all other pools are using different

[DRPD]

HashFever is getting a lot of DDOS  Can someone recommend a good pool that is in the right fork and that doesn't have much attention from the DDOSers ?

http://xhash.net

very stable, no downtime or dc's and on right chain!

[mr.pj]

The current p2pnode status is as follows

• all nodes are on the correct chain
• the largest p2pnetwork ist the one that we provide with the highest hashpower (180MH vs. 50MH)
• omarG's sourcecode still refers to the old network
• omarG refuses to switch back, even though it is easier to switch 3 nodes than 7+ total right? Especially while omarG is/was in contact with the pool owners

For the benefit of p2p it would be best to only have 1 network - and I propose to use the one with the largest amount of nodes and hashrate..

what code are you using now? do I need to remove source code from OP?

I am using the code from omarG and now it is working - but the network prefix is still on the old network.
As for now you can leave it since all nodes are on the correct chain and no more problems will occur.

I encourage omarG to move back to the old p2pnetwork and then its one big network.

Other option is that I push a new sourcecode to git and things can be resolved.


Either is fine - pm me for what solution you prefer

I prefer one P2Pool network, hence I'll remove the code if all other pools are using different

If you prefer one p2pnetwork than removing the source is not the solution

The solution is to move back to the old network prefix since this is used by almost all p2pnodes available

just my 2 cents

E: the source of omarg uses the old network prefix ...

[BlitzCoinDev]

checkpoints updated
https://github.com/blitzcoin/BlitzCoin

compiling win wallet win new checkpoints. In aprox 1h it will be ready

[yesiam6]

what am i doing wrong my wallet just syncs to block 1256 although ive deleted the blitzcoin folder