Locking Bounty Rewards To Avoid Dumping

[anobtc]

I think that's the decision of the bounty hunter. They sell tokens at the price they feel satisfied, and those who accept risk to hold may be lucky or not. The majority of the price of tokens depends on the project.

[1714615068]

1714615068

[1714615068]

1714615068

[1714615068]

1714615068

[sujonali1819]

Why people are complaining only bounty hunters for dumping price of any project? if Bounty hunters are the main problem then they should not launch any bounty for promotion their project. WHy they don't pay btc/eth instead of token?

When do bounty hunters sell their token quickly after open trading?
Bounty hunters sell their token quickly when they don't trust or depend much to the team project then they try to sell at any price. but if they feel about the project that will be Good in the future and holding will be better, then bounty hunters also hold the token. So the project team should pay btc/eth as bounty payment and be more promising to the investor and as well as bounty hunters also. Thanks

[dataispower]

So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters 

If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.

Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.

They can pay the bonuses many times to avoid the dumping of bounty hunter. And that's just the smallest way. Whether a coin survives pumd or not depends on whether the DEV team is good.

[martina14]

Can we suggest also that the private investors wil have their tokens locked?
They are the one who has the biggest discount in this ICO.
Bounty participants will not like to get small amounts and being blamed for most of the time why dont we look on other sides?
OR! ICO TEAM Shoul pay the participants in BTC and ETHEREUM?

[Xmm]

Blocking team tokens is what really matters! bounty hunters own about 1-2% of the time and it’s very sad to realize that they can influence the project somehow!

[AngelOnCrypto]

Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.

I completely agree. Bounty hunters are often getting paid after investors, which is unfair. The irony is that, the work of bounty hunters brought the investors to the project in the first place.

[investtra]

Locking Bounty prizes to keep prices good I think that's good. But the situation must be well thought out and can have a positive impact on price increases. It was a difficult task for the Team to continue to develop coins. And for the Team don't lock the Bounty prize too long.

[rosezionjohn]

if the level of concern has started to be extreme, it's better to pay a bounty hunter with only USD, and let the tokens have good value and avoid dumping after listing. so that investors and teams get profits.

Why only USD? Why not BTC, ETH, or any other established altcoins?
If every bounty would pay USD, then all hunters in all campaigns might have to undergo KYC.

[bitc0000]

So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters 

If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.

Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.

As long as its stated clearly to the sight of every hunter before bounty campaign begins. Hunters will accept it if fair enough but I am sure that their are many other Tokenomics that effect price dump which is amount of token available fir sale, team and advisors. Private and presale bonus matters alot too

[Leo]

I agree with you about the buy back option,  because later or sooner they will still unlock it and bounties hunters will still do the needful by dumping it on the market,  the team should focus on development of the project to win the investors and bounties participants heart by not dumping

[CleverOracle]

Locking the tokens for bounty hunters will not stop price dump when it hits exchange unless there is a big development on the project which could pull the value of the coin to grow away from its ICO price. always remember that a coin will go up or down in an open market but the true value of the coin will depend on how the project progress.

[klaaas]

To begin with, locking bounty rewards does not stop a token from dumping

Correct. I also think a person with that mindset would dump either way, Locked or not.
Thinks like fines or rewards wont even help where people want to dump on a little spike and going the short way out.

[Corer]

Locking of token can never prevent the price not to fall, for every token that was distributed 90% of those that received have that mindset to sell off so even if it was locked for 2years, the same thing will still happen

[maculeth]

very difficult indeed to reverse the situation after listing the coin to the market exchange. the absence of repurchases and sales at the same time makes the tokens sink.

[Migranet]

So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters 

If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.

Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.

To link topics, IEOs also require locking of tokens post listing to mitigate the risk of dumping.  Another benefit of the IEO, they are protecting investors and the company.

[carriagehoodlum]

very difficult indeed to reverse the situation after listing the coin to the market exchange. the absence of repurchases and sales at the same time makes the tokens sink.

all depends on the strategy of the developer. if they want to run their project first and can get investors who want to buy their tokens on the market, I think the decline can be overcome. but most early investors and bounty hunters are impatient in waiting to be registered in exchange so they can immediately sell the assets they have.

[fortelen]

Yes, now many gift tokens are locked and this is indeed happening because of keeping the token price experiencing a dump. However, he also received many protests from the bounty hunters because they were not in accordance with the rules that had been made. My token is still unsold and is still locked, but I don't see that the coin is growing.

[makishart]

So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters  

If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.

Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.

To link topics, IEOs also require locking of tokens post listing to mitigate the risk of dumping.  Another benefit of the IEO, they are protecting investors and the company.

That sounds bullshit for me and why? have you seen veriblock IEO that has been hitting bottom price that makes a lot of investors are getting looses? I hope you can see that and you can change your mind about IEO. not all IEOs are good for me personally.

[Dingdongjl]

So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters 

I think bounty hunters now HOLD because they didnt get the amount they expect and they are waiting for better prices while investors sell to stop their loss.

[DainSLane]

Locking bounty rewards to avoid dumping it is not good for me because it is not the bounty hunters are responsible of dumping the price as you can see the allocation of the bounty is almost 3 to 5 percent i guess, the responsible of dumping the price is the investors because they got huge of bunoses from the ICO.